| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Summary:
This is a blocker on another patch in the OpenMP runtime. The problem is
that NVIDIA truly doesn't handle RPC-based allocations very well. It
cannot reliably update the MMU while a kernel is running and it will
usually deadlock if called from a separate thread due to internal use of
TLS.
This patch just removes the definition of `malloc` and `free` for NVPTX.
The result here is that they will be undefined, which is the cue for the
`nvlink` linker to define them for us. So, as far as `libc` is concerned
it still implements malloc.
|
|
This is a part of #97655.
|
|
declaration" (#98593)
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#98075
bots are broken
|
|
This is a part of #97655.
|
|
Summary:
This is a NFC move preceding more radical functional changes to the
allocator implementation. We just move it to a common utility so it will
be easier to write these in tandem.
|
|
This is step 4 of
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-customizable-namespace-to-allow-testing-the-libc-when-the-system-libc-is-also-llvms-libc/73079
|
|
The GPU port of the LLVM C library needs to export a few extensions to
the interface such that users can interface with it. This patch adds the
necessary logic to define a GPU extension. Currently, this only exports
a `rpc_reset_client` function. This allows us to use the server in
D147054 to set up the RPC interface outside of `libc`.
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D147054
Reviewed By: sivachandra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152283
|
|
This patch adds support for the `malloc` and `free` functions. These
currently aren't implemented in-tree so we first add the interface
filies.
This patch provides the most basic support for a true `malloc` and
`free` by using the RPC interface. This is functional, but in the future
we will want to implement a more intelligent system and primarily use
the RPC interface more as a `brk()` or `sbrk()` interface only called
when absolutely necessary. We will need to design an intelligent
allocator in the future.
The semantics of these memory allocations will need to be checked. I am
somewhat iffy on the details. I've heard that HSA can allocate
asynchronously which seems to work with my tests at least. CUDA uses an
implicit synchronization scheme so we need to use an explicitly separate
stream from the one launching the kernel or the default stream. I will
need to test the NVPTX case.
I would appreciate if anyone more experienced with the implementation details
here could chime in for the HSA and CUDA cases.
Reviewed By: sivachandra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151735
|
