| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This is still somehow a WIP, we have some issues with this interface
that are not trivial to solve. This patch tries to make the concepts of
RegionBranchPoint and RegionSuccessor more robust and aligned with their
definition:
- A `RegionBranchPoint` is either the parent (`RegionBranchOpInterface`)
op or a `RegionBranchTerminatorOpInterface` operation in a nested
region.
- A `RegionSuccessor` is either one of the nested region or the parent
`RegionBranchOpInterface`
Some new methods with reasonnable default implementation are added to
help resolving the flow of values across the RegionBranchOpInterface.
It is still not trivial in the current state to walk the def-use chain
backward with this interface. For example when you have the 3rd block
argument in the entry block of a for-loop, finding the matching operands
requires to know about the hidden loop iterator block argument and where
the iterargs start. The API is designed around forward-tracking of the
chain unfortunately.
Try to reland #161575 ; I suspect a buildbot incremental build issue.
|
|
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#161575
Broke Windows on ARM buildbot build, needs investigations.
|
|
This is still somehow a WIP, we have some issues with this interface
that are not trivial to solve. This patch tries to make the concepts of
RegionBranchPoint and RegionSuccessor more robust and aligned with their
definition:
- A `RegionBranchPoint` is either the parent (`RegionBranchOpInterface`)
op or a `RegionBranchTerminatorOpInterface` operation in a nested
region.
- A `RegionSuccessor` is either one of the nested region or the parent
`RegionBranchOpInterface`
Some new methods with reasonnable default implementation are added to
help resolving the flow of values across the RegionBranchOpInterface.
It is still not trivial in the current state to walk the def-use chain
backward with this interface. For example when you have the 3rd block
argument in the entry block of a for-loop, finding the matching operands
requires to know about the hidden loop iterator block argument and where
the iterargs start. The API is designed around forward-tracking of the
chain unfortunately.
|
|
Add a new unit attribute to allow for unsigned integer comparison.
Example:
```mlir
scf.for unsigned %iv_32 = %lb_32 to %ub_32 step %step_32 : i32 {
// body
}
```
Discussion:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/scf-should-scf-for-support-unsigned-comparison/84655
|
|
See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147168 for more info.
|
|
The greedy rewriter is used in many different flows and it has a lot of
convenience (work list management, debugging actions, tracing, etc). But
it combines two kinds of greedy behavior 1) how ops are matched, 2)
folding wherever it can.
These are independent forms of greedy and leads to inefficiency. E.g.,
cases where one need to create different phases in lowering and is
required to applying patterns in specific order split across different
passes. Using the driver one ends up needlessly retrying folding/having
multiple rounds of folding attempts, where one final run would have
sufficed.
Of course folks can locally avoid this behavior by just building their
own, but this is also a common requested feature that folks keep on
working around locally in suboptimal ways.
For downstream users, there should be no behavioral change. Updating
from the deprecated should just be a find and replace (e.g., `find ./
-type f -exec sed -i
's|applyPatternsAndFoldGreedily|applyPatternsGreedily|g' {} \;` variety)
as the API arguments hasn't changed between the two.
|
|
The pattern rewriter documentation states that "*all* IR mutations [...]
are required to be performed via the `PatternRewriter`." This commit
adds two functions that were missing from the rewriter API:
`moveOpBefore` and `moveOpAfter`.
After an operation was moved, the `notifyOperationInserted` callback is
triggered. This allows listeners such as the greedy pattern rewrite
driver to react to IR changes.
This commit narrows the discrepancy between the kind of IR modification
that can be performed and the kind of IR modifications that can be
listened to.
|
|
This commit renames 4 pattern rewriter API functions:
* `updateRootInPlace` -> `modifyOpInPlace`
* `startRootUpdate` -> `startOpModification`
* `finalizeRootUpdate` -> `finalizeOpModification`
* `cancelRootUpdate` -> `cancelOpModification`
The term "root" is a misnomer. The root is the op that a rewrite pattern
matches against
(https://mlir.llvm.org/docs/PatternRewriter/#root-operation-name-optional).
A rewriter must be notified of all in-place op modifications, not just
in-place modifications of the root
(https://mlir.llvm.org/docs/PatternRewriter/#pattern-rewriter). The old
function names were confusing and have contributed to various broken
rewrite patterns.
Note: The new function names use the term "modify" instead of "update"
for consistency with the `RewriterBase::Listener` terminology
(`notifyOperationModified`).
|
|
Add two new helper functions `getBeforeBody` and `getAfterBody` to be consistent with "scf.for" (`getBody`) and to show in the API that both regions have exactly one block. Also simplify some code that assumed that there can be more than one block in a region.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157860
|
|
Incorrect API usage was detected by D144552.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144636
|
|
Suggested by @lattner in https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-define-precise-arith-semantics/65507/22.
Tested with:
`ninja check-mlir check-mlir-integration check-mlir-mlir-spirv-cpu-runner check-mlir-mlir-vulkan-runner check-mlir-examples`
and `bazel build --config=generic_clang @llvm-project//mlir:all`.
Reviewed By: lattner, Mogball, rriddle, jpienaar, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134762
|
|
The patch introduces the required changes to update the pass declarations and definitions to use the new autogenerated files and allow dropping the old infrastructure.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, rriddle
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132838
|
|
This reverts commit 2be8af8f0e0780901213b6fd3013a5268ddc3359.
|
|
The patch introduces the required changes to update the pass declarations and definitions to use the new autogenerated files and allow dropping the old infrastructure.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, rriddle
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132838
|
|
Seems to have been an accident of history and none of these had any reason to be restricted to FuncOp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128614
|
|
This aligns the SCF dialect file layout with the majority of the dialects.
Reviewed By: jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128049
|
|
FuncOp has been moved to the `func` namespace for a little over a month, the
using directive can be dropped now.
|
|
The Func has a large number of legacy dependencies carried over from the old
Standard dialect, which was pervasive and contained a large number of varied
operations. With the split of the standard dialect and its demise, a lot of lingering
dead dependencies have survived to the Func dialect. This commit removes a
large majority of then, greatly reducing the dependence surface area of the
Func dialect.
|
|
The last remaining operations in the standard dialect all revolve around
FuncOp/function related constructs. This patch simply handles the initial
renaming (which by itself is already huge), but there are a large number
of cleanups unlocked/necessary afterwards:
* Removing a bunch of unnecessary dependencies on Func
* Cleaning up the From/ToStandard conversion passes
* Preparing for the move of FuncOp to the Func dialect
See the discussion at https://discourse.llvm.org/t/standard-dialect-the-final-chapter/6061
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120624
|
|
BlockArguments gained the ability to have locations attached a while ago, but they
have always been optional. This goes against the core tenant of MLIR where location
information is a requirement, so this commit updates the API to require locations.
Fixes #53279
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117633
|
|
The only benefit of FunctionPass is that it filters out function
declarations. This isn't enough to justify carrying it around, as we can
simplify filter out declarations when necessary within the pass. We can
also explore with better scheduling primitives to filter out declarations
at the pipeline level in the future.
The definition of FunctionPass is left intact for now to allow time for downstream
users to migrate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117182
|
|
|
|
Makes eventual prefixing flag flip smaller change.
|
|
Precursor: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110200
Removed redundant ops from the standard dialect that were moved to the
`arith` or `math` dialects.
Renamed all instances of operations in the codebase and in tests.
Reviewed By: rriddle, jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110797
|
|
This pass transforms SCF.ForOp operations to SCF.WhileOp. The For loop condition is placed in the 'before' region of the while operation, and indctuion variable incrementation + the loop body in the 'after' region. The loop carried values of the while op are the induction variable (IV) of the for-loop + any iter_args specified for the for-loop.
Any 'yield' ops in the for-loop are rewritten to additionally yield the (incremented) induction variable.
This transformation is useful for passes where we want to consider structured control flow solely on the basis of a loop body and the computation of a loop condition. As an example, when doing high-level synthesis in CIRCT, the incrementation of an IV in a for-loop is "just another part" of a circuit datapath, and what we really care about is the distinction between our datapath and our control logic (the condition variable).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108454
|
|
This reverts commit 644b55d57ec76a18916d30f921781b99795f6e10.
The added test is failing the bots.
|
|
This pass transforms SCF.ForOp operations to SCF.WhileOp. The For loop condition is placed in the 'before' region of the while operation, and indctuion variable incrementation + the loop body in the 'after' region. The loop carried values of the while op are the induction variable (IV) of the for-loop + any iter_args specified for the for-loop.
Any 'yield' ops in the for-loop are rewritten to additionally yield the (incremented) induction variable.
This transformation is useful for passes where we want to consider structured control flow solely on the basis of a loop body and the computation of a loop condition. As an example, when doing high-level synthesis in CIRCT, the incrementation of an IV in a for-loop is "just another part" of a circuit datapath, and what we really care about is the distinction between our datapath and our control logic (the condition variable).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108454
|
