| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The motivating use case is to support import the function declaration
across modules to construct call graph edges for indirect calls [1]
when importing the function definition costs too much compile time
(e.g., the function is too large has no `noinline` attribute).
1. Currently, when the compiled IR module doesn't have a function
definition but its postlink combined summary contains the function
summary or a global alias summary with this function as aliasee, the
function definition will be imported from source module by IRMover. The
implementation is in FunctionImporter::importFunctions [2]
2. In order for FunctionImporter to import a declaration of a function,
both function summary and alias summary need to carry the def / decl
state. Specifically, all existing summary fields doesn't differ across
import modules, but the def / decl state of is decided by
`<ImportModule, Function>`.
This change encodes the def/decl state in `GlobalValueSummary::GVFlags`.
In the subsequent changes
1. The indexing step `computeImportForModule` [3]
will compute the set of definitions and the set of declarations for each
module, and passing on the information to bitcode writer.
2. Bitcode writer will look up the def/decl state and sets the state
when it writes out the flag value. This is demonstrated in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87600
3. Function importer will read the def/decl state when reading the
combined summary to figure out two sets of global values, and IRMover
will be updated to import the declaration (aka linkGlobalValuePrototype [4])
into the destination module.
- The next change is https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87600
[1] mentioned in rfc https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-for-better-call-graph-sort-build-a-more-complete-call-graph-by-adding-more-indirect-call-edges/74029#support-cross-module-function-declaration-import-5
[2] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/3b337242ee165554f0017b00671381ec5b1ba855/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionImport.cpp#L1608-L1764
[3] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/3b337242ee165554f0017b00671381ec5b1ba855/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionImport.cpp#L856
[4] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/3b337242ee165554f0017b00671381ec5b1ba855/llvm/lib/Linker/IRMover.cpp#L605
|
|
Imported functions and variable get the visibility from the module supplying the
definition. However, non-imported definitions do not get the visibility from
(ELF) the most constraining visibility among all modules (Mach-O) the visibility
of the prevailing definition.
This patch
* adds visibility bits to GlobalValueSummary::GVFlags
* computes the result visibility and propagates it to all definitions
Protected/hidden can imply dso_local which can enable some optimizations (this
is stronger than GVFlags::DSOLocal because the implied dso_local can be
leveraged for ELF -shared while default visibility dso_local has to be cleared
for ELF -shared).
Note: we don't have summaries for declarations, so for ELF if a declaration has
the most constraining visibility, the result visibility may not be that one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92900
|
|
Summary:
We hit undefined references building with ThinLTO when one source file
contained explicit instantiations of a template method (weak_odr) but
there were also implicit instantiations in another file (linkonce_odr),
and the latter was the prevailing copy. In this case the symbol was
marked hidden when the prevailing linkonce_odr copy was promoted to
weak_odr. It led to unsats when the resulting shared library was linked
with other code that contained a reference (expecting to be resolved due
to the explicit instantiation).
Add a CanAutoHide flag to the GV summary to allow the thin link to
identify when all copies are eligible for auto-hiding (because they were
all originally linkonce_odr global unnamed addr), and only do the
auto-hide in that case.
Most of the changes here are due to plumbing the new flag through the
bitcode and llvm assembly, and resulting test changes. I augmented the
existing auto-hide test to check for this situation.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits, steven_wu, wmi
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59709
llvm-svn: 360466
|
|
Summary:
Adds assembly parsing support for the module summary index (follow on
to r333335 which added the assembly writing support).
I added support to llvm-as to invoke the index parsing, so that it can
create either a bitcode file with a Module and a per-module index, or
a combined index without a Module.
I will send follow on patches soon to do the following:
- add support to tools such as llvm-lto2 to parse the per-module indexes
from assembly instead of bitcode when testing the thin link.
- verification support.
Depends on D47844 and D47842.
Reviewers: pcc, dexonsmith, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47905
llvm-svn: 335602
|
|
Fix a few more bot failures due to r333335:
- don't match path other than file name, since the delimiter is
different for Windows
- The summary IDs in thinlto-function-summary-refgraph.ll may vary
and therefore can't be matched exactly, because the ordering depends
on the iteration order of the index map which is keyed by GUID. The GUID
for private values will depend on the path.
llvm-svn: 333338
|
|
Summary:
Implements AsmWriter support for printing the module summary index to
assembly with the format discussed in the RFC "LLVM Assembly format for
ThinLTO Summary".
Implements just enough of the parsing support to recognize and ignore
the summary entries. As agreed in the RFC thread, this will be the
behavior when assembling the IR. A follow on change will implement
parsing/assembling of the summary entries for use by tools that
currently build the summary index from bitcode.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, pcc
Subscribers: inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dblaikie, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46699
llvm-svn: 333335
|
|
Each function summary has an attached list of type identifier GUIDs. The
idea is that during the regular LTO phase we would match these GUIDs to type
identifiers defined by the regular LTO module and store the resolutions in
a top-level "type identifier summary" (which will be implemented separately).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27967
llvm-svn: 290280
|
