summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/llvm/test/Bitcode/compatibility.ll
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-10-07[AllocToken] Introduce sanitize_alloc_token attribute and alloc_token ↵Marco Elver
metadata (#160131) In preparation of adding the "AllocToken" pass, add the pre-requisite `sanitize_alloc_token` function attribute and `alloc_token` metadata. --- This change is part of the following series: 1. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/160131 2. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/156838 3. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162098 4. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162099 5. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/156839 6. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/156840 7. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/156841 8. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/156842
2025-07-21[AMDGPU] ISel & PEI for whole wave functions (#145858)Diana Picus
Whole wave functions are functions that will run with a full EXEC mask. They will not be invoked directly, but instead will be launched by way of a new intrinsic, `llvm.amdgcn.call.whole.wave` (to be added in a future patch). These functions are meant as an alternative to the `llvm.amdgcn.init.whole.wave` or `llvm.amdgcn.strict.wwm` intrinsics. Whole wave functions will set EXEC to -1 in the prologue and restore the original value of EXEC in the epilogue. They must have a special first argument, `i1 %active`, that is going to be mapped to EXEC. They may have either the default calling convention or amdgpu_gfx. The inactive lanes need to be preserved for all registers used, active lanes only for the CSRs. At the IR level, arguments to a whole wave function (other than `%active`) contain poison in their inactive lanes. Likewise, the return value for the inactive lanes is poison. This patch contains the following work: * 2 new pseudos, SI_SETUP_WHOLE_WAVE_FUNC and SI_WHOLE_WAVE_FUNC_RETURN used for managing the EXEC mask. SI_SETUP_WHOLE_WAVE_FUNC will return a SReg_1 representing `%active`, which needs to be passed into SI_WHOLE_WAVE_FUNC_RETURN. * SelectionDAG support for generating these 2 new pseudos and the special handling of %active. Since the return may be in a different basic block, it's difficult to add the virtual reg for %active to SI_WHOLE_WAVE_FUNC_RETURN, so we initially generate an IMPLICIT_DEF which is later replaced via a custom inserter. * Expansion of the 2 pseudos during prolog/epilog insertion. PEI also marks any used VGPRs as WWM registers, which are then spilled and restored with the usual logic. Future patches will include the `llvm.amdgcn.call.whole.wave` intrinsic and a lot of optimization work (especially in order to reduce spills around function calls). --------- Co-authored-by: Matt Arsenault <Matthew.Arsenault@amd.com> Co-authored-by: Shilei Tian <i@tianshilei.me>
2025-04-30Reland [llvm] Add support for llvm IR atomicrmw fminimum/fmaximum ↵Jonathan Thackray
instructions (#137701) This patch adds support for LLVM IR atomicrmw `fmaximum` and `fminimum` instructions. These mirror the `llvm.maximum.*` and `llvm.minimum.*` instructions, but are atomic and use IEEE754 2019 handling for NaNs, which is different to `fmax` and `fmin`. See: https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#llvm-minimum-intrinsic for more details. Future changes will allow this LLVM IR to be lowered to specialised assembler instructions on suitable targets, such as AArch64.
2025-04-28Revert "[llvm] Add support for llvm IR atomicrmw fminimum/fmaximum ↵Jonathan Thackray
instructions" (#137657) Reverts llvm/llvm-project#136759 due to bad interaction with c792b25e4
2025-04-28[llvm] Add support for llvm IR atomicrmw fminimum/fmaximum instructions ↵Jonathan Thackray
(#136759) This patch adds support for LLVM IR atomicrmw `fmaximum` and `fminimum` instructions. These mirror the `llvm.maximum.*` and `llvm.minimum.*` instructions, but are atomic and use IEEE754 2019 handling for NaNs, which is different to `fmax` and `fmin`. See: https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#llvm-minimum-intrinsic for more details. Future changes will allow this LLVM IR to be lowered to specialised assembler instructions on suitable targets, such as AArch64.
2025-03-03[RISCV][VLS] Support RISCV VLS calling convention (#100346)Brandon Wu
This patch adds a function attribute `riscv_vls_cc` for RISCV VLS calling convention which takes 0 or 1 argument, the argument is the `ABI_VLEN` which is the `VLEN` for passing the fixed-vector arguments, it wraps the argument as a scalable vector(VLA) using the `ABI_VLEN` and uses the corresponding mechanism to handle it. The range of `ABI_VLEN` is [32, 65536], if not specified, the default value is 128. Here is an example of VLS argument passing: Non-VLS call: ``` void original_call(__attribute__((vector_size(16))) int arg) {} => define void @original_call(i128 noundef %arg) { entry: ... ret void } ``` VLS call: ``` void __attribute__((riscv_vls_cc(256))) vls_call(__attribute__((vector_size(16))) int arg) {} => define riscv_vls_cc void @vls_call(<vscale x 1 x i32> %arg) { entry: ... ret void } } ``` The first Non-VLS call passes generic vector argument of 16 bytes by flattened integer. On the contrary, the VLS call uses `ABI_VLEN=256` which wraps the vector to <vscale x 1 x i32> where the number of scalable vector elements is calaulated by: `ORIG_ELTS * RVV_BITS_PER_BLOCK / ABI_VLEN`. Note: ORIG_ELTS = Vector Size / Type Size = 128 / 32 = 4. PsABI PR: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/pull/418 C-API PR: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-c-api-doc/pull/68
2025-01-29[IR] Convert from nocapture to captures(none) (#123181)Nikita Popov
This PR removes the old `nocapture` attribute, replacing it with the new `captures` attribute introduced in #116990. This change is intended to be essentially NFC, replacing existing uses of `nocapture` with `captures(none)` without adding any new analysis capabilities. Making use of non-`none` values is left for a followup. Some notes: * `nocapture` will be upgraded to `captures(none)` by the bitcode reader. * `nocapture` will also be upgraded by the textual IR reader. This is to make it easier to use old IR files and somewhat reduce the test churn in this PR. * Helper APIs like `doesNotCapture()` will check for `captures(none)`. * MLIR import will convert `captures(none)` into an `llvm.nocapture` attribute. The representation in the LLVM IR dialect should be updated separately.
2024-12-04[IR] Allow fast math flags on fptrunc and fpext (#115894)John Brawn
This consists of: * Make these instructions part of FPMathOperator. * Adjust bitcode/ir readers/writers to expect fast math flags on these instructions. * Make IRBuilder set the fast math flags on these instructions. * Update langref and release notes. * Update a bunch of tests. Some of these are due to InstCombineCasts incorrectly adding fast math flags to fptrunc, which will be fixed in a later patch.
2024-10-26[rtsan][llvm][NFC] Rename sanitize_realtime_unsafe attr to ↵davidtrevelyan
sanitize_realtime_blocking (#113155) # What This PR renames the newly-introduced llvm attribute `sanitize_realtime_unsafe` to `sanitize_realtime_blocking`. Likewise, sibling variables such as `SanitizeRealtimeUnsafe` are renamed to `SanitizeRealtimeBlocking` respectively. There are no other functional changes. # Why? - There are a number of problems that can cause a function to be real-time "unsafe", - we wish to communicate what problems rtsan detects and *why* they're unsafe, and - a generic "unsafe" attribute is, in our opinion, too broad a net - which may lead to future implementations that need extra contextual information passed through them in order to communicate meaningful reasons to users. - We want to avoid this situation and make the runtime library boundary API/ABI as simple as possible, and - we believe that restricting the scope of attributes to names like `sanitize_realtime_blocking` is an effective means of doing so. We also feel that the symmetry between `[[clang::blocking]]` and `sanitize_realtime_blocking` is easier to follow as a developer. # Concerns - I'm aware that the LLVM attribute `sanitize_realtime_unsafe` has been part of the tree for a few weeks now (introduced here: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106754). Given that it hasn't been released in version 20 yet, am I correct in considering this to not be a breaking change?
2024-10-11[IR] Allow MDString in operand bundles (#110805)Serge Pavlov
This change implements support of metadata strings in operand bundle values. It makes possible calls like: call void @some_func(i32 %x) [ "foo"(i32 42, metadata !"abc") ] It requires some extension of the bitcode serialization. As SSA values and metadata are stored in different tables, there must be a way to distinguish them during deserialization. It is implemented by putting a special marker before the metadata index. The marker cannot be treated as a reference to any SSA value, so it unambiguously identifies metadata. It allows extending the bitcode serialization without breaking compatibility. Metadata as operand bundle values are intended to be used in floating-point function calls. They would represent the same information as now is passed by the constrained intrinsic arguments.
2024-10-02[IR] Allow fast math flags on calls with homogeneous FP struct types (#110506)Benjamin Maxwell
This extends FPMathOperator to allow calls that return literal structs of homogeneous floating-point or vector-of-floating-point types. The intended use case for this is to support FP intrinsics that return multiple values (such as `llvm.sincos`).
2024-09-19[LLVM][rtsan] Add `sanitize_realtime_unsafe` attribute (#106754)davidtrevelyan
2024-09-06Add usub_cond and usub_sat operations to atomicrmw (#105568)anjenner
These both perform conditional subtraction, returning the minuend and zero respectively, if the difference is negative.
2024-08-30Revert "[LLVM][rtsan] Add LLVM nosanitize_realtime attribute (#105447)" ↵Chris Apple
(#106743) This reverts commit 178fc4779ece31392a2cd01472b0279e50b3a199. This attribute was not needed now that we are using the lsan style ScopedDisabler for disabling this sanitizer See #106736 #106125 For more discussion
2024-08-26[LLVM][rtsan] Add LLVM nosanitize_realtime attribute (#105447)Chris Apple
2024-08-08[LLVM][rtsan] Add sanitize_realtime attribute for the realtime sanitizer ↵Chris Apple
(#100596) Add a new "sanitize_realtime" attribute, which will correspond to the nonblocking function effect in clang. This is used in the realtime sanitizer transform. Please see the [reviewer support document](https://github.com/realtime-sanitizer/radsan/blob/doc/review-support/doc/review.md) for what our next steps are. The original discourse thread can be found [here](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-nolock-and-noalloc-attributes/76837)
2024-07-28Cleanup x86_mmx after removing IR type (#100646)James Y Knight
After #98505, the textual IR keyword `x86_mmx` was temporarily made to parse as `<1 x i64>`, so as not to require a lot of test update noise. This completes the removal of the type, by removing the`x86_mmx` keyword from the IR parser, and making the (now no-op) test updates via `sed -i 's/\bx86_mmx\b/<1 x i64>/g' $(git grep -l x86_mmx llvm/test/)`. Resulting bitcasts from <1 x i64> to itself were then manually deleted. Changes to llvm/test/Bitcode/compatibility-$VERSION.ll were reverted, as they're intended to be equivalent to the .bc file, if parsed by old LLVM, so shouldn't be updated. A few tests were removed, as they're no longer testing anything, in the following files: - llvm/test/Transforms/GlobalOpt/x86_mmx_load.ll - llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/cast.ll - llvm/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/ConstProp/gep-zeroinit-vector.ll Works towards issue #98272.
2024-07-25Remove the `x86_mmx` IR type. (#98505)James Y Knight
It is now translated to `<1 x i64>`, which allows the removal of a bunch of special casing. This _incompatibly_ changes the ABI of any LLVM IR function with `x86_mmx` arguments or returns: instead of passing in mmx registers, they will now be passed via integer registers. However, the real-world incompatibility caused by this is expected to be minimal, because Clang never uses the x86_mmx type -- it lowers `__m64` to either `<1 x i64>` or `double`, depending on ABI. This change does _not_ eliminate the SelectionDAG `MVT::x86mmx` type. That type simply no longer corresponds to an IR type, and is used only by MMX intrinsics and inline-asm operands. Because SelectionDAGBuilder only knows how to generate the operands/results of intrinsics based on the IR type, it thus now generates the intrinsics with the type MVT::v1i64, instead of MVT::x86mmx. We need to fix this before the DAG LegalizeTypes, and thus have the X86 backend fix them up in DAGCombine. (This may be a short-lived hack, if all the MMX intrinsics can be removed in upcoming changes.) Works towards issue #98272.
2024-06-10[LLVM][IR][Sanitizers] Add sanitize_numerical_stability attribute (#95051)Alexander Shaposhnikov
Add sanitize_numerical_stability attribute.
2024-05-28[IR][AArch64][PAC] Add "ptrauth(...)" Constant to represent signed pointers. ↵Ahmed Bougacha
(#85738) This defines a new kind of IR Constant that represents a ptrauth signed pointer, as used in AArch64 PAuth. It allows representing most kinds of signed pointer constants used thus far in the llvm ptrauth implementations, notably those used in the Darwin and ELF ABIs being implemented for c/c++. These signed pointer constants are then lowered to ELF/MachO relocations. These can be simply thought of as a constant `llvm.ptrauth.sign`, with the interesting addition of discriminator computation: the `ptrauth` constant can also represent a combined blend, when both address and integer discriminator operands are used. Both operands are otherwise optional, with default values 0/null.
2024-03-27[CodeGen][LLVM] Make the `va_list` related intrinsics generic. (#85460)Alex Voicu
Currently, the builtins used for implementing `va_list` handling unconditionally take their arguments as unqualified `ptr`s i.e. pointers to AS 0. This does not work for targets where the default AS is not 0 or AS 0 is not a viable AS (for example, a target might choose 0 to represent the constant address space). This patch changes the builtins' signature to take generic `anyptr` args, which corrects this issue. It is noisy due to the number of tests affected. A test for an upstream target which does not use 0 as its default AS (SPIRV for HIP device compilations) is added as well.
2024-03-20[IR] Change representation of getelementptr inrange (#84341)Nikita Popov
As part of the migration to ptradd (https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-replacing-getelementptr-with-ptradd/68699), we need to change the representation of the `inrange` attribute, which is used for vtable splitting. Currently, inrange is specified as follows: ``` getelementptr inbounds ({ [4 x ptr], [4 x ptr] }, ptr @vt, i64 0, inrange i32 1, i64 2) ``` The `inrange` is placed on a GEP index, and all accesses must be "in range" of that index. The new representation is as follows: ``` getelementptr inbounds inrange(-16, 16) ({ [4 x ptr], [4 x ptr] }, ptr @vt, i64 0, i32 1, i64 2) ``` This specifies which offsets are "in range" of the GEP result. The new representation will continue working when canonicalizing to ptradd representation: ``` getelementptr inbounds inrange(-16, 16) (i8, ptr @vt, i64 48) ``` The inrange offsets are relative to the return value of the GEP. An alternative design could make them relative to the source pointer instead. The result-relative format was chosen on the off-chance that we want to extend support to non-constant GEPs in the future, in which case this variant is more expressive. This implementation "upgrades" the old inrange representation in bitcode by simply dropping it. This is a very niche feature, and I don't think trying to upgrade it is worthwhile. Let me know if you disagree.
2024-02-05New calling convention preserve_none (#76868)weiguozhi
The new experimental calling convention preserve_none is the opposite side of existing preserve_all. It tries to preserve as few general registers as possible. So all general registers are caller saved registers. It can also uses more general registers to pass arguments. This attribute doesn't impact floating-point registers. Floating-point registers still follow the c calling convention. Currently preserve_none is supported on X86-64 only. It changes the c calling convention in following fields: * RSP and RBP are the only preserved general registers, all other general registers are caller saved registers. * We can use [RDI, RSI, RDX, RCX, R8, R9, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, RAX] to pass arguments. It can improve the performance of hot tailcall chain, because many callee saved registers' save/restore instructions can be removed if the tail functions are using preserve_none. In my experiment in protocol buffer, the parsing functions are improved by 3% to 10%.
2023-11-24[IR] Add disjoint flag for Or instructions. (#72583)Craig Topper
This flag indicates that every bit is known to be zero in at least one of the inputs. This allows the Or to be treated as an Add since there is no possibility of a carry from any bit. If the flag is present and this property does not hold, the result is poison. This makes it easier to reverse the InstCombine transform that turns Add into Or. This is inspired by a comment here https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71955#discussion_r1391614578 Discourse thread https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-add-or-disjoint-flag/75036
2023-11-09Obsolete WebKit Calling Convention (#71567)Juergen Ributzka
The WebKit Calling Convention was created specifically for the WebKit FTL. FTL doesn't use LLVM anymore and therefore this calling convention is obsolete. This commit removes the WebKit CC, its associated tests, and documentation.
2023-08-09Intrinsics: Add type overload to stacksave and stackstoreMatt Arsenault
This allows use with non-0 address space stacks. llvm_ptr_ty should never be used. This could use some more percolation up through mlir, but this is enough to fix existing tests. https://reviews.llvm.org/D156666
2023-02-24IR: Add nofpclass parameter attributeMatt Arsenault
This carries a bitmask indicating forbidden floating-point value kinds in the argument or return value. This will enable interprocedural -ffinite-math-only optimizations. This is primarily to cover the no-nans and no-infinities cases, but also covers the other floating point classes for free. Textually, this provides a number of names corresponding to bits in FPClassTest, e.g. call nofpclass(nan inf) @must_be_finite() call nofpclass(snan) @cannot_be_snan() This is more expressive than the existing nnan and ninf fast math flags. As an added bonus, you can represent fun things like nanf: declare nofpclass(inf zero sub norm) float @only_nans() Compared to nnan/ninf: - Can be applied to individual call operands as well as the return value - Can distinguish signaling and quiet nans - Distinguishes the sign of infinities - Can be safely propagated since it doesn't imply anything about other operands. - Does not apply to FP instructions; it's not a flag This is one step closer to being able to retire "no-nans-fp-math" and "no-infs-fp-math". The one remaining situation where we have no way to represent no-nans/infs is for loads (if we wanted to solve this we could introduce !nofpclass metadata, following along with noundef/!noundef). This is to help simplify the GPU builtin math library distribution. Currently the library code has explicit finite math only checks, read from global constants the compiler driver needs to set based on the compiler flags during linking. We end up having to internalize the library into each translation unit in case different linked modules have different math flags. By propagating known-not-nan and known-not-infinity information, we can automatically prune the edge case handling in most functions if the function is only reached from fast math uses.
2023-01-24IR: Add atomicrmw uinc_wrap and udec_wrapMatt Arsenault
These are essentially add/sub 1 with a clamping value. AMDGPU has instructions for these. CUDA/HIP expose these as atomicInc/atomicDec. Currently we use target intrinsics for these, but those do no carry the ordering and syncscope. Add these to atomicrmw so we can carry these and benefit from the regular legalization processes.
2023-01-20[Bitcode] Fix invalid !nonnull metadata in test (NFC)Nikita Popov
2022-12-13[Bitcode] Convert test to opaque pointers (NFC)Nikita Popov
2022-12-07[AMDGPU] Annotate the intrinsics to be default and nocallbackJohannes Doerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135155
2022-11-04[IR] Switch everything to use memory attributeNikita Popov
This switches everything to use the memory attribute proposed in https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-unify-memory-effect-attributes/65579. The old argmemonly, inaccessiblememonly and inaccessiblemem_or_argmemonly attributes are dropped. The readnone, readonly and writeonly attributes are restricted to parameters only. The old attributes are auto-upgraded both in bitcode and IR. The bitcode upgrade is a policy requirement that has to be retained indefinitely. The IR upgrade is mainly there so it's not necessary to update all tests using memory attributes in this patch, which is already large enough. We could drop that part after migrating tests, or retain it longer term, to make it easier to import IR from older LLVM versions. High-level Function/CallBase APIs like doesNotAccessMemory() or setDoesNotAccessMemory() are mapped transparently to the memory attribute. Code that directly manipulates attributes (e.g. via AttributeList) on the other hand needs to switch to working with the memory attribute instead. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135780
2022-07-13Remove 'no_sanitize_memtag'. Add 'sanitize_memtag'.Mitch Phillips
For MTE globals, we should have clang emit the attribute for all GV's that it creates, and then use that in the upcoming AArch64 global tagging IR pass. We need a positive attribute for this sanitizer (rather than implicit sanitization of all globals) because it needs to interact with other parts of LLVM, including: 1. Suppressing certain global optimisations (like merging), 2. Emitting extra directives by the ASM writer, and 3. Putting extra information in the symbol table entries. While this does technically make the LLVM IR / bitcode format non-backwards-compatible, nobody should have used this attribute yet, because it's a no-op. Reviewed By: eugenis Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128950
2022-07-06[LLVM] Add the support for fmax and fmin in atomicrmw instructionShilei Tian
This patch adds the support for `fmax` and `fmin` operations in `atomicrmw` instruction. For now (at least in this patch), the instruction will be expanded to CAS loop. There are already a couple of targets supporting the feature. I'll create another patch(es) to enable them accordingly. Reviewed By: arsenm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127041
2022-06-10Add sanitizer-specific GlobalValue attributes.Mitch Phillips
Plan is the migrate the global variable metadata for sanitizers, that's currently carried around generally in the 'llvm.asan.globals' section, onto the global variable itself. This patch adds the attribute and plumbs it through the LLVM IR and bitcode formats, but is a no-op other than that so far. Reviewed By: vitalybuka, kstoimenov Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126100
2022-06-08[Bitcode] Re-enable verify-uselistorder test (NFC)Nikita Popov
This issue has since been fixed, so re-enable the commented RUN line.
2022-05-31attributes: introduce allockind attr for describing allocator fn behaviorAugie Fackler
I chose to encode the allockind information in a string constant because otherwise we would get a bit of an explosion of keywords to deal with the possible permutations of allocation function types. I'm not sure that CodeGen.h is the correct place for this enum, but it seemed to kind of match the UWTableKind enum so I put it in the same place. Constructive suggestions on a better location most certainly encouraged. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123088
2022-05-25Allow pointer types for atomicrmw xchgTakafumi Arakaki
This adds support for pointer types for `atomic xchg` and let us write instructions such as `atomicrmw xchg i64** %0, i64* %1 seq_cst`. This is similar to the patch for allowing atomicrmw xchg on floating point types: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52416. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124728
2022-04-26Attributes: add a new `allocptr` attributeAugie Fackler
This continues the push away from hard-coded knowledge about functions towards attributes. We'll use this to annotate free(), realloc() and cousins and obviate the hard-coded list of free functions. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123083
2022-03-25Reapply "[Intrinsics] Add `nocallback` to the default intrinsic attributes"Johannes Doerfert
This reverts commit c5f789050daab25aad6770790987e2b7c0395936 and reapplies 7aea3ea8c3b33c9bb338d5d6c0e4832be1d09ac3 with additional test changes.
2022-03-04Attributes: add a new allocalign attributeAugie Fackler
This will let us start moving away from hard-coded attributes in MemoryBuiltins.cpp and put the knowledge about various attribute functions in the compilers that emit those calls where it probably belongs. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117921
2022-03-01[SanitizerBounds] Add support for NoSanitizeBounds functionTong Zhang
Currently adding attribute no_sanitize("bounds") isn't disabling -fsanitize=local-bounds (also enabled in -fsanitize=bounds). The Clang frontend handles fsanitize=array-bounds which can already be disabled by no_sanitize("bounds"). However, instrumentation added by the BoundsChecking pass in the middle-end cannot be disabled by the attribute. The fix is very similar to D102772 that added the ability to selectively disable sanitizer pass on certain functions. In this patch, if no_sanitize("bounds") is provided, an additional function attribute (NoSanitizeBounds) is attached to IR to let the BoundsChecking pass know we want to disable local-bounds checking. In order to support this feature, the IR is extended (similar to D102772) to make Clang able to preserve the information and let BoundsChecking pass know bounds checking is disabled for certain function. Reviewed By: melver Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119816
2022-02-03add IR compatability test for (upcoming) allocsize attributeAugie Fackler
2021-10-31[Verifier] Add verification logic for GlobalIFuncsItay Bookstein
Verify that the resolver exists, that it is a defined Function, and that its return type matches the ifunc's type. Add corresponding check to BitcodeReader, change clang to emit the correct type, and fix tests to comply. Reviewed By: MaskRay Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112349
2021-08-20[clang][Codegen] Introduce the disable_sanitizer_instrumentation attributeAlexander Potapenko
The purpose of __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation)) is to prevent all kinds of sanitizer instrumentation applied to a certain function, Objective-C method, or global variable. The no_sanitize(...) attribute drops instrumentation checks, but may still insert code preventing false positive reports. In some cases though (e.g. when building Linux kernel with -fsanitize=kernel-memory or -fsanitize=thread) the users may want to avoid any kind of instrumentation. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108029
2021-07-20[IR] Rename `comdat noduplicates` to `comdat nodeduplicate`Fangrui Song
In the textual format, `noduplicates` means no COMDAT/section group deduplication is performed. Therefore, if both sets of sections are retained, and they happen to define strong external symbols with the same names, there will be a duplicate definition linker error. In PE/COFF, the selection kind lowers to `IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_NODUPLICATES`. The name describes the corollary instead of the immediate semantics. The name can cause confusion to other binary formats (ELF, wasm) which have implemented/ want to implement the "no deduplication" selection kind. Rename it to be clearer. Reviewed By: rnk Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106319
2021-05-25[SanitizeCoverage] Add support for NoSanitizeCoverage function attributeMarco Elver
We really ought to support no_sanitize("coverage") in line with other sanitizers. This came up again in discussions on the Linux-kernel mailing lists, because we currently do workarounds using objtool to remove coverage instrumentation. Since that support is only on x86, to continue support coverage instrumentation on other architectures, we must support selectively disabling coverage instrumentation via function attributes. Unfortunately, for SanitizeCoverage, it has not been implemented as a sanitizer via fsanitize= and associated options in Sanitizers.def, but rolls its own option fsanitize-coverage. This meant that we never got "automatic" no_sanitize attribute support. Implement no_sanitize attribute support by special-casing the string "coverage" in the NoSanitizeAttr implementation. To keep the feature as unintrusive to existing IR generation as possible, define a new negative function attribute NoSanitizeCoverage to propagate the information through to the instrumentation pass. Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49035 Reviewed By: vitalybuka, morehouse Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102772
2021-05-17IR/AArch64/X86: add "swifttailcc" calling convention.Tim Northover
Swift's new concurrency features are going to require guaranteed tail calls so that they don't consume excessive amounts of stack space. This would normally mean "tailcc", but there are also Swift-specific ABI desires that don't naturally go along with "tailcc" so this adds another calling convention that's the combination of "swiftcc" and "tailcc". Support is added for AArch64 and X86 for now.
2021-05-14IR+AArch64: add a "swiftasync" argument attribute.Tim Northover
This extends any frame record created in the function to include that parameter, passed in X22. The new record looks like [X22, FP, LR] in memory, and FP is stored with 0b0001 in bits 63:60 (CodeGen assumes they are 0b0000 in normal operation). The effect of this is that tools walking the stack should expect to see one of three values there: * 0b0000 => a normal, non-extended record with just [FP, LR] * 0b0001 => the extended record [X22, FP, LR] * 0b1111 => kernel space, and a non-extended record. All other values are currently reserved. If compiling for arm64e this context pointer is address-discriminated with the discriminator 0xc31a and the DB (process-specific) key. There is also an "i8** @llvm.swift.async.context.addr()" intrinsic providing front-ends access to this slot (and forcing its creation initialized to nullptr if necessary).
2021-04-15[clang][AArch64] Correctly align HFA arguments when passed on the stackMomchil Velikov
When we pass a AArch64 Homogeneous Floating-Point Aggregate (HFA) argument with increased alignment requirements, for example struct S { __attribute__ ((__aligned__(16))) double v[4]; }; Clang uses `[4 x double]` for the parameter, which is passed on the stack at alignment 8, whereas it should be at alignment 16, following Rule C.4 in AAPCS (https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/master/aapcs64/aapcs64.rst#642parameter-passing-rules) Currently we don't have a way to express in LLVM IR the alignment requirements of the function arguments. The align attribute is applicable to pointers only, and only for some special ways of passing arguments (e..g byval). When implementing AAPCS32/AAPCS64, clang resorts to dubious hacks of coercing to types, which naturally have the needed alignment. We don't have enough types to cover all the cases, though. This patch introduces a new use of the stackalign attribute to control stack slot alignment, when and if an argument is passed in memory. The attribute align is left as an optimizer hint - it still applies to pointer types only and pertains to the content of the pointer, whereas the alignment of the pointer itself is determined by the stackalign attribute. For byval arguments, the stackalign attribute assumes the role, previously perfomed by align, falling back to align if stackalign` is absent. On the clang side, when passing arguments using the "direct" style (cf. `ABIArgInfo::Kind`), now we can optionally specify an alignment, which is emitted as the new `stackalign` attribute. Patch by Momchil Velikov and Lucas Prates. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98794