summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/llvm/test/Bitcode/DIExpression-aggresult.ll
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-04-01[DebugInfo][RemoveDIs] Remove debug-intrinsic printing cmdline options (#131855)Jeremy Morse
During the transition from debug intrinsics to debug records, we used several different command line options to customise handling: the printing of debug records to bitcode and textual could be independent of how the debug-info was represented inside a module, whether the autoupgrader ran could be customised. This was all valuable during development, but now that totally removing debug intrinsics is coming up, this patch removes those options in favour of a single flag (experimental-debuginfo-iterators), which enables autoupgrade, in-memory debug records, and debug record printing to bitcode and textual IR. We need to do this ahead of removing the experimental-debuginfo-iterators flag, to reduce the amount of test-juggling that happens at that time. There are quite a number of weird test behaviours related to this -- some of which I simply delete in this commit. Things like print-non-instruction-debug-info.ll , the test suite now checks for debug records in all tests, and we don't want to check we can print as intrinsics. Or the update_test_checks tests -- these are duplicated with write-experimental-debuginfo=false to ensure file writing for intrinsics is correct, but that's something we're imminently going to delete. A short survey of curious test changes: * free-intrinsics.ll: we don't need to test that debug-info is a zero cost intrinsic, because we won't be using intrinsics in the future. * undef-dbg-val.ll: apparently we pinned this to non-RemoveDIs in-memory mode while we sorted something out; it works now either way. * salvage-cast-debug-info.ll: was testing intrinsics-in-memory get salvaged, isn't necessary now * localize-constexpr-debuginfo.ll: was producing "dead metadata" intrinsics for optimised-out variable values, dbg-records takes the (correct) representation of poison/undef as an operand. Looks like we didn't update this in the past to avoid spurious test differences. * Transforms/Scalarizer/dbginfo.ll: this test was explicitly testing that debug-info affected codegen, and we deferred updating the tests until now. This is just one of those silent gnochange issues that get fixed by RemoveDIs. Finally: I've added a bitcode test, dbg-intrinsics-autoupgrade.ll.bc, that checks we can autoupgrade debug intrinsics that are in bitcode into the new debug records.
2024-06-14 [RemoveDIs] Print IR with debug records by default (#91724)Stephen Tozer
This patch makes the final major change of the RemoveDIs project, changing the default IR output from debug intrinsics to debug records. This is expected to break a large number of tests: every single one that tests for uses or declarations of debug intrinsics and does not explicitly disable writing records. If this patch has broken your downstream tests (or upstream tests on a configuration I wasn't able to run): 1. If you need to immediately unblock a build, pass `--write-experimental-debuginfo=false` to LLVM's option processing for all failing tests (remember to use `-mllvm` for clang/flang to forward arguments to LLVM). 2. For most test failures, the changes are trivial and mechanical, enough that they can be done by script; see the migration guide for a guide on how to do this: https://llvm.org/docs/RemoveDIsDebugInfo.html#test-updates 3. If any tests fail for reasons other than FileCheck check lines that need updating, such as assertion failures, that is most likely a real bug with this patch and should be reported as such. For more information, see the recent PSA: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/psa-ir-output-changing-from-debug-intrinsics-to-debug-records/79578
2024-03-19[RemoveDIs] Auto-upgrade debug intrinsics to DbgRecords (default false) (#85650)Orlando Cazalet-Hyams
If --load-bitcode-into-experimental-debuginfo-iterators is true then debug intrinsics are auto-upgraded to DbgRecords (the new debug info format). The upgrade is trivial because the two representations are semantically identical. llvm.dbg.value with 4 operands and llvm.dbg.addr intrinsics are upgraded in the same way as usual, but converted directly into DbgRecords instead of debug intrinsics.
2023-06-20[Bitcode] Remove -opaque-pointer=0 check lines (NFC)Nikita Popov
These tests were testing both typed an opaque pointers. Only keep opaque pointers tests.
2022-02-15[Bitcode] Improve support for opaque-pointer bitcode upgradeNikita Popov
This is step two of supporting autoupgrade of old bitcode to opaque pointers. Rather than tracking the element type ID of pointers in particular, track all type IDs that a type contains. This allows us to recover the element type in more complex situations, e.g. when we need to determine the pointer element type of a vector element or function type parameter. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119339
2020-11-20OpaquePtr: Bulk update tests to use typed sretMatt Arsenault
2017-08-23Parse and print DIExpressions inline to ease IR and MIR testingReid Kleckner
Summary: Most DIExpressions are empty or very simple. When they are complex, they tend to be unique, so checking them inline is reasonable. This also avoids the need for CodeGen passes to append to the llvm.dbg.mir named md node. See also PR22780, for making DIExpression not be an MDNode. Reviewers: aprantl, dexonsmith, dblaikie Subscribers: qcolombet, javed.absar, eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37075 llvm-svn: 311594
2017-04-18PR32382: Fix emitting complex DWARF expressions.Adrian Prantl
The DWARF specification knows 3 kinds of non-empty simple location descriptions: 1. Register location descriptions - describe a variable in a register - consist of only a DW_OP_reg 2. Memory location descriptions - describe the address of a variable 3. Implicit location descriptions - describe the value of a variable - end with DW_OP_stack_value & friends The existing DwarfExpression code is pretty much ignorant of these restrictions. This used to not matter because we only emitted very short expressions that we happened to get right by accident. This patch makes DwarfExpression aware of the rules defined by the DWARF standard and now chooses the right kind of location description for each expression being emitted. This would have been an NFC commit (for the existing testsuite) if not for the way that clang describes captured block variables. Based on how the previous code in LLVM emitted locations, DW_OP_deref operations that should have come at the end of the expression are put at its beginning. Fixing this means changing the semantics of DIExpression, so this patch bumps the version number of DIExpression and implements a bitcode upgrade. There are two major changes in this patch: I had to fix the semantics of dbg.declare for describing function arguments. After this patch a dbg.declare always takes the *address* of a variable as the first argument, even if the argument is not an alloca. When lowering a DBG_VALUE, the decision of whether to emit a register location description or a memory location description depends on the MachineLocation — register machine locations may get promoted to memory locations based on their DIExpression. (Future) optimization passes that want to salvage implicit debug location for variables may do so by appending a DW_OP_stack_value. For example: DBG_VALUE, [RBP-8] --> DW_OP_fbreg -8 DBG_VALUE, RAX --> DW_OP_reg0 +0 DBG_VALUE, RAX, DIExpression(DW_OP_deref) --> DW_OP_reg0 +0 All testcases that were modified were regenerated from clang. I also added source-based testcases for each of these to the debuginfo-tests repository over the last week to make sure that no synchronized bugs slip in. The debuginfo-tests compile from source and run the debugger. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32382 <rdar://problem/31205000> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31439 llvm-svn: 300522