| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
There's a pattern throughout LLVM of cl::opts being exported. That in
itself is probably a bit unfortunate, but what's especially bad about it
is that a lot of those symbols are in the global namespace. Move them
into the llvm namespace.
While doing this, I noticed some other variables in the global namespace
and moved them as well.
|
|
Allow users to set the minimum absolute count for indirect call promotion. This is primarily meant to be control indirect call promotion for synthetic vp metadata introduced in #141164 for use by MemProf.
|
|
Identified with misc-include-cleaner.
|
|
This patch migrates a use of getValueProfDataFromInst in the indirect
call promotion to a new version.
Without this patch, getProfitablePromotionCandidates is a little
strange in that it takes value profiling data from member variable
ValueDataArray while taking its length as a function parameter. This
patch rectifies that by teaching the function to refer to
ValueDataArray, which is now a SmallVector.
|
|
indirect-call-promotion with vtable profiles. (#81442)
Clang's `-fwhole-program-vtables` is required for this optimization to
take place. If `-fwhole-program-vtables` is not enabled, this change is
no-op.
* Function-comparison (before):
```
%vtable = load ptr, ptr %obj
%vfn = getelementptr inbounds ptr, ptr %vtable, i64 1
%func = load ptr, ptr %vfn
%cond = icmp eq ptr %func, @callee
br i1 %cond, label bb1, label bb2:
bb1:
call @callee
bb2:
call %func
```
* VTable-comparison (after):
```
%vtable = load ptr, ptr %obj
%cond = icmp eq ptr %vtable, @vtable-address-point
br i1 %cond, label bb1, label bb2:
bb1:
call @callee
bb2:
%vfn = getelementptr inbounds ptr, ptr %vtable, i64 1
%func = load ptr, ptr %vfn
call %func
```
Key changes:
1. Find out virtual calls and the vtables they come from.
- The ICP relies on type intrinsic `llvm.type.test` to find out virtual
calls and the
compatible vtables, and relies on type metadata to find the address
point for comparison.
2. ICP pass does cost-benefit analysis and compares vtable only when the
number of vtables for a function candidate is within (option specified)
threshold.
3. Sink the function addressing and vtable load instruction to indirect
fallback.
- The sink helper functions are simplified versions of
`InstCombinerImpl::tryToSinkInstruction`. Currently debug intrinsics are
not handled. Ideally `InstCombinerImpl::tryToSinkInstructionDbgValues`
and `InstCombinerImpl::tryToSinkInstructionDbgVariableRecords` could be
moved into Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp (or another util cpp file) to
handle debug intrinsics when moving instructions across basic blocks.
4. Keep value profiles updated
1) Update vtable value profiles after inline
2) For either function-based comparison or vtable-based comparison,
update both vtable and indirect call value profiles.
|
|
Callers of getPromotionCandidatesForInstruction pass NumVals as an out
parameter for the number of value-count pairs of the value profiling
data, but nobody uses the out parameter.
This patch removes the parameter and updates the callers. Note that
the number of value-count pairs is still available via
getPromotionCandidatesForInstruction(...).size().
|
|
Note that the version of getValueProfDataFromInst that returns bool
has been "deprecated" since:
commit 1e15371dd8843dfc52b9435afaa133997c1773d8
Author: Mingming Liu <mingmingl@google.com>
Date: Mon Apr 1 15:14:49 2024 -0700
|
|
Add annotated vtable GUID as referenced variables in per function
summary, and update bitcode writer to create value-ids for these
referenced vtables.
- This is the part3 of type profiling work, and described in the "Virtual Table Definition Import" [1] section of the
RFC.
[1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/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
|
|
Similar to 557efc9a8b68628c2c944678c6471dac30ed9e8e.
This commit handles options where cl::ZeroOrMore is more than one line below
cl::opt.
|
|
Some cl::ZeroOrMore were added to avoid the `may only occur zero or one times!`
error. More were added due to cargo cult. Since the error has been removed,
cl::ZeroOrMore is unneeded.
Also remove cl::init(false) while touching the lines.
|
|
Number of lines output by preprocessor:
before: 1065940348
after: 1065307662
Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120659
|
|
sample loader pass.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/rG5fb65c02ca5e91e7e1a00e0efdb8edc899f3e4b9,
to prevent repeated indirect call promotion for the same indirect call
and the same target, we used zero-count value profile to indicate an
indirect call has been promoted for a certain target. We removed
PromotedInsns cache in the same patch. However, there was a problem in
that patch described below, and that problem led me to add PromotedInsns
back as a mitigation in
https://reviews.llvm.org/rG4ffad1fb489f691825d6c7d78e1626de142f26cf.
When we get value profile from metadata by calling getValueProfDataFromInst,
we need to specify the maximum possible number of values we expect to read.
We uses MaxNumPromotions in the last patch so the maximum number of value
information extracted from metadata is MaxNumPromotions. If we have many
values including zero-count values when we write the metadata, some of them
will be dropped when we read them because we only read MaxNumPromotions
values. It will allow repeated indirect call promotion again. We need to
make sure if there are values indicating promoted targets, those values need
to be saved in metadata with higher priority than other values.
The patch fixed that problem. We change to use -1 to represent the count
of a promoted target instead of 0 so it is easier to sort the values.
When we prepare to update the metadata in updateIDTMetaData, we will sort
the values in the descending count order and extract only MaxNumPromotions
values to write into metadata. Since -1 is the max uint64_t number, if we
have equal to or less than MaxNumPromotions of -1 count values, they will
all be kept in metadata. If we have more than MaxNumPromotions of -1 count
values, we will only save MaxNumPromotions such values maximally. In such
case, we have logic in place in doesHistoryAllowICP to guarantee no more
promotion in sample loader pass will happen for the indirect call, because
it has been promoted enough.
With this change, now we can remove PromotedInsns without problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97350
|
|
Found a problem in indirect call promotion in sample loader pass. Currently
if an indirect call is promoted for a target, and if the parent function is
inlined into some other function, the indirect call can be promoted for the
same target again. That is redundent which can harm performance and can cause
excessive compile time in some extreme case.
The patch fixes the issue. If a target is promoted for an indirect call, the
patch will write ICP metadata with the target call count being set to 0.
In the later ICP in sample profile loader, if it sees a target has 0 count
for an indirect call, it knows the target has been promoted and won't do
indirect call promotion for the indirect call.
The fix brings 0.1~0.2% performance on our search benchmark.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96806
|
|
Cleanup unused system headers and fix an implicit dependency
|
|
|
|
These are a pre-requisite to removing #include "llvm/Support/Options.h"
from LLVMContext.h: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70280
|
|
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
|
|
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
update client code.
Also rename it to use the more generic term `call` instead of something
that could be confused with a praticular type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56183
llvm-svn: 350508
|
|
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
|
|
llvm-svn: 320617
|
|
Summary: Currently, ICP checks the count against a fixed value to see if it is hot enough to be promoted. This does not work for SamplePGO because sampled count may be much smaller. This patch uses PSI to check if the count is hot enough to be promoted.
Reviewers: davidxl, tejohnson, eraman
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36341
llvm-svn: 310416
|
|
Summary: In performance tuning, we see performance benefits when enlarge the maximum num promotion targets to 3. This is safe as soon as we have total percentage threshold properly setup (https://reviews.llvm.org/D35962)
Reviewers: davidxl, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35966
llvm-svn: 309346
|
|
Summary: In the current implementation, isPromotionProfitable only checks if the call count to a direct target is no less than a certain percentage threshold of the remaining call counts that have not been promoted. This causes code size problems when the target count is small but greater than a large portion of remaining counts. E.g. target1 takes 99.9%, while target2 takes 0.1%. Both targets will be promoted and inlined, makes the function size too large, which potentially prevents it from further inlining into its callers. This patch adds another percentage threshold against the total indirect call count. If the target count needs to be no less than both thresholds in order to be promoted speculatively.
Reviewers: davidxl, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35962
llvm-svn: 309345
|
|
Summary:
Reduce min percent required for indirect call promotion from 33% to 30%,
which matches gcc's threshold and catches the same hot opportunities.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33798
llvm-svn: 304469
|
|
Remove another variable added in r275216 that was only used in debug
mode.
llvm-svn: 275238
|
|
Summary:
Refactored the profitability analysis out of the IC promotion pass and
into lib/Analysis so that it can be accessed by the summary index
builder in a follow-on patch to enable IC promotion in ThinLTO (D21932).
Reviewers: davidxl, xur
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22182
llvm-svn: 275216
|
