summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/PDB/variables.test
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-10-07Reland "[LLDB][NativePDB] Create functions with mangled name" (#161678)nerix
Relands #149701 which was reverted in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/185ae5cdc695248b58ae017508cc764c19bee5b7 because it broke demangling of Itanium symbols on i386. The last commit in this PR adds the fix for this (discussed in #160930). On x86 environments, the prefix of `__cdecl` functions will now be removed to match DWARF. I opened #161676 to discuss this for the other calling conventions.
2025-09-25Revert "[LLDB][NativePDB] Create functions with mangled name (#149701)"Martin Storsjö
This reverts commit e98f34eb08b2bf7aed787e7f8a7cea9111f044c8. This broke demangling of Itanium symbols on i386.
2025-09-24[LLDB][NativePDB] Create functions with mangled name (#149701)nerix
Before, functions created using the NativePDB plugin would not know about their mangled name. This showed when printing a stacktrace. There, only the function name was shown. For https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/143149, the mangled function name is required to separate different parts. This PR adds that name if available. The Clang AST nodes also take in a mangled name, which was previously unset. I don't think this unblocks anything further, because Clang can mangle the function anyway.
2025-09-09[LLDB][NativePDB] Mark blocks as parsed after parsing (#157493)nerix
After parsing blocks in a function, the blocks should be marked as parsed for them to be dumped (see [Function::Dump](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/e6aefbec782dbb57f72eb0ae399ed944fe49db2e/lldb/source/Symbol/Function.cpp#L446-L447)). As explained in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/114906#issuecomment-3255016266, this happens (accidentally?) in the DIA plugin when parsing variables, because it calls `function.GetBlock(can_create=true)` which marks blocks as parsed. In the native plugin, this was never called, so blocks and variables were never included in the `lldb-test symbols` output. The `variables.test` for the DIA plugin tests this. One difference between the plugins is how they specify the location of local variables. This causes the output of the native plugin to be two lines per variable, whereas the DIA plugin has one line: ``` (native): 000002C4B7593020: Variable{0x1c800001}, name = "var_arg1", type = {0000000000000744} 0x000002C4B6CA7900 (int), scope = parameter, location = 0x00000000: [0x000000014000102c, 0x000000014000103e): DW_OP_breg7 RSP+8 ``` ``` (DIA): 000002778C827EE0: Variable{0x0000001b}, name = "var_arg1", type = {0000000000000005} 0x000002778C1FBAB0 (int), scope = parameter, decl = VariablesTest.cpp:32, location = DW_OP_breg7 RSP+8 ``` In the test, I filtered lines starting with spaces followed by `[0x`, so we can still use `CHECK-NEXT`. --- Another difference between the plugins is that DIA marks the `this` pointer as artificial (equivalent to DWARF). This is done if a variable's object kind is `ObjectPtr` ([source](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/ab898f32c60689d1d47d0b6de66c30d3476994bb/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/PDB/SymbolFilePDB.cpp#L1050)). As far as I know, there isn't anything in the debug info that says "this variable is the `this` pointer" other than the name/type of a variable and the type of the function.
2025-07-30[lldb] Remove %T from lit tests (#151343)Aiden Grossman
%T has been deprecated for about seven years, mostly because it is not unique to each test which can lead to races. This patch updates the few remaining tests in lldb that use %T to not use it (either directly using files or creating their own temp dir). The eventual goal is to remove support for %T from llvm-lit given few tests use it and it still has racey behavior. This patch errors on the side of creating new temp dirs even when not strictly necessary to avoid needing to update filenames inside filecheck matchers.
2021-12-14[lldb] Update the PDB tests to pass with the VS2019 toolsetStella Stamenova
The pdb lldb tests do not work correctly with both the VS2019 and VS2017 toolsets at the moment. This change updates several of the tests to work with both toolsets. Unfortunately, this makes the tests suboptimal for both toolsets, but we can update them to be better for VS2019 once we officially drop VS2017. This change is meant to bridge the gap until the update happens, so that the buildbots can work with either toolset. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115482
2020-05-18Re-land [Debug][CodeView] Emit fully qualified names for globalsReid Kleckner
This reverts commit 525a591f0f48b9d54018bf5245f2abee09c9c1c8. Fixed an issue with pointers to members based on typedefs. In this case, LLVM would emit a second UDT. I fixed it by not passing the class type to getTypeIndex when the base type is not a function type. lowerType only uses the class type for direct function types. This suggests if we have a PMF with a function typedef, there may be an issue, but that can be solved separately.
2020-05-18Revert 76c5f277f2 "Re-land [Debug][CodeView] Emit fully qualified names for ↵Hans Wennborg
globals" > Before this patch, S_[L|G][THREAD32|DATA32] records were emitted with a simple name, not the fully qualified name (namespace + class scope). > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79447 This causes asserts in Chromium builds: CodeViewDebug.cpp:2997: void llvm::CodeViewDebug::emitDebugInfoForUDTs(const std::vector<std::pair<std::string, const DIType *>> &): Assertion `OriginalSize == UDTs.size()' failed. I will follow up on the Phabricator issue.
2020-05-15Re-land [Debug][CodeView] Emit fully qualified names for globalsAlexandre Ganea
Before this patch, S_[L|G][THREAD32|DATA32] records were emitted with a simple name, not the fully qualified name (namespace + class scope). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79447
2019-10-09Re-land "[test] Split LLDB tests into API, Shell & Unit"Jonas Devlieghere
The original patch got reverted because it broke `check-lldb` on a clean build. This fixes that. llvm-svn: 374201
2019-10-09Revert [test] Split LLDB tests into API, Shell & UnitAdrian Prantl
as it appears to have broken check-lldb. This reverts r374184 (git commit 22314179f0660c172514b397060fd8f34b586e82) llvm-svn: 374187
2019-10-09[test] Split LLDB tests into API, Shell & UnitJonas Devlieghere
LLDB has three major testing strategies: unit tests, tests that exercise the SB API though dotest.py and what we currently call lit tests. The later is rather confusing as we're now using lit as the driver for all three types of tests. As most of this grew organically, the directory structure in the LLDB repository doesn't really make this clear. The 'lit' tests are part of the root and among these tests there's a Unit and Suite folder for the unit and dotest-tests. This layout makes it impossible to run just the lit tests. This patch changes the directory layout to match the 3 testing strategies, each with their own directory and their own configuration file. This means there are now 3 directories under lit with 3 corresponding targets: - API (check-lldb-api): Test exercising the SB API. - Shell (check-lldb-shell): Test exercising command line utilities. - Unit (check-lldb-unit): Unit tests. Finally, there's still the `check-lldb` target that runs all three test suites. Finally, this also renames the lit folder to `test` to match the LLVM repository layout. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68606 llvm-svn: 374184