summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lldb/test/Shell/Recognizer
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-11-09[NFCI][lldb][test][Recognizer] Fix mismatched C/C++ frontend subtitutions ↵Raul Tambre
(#167220) The explicit language specifications for Objective C/C++ don't seem necessary either so I've removed them too. I found these by using Clang frontend configuration files containing language-specific options for both C and C++ (e.g. `-std=c2y` and `-std=c++26`). Prior-art: 21041c9
2025-11-04[lldb][test] Skip registration-unique.test on WindowsMichael Buch
Fails with: ``` RUN: at line 4 split-file C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\llvm-project\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\registration-unique.test C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp executed command: split-file 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\llvm-project\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\registration-unique.test' 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp' note: command had no output on stdout or stderr RUN: at line 6 c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\bin\clang.exe --target=specify-a-target-or-use-a-_host-substitution --target=aarch64-pc-windows-msvc -fmodules-cache-path=C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/lldb-aarch64-windows/build/lldb-test-build.noindex/module-cache-clang\lldb-shell C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp/main.cpp -g -o C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp/cpp.out executed command: 'c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\bin\clang.exe' --target=specify-a-target-or-use-a-_host-substitution --target=aarch64-pc-windows-msvc '-fmodules-cache-path=C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/lldb-aarch64-windows/build/lldb-test-build.noindex/module-cache-clang\lldb-shell' 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp/main.cpp' -g -o 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp/cpp.out' .---command stderr------------ | clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fmodules-cache-path=C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/lldb-aarch64-windows/build/lldb-test-build.noindex/module-cache-clang\lldb-shell' [-Wunused-command-line-argument] `----------------------------- RUN: at line 7 c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\bin\lldb.exe --no-lldbinit -S C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/lldb-aarch64-windows/build/tools/lldb\test\Shell\lit-lldb-init-quiet -b -s C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp/commands.input C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp/cpp.out | c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\bin\filecheck.exe C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\llvm-project\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\registration-unique.test executed command: 'c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\bin\lldb.exe' --no-lldbinit -S 'C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/lldb-aarch64-windows/build/tools/lldb\test\Shell\lit-lldb-init-quiet' -b -s 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp/commands.input' 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp/cpp.out' note: command had no output on stdout or stderr executed command: 'c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\bin\filecheck.exe' 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\llvm-project\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\registration-unique.test' .---command stderr------------ | C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\llvm-project\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\registration-unique.test:45:10: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input | # CHECK: Assert StackFrame Recognizer | ^ | <stdin>:20:38: note: scanning from here | 1: Verbose Trap StackFrame Recognizer, demangled symbol regex ^__clang_trap_msg | ^ | <stdin>:34:10: note: possible intended match here | 3: Verbose Trap StackFrame Recognizer, demangled symbol regex ^__clang_trap_msg | ^ | | Input file: <stdin> | Check file: C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\llvm-project\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\registration-unique.test | | -dump-input=help explains the following input dump. ```
2025-11-04[lldb][test] registration-unique.test: don't hardcode the order of ↵Michael Buch
recognizer registration These might get registered in a different order on different platforms. Use `CHECK-DAG` to account for that. Attempts to fix the failure seen on the x86 Linux bots: ``` ******************** TEST 'lldb-shell :: Recognizer/registration-unique.test' FAILED ******************** Exit Code: 1 Command Output (stdout): -- RUN: at line 4 lit-file C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\llvm-project\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\registration-unique.test C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp executed command: split-file 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\llvm-project\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\registration-unique.test' 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp' note: command had no output on stdout or stderr RUN: at line 6 \users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\bin\clang.exe --target=specify-a-target-or-use-a-_host-substitution --target=aarch64-pc-windows-msvc -fmodules-cache-path=C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/lldb-aarch64-windows/build/lldb-test-build.noindex/module-cache-clang\lldb-shell C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp/main.cpp -g -o C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp/cpp.out executed command: 'c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\bin\clang.exe' --target=specify-a-target-or-use-a-_host-substitution --target=aarch64-pc-windows-msvc '-fmodules-cache-path=C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/lldb-aarch64-windows/build/lldb-test-build.noindex/module-cache-clang\lldb-shell' 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp/main.cpp' -g -o 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp/cpp.out' .---command stderr------------ | clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fmodules-cache-path=C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/lldb-aarch64-windows/build/lldb-test-build.noindex/module-cache-clang\lldb-shell' [-Wunused-command-line-argument] `----------------------------- RUN: at line 7 \users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\bin\lldb.exe --no-lldbinit -S C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/lldb-aarch64-windows/build/tools/lldb\test\Shell\lit-lldb-init-quiet -b -s C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp/commands.input C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp/cpp.out | c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\bin\filecheck.exe C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\llvm-project\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\registration-unique.test executed command: 'c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\bin\lldb.exe' --no-lldbinit -S 'C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/lldb-aarch64-windows/build/tools/lldb\test\Shell\lit-lldb-init-quiet' -b -s 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp/commands.input' 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\tools\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\Output\registration-unique.test.tmp/cpp.out' note: command had no output on stdout or stderr executed command: 'c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\build\bin\filecheck.exe' 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\llvm-project\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\registration-unique.test' .---command stderr------------ | C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\llvm-project\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\registration-unique.test:45:10: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input | # CHECK: Assert StackFrame Recognizer | ^ | <stdin>:20:38: note: scanning from here | 1: Verbose Trap StackFrame Recognizer, demangled symbol regex ^__clang_trap_msg | ^ | <stdin>:34:10: note: possible intended match here | 3: Verbose Trap StackFrame Recognizer, demangled symbol regex ^__clang_trap_msg | ^ | | Input file: <stdin> | Check file: C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\lldb-aarch64-windows\llvm-project\lldb\test\Shell\Recognizer\registration-unique.test | | -dump-input=help explains the following input dump. | | Input was: | <<<<<< ```
2025-11-04[lldb][Runtime] Move VerboseTrapFrameRecognizer into CPPLanguageRuntime ↵Michael Buch
(#166157) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165996 is adding a Clang dependency to Target because we're moving some of the functionality of the VerboseTrapFrameRecognizer into libClang. To avoid adding this dependency this patch moves VerboseTrapFrameRecognizer into the CPPLanguageRuntime. Most of the frame recognizers already live in the various runtime plugins. An alternative discussed was to create a common `CLanguageRuntime` whose currently sole responsibility was to register the `VerboseTrapFrameRecognizer` and `AssertStackFrameRecognizer`. The main issue I ran into here was frame recognizers aren't uniqued in the target. Currently this only manifests when re-running a target, which re-triggers all the recognizer registration (added a test with a FIXME for this). If we had a common `CLanguageRuntime` that `CPPLanguageRuntime` and `ObjCLanguageRuntime` inherited from, I didn't find a great way to avoid registering the recognizer multiple times. We can't just call_once on it because we do want the recognisers to be re-registered for new targets in the same debugger session. If the recognisers were stored in something like a UniqueVector in the Target, then we wouldn't have that issue. But currently that's not the case, and it would take a bit of refactoring to de-dupe the recognisers. There may very well be solutions I haven't considered, but all the things I've tried so far I wasn't very happy with. So in the end I just moved this to the C++ runtime for now in order to unblock https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165996. The C++ language runtime is always available (even for C targets) if the C++ language plugin is available. Which it should also be unless someone is using an LLDB with the C++ plugin compiled out. But at that point numerous things wouldn't work when even debugging just C.
2025-10-30[NFCI][lldb][test] Fix mismatched C/C++ substitutions (#165773)Raul Tambre
Most of the cases were where a C++ file was being compiled with the C substitution. There were a few cases of the opposite though. LLDB seems to be the only real culprit in the LLVM codebase for these mismatches. Rest of the LLVM presumably sticks at least language-specific options in the common substitutions making the mistakes immediately apparent. I found these by using Clang frontend configuration files containing language-specific options for both C and C++ (e.g. `-std=c2y` and `-std=c++26`).
2025-08-27[UBSan][BoundsSafety] Implement support for more expressive "trap reasons" ↵Dan Liew
(#154618) In 29992cfd628ed5b968ccb73b17ed0521382ba317 (#145967) support was added for "trap reasons" on traps emitted in UBSan in trapping mode (e.g. `-fsanitize-trap=undefined`). This improved the debugging experience by attaching the reason for trapping as a string on the debug info on trap instructions. Consumers such as LLDB can display this trap reason string when the trap is reached. A limitation of that patch is that the trap reason string is hard-coded for each `SanitizerKind` even though the compiler actually has much more information about the trap available at compile time that could be shown to the user. This patch is an incremental step in fixing that. It consists of two main steps. **1. Introduce infrastructure for building trap reason strings** To make it convenient to construct trap reason strings this patch re-uses Clang's powerful diagnostic infrastructure to provide a convenient API for constructing trap reason strings. This is achieved by: * Introducing a new `Trap` diagnostic kind to represent trap diagnostics in TableGen files. * Adding a new `Trap` diagnostic component. While this part probably isn't technically necessary it seemed like I should follow the existing convention used by the diagnostic system. * Adding `DiagnosticTrapKinds.td` to describe the different trap reasons. * Add the `TrapReasonBuilder` and `TrapReason` classes to provide an interface for constructing trap reason strings and the trap category. Note this API while similar to `DiagnosticBuilder` has different semantics which are described in the code comments. In particular the behavior when the destructor is called is very different. * Adding `CodeGenModule::BuildTrapReason()` as a convenient constructor for the `TrapReasonBuilder`. This use of the diagnostic system is a little unusual in that the emitted trap diagnostics aren't actually consumed by normal diagnostic consumers (e.g. the console). Instead the `TrapReasonBuilder` is just used to format a string, so in effect the builder is somewhat analagous to "printf". However, re-using the diagnostics system in this way brings a several benefits: * The powerful diagnostic templating languge (e.g. `%select`) can be used. * Formatting Clang data types (e.g. `Type`, `Expr`, etc.) just work out-of-the-box. * Describing trap reasons in tablegen files opens the door for translation to different languages in the future. * The `TrapReasonBuilder` API is very similar to `DiagnosticBuilder` which makes it easy to use by anyone already familiar with Clang's diagnostic system. While UBSan is the first consumer of this new infrastructure the intent is to use this to overhaul how trap reasons are implemented in the `-fbounds-safety` implementation (currently exists downstream). **2. Apply the new infrastructure to UBSan checks for arithmetic overflow** To demonstrate using `TrapReasonBuilder` this patch applies it to UBSan traps for arithmetic overflow. The intention is that we would iteratively switch to using the `TrapReasonBuilder` for all UBSan traps where it makes sense in future patches. Previously for code like ``` int test(int a, int b) { return a + b; } ``` The trap reason string looked like ``` Undefined Behavior Sanitizer: Integer addition overflowed ``` now the trap message looks like: ``` Undefined Behavior Sanitizer: signed integer addition overflow in 'a + b' ``` This string is much more specific because * It explains if signed or unsigned overflow occurred * It actually shows the expression that overflowed One possible downside of this approach is it may blow up Debug info size because now there can be many more distinct trap reason strings. To allow users to avoid this a new driver/cc1 flag `-fsanitize-debug-trap-reasons=` has been added which can either be `none` (disable trap reasons entirely), `basic` (use the per `SanitizerKind` hard coded strings), and `detailed` (use the new expressive trap reasons implemented in this patch). The default is `detailed` to give the best out-of-the-box debugging experience. The existing `-fsanitize-debug-trap-reasons` and `-fno-sanitize-debug-trap-reasons` have been kept for compatibility and are aliases of the new flag with `detailed` and `none` arguments passed respectively. rdar://158612755
2025-07-31[lldb][test] Skip Recognizer/ubsan_add_overflow.test on WindowsMichael Buch
Same reason we skip the other verbose_trap tests. Fails on Windows CI
2025-07-30[lldb][test][NFC] Add LLDB test for UBSan trap frame recognizer (#151231)Anthony Tran
In #145967 Clang was taught to emit trap reasons on UBSan traps in debug info using the same method as `__builtin_verbose_trap`. This patch adds a test case to make sure that the existing "Verbose Trap StackFrame Recognizer" recognizes the trap reason and sets the stop reason and stack frame appropriately. Part of a GSoC 2025 Project.
2025-04-13[lldb][Format] Display only the inlined frame name in backtraces if ↵Michael Buch
available (#135343) When a frame is inlined, LLDB will display its name in backtraces as follows: ``` * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.3 * frame #0: 0x0000000100000398 a.out`func() [inlined] baz(x=10) at inline.cpp:1:42 frame #1: 0x0000000100000398 a.out`func() [inlined] bar() at inline.cpp:2:37 frame #2: 0x0000000100000398 a.out`func() at inline.cpp:4:15 frame #3: 0x00000001000003c0 a.out`main at inline.cpp:7:5 frame #4: 0x000000026eb29ab8 dyld`start + 6812 ``` The longer the names get the more confusing this gets because the first function name that appears is the parent frame. My assumption (which may need some more surveying) is that for the majority of cases we only care about the actual frame name (not the parent). So this patch removes all the special logic that prints the parent frame. Another quirk of the current format is that the inlined frame name does not abide by the `${function.name-XXX}` format variables. We always just print the raw demangled name. With this patch, we would format the inlined frame name according to the `frame-format` setting (see the test-cases). If we really want to have the `parentFrame [inlined] inlinedFrame` format, we could expose it through a new `frame-format` variable (e..g., `${function.inlined-at-name}` and let the user decide where to place things.
2024-10-21[lldb][test] Make vector operator[] return T& to workaround Arm codegen issueDavid Spickett
Since https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109628 landed, this test has been failing on 32-bit Arm. This is due to a codegen problem (whether added or uncovered by the change, not known) where the trap instruction is placed after the frame pointer and link register are restored. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/113154 So the code was: ``` std::__1::vector<int>::operator[](unsigned int): sub sp, sp, #8 str r0, [sp, #4] str r1, [sp] add sp, sp, #8 .inst 0xe7ffdefe bx lr ``` When lldb saw the trap, the PC was inside operator[] but the frame information actually pointed to g. This bug only happens for leaf functions so adding a return type works around it: ``` std::__1::vector<int>::operator[](unsigned int): push {r11, lr} mov r11, sp sub sp, sp, #8 str r0, [sp, #4] str r1, [sp] mov sp, r11 pop {r11, lr} .inst 0xe7ffdefe bx lr ``` (and operator[] should return T& anyway) Now the PC location and frame information should match and the test passes.
2024-09-19[lldb][FrameRecognizer] Display the first non-std frame on verbose_trap ↵Michael Buch
(#108825) This attempts to improve user-experience when LLDB stops on a verbose_trap. Currently if a `__builtin_verbose_trap` triggers, we display the first frame above the call to the verbose_trap. So in the newly added test case, we would've previously stopped here: ``` (lldb) run Process 28095 launched: '/Users/michaelbuch/a.out' (arm64) Process 28095 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Bounds error: out-of-bounds access frame #1: 0x0000000100003f5c a.out`std::__1::vector<int>::operator[](this=0x000000016fdfebef size=0, (null)=10) at verbose_trap.cpp:6:9 3 template <typename T> 4 struct vector { 5 void operator[](unsigned) { -> 6 __builtin_verbose_trap("Bounds error", "out-of-bounds access"); 7 } 8 }; ``` After this patch, we would stop in the first non-`std` frame: ``` (lldb) run Process 27843 launched: '/Users/michaelbuch/a.out' (arm64) Process 27843 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Bounds error: out-of-bounds access frame #2: 0x0000000100003f44 a.out`g() at verbose_trap.cpp:14:5 11 12 void g() { 13 std::vector<int> v; -> 14 v[10]; 15 } 16 ``` rdar://134490328
2024-07-17[lldb] Disable verbose_trap.test on Windows (#99323)Leandro Lupori
verbose_trap.test, added in #80368, fails on some Windows bots. See https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/141/builds/808.
2024-07-16[lldb] Add frame recognizer for __builtin_verbose_trap (#80368)Michael Buch
This patch adds a frame recognizer for Clang's `__builtin_verbose_trap`, which behaves like a `__builtin_trap`, but emits a failure-reason string into debug-info in order for debuggers to display it to a user. The frame recognizer triggers when we encounter a frame with a function name that begins with `__clang_trap_msg`, which is the magic prefix Clang emits into debug-info for verbose traps. Once such frame is encountered we display the frame function name as the `Stop Reason` and display that frame to the user. Example output: ``` (lldb) run warning: a.out was compiled with optimization - stepping may behave oddly; variables may not be available. Process 35942 launched: 'a.out' (arm64) Process 35942 stopped * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Misc.: Function is not implemented frame #1: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main [inlined] Dummy::func(this=<unavailable>) at verbose_trap.cpp:3:5 [opt] 1 struct Dummy { 2 void func() { -> 3 __builtin_verbose_trap("Misc.", "Function is not implemented"); 4 } 5 }; 6 7 int main() { (lldb) bt * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Misc.: Function is not implemented frame #0: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main [inlined] __clang_trap_msg$Misc.$Function is not implemented$ at verbose_trap.cpp:0 [opt] * frame #1: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main [inlined] Dummy::func(this=<unavailable>) at verbose_trap.cpp:3:5 [opt] frame #2: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main at verbose_trap.cpp:8:13 [opt] frame #3: 0x0000000189d518b4 dyld`start + 1988 ```
2023-05-10When the Debugger runs HandleProcessEvent it should allowJim Ingham
selecting the "Most relevant" frame. If you don't do that, then the correct frame gets selected, but it happens AFTER the frame info gets printed in the stop message, so you don't see the selected frame. The test for this hid the issue because it ran `frame info` and checked the result of that. That happens after the recognizer selects the frame, and so it was right. But if the recognizer is working correctly it will have already done the same printing in the stop message, and this way we also verify that the stop message was right. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150315
2022-12-12[lldb] Remove redundant XFAILPaul Robinson
The test is `UNSUPPORTED: system-linux` so the XFAIL for linux is redundant. Part of the project to eliminate special handling for triples in lit expressions. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139734
2022-06-21[lldb] Skip Recognizer/assert.test on linuxPavel Labath
-> PR56144
2020-12-20[lldb] [test] Update test status for NetBSDMichał Górny
2020-11-05[lldb] Enable FreeBSDRemote plugin by default and update test statusMichał Górny
The new FreeBSDRemote plugin has reached feature parity on i386 and amd64 targets. Use it by default on these architectures, while allowing the use of the legacy plugin via FREEBSD_LEGACY_PLUGIN envvar. Revisit the method of switching plugins. Apparently, the return value of PlatformFreeBSD::CanDebugProcess() is what really decides whether the legacy or the new plugin is used. Update the test status. Reenable the tests that were previously disabled on FreeBSD and do not cause hangs or are irrelevant to FreeBSD. Mark all tests that fail reliably as expectedFailure. For now, tests that are flaky (i.e. produce unstable results) are left enabled and cause unpredictable test failures. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90757
2020-06-30[lldb/Test] Skip recognizer tests when Python is disabledJonas Devlieghere
The `frame recognizer` command only exists when Python scripting is enabled. Therefore the test should be made conditional on Python. Without it, the test fails with "'frame recognizer' is not a known command."
2020-05-13[LLDB] Fix typo in xfail decorator assert.testMuhammad Omair Javaid
Fix a typo in earlier xfailed assert.test replace // with #.
2020-05-13[LLDB] Mark some xfails for arm-linuxMuhammad Omair Javaid
This patch marks following tests as xfail for arm-linux target. lldb/test/API/functionalities/load_using_paths/TestLoadUsingPaths.py lldb/test/API/python_api/thread/TestThreadAPI.py lldb/test/Shell/Recognizer/assert.test Bugs have been filed for all of them for the corresponding failing component.
2020-02-11[lldb/test] Add alternate symbol to StackFrame RecognizerMed Ismail Bennani
This reimplements commit 6b2979c12300b90a1e69791d43ee9cff14f4265e and updates the tests to reflect the addition of the alternate symbol attribute. Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
2020-02-10Revert "[lldb] Fix+re-enable Assert StackFrame Recognizer on Linux"Davide Italiano
This reverts commit 1a39f1b966a8d8f15ed0d5a832d5097cccefe93b as it breaks macOS.
2020-02-10[lldb] Fix+re-enable Assert StackFrame Recognizer on LinuxJan Kratochvil
D73303 was failing on Fedora Linux and so it was disabled by Skip the AssertFrameRecognizer test for Linux. I find no easy way how to find out if it gets recognized as `__assert_fail` or `__GI___assert_fail` as during `Process` ctor libc.so.6 is not yet loaded by the debuggee. DWARF symbol `__GI___assert_fail` overrides the ELF symbol `__assert_fail`. While external debug info (=DWARF) gets disabled for testsuite (D55859) that sure does not apply for real world usage. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74252
2020-02-08Revert "[lldb] Fix+re-enable Assert StackFrame Recognizer on Linux"Jan Kratochvil
This reverts commit cf1046c716b33ed449aa8fc26376864917c63c25. Reverted: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74252 It fixed testsuite but broke real world functionality where is not used: settings set symbols.enable-external-lookup false
2020-02-07[lldb] Fix+re-enable Assert StackFrame Recognizer on LinuxJan Kratochvil
D73303 was failing on Fedora Linux and so it was disabled by Skip the AssertFrameRecognizer test for Linux. On Fedora 30 x86_64 I have: $ readelf -Ws /lib64/libc.so.6 |grep '^Symbol\|.*assert_fail' Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 2362 entries: 630: 0000000000030520 70 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 14 __assert_fail@@GLIBC_2.2.5 Symbol table '.symtab' contains 22711 entries: 922: 000000000002275a 15 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT 14 __assert_fail_base.cold 18044: 0000000000030520 70 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT 14 __GI___assert_fail 20081: 00000000000303a0 370 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT 14 __assert_fail_base 21766: 0000000000030520 70 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 14 __assert_fail The patch should never expect __GI___assert_fail: .symtab can be present or not but that should not change that __assert_fail always wins - it is always present from .dynsym and it can never be overriden by __GI___assert_fail as __GI___assert_fail has only local binding. Global binding is preferred since D63540. External debug info symbols do not matter since D55859 (and DWARF should never be embedded in system libc.so.6). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74252
2020-02-07[lldb/test] Skip the AssertFrameRecognizer test for LinuxMed Ismail Bennani
This patch skips the AssertFrameRecognizer test for Linux since it appears to fail on certain distributions (AFAIK Fedora & ArchLinux). The failure happen because the thread don't set the current frame to the most relevant one. So the stopped location doesn't match with what the test is expecting. The test will be enabled again after I'll be able to reproduce the failure on one of those platform and fix the issue. Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
2020-02-06[lldb/Target] Add Assert StackFrame RecognizerMed Ismail Bennani
When a thread stops, this checks depending on the platform if the top frame is an abort stack frame. If so, it looks for an assert stack frame in the upper frames and set it as the most relavant frame when found. To do so, the StackFrameRecognizer class holds a "Most Relevant Frame" and a "cooked" stop reason description. When the thread is about to stop, it checks if the current frame is recognized, and if so, it fetches the recognized frame's attributes and applies them. rdar://58528686 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73303 Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
2020-02-05Revert "[lldb/Target] Add Assert StackFrame Recognizer"Pavel Labath
This reverts commit 2b7f32892b76cdfbe075300a5bf4a52e1b674bc7 because of test failures due to dangling pointers.
2020-02-05[lldb/Target] Add Assert StackFrame RecognizerMed Ismail Bennani
When a thread stops, this checks depending on the platform if the top frame is an abort stack frame. If so, it looks for an assert stack frame in the upper frames and set it as the most relavant frame when found. To do so, the StackFrameRecognizer class holds a "Most Relevant Frame" and a "cooked" stop reason description. When the thread is about to stop, it checks if the current frame is recognized, and if so, it fetches the recognized frame's attributes and applies them. rdar://58528686 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73303 Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
2020-01-28Revert "[lldb/Target] Add Assert StackFrame Recognizer"Med Ismail Bennani
This reverts commit 03a6b858fde5c644ec16b1fddd8e10aa9ef3f0ad. The test doesn't pass on Debian.
2020-01-28[lldb/Target] Add Assert StackFrame RecognizerMed Ismail Bennani
When a thread stops, this checks depending on the platform if the top frame is an abort stack frame. If so, it looks for an assert stack frame in the upper frames and set it as the most relavant frame when found. To do so, the StackFrameRecognizer class holds a "Most Relevant Frame" and a "cooked" stop reason description. When the thread is about to stop, it checks if the current frame is recognized, and if so, it fetches the recognized frame's attributes and applies them. rdar://58528686 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73303 Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>