| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Commit 6bc1e69de270db8d7191200f54158e4192f997ba changed the search string
to also check for the generated strings that surround the plain assert:
Assertion `false && "lldb-test assert"' failed
^^^^^^^^^
This causes the test to fail on setups where the generated assert message
looks different. E.g., on macOS the generated message looks like this:
Assertion failed: (false && "lldb_assert failed"), function lldb_assert
This reverts the old behaviour of just checking for the actual string we
have inside LLDB.
|
|
LLDB on Linux built with symbols is showing this error.
Without symbols it still PASSes:
lldb-test: .../lldb/source/Utility/LLDBAssert.cpp:29: void lldb_private::lldb_assert(bool, const char *, const char *, const char *, unsigned int): Assertion `false && "lldb_assert failed"' failed.
With symbols it FAILs:
lldb-test: .../lldb/tools/lldb-test/lldb-test.cpp:1086: int opts::assert::lldb_assert(lldb_private::Debugger &): Assertion `false && "lldb-test assert"' failed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99462
|
|
Be less strict when checking for the assert substring.
|
|
Call `os_log_fault` when an lldb assert fails. We piggyback off
`LLVM_SUPPORT_XCODE_SIGNPOSTS`, which also depends on `os_log`, to avoid
having to introduce another CMake check and corresponding define.
This patch also adds a small test using lldb-test that verifies we abort
with a "regular" assertion when asserts are enabled.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98987
|
