| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Actually emit a warning, rather than an error, when there's an .lldbinit
file in the current directly. Currently, the message is prepended by
"error" which looks rather odd, as the warning refers to itself as a
warning.
|
|
Emit an error when using --wait-for without a name and correct the help
output to specify a name must be provided, rather than a name or PID.
Motivated by
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/why-is-wait-for-not-attaching/86636
|
|
Remove lldb-repro which was used to run the test suite against a
reproducer. The corresponding functionality has been removed from LLDB
so there's no need for the tool anymore.
|
|
shell (#104878)
This patch changes the test that uses the `cat -e` option to `cat -v` so
that the test can be run using lit's internal shell. For `cat`, the `-v`
option prints non-printing characters in ^ and M- notation, while the
`-e` option adds `$` to the end of lines in addition to printing
non-printing characters in ^ and M- notation. This is an alternative
patch to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102061, opting to
rewrite the test that uses `cat -e` instead of extending support to the
`-e` option.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/102377
|
|
The -d(ebug) option broke 5 years ago when I migrated the driver to
libOption. Since then, we were never check if the option is set. We were
incorrectly toggling the internal variable (m_debug_mode) based on
OPT_no_use_colors instead.
Given that the functionality doesn't seem particularly useful and nobody
noticed it has been broken for 5 years, I'm just removing the flag.
|
|
Currently empty arguments are not respected. They are silently dropped
in two places: (1) when extracting them from the target.run-args
setting and (2) when constructing the lldb-argdumper invocation.
(1) is actually a regression from a few years ago. We did not always
drop empty arguments. See 31d97a5c8ab78c619deada0cdb1fcf64021d25dd.
rdar://106279228
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145450
|
|
If a process has multiple threads, the thread with the stop
info might not be the first one in the thread list.
On Windows, under certain circumstances, processes seem to have
one or more extra threads that haven't been launched by the
executable itself, waiting in NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory. If the
main (stopped) thread isn't the first one in the list (the order
seems nondeterministic), DidProcessStopAbnormally() would return
false prematurely, instead of inspecting later threads.
The main observable effect of DidProcessStopAbnormally() erroneously
returning false, is when running lldb with multiple "-o" parameters
to specify multiple commands to execute on the command line.
After an abnormal stop, lldb would stop executing "-o" parameters
and execute "-k" parameters instead - but due to this issue, it
would instead keep executing "-o" parameters as if there was no
abnormal stop. (If multiple parameters are specified via a script
file via the "-s" option, all of the commands in that file are
executed regardless of whether there's an abnormal stop inbetween.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134037
|
|
This patch removes the remaining reproducer code. The SBReproducer class
remains for ABI stability but is just an empty shell. This completes the
removal process outlined on the mailing list [1].
[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2021-September/017045.html
|
|
This patch fixes TestConvenienceVariables.test for AArch64 Windows.
Clang/LLD was unable to find printf apparently available as a macro
definition in stdio.h.
|
|
When using the `script` Python repl, SB objects are printed in a way that gives
the user no information. The simplest example is:
```
(lldb) script lldb.debugger
<lldb.SBDebugger; proxy of <Swig Object of type 'lldb::SBDebugger *' at 0x1097a5de0> >
```
This output comes from the Python repl printing the `repr()` of an object.
None of the SB classes implement `__repr__`, and all print like the above.
However, many (most?, all?) SB classes implement `__str__`. Because they
implement `__str__`, a more detailed output can be had by `print`ing the
object, for example:
```
(lldb) script print(lldb.debugger)
Debugger (instance: "debugger_1", id: 1)
```
For convenience, this change switches all SB classes that implement to
`__str__` to instead implement `__repr__`. **The result is that `str()` and
`repr()` will produce the same output**. This is because `str` calls `__repr__`
for classes that have no `__str__` method.
The benefit being that when writing a `script` invocation, you don't need to
remember to wrap in `print()`. If that isn't enough motivation, consider the
case where your Python expression results in a list of SB objects, in that case
you'd have to `map` or use a list comprehension like `[str(x) for x in <expr>]`
in order to see the details of the objects in the list.
For reference, the docs for `repr` say:
> repr(object)
> Return a string containing a printable representation of an object. For
> many types, this function makes an attempt to return a string that would
> yield an object with the same value when passed to eval(); otherwise, the
> representation is a string enclosed in angle brackets that contains the
> name of the type of the object together with additional information often
> including the name and address of the object. A class can control what this
> function returns for its instances by defining a __repr__() method.
and the docs for `__repr__` say:
> object.__repr__(self)
> Called by the repr() built-in function to compute the “official” string
> representation of an object. If at all possible, this should look like a
> valid Python expression that could be used to recreate an object with the
> same value (given an appropriate environment). If this is not possible, a
> string of the form <...some useful description...> should be returned. The
> return value must be a string object. If a class defines __repr__() but not
> __str__(), then __repr__() is also used when an “informal” string
> representation of instances of that class is required.
>
> This is typically used for debugging, so it is important that the
> representation is information-rich and unambiguous.
Even if it were convenient to construct Python expressions for SB classes so
that they could be `eval`'d, however for typical lldb usage, I can't think of a
motivating reason to do so. As it stands, the only action the docs say to do,
that this change doesn't do, is wrap the `repr` string in `<>` angle brackets.
An alternative implementation is to change lldb's python repl to apply `str()`
to the top level result. While this would work well in the case of a single SB
object, it doesn't work for a list of SB objects, since `str([x])` uses `repr`
to convert each list element to a string.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127458
|
|
Adds a check to ensure that a process exists before attempting to get
its ABI to prevent lldb from crashing due to trying to read from page zero.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127016
|
|
This is part of a bigger rework of the reproducer feature. See [1] for
more details.
[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2021-September/017045.html
|
|
It is surprisingly difficult to write a simple python script that
can reliably `import lldb` without failing, or crashing. I'm
currently resorting to convolutions like this:
def find_lldb(may_reexec=False):
if prefix := os.environ.get('LLDB_PYTHON_PREFIX'):
if os.path.realpath(prefix) != os.path.realpath(sys.prefix):
raise Exception("cannot import lldb.\n"
f" sys.prefix should be: {prefix}\n"
f" but it is: {sys.prefix}")
else:
line1, line2 = subprocess.run(
['lldb', '-x', '-b', '-o', 'script print(sys.prefix)'],
encoding='utf8', stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
check=True).stdout.strip().splitlines()
assert line1.strip() == '(lldb) script print(sys.prefix)'
prefix = line2.strip()
os.environ['LLDB_PYTHON_PREFIX'] = prefix
if sys.prefix != prefix:
if not may_reexec:
raise Exception(
"cannot import lldb.\n" +
f" This python, at {sys.prefix}\n"
f" does not math LLDB's python at {prefix}")
os.environ['LLDB_PYTHON_PREFIX'] = prefix
python_exe = os.path.join(prefix, 'bin', 'python3')
os.execl(python_exe, python_exe, *sys.argv)
lldb_path = subprocess.run(['lldb', '-P'],
check=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
encoding='utf8').stdout.strip()
sys.path = [lldb_path] + sys.path
This patch aims to replace all that with:
#!/usr/bin/env lldb-python
import lldb
...
... by adding the following features:
* new command line option: --print-script-interpreter-info. This
prints language-specific information about the script interpreter
in JSON format.
* new tool (unix only): lldb-python which finds python and exec's it.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112973
|
|
Jim says:
lldb has a -Q or --source-quietly option, which supposedly does:
--source-quietly Tells the debugger to execute this one-line lldb command before any file has been loaded.
That seems like a weird description, since we don't generally use source for one line entries, but anyway, let's try it:
> $LLDB_LLVM/clean-mono/build/Debug/bin/lldb -Q "script print('I should be quiet')" a.out -O "script print('I should be before')" -o "script print('I should be after')"
(lldb) script print('I should be before')
I should be before
(lldb) target create "script print('I should be quiet')"
error: unable to find executable for 'script print('I should be quiet')'
That was weird. The first real -O gets sourced but not quietly, then the argument to the -Q gets treated as the target.
> $LLDB_LLVM/clean-mono/build/Debug/bin/lldb -Q a.out -O "script print('I should be before')" -o "script print('I should be after')"
(lldb) script print('I should be before')
I should be before
(lldb) target create "a.out"
Current executable set to '/tmp/a.out' (x86_64).
(lldb) script print('I should be after')
I should be after
Well, that's a little better, but the -Q option seems to have done nothing.
---
This fixes the description of --source-quietly, as well as causing it
to actually suppress echoing while executing the initialization
commands.
Reviewed By: jingham
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112988
|
|
This tests the driver, which is bypassed by the reproducer during
replay.
|
|
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84955
|
|
Color the error: and warning: part of the CommandReturnObject output,
similar to how an error is printed from the driver when colors are
enabled.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81058
|
|
|
|
On Windows the line must match:
Use 'lldb.exe --help' for a complete list of options.
|
|
Print a little snippet before exiting when passed unrecognized
arguments. The goal is twofold:
- Point users to lldb --help.
- Make it clear that we exited the debugger.
|
|
There appears to be consensus in D80165 that this is the desired
behavior and I personally agree.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80226
|
|
|
|
Before the transition to libOption it was possible to specify arguments
for the inferior without -- as long as they didn't start with a dash.
For example, the following invocations should all behave the same:
$ lldb inferior inferior-arg
$ lldb inferior -- inferior-arg
$ lldb -- inferior inferior-arg
This patch fixes that behavior, documents it and adds a test to cover
the different combinations.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80165
|
|
We have the option to stop running commands in batch mode when an error
occurs. When that happens we should exit the driver with a non-zero exit
code.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78825
|
|
This reverts commit 9bce9d2d65e2462140597f71a8247750b837094c, as
it breaks the bots.
|
|
|
|
These test are checking for diagnostics printed by the driver. During
replay we only replay the SB API calls made by the driver, so it's
expected that these messages aren't displayed.
|
|
In TestConvenienceVariables I changed %t from a file to a directory.
This tripped up mkdir which can't deal with an existing file at the
given location. In order to solve this issue on the bots I added an
`rm -rf %t` statement, but now the Windows bot complains that "This
function is not supported on this system".
If you never ran the test suite wit this temporary workaround, the test
might fail. If this happens please remove what %t expands to in the lit
output and rerun the test.
|
|
On a dirty build directory the new mkdir fails because the file already
exists and is not a directory.
|
|
This test was passing even when the output of lldb.target was empty.
I've made the test more strict by checking explicitly for the target
name and by using CHECK-NEXT lines.
|
|
Summary:
This patch addresses an ambiguity in how our existing tests invoke the
compiler. Roughly two thirds of our current "shell" tests invoke the
compiler to build the executables for the host. However, there is also
a significant number of tests which don't build a host binary (because
they don't need to run it) and instead they hardcode a certain target.
We also have code which adds a bunch of default arguments to the %clang
substitutions. However, most of these arguments only really make sense
for the host compilation. So far, this has worked mostly ok, because the
arguments we were adding were not conflicting with the target-hardcoding
tests (though they did provoke an occasional "argument unused" warning).
However, this started to break down when we wanted to use
target-hardcoding clang-cl tests (D69031) because clang-cl has a
substantially different command line, and it was getting very confused
by some of the arguments we were adding on non-windows hosts.
This patch avoid this problem by creating separate %clang(xx,_cl)_host
substutitions, which are specifically meant to be used for compiling
host binaries. All funny host-specific options are moved there. To
ensure that the regular %clang substitutions are not used for compiling
host binaries (skipping the extra arguments) I employ a little
hac^H^H^Htrick -- I add an invalid --target argument to the %clang
substitution, which means that one has to use an explicit --target in
order for the compilation to succeed.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, mstorsjo, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, MaskRay, jfb, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69619
|
|
The original patch got reverted because it broke `check-lldb` on a clean
build. This fixes that.
llvm-svn: 374201
|
|
as it appears to have broken check-lldb.
This reverts r374184 (git commit 22314179f0660c172514b397060fd8f34b586e82)
llvm-svn: 374187
|
|
LLDB has three major testing strategies: unit tests, tests that exercise
the SB API though dotest.py and what we currently call lit tests. The
later is rather confusing as we're now using lit as the driver for all
three types of tests. As most of this grew organically, the directory
structure in the LLDB repository doesn't really make this clear.
The 'lit' tests are part of the root and among these tests there's a
Unit and Suite folder for the unit and dotest-tests. This layout makes
it impossible to run just the lit tests.
This patch changes the directory layout to match the 3 testing
strategies, each with their own directory and their own configuration
file. This means there are now 3 directories under lit with 3
corresponding targets:
- API (check-lldb-api): Test exercising the SB API.
- Shell (check-lldb-shell): Test exercising command line utilities.
- Unit (check-lldb-unit): Unit tests.
Finally, there's still the `check-lldb` target that runs all three test
suites.
Finally, this also renames the lit folder to `test` to match the LLVM
repository layout.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68606
llvm-svn: 374184
|
