summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lldb/test/API/python_api/watchpoint/watchlocation/TestTargetWatchAddress.py
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-06-19[lldb] Disable TestTargetWatchAddress on Windows x86_64 (#144779)Dmitry Vasilyev
See #144777 for details.
2025-06-03[lldb] Disable TestTargetWatchAddress.py on Windows x86_64 (#142573)Dmitry Vasilyev
See #142196 and https://github.com/llvm/llvm-zorg/pull/452 for details.
2025-02-04[lldb] WatchAddress ignores modify option (#124847)Ben Jackson
The WatchAddress API includes a flag to indicate if watchpoint should be for read, modify or both. This API uses 2 booleans, but the 'modify' flag was ignored and WatchAddress unconditionally watched write (actually modify). We now only watch for modify when the modify flag is true. --- The included test fails prior to this patch and succeeds after. That is previously specifying `False` for `modify` would still stop on _write_, but after the patch correctly only stops on _read_
2023-11-30[lldb] [mostly NFC] Large WP foundation: WatchpointResources (#68845)Jason Molenda
This patch is rearranging code a bit to add WatchpointResources to Process. A WatchpointResource is meant to represent a hardware watchpoint register in the inferior process. It has an address, a size, a type, and a list of Watchpoints that are using this WatchpointResource. This current patch doesn't add any of the features of WatchpointResources that make them interesting -- a user asking to watch a 24 byte object could watch this with three 8 byte WatchpointResources. Or a Watchpoint on 1 byte at 0x1002 and a second watchpoint on 1 byte at 0x1003, these must both be served by a single WatchpointResource on that doubleword at 0x1000 on a 64-bit target, if two hardware watchpoint registers were used to track these separately, one of them may not be hit. Or if you have one Watchpoint on a variable with a condition set, and another Watchpoint on that same variable with a command defined or different condition, or ignorecount, both of those Watchpoints need to evaluate their criteria/commands when their WatchpointResource has been hit. There's a bit of code movement to rearrange things in the direction I'll need for implementing this feature, so I want to start with reviewing & landing this mostly NFC patch and we can focus on the algorithmic choices about how WatchpointResources are shared and handled as they're triggeed, separately. This patch also stops printing "Watchpoint <n> hit: old value: <x>, new vlaue: <y>" for Read watchpoints. I could make an argument for print "Watchpoint <n> hit: current value <x>" but the current output doesn't make any sense, and the user can print the value if they are particularly interested. Read watchpoints are used primarily to understand what code is reading a variable. This patch adds more fallbacks for how to print the objects being watched if we have types, instead of assuming they are all integral values, so a struct will print its elements. As large watchpoints are added, we'll be doing a lot more of those. To track the WatchpointSP in the WatchpointResources, I changed the internal API which took a WatchpointSP and devolved it to a Watchpoint*, which meant touching several different Process files. I removed the watchpoint code in ProcessKDP which only reported that watchpoints aren't supported, the base class does that already. I haven't yet changed how we receive a watchpoint to identify the WatchpointResource responsible for the trigger, and identify all Watchpoints that are using this Resource to evaluate their conditions etc. This is the same work that a BreakpointSite needs to do when it has been tiggered, where multiple Breakpoints may be at the same address. There is not yet any printing of the Resources that a Watchpoint is implemented in terms of ("watchpoint list", or SBWatchpoint::GetDescription). "watchpoint set var" and "watchpoint set expression" take a size argument which was previously 1, 2, 4, or 8 (an enum). I've changed this to an unsigned int. Most hardware implementations can only watch 1, 2, 4, 8 byte ranges, but with Resources we'll allow a user to ask for different sized watchpoints and set them in hardware-expressble terms soon. I've annotated areas where I know there is work still needed with LWP_TODO that I'll be working on once this is landed. I've tested this on aarch64 macOS, aarch64 Linux, and Intel macOS. https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116 (cherry picked from commit fc6b72523f3d73b921690a713e97a433c96066c6)
2023-11-28Revert "[lldb] [mostly NFC] Large WP foundation: WatchpointResources (#68845)"David Spickett
...and follow ups. As it has caused test failures on Linux Arm and AArch64: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/96/builds/49126 https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/17/builds/45824 ``` lldb-shell :: Subprocess/clone-follow-child-wp.test lldb-shell :: Subprocess/fork-follow-child-wp.test lldb-shell :: Subprocess/vfork-follow-child-wp.test ``` This reverts commit a6c62bf1a4717accc852463b664cd1012237d334, commit a0a1ff3ab40e347589b4e27d8fd350c600526735 and commit fc6b72523f3d73b921690a713e97a433c96066c6.
2023-11-27[lldb] [mostly NFC] Large WP foundation: WatchpointResources (#68845)Jason Molenda
This patch is rearranging code a bit to add WatchpointResources to Process. A WatchpointResource is meant to represent a hardware watchpoint register in the inferior process. It has an address, a size, a type, and a list of Watchpoints that are using this WatchpointResource. This current patch doesn't add any of the features of WatchpointResources that make them interesting -- a user asking to watch a 24 byte object could watch this with three 8 byte WatchpointResources. Or a Watchpoint on 1 byte at 0x1002 and a second watchpoint on 1 byte at 0x1003, these must both be served by a single WatchpointResource on that doubleword at 0x1000 on a 64-bit target, if two hardware watchpoint registers were used to track these separately, one of them may not be hit. Or if you have one Watchpoint on a variable with a condition set, and another Watchpoint on that same variable with a command defined or different condition, or ignorecount, both of those Watchpoints need to evaluate their criteria/commands when their WatchpointResource has been hit. There's a bit of code movement to rearrange things in the direction I'll need for implementing this feature, so I want to start with reviewing & landing this mostly NFC patch and we can focus on the algorithmic choices about how WatchpointResources are shared and handled as they're triggeed, separately. This patch also stops printing "Watchpoint <n> hit: old value: <x>, new vlaue: <y>" for Read watchpoints. I could make an argument for print "Watchpoint <n> hit: current value <x>" but the current output doesn't make any sense, and the user can print the value if they are particularly interested. Read watchpoints are used primarily to understand what code is reading a variable. This patch adds more fallbacks for how to print the objects being watched if we have types, instead of assuming they are all integral values, so a struct will print its elements. As large watchpoints are added, we'll be doing a lot more of those. To track the WatchpointSP in the WatchpointResources, I changed the internal API which took a WatchpointSP and devolved it to a Watchpoint*, which meant touching several different Process files. I removed the watchpoint code in ProcessKDP which only reported that watchpoints aren't supported, the base class does that already. I haven't yet changed how we receive a watchpoint to identify the WatchpointResource responsible for the trigger, and identify all Watchpoints that are using this Resource to evaluate their conditions etc. This is the same work that a BreakpointSite needs to do when it has been tiggered, where multiple Breakpoints may be at the same address. There is not yet any printing of the Resources that a Watchpoint is implemented in terms of ("watchpoint list", or SBWatchpoint::GetDescription). "watchpoint set var" and "watchpoint set expression" take a size argument which was previously 1, 2, 4, or 8 (an enum). I've changed this to an unsigned int. Most hardware implementations can only watch 1, 2, 4, 8 byte ranges, but with Resources we'll allow a user to ask for different sized watchpoints and set them in hardware-expressble terms soon. I've annotated areas where I know there is work still needed with LWP_TODO that I'll be working on once this is landed. I've tested this on aarch64 macOS, aarch64 Linux, and Intel macOS. https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116
2023-09-21Reland "[lldb] Add 'modify' type watchpoints, make it default (#66308)"David Spickett
This reverts commit a7b78cac9a77e3ef6bbbd8ab1a559891dc693401. With updates to the tests. TestWatchTaggedAddress.py: Updated the expected watchpoint types, though I'm not sure there should be a differnt default for the two ways of setting them, that needs to be confirmed. TestStepOverWatchpoint.py: Skipped this everywhere because I think what used to happen is you couldn't put 2 watchpoints on the same address (after alignment). I guess that this is now allowed because modify watchpoints aren't accounted for, but likely should be. Needs investigating.
2023-09-21Revert "[lldb] Add 'modify' type watchpoints, make it default (#66308)"David Spickett
This reverts commit 933ad5c897ee366759a54869b35b2d7285a92137. This caused 1 test failure and an unexpected pass on AArch64 Linux: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/96/builds/45765 Wasn't reported because the bot was already red at the time.
2023-09-20[lldb] Add 'modify' type watchpoints, make it default (#66308)Jason Molenda
Watchpoints in lldb can be either 'read', 'write', or 'read/write'. This is exposing the actual behavior of hardware watchpoints. gdb has a different behavior: a "write" type watchpoint only stops when the watched memory region *changes*. A user is using a watchpoint for one of three reasons: 1. Want to find what is changing/corrupting this memory. 2. Want to find what is writing to this memory. 3. Want to find what is reading from this memory. I believe (1) is the most common use case for watchpoints, and it currently can't be done in lldb -- the user needs to continue every time the same value is written to the watched-memory manually. I think gdb's behavior is the correct one. There are some use cases where a developer wants to find every function that writes/reads to/from a memory region, regardless of value, I want to still allow that functionality. This is also a bit of groundwork for my large watchpoint support proposal https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116 where I will be adding support for AArch64 MASK watchpoints which watch power-of-2 memory regions. A user might ask to watch 24 bytes, and a MASK watchpoint stub can do this with a 32-byte MASK watchpoint if it is properly aligned. And we need to ignore writes to the final 8 bytes of that watched region, and not show those hits to the user. This patch adds a new 'modify' watchpoint type and it is the default. Re-landing this patch after addressing testsuite failures found in CI on Linux, Intel machines, and windows. rdar://108234227
2023-09-18Revert "[lldb] Add 'modify' type watchpoints, make it default (#66308)"Jason Molenda
TestStepOverWatchpoint.py and TestUnalignedWatchpoint.py are failing on the ubuntu and debian bots https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/68/builds/60204 https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/96/builds/45623 and the newly added test TestModifyWatchpoint.py does not work on windows bot https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/219/builds/5708 I will debug tomorrow morning and reland. This reverts commit 3692267ca8f9c51cb55e4387283762d921fe2ae2.
2023-09-18[lldb] Add 'modify' type watchpoints, make it default (#66308)Jason Molenda
Watchpoints in lldb can be either 'read', 'write', or 'read/write'. This is exposing the actual behavior of hardware watchpoints. gdb has a different behavior: a "write" type watchpoint only stops when the watched memory region *changes*. A user is using a watchpoint for one of three reasons: 1. Want to find what is changing/corrupting this memory. 2. Want to find what is writing to this memory. 3. Want to find what is reading from this memory. I believe (1) is the most common use case for watchpoints, and it currently can't be done in lldb -- the user needs to continue every time the same value is written to the watched-memory manually. I think gdb's behavior is the correct one. There are some use cases where a developer wants to find every function that writes/reads to/from a memory region, regardless of value, I want to still allow that functionality. This is also a bit of groundwork for my large watchpoint support proposal https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116 where I will be adding support for AArch64 MASK watchpoints which watch power-of-2 memory regions. A user might ask to watch 24 bytes, and a MASK watchpoint stub can do this with a 32-byte MASK watchpoint if it is properly aligned. And we need to ignore writes to the final 8 bytes of that watched region, and not show those hits to the user. This patch adds a new 'modify' watchpoint type and it is the default. rdar://108234227
2023-05-25[NFC][Py Reformat] Reformat python files in lldbJonas Devlieghere
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0). If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black. RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
2023-05-04Add AArch64 MASK watchpoint support in debugserverJason Molenda
Add suport for MASK style watchpoints on AArch64 in debugserver on Darwin systems, for watching power-of-2 sized memory ranges. More work needed in lldb before this can be exposed to the user (because they will often try watching memory ranges that are not exactly power-of-2 in size/alignment) but this is the first part of adding that capability. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149792 rdar://108233371
2022-08-15[LLDB] Remove __future__ imports from testsDavid Spickett
Not needed now that we require python 3. Reviewed By: kastiglione, JDevlieghere Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131761
2022-06-17[lldb][tests] Automatically call compute_mydir (NFC)Dave Lee
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling `compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
2022-06-09[lldb] Use assertState in more tests (NFC)Dave Lee
Follow to D127355, converting more `assertEquals` to `assertState`. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127378
2021-02-08[lldb/tests] Removed add_test_categories decorator for python API tests, NFCTatyana Krasnukha
There is a .categories file in the python_api directory that makes all nested tests belong to the category "pyapi". The decorator is unnecessary for these tests.
2021-02-02[lldb] Convert assertTrue(a == b) to assertEqual(a, b)Dave Lee
Convert `assertTrue(a == b)` to `assertEqual(a, b)` to produce better failure messages. These were mostly done via regex search & replace, with some manual fixes. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95813
2020-02-11[lldb][test] Remove symlink for API tests.Jordan Rupprecht
Summary: Moves lldbsuite tests to lldb/test/API. This is a largely mechanical change, moved with the following steps: ``` rm lldb/test/API/testcases mkdir -p lldb/test/API/{test_runner/test,tools/lldb-{server,vscode}} mv lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/test_runner/test lldb/test/API/test_runner for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/* -maxdepth 0 -type d | egrep -v "make|plugins|test_runner|tools"); do mv $d lldb/test/API; done for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-vscode -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 | grep -v ".py"); do mv $d lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-vscode; done for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-server -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 | egrep -v "gdbremote_testcase.py|lldbgdbserverutils.py|socket_packet_pump.py"); do mv $d lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server; done ``` lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/__init__.py and lldb/test/API/lit.cfg.py were also updated with the new directory structure. Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71151