summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lldb/test/API/functionalities/thread/step_until/function.list
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-11-11[lldb][test] Fix ThreadStepUntilAPI.pyDavid Spickett
After #167359 / 95db31e7f69e7008f0c570ed30d54d1e418e10f2. A fix was attempted in #167423 but was not quite enough. From what I could understand, in v1 format you have to specify all the basic blocks. Where before !call_me implied they were all cold (I think, very shaky understanding here). For this test we want to see blocks like call_me/foo/call_me. So adding a line for block 1 fixes the tests. It could produce more blocks at some point but I think as long as foo is within two of them, it'll be fine.
2025-11-10[LLDB] Fix lldb failure caused by 95db31e7f6. (#167423)Rahman Lavaee
2025-01-17[lldb] Fix SBThread::StepOverUntil for discontinuous functions (#123046)Pavel Labath
I think the only issue here was that we would erroneously consider functions which are "in the middle" of the function were stepping to as a part of the function, and would try to step into them (likely stepping out of the function instead) instead of giving up early.