| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
|
|
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
|
|
These tests fail every 10 or so runs on Windows causing both local failures as well as buildbot failures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111659
|
|
|
|
The test uses debug info from one binary to debug a different one. This
does not work on macos, and its pure luck that it works elsewhere (the
variable that it inspects happens to have the same address in both).
The purpose of this test is to verify that lldb has not overwritten the
target executable. That can be more easily achieved by checking the exit
code of the binary, so change the test to do that.
Also remove the llgs_test decorator, as it's preventing the test from
running on macos. All the test needs is the platform functionality of
lldb-server, which is available everywhere.
|
|
This got removed in 68bb51acd572735d80d20adb2c2fc51a5cbbd88e and this enabled
the test on macOS (where it just causes lldb-server to crash). Re-adding the
decorator to get the tests passing again.
|
|
Fix the test to account for recent test infrastructure changes, and make
it run locally to increase the chances of it continuing to work in the
future.
|
|
Nearly all of our lldb-server tests have two flavours (lldb-server and
debugserver). Each of them is tagged with an appropriate decorator, and
each of them starts with a call to a matching "init" method. The init
calls are mandatory, and it's not possible to meaningfully combine them
with a different decorator.
This patch leverages the existing decorators to also tag the tests with
the appropriate debug server tag, similar to how we do with debug info
flavours. This allows us to make the "init" calls from inside the common
setUp method.
|
|
init_llgs_test no longer takes an argument
but these two were not updated.
Also fix some mistakes in TestAutoInstallMainExecutable
to get it passing again.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91612
|
|
Update tests that were creating an empty LaunchInfo instead of using the
one coming from the target. This ensures target properties are honored.
|
|
Always clean up subprocesses on tear down instead of relying on the
caller to do so. This is not only less error prone but also means the
tests can be more concise.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83787
|
|
Summary:
A lot of our tests do 'self.assertTrue(error.Success()'. The problem
with that is that when this fails, it produces a completely useless
error message (False is not True) and the most important piece of
information -- the actual error message -- is completely hidden.
Sometimes we mitigate that by including the error message in the "msg"
argument, but this has two additional problems:
- as the msg argument is evaluated unconditionally, one needs to be
careful to not trigger an exception when the operation was actually
successful.
- it requires more typing, which means we often don't do it
assertSuccess solves these problems by taking the entire SBError object
as an argument. If the operation was unsuccessful, it can format a
reasonable error message itself. The function still accepts a "msg"
argument, which can include any additional context, but this context now
does not need to include the error message.
To demonstrate usage, I replace a number of existing assertTrue
assertions with the new function. As this process is not easily
automatable, I have just manually updated a representative sample. In
some cases, I did not update the code to use assertSuccess, but I went
for even higher-level assertion apis (runCmd, expect_expr), as these are
even shorter, and can produce even better failure messages.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arphaman, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82759
|
|
Some tests set settings and don't clean them up, this leads to side effects in other tests.
The patch removes a global debugger instance with a per-test debugger to avoid such effects.
From what I see, lldb.DBG was needed to determine the platform before a test is run,
lldb.selected_platform is used for this purpose now. Though, this required adding a new function
to the SBPlatform interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74903
|
|
Summary: Moves lldbsuite tests to lldb/test/API.
This is a largely mechanical change, moved with the following steps:
```
rm lldb/test/API/testcases
mkdir -p lldb/test/API/{test_runner/test,tools/lldb-{server,vscode}}
mv lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/test_runner/test lldb/test/API/test_runner
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/* -maxdepth 0 -type d | egrep -v "make|plugins|test_runner|tools"); do mv $d lldb/test/API; done
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-vscode -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 | grep -v ".py"); do mv $d lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-vscode; done
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-server -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 | egrep -v "gdbremote_testcase.py|lldbgdbserverutils.py|socket_packet_pump.py"); do mv $d lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server; done
```
lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/__init__.py and lldb/test/API/lit.cfg.py were also updated with the new directory structure.
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71151
|
