| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
(#157756)
I neglected to add a test when I was writing tests for this, so of
course it broke. This makes it work again and adds a test.
rdar://159459160
|
|
The LLVM Style Guide says the following about error and warning messages
[1]:
> [T]o match error message styles commonly produced by other tools,
> start the first sentence with a lowercase letter, and finish the last
> sentence without a period, if it would end in one otherwise.
I often provide this feedback during code review, but we still have a
bunch of places where we have inconsistent error message, which bothers
me as a user. This PR identifies a handful of those places and updates
the messages to be consistent.
[1] https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#error-and-warning-messages
|
|
Also fixes our Windows on Arm bot.
|
|
This fixes issues found in e066f35c6981c720e3a7e5883efc40c861b3b7, which
was later reverted. The problem was with "k" message which was sent with
sync_on_timeout flag set to true, so lldb was waiting for response,
which is currently not being sent by lldb-server. Not waiting for
response at all seems to be not a solution, because on MAC OS X lldb
waits for response from "k" to gracefully kill inferior.
|
|
Tests using ObjC do not readily run on Linux.
|
|
The use of `-lobjc` resulted in this test failing to build on Linux. The
flag is not necessary, this removes the flag with the expectation it
will fix the test on Linux.
|
|
frame (#136766)
Use the current frame's language to lookup commands provided by language plugins.
This means commands like `language {objc,cplusplus} <command>` can be used directly, without using the `language <lang>` prefix.
For example, when stopped on a C++ frame, `demangle _Z1fv` will run `language cplusplus demangle _Z1fv`.
rdar://149882520
|
|
Co-authored-by: Eisuke Kawashima <e-kwsm@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
(#109062)
If your arguments or option values are of a type that naturally uses one
of our common completion mechanisms, you will get completion for free.
But if you have your own custom values or if you want to do fancy things
like have `break set -s foo.dylib -n ba<TAB>` only complete on symbols
in foo.dylib, you can use this new mechanism to achieve that.
|
|
(#94823)
Among other things, returning an empty string as the repeat command
disables auto-repeat, which can be useful for state-changing commands.
There's one remaining refinement to this setup, which is that for parsed
script commands, it should be possible to change an option value, or add
a new option value that wasn't originally specified, then ask lldb "make
this back into a command string". That would make doing fancy things
with repeat commands easier.
That capability isn't present in the lldb_private side either, however.
So that's for a next iteration.
I haven't added this to the docs on adding commands yet. I wanted to
make sure this was an acceptable approach before I spend the time to do
that.
|
|
from PEP8
(https://peps.python.org/pep-0008/#programming-recommendations):
> Comparisons to singletons like None should always be done with is or
is not, never the equality operators.
Co-authored-by: Eisuke Kawashima <e-kwsm@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
There was a think-o in a previous commit that made us only able to
define 1 line commands when using command script add interactively.
There was also no test for this feature, so I fixed the think-o and
added a test.
|
|
|
|
Python3.9 does not allow you to put a reference to a class staticmethod
in a table and call it from there. Python3.10 and following do allow
this, but we still support 3.9. staticmethod was slightly cleaner,
but this will do.
|
|
When the parsed command python code is run on 3.9, I get:
File ".../lib/python3.9/site-packages/lldb/plugins/parsed_cmd.py", line 124, in translate_value
return cls.translators[value_type](value)
TypeError: 'staticmethod' object is not callable
But this works correctly in Python 3.10 on macOS and Linux. I'm guessing something
changed between those versions, and I'll have to do something to work around the difference.
But I'm going to skip the test on 3.9 while I figure that out.
|
|
The Linux std has more asserts enabled by default, so it
complained, even though this worked on Darwin...
|
|
why it's crashing on the x86_64 Debian Linux worker.
|
|
CommandObjectParsed (#70734)
This allows you to specify options and arguments and their definitions
and then have lldb handle the completions, help, etc. in the same way
that lldb does for its parsed commands internally.
This feature has some design considerations as well as the code, so I've
also set up an RFC, but I did this one first and will put the RFC
address in here once I've pushed it...
Note, the lldb "ParsedCommand interface" doesn't actually do all the
work that it should. For instance, saying the type of an option that has
a completer doesn't automatically hook up the completer, and ditto for
argument values. We also do almost no work to verify that the arguments
match their definition, or do auto-completion for them. This patch
allows you to make a command that's bug-for-bug compatible with built-in
ones, but I didn't want to stall it on getting the auto-command checking
to work all the way correctly.
As an overall design note, my primary goal here was to make an interface
that worked well in the script language. For that I needed, for
instance, to have a property-based way to get all the option values that
were specified. It was much more convenient to do that by making a
fairly bare-bones C interface to define the options and arguments of a
command, and set their values, and then wrap that in a Python class
(installed along with the other bits of the lldb python module) which
you can then derive from to make your new command. This approach will
also make it easier to experiment.
See the file test_commands.py in the test case for examples of how this
works.
|
|
If adding a user commands fails because a command with the same name
already exists, we only say that "force replace is not set" without
telling the user _how_ to set it. There are two ways to do so; this
commit changes the error message to mention both.
|
|
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
|
|
Fix a mutation of `CommandAlias::m_option_args_sp`, which resulted in cases where
aliases would fail to run on second, and subsequent times.
For example, an alias such as:
```
command alias p1 p 1
```
When run the second time, the following error would be reported to the user:
```
error: expression failed to parse:
error: <user expression 1>:1:1: expression is not assignable
-- 1
^ ~
```
To fix this, `CommandAlias::Desugar` now constructs options to a freshly constructed
vector, rather than by appending to the results of `GetOptionArguments`.
rdar://107770836
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150078
|
|
|
|
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146779
|
|
|
|
The latter only checks built-in commands. I also added some docs to
make the distinction clear and a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144929
|
|
|
|
This didn't work previously because we had to check whether the incoming
command was an alias command, but if it wasn't we still used the result
of that lookup - which was by the command's node name. That fails for
non-top-level commands. In this case, the resolution is pretty simple since
we already have the node's CommandObject, so all we needed to do was turn
it into a shared pointer, for which I added enable_shared_from_this to the
CommandObject.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137662
|
|
commands.""
This reverts commit ac05bc0524c66c74278b26742896a4c634c034cf.
I had incorrectly removed one set of checks in the option handling in
Options::ParseAlias because I couldn't see what it is for. It was a
bit obscure, but it handled the case where you pass "-something=other --"
as the input_line, which caused the built-in "run" alias not to return
the right value for IsDashDashCommand, causing TestHelp.py to fail.
|
|
This reverts commit 6c089b2af5d8d98f66b27b67f70958f520820a76.
This was causing the test test_help_run_hides_options from TestHelp.py to
fail on Linux and Windows (but the test succeeds on macOS). The decision
to print option information is determined by CommandObjectAlias::IsDashDashCommand
which was changed, but only by replacing an inline string constant with a const char *
CommandInterpreter::g_argument which has the same string value. I can't see why this
would fail, I'll have to spin up a vm to see if I can repo there.
|
|
This is particularly a problem for alias construction, where you might
want to have a backtick surrounded option in the alias. Before this
patch:
command alias expression -Z \`argc\` -- argv
for instance would be rendered as:
expression -Z argc -- argv
and would fail to work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133045
|
|
Not needed now that we require python 3.
Reviewed By: kastiglione, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131761
|
|
With lldb (& llvm) requiring Python 3.6+, use of the `six` module can be removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131304
|
|
We were just emitting "invalid module" w/o saying which module. That's
not particularly helpful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129338
|
|
TestCommandScript.py fails on Arm/Windows due following issues:
https://llvm.org/pr56288
https://llvm.org/pr56292
LLDB fails to skip prologue and also step over library function or
nodebug functions fails due to PDB/DWARF mismatch.
This patch replace function breakpoint with line breakpoint so that we
can expect LLDB to stop on desired line. Also replace dwarf with PDB
debug info for this test only.
|
|
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
|
|
I also added a call to help in the test which was crashing before
the test, and not after.
|
|
Protecting against accidental overwriting of commands is good, but
having to pass a flag to overwrite the command when developing your
commands is pretty annoying. This adds a setting to defeat the protection
so you can do this once at the start of your session and not have to
worry about it again.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122680
|
|
Allow users to create aliases for aliases to raw input commands. That probably
sounds convoluted, so here's an example:
```
command alias some-setup env SOMEVAR=SOMEVALUE
```
This an alias based on `env`, which itself is an alias for `_regex-env`.
`_regex-env` is a `command regex` command, which takes raw input.
The above `some-setup` alias fails with:
```
error: Unable to create requested alias.
```
This change allows such aliases to be created. lldb already supports aliases to
aliases for parsed commands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117259
|
|
Fixes incomplete command names in `apropos` results.
The full command names given by `apropos` have come from command name string
literals given to `CommandObject` constructors. For most commands, this has
been accurate, but some commands have incorrect strings. This results in
`apropos` output that doesn't tell the user the full command name they might
want learn more about. These strings can be fixed.
There's a seperate issue that can't be fixed as easily: plugin commands. With
the way they're implemented, plugin commands have to exclude the root command
from their command name string. To illustrate, the `language objc` subcommand
has to set its command name string to "objc", which results in apropos printing
results as `objc ...` instead of `language objc ...`.
To fix both of these issues, this commit changes `FindCommandsForApropos` to
derive the fully qualified command name using the keys of subcommand maps.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116491
(cherry picked from commit b3bfd595a548cd85b12e4e83729436cb73b26f29)
|
|
Unlike the rest of our SB objects, SBEvent and SBCommandReturnObject
have the ability to hold non-owning pointers to their non-SB
counterparts. This makes it hard to ensure the SB objects do not become
dangling once their backing object goes away.
While we could make these two objects behave like others, that would
require plubming even more shared pointers through our internal code
(Event objects are mostly prepared for it, CommandReturnObject are not).
Doing so seems unnecessarily disruptive, given that (unlike for some of
the other objects) I don't see any good reason why would someone want to
hold onto these objects after the function terminates.
For that reason, this patch implements a different approach -- the SB
objects will still hold non-owning pointers, but they will be reset to
the empty/default state as soon as the function terminates. This python
code will not crash if the user decides to store these objects -- but
the objects themselves will be useless/empty.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116162
|
|
This starts to fix the other half of the lifetime problems in this code
-- dangling references. SB objects created on the stack will go away
when the function returns, which is a problem if the python code they
were meant for stashes a reference to them somewhere. Most of the time
this goes by unnoticed, as the code rarely has a reason to store these,
but in case it does, we shouldn't respond by crashing.
This patch fixes the management for a couple of SB objects (Debugger,
Frame, Thread). The SB objects are now created on the heap, and
their ownership is immediately passed on to SWIG, which will ensure they
are destroyed when the last python reference goes away. I will handle
the other objects in separate patches.
I include one test which demonstrates the lifetime issue for SBDebugger.
Strictly speaking, one should create a test case for each of these
objects and each of the contexts they are being used. That would require
figuring out how to persist (and later access) each of these objects.
Some of those may involve a lot of hoop-jumping (we can run python code
from within a frame-format string). I don't think that is
necessary/worth it since the new wrapper functions make it very hard to
get this wrong.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115925
|
|
Testing the breakpoint itself rather than the lldb string.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111899
|
|
The point is to allow users with a related set of script based commands
to organize their commands in a hierarchy in the command set, rather than
having to have only top-level commands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110298
|
|
This patch removes the infrastructure to replay the test suite from a
reproducer, as well as the modifications made to the individual tests.
|
|
have linked command files in a source tree and get to them all from
one main command file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110601
|
|
The old code incorrectly calculated the start position for the search
for the third (and subsequent) instance of a particular substitution
pattern (e.g. %1).
I also added a few test cases for this parsing covering this failure.
|
|
Make category-specifying files visible. There is really no good reason
to keep them hidden, and having them visible increases the chances
that someone will actually spot them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91065
|
|
This patch moves the `history` subcommand from the `command` to `session`
command. I think it makes more sense to have it there because as the `command`
usage suggests, it should be used to manage custom LLDB commands.
However, `history` is essentially tied to a debugging session and holds
all the commands (not specifically custom ones).
This also makes it more discoverable by adding an alias for it (mimicking
the shell builtin).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84307
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
Add the skipIfReproducer decorator to the remaining tests that fail to
replay because the GDB remote packets diverge during replay. This is
*not* expected and should be fixed, but figuring out exactly what caused
the divergence has proven pretty difficult to track down.
I've marked these tests as skipped for now so we can get clean results
and detect new regressions. I have no evidence to believe that these
failures have the same root cause, so I've not assigned them a PR.
|
