summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Windows/Common/ProcessWindows.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-03-17Reapply "[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (#125242)" ↵Pavel Labath
(again) (#128156) This reverts commit https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/87b7f63a117c340a6d9ca47959335fd7ef6c7ad2, reapplying https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7e66cf74fb4e6a103f923e34700a7b6f20ac2a9b with a small (and probably temporary) change to generate more debug info to help with diagnosing buildbot issues.
2025-01-31Revert "Reland "[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue" (#125242)"Adrian Prantl
This reverts commit 7e66cf74fb4e6a103f923e34700a7b6f20ac2a9b. Breaking green dragon: https://green.lab.llvm.org/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/as-lldb-cmake/19569/testReport/junit/lldb-api/functionalities_reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueWatchpoints_py/
2025-01-31Reland "[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue" (#125242)David Spickett
This reverts commit a774de807e56c1147d4630bfec3110c11d41776e. This is the same changes as last time, plus: * We load the binary into the target object so that on Windows, we can resolve the locations of the functions. * We now assert that each required breakpoint has at least 1 location, to prevent an issue like that in the future. * We are less strict about the unsupported error message, because it prints "error: windows" on Windows instead of "error: gdb-remote".
2025-01-30Revert "Reland "[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue" ↵David Spickett
(#123906)"" (#125091) Reverts llvm/llvm-project#123945 Has failed on the Windows on Arm buildbot: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/141/builds/5865 ``` ******************** Unresolved Tests (2): lldb-api :: functionalities/reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py lldb-api :: functionalities/reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueWatchpoints.py ******************** Failed Tests (1): lldb-api :: functionalities/reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueNotSupported.py ``` Reverting while I reproduce locally.
2025-01-30Reland "[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue" (#123906)" ↵David Spickett
(#123945) This reverts commit 22561cfb443267905d4190f0e2a738e6b412457f and fixes b7b9ccf44988edf49886743ae5c3cf4184db211f (#112079). The problem is that x86_64 and Arm 32-bit have memory regions above the stack that are readable but not writeable. First Arm: ``` (lldb) memory region --all <...> [0x00000000fffcf000-0x00000000ffff0000) rw- [stack] [0x00000000ffff0000-0x00000000ffff1000) r-x [vectors] [0x00000000ffff1000-0xffffffffffffffff) --- ``` Then x86_64: ``` $ cat /proc/self/maps <...> 7ffdcd148000-7ffdcd16a000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [stack] 7ffdcd193000-7ffdcd196000 r--p 00000000 00:00 0 [vvar] 7ffdcd196000-7ffdcd197000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vdso] ffffffffff600000-ffffffffff601000 --xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vsyscall] ``` Compare this to AArch64 where the test did pass: ``` $ cat /proc/self/maps <...> ffffb87dc000-ffffb87dd000 r--p 00000000 00:00 0 [vvar] ffffb87dd000-ffffb87de000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vdso] ffffb87de000-ffffb87e0000 r--p 0002a000 00:3c 76927217 /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 ffffb87e0000-ffffb87e2000 rw-p 0002c000 00:3c 76927217 /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 fffff4216000-fffff4237000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [stack] ``` To solve this, look up the memory region of the stack pointer (using https://lldb.llvm.org/resources/lldbgdbremote.html#qmemoryregioninfo-addr) and constrain the read to within that region. Since we know the stack is all readable and writeable. I have also added skipIfRemote to the tests, since getting them working in that context is too complex to be worth it. Memory write failures now display the range they tried to write, and register write errors will show the name of the register where possible. The patch also includes a workaround for a an issue where the test code could mistake an `x` response that happens to begin with an `O` for an output packet (stdout). This workaround will not be necessary one we start using the [new implementation](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-fixing-incompatibilties-of-the-x-packet-w-r-t-gdb/84288) of the `x` packet. --------- Co-authored-by: Pavel Labath <pavel@labath.sk>
2025-01-22Revert "[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue" (#123906)Pavel Labath
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#112079 due to failures on the arm bot.
2025-01-22[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (#112079)Robert O'Callahan
This commit adds support for a `SBProcess::ContinueInDirection()` API. A user-accessible command for this will follow in a later commit. This feature depends on a gdbserver implementation (e.g. `rr`) providing support for the `bc` and `bs` packets. `lldb-server` does not support those packets, and there is no plan to change that. For testing purposes, this commit adds a Python implementation of *very limited* record-and-reverse-execute functionality, implemented as a proxy between lldb and lldb-server in `lldbreverse.py`. This should not (and in practice cannot) be used for anything except testing. The tests here are quite minimal but we test that simple breakpoints and watchpoints work as expected during reverse execution, and that conditional breakpoints and watchpoints work when the condition calls a function that must be executed in the forward direction.
2024-10-10Revert "[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (#99736)"Jason Molenda
Reverting this again; I added a commit which added @skipIfDarwin markers to the TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py and TestReverseContinueNotSupported.py API tests, which use lldb-server in gdbserver mode which does not work on Darwin. But the aarch64 ubuntu bot reported a failure on TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py, https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/59/builds/6397 File "/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py", line 63, in test_reverse_continue_skip_breakpoint self.reverse_continue_skip_breakpoint_internal(async_mode=False) File "/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py", line 81, in reverse_continue_skip_breakpoint_internal self.expect( File "/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py", line 2372, in expect self.runCmd( File "/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py", line 1002, in runCmd self.assertTrue(self.res.Succeeded(), msg + output) AssertionError: False is not true : Process should be stopped due to history boundary Error output: error: Process must be launched. This reverts commit 4f297566b3150097de26c6a23a987d2bd5fc19c5.
2024-10-10[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (#99736)Robert O'Callahan
This commit only adds support for the `SBProcess::ReverseContinue()` API. A user-accessible command for this will follow in a later commit. This feature depends on a gdbserver implementation (e.g. `rr`) providing support for the `bc` and `bs` packets. `lldb-server` does not support those packets, and there is no plan to change that. So, for testing purposes, `lldbreverse.py` wraps `lldb-server` with a Python implementation of *very limited* record-and-replay functionality for use by *tests only*. The majority of this PR is test infrastructure (about 700 of the 950 lines added).
2024-10-10Revert "[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (#99736)"Augusto Noronha
This reverts commit d5e1de6da96c1ab3b8cae68447e8ed3696a7006e.
2024-10-10[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (#99736)Robert O'Callahan
This commit only adds support for the `SBProcess::ReverseContinue()` API. A user-accessible command for this will follow in a later commit. This feature depends on a gdbserver implementation (e.g. `rr`) providing support for the `bc` and `bs` packets. `lldb-server` does not support those packets, and there is no plan to change that. So, for testing purposes, `lldbreverse.py` wraps `lldb-server` with a Python implementation of *very limited* record-and-replay functionality for use by *tests only*. The majority of this PR is test infrastructure (about 700 of the 950 lines added).
2023-11-30[lldb] [mostly NFC] Large WP foundation: WatchpointResources (#68845)Jason Molenda
This patch is rearranging code a bit to add WatchpointResources to Process. A WatchpointResource is meant to represent a hardware watchpoint register in the inferior process. It has an address, a size, a type, and a list of Watchpoints that are using this WatchpointResource. This current patch doesn't add any of the features of WatchpointResources that make them interesting -- a user asking to watch a 24 byte object could watch this with three 8 byte WatchpointResources. Or a Watchpoint on 1 byte at 0x1002 and a second watchpoint on 1 byte at 0x1003, these must both be served by a single WatchpointResource on that doubleword at 0x1000 on a 64-bit target, if two hardware watchpoint registers were used to track these separately, one of them may not be hit. Or if you have one Watchpoint on a variable with a condition set, and another Watchpoint on that same variable with a command defined or different condition, or ignorecount, both of those Watchpoints need to evaluate their criteria/commands when their WatchpointResource has been hit. There's a bit of code movement to rearrange things in the direction I'll need for implementing this feature, so I want to start with reviewing & landing this mostly NFC patch and we can focus on the algorithmic choices about how WatchpointResources are shared and handled as they're triggeed, separately. This patch also stops printing "Watchpoint <n> hit: old value: <x>, new vlaue: <y>" for Read watchpoints. I could make an argument for print "Watchpoint <n> hit: current value <x>" but the current output doesn't make any sense, and the user can print the value if they are particularly interested. Read watchpoints are used primarily to understand what code is reading a variable. This patch adds more fallbacks for how to print the objects being watched if we have types, instead of assuming they are all integral values, so a struct will print its elements. As large watchpoints are added, we'll be doing a lot more of those. To track the WatchpointSP in the WatchpointResources, I changed the internal API which took a WatchpointSP and devolved it to a Watchpoint*, which meant touching several different Process files. I removed the watchpoint code in ProcessKDP which only reported that watchpoints aren't supported, the base class does that already. I haven't yet changed how we receive a watchpoint to identify the WatchpointResource responsible for the trigger, and identify all Watchpoints that are using this Resource to evaluate their conditions etc. This is the same work that a BreakpointSite needs to do when it has been tiggered, where multiple Breakpoints may be at the same address. There is not yet any printing of the Resources that a Watchpoint is implemented in terms of ("watchpoint list", or SBWatchpoint::GetDescription). "watchpoint set var" and "watchpoint set expression" take a size argument which was previously 1, 2, 4, or 8 (an enum). I've changed this to an unsigned int. Most hardware implementations can only watch 1, 2, 4, 8 byte ranges, but with Resources we'll allow a user to ask for different sized watchpoints and set them in hardware-expressble terms soon. I've annotated areas where I know there is work still needed with LWP_TODO that I'll be working on once this is landed. I've tested this on aarch64 macOS, aarch64 Linux, and Intel macOS. https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116 (cherry picked from commit fc6b72523f3d73b921690a713e97a433c96066c6)
2023-11-28Revert "[lldb] [mostly NFC] Large WP foundation: WatchpointResources (#68845)"David Spickett
...and follow ups. As it has caused test failures on Linux Arm and AArch64: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/96/builds/49126 https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/17/builds/45824 ``` lldb-shell :: Subprocess/clone-follow-child-wp.test lldb-shell :: Subprocess/fork-follow-child-wp.test lldb-shell :: Subprocess/vfork-follow-child-wp.test ``` This reverts commit a6c62bf1a4717accc852463b664cd1012237d334, commit a0a1ff3ab40e347589b4e27d8fd350c600526735 and commit fc6b72523f3d73b921690a713e97a433c96066c6.
2023-11-27[lldb] [mostly NFC] Large WP foundation: WatchpointResources (#68845)Jason Molenda
This patch is rearranging code a bit to add WatchpointResources to Process. A WatchpointResource is meant to represent a hardware watchpoint register in the inferior process. It has an address, a size, a type, and a list of Watchpoints that are using this WatchpointResource. This current patch doesn't add any of the features of WatchpointResources that make them interesting -- a user asking to watch a 24 byte object could watch this with three 8 byte WatchpointResources. Or a Watchpoint on 1 byte at 0x1002 and a second watchpoint on 1 byte at 0x1003, these must both be served by a single WatchpointResource on that doubleword at 0x1000 on a 64-bit target, if two hardware watchpoint registers were used to track these separately, one of them may not be hit. Or if you have one Watchpoint on a variable with a condition set, and another Watchpoint on that same variable with a command defined or different condition, or ignorecount, both of those Watchpoints need to evaluate their criteria/commands when their WatchpointResource has been hit. There's a bit of code movement to rearrange things in the direction I'll need for implementing this feature, so I want to start with reviewing & landing this mostly NFC patch and we can focus on the algorithmic choices about how WatchpointResources are shared and handled as they're triggeed, separately. This patch also stops printing "Watchpoint <n> hit: old value: <x>, new vlaue: <y>" for Read watchpoints. I could make an argument for print "Watchpoint <n> hit: current value <x>" but the current output doesn't make any sense, and the user can print the value if they are particularly interested. Read watchpoints are used primarily to understand what code is reading a variable. This patch adds more fallbacks for how to print the objects being watched if we have types, instead of assuming they are all integral values, so a struct will print its elements. As large watchpoints are added, we'll be doing a lot more of those. To track the WatchpointSP in the WatchpointResources, I changed the internal API which took a WatchpointSP and devolved it to a Watchpoint*, which meant touching several different Process files. I removed the watchpoint code in ProcessKDP which only reported that watchpoints aren't supported, the base class does that already. I haven't yet changed how we receive a watchpoint to identify the WatchpointResource responsible for the trigger, and identify all Watchpoints that are using this Resource to evaluate their conditions etc. This is the same work that a BreakpointSite needs to do when it has been tiggered, where multiple Breakpoints may be at the same address. There is not yet any printing of the Resources that a Watchpoint is implemented in terms of ("watchpoint list", or SBWatchpoint::GetDescription). "watchpoint set var" and "watchpoint set expression" take a size argument which was previously 1, 2, 4, or 8 (an enum). I've changed this to an unsigned int. Most hardware implementations can only watch 1, 2, 4, 8 byte ranges, but with Resources we'll allow a user to ask for different sized watchpoints and set them in hardware-expressble terms soon. I've annotated areas where I know there is work still needed with LWP_TODO that I'll be working on once this is landed. I've tested this on aarch64 macOS, aarch64 Linux, and Intel macOS. https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116
2023-02-14[LLDB] add arch-specific watchpoint behavior defaults to lldbJason Molenda
lldb was originally designed to get the watchpoint exception behavior from the gdb remote serial protocol stub -- exceptions are either received before the instruction executes, or after the instruction has executed. This behavior was reported via two lldb extensions to gdb RSP, so generic remote stubs like gdbserver or a JTAG stub, would not tell lldb which behavior was correct, and it would default to "exceptions are received after the instruction has executed". Two architectures hard coded their correct "exceptions before instruction" behavior, to work around this issue. Most architectures have a fixed behavior of watchpoint exceptions, and we can center that information in lldb. We can allow a remote stub to override the default behavior via our packet extensions if it's needed on a specific target. This patch also separates the fetching of the number of watchpoints from whether exceptions are before/after the insn. Currently if lldb couldn't fetch the number of watchpoints (not really needed), it also wouldn't get when exceptions are received, and watchpoint handling would fail. lldb doesn't actually use the number of watchpoints for anything beyond printing it to the user. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143215 rdar://101426626
2022-08-08[lldb] Make Process and subclass constructors protectedMichał Górny
Make constructors of the Process and its subclasses class protected, to prevent accidentally constructing Process on stack when it could be afterwards accessed via a shared_ptr (since it uses std::enable_shared_from_this<>). The only place where a stack allocation was used were unittests, and fixing them via declaring an explicit public constructor in the respective mock classes is trivial. Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131275
2022-03-11[lldb] Fix typo in ProcessWindows.hJonas Devlieghere
2022-03-11[lldb] Add a getter for the process' system architectureJonas Devlieghere
This patch adds a getter for the process' system architecture. I went with Process::GetSystemArchitecture to match Platform::GetSystemArchitecture. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121443
2022-02-10Reland "[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regions"David Spickett
This reverts commit 0df522969a7a0128052bd79182c8d58e00556e2f. Additional checks are added to fix the detection of the last memory region in GetMemoryRegions or repeating the "memory region" command when the target has non-address bits. Normally you keep reading from address 0, looking up each region's end address until you get LLDB_INVALID_ADDR as the region end address. (0xffffffffffffffff) This is what the remote will return once you go beyond the last mapped region: [0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack] [0x0001000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff) --- Problem is that when we "fix" the lookup address, we remove some bits from it. On an AArch64 system we have 48 bit virtual addresses, so when we fix the end address of the [stack] region the result is 0. So we loop back to the start. [0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack] [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000400000) --- To fix this I added an additional check for the last range. If the end address of the region is different once you apply FixDataAddress, we are at the last region. Since the end of the last region will be the last valid mappable address, plus 1. That 1 will be removed by the ABI plugin. The only side effect is that on systems with non-address bits, you won't get that last catch all unmapped region from the max virtual address up to 0xf...f. [0x0000fffff8000000-0x0000fffffffdf000) --- [0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack] <ends here> Though in some way this is more correct because that region is not just unmapped, it's not mappable at all. No extra testing is needed because this is already covered by TestMemoryRegion.py, I simply forgot to run it on system that had both top byte ignore and pointer authentication. This change has been tested on a qemu VM with top byte ignore, memory tagging and pointer authentication enabled. Reviewed By: omjavaid Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115508
2021-11-26Revert "Reland "[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regions""David Spickett
This reverts commit fac3f20de55769d028bd92220e74f22fa57dd4b2. I found this has broken how we detect the last memory region in GetMemoryRegions/"memory region" command. When you're debugging an AArch64 system with pointer authentication, the ABI plugin will remove the top bit from the end address of the last user mapped area. (lldb) [0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack] ABI plugin removes anything above the 48th bit (48 bit virtual addresses by default on AArch64, leaving an address of 0. (lldb) [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000400000) --- You get back a mapping for 0 and get into an infinite loop.
2021-11-03Reland "[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regions"David Spickett
This reverts commit 5fbcf677347e38718461496d9e9e184a7a30c3fb. ProcessDebugger is used in ProcessWindows and NativeProcessWindows. I thought I was simplifying things by renaming to DoGetMemoryRegionInfo in ProcessDebugger but the Native process side expects "GetMemoryRegionInfo". Follow the pattern that WriteMemory uses. So: * ProcessWindows::DoGetMemoryRegioninfo calls ProcessDebugger::GetMemoryRegionInfo * NativeProcessWindows::GetMemoryRegionInfo does the same
2021-11-03Revert "[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regions"David Spickett
This reverts commit 6f5ce43b433706c3ae5c37022d6c0964b6bfadf8 due to build failure on Windows.
2021-11-03[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regionsDavid Spickett
On AArch64 we have various things using the non address bits of pointers. This means when you lookup their containing region you won't find it if you don't remove them. This changes Process GetMemoryRegionInfo to a non virtual method that uses the current ABI plugin to remove those bits. Then it calls DoGetMemoryRegionInfo. That function does the actual work and is virtual to be overriden by Process implementations. A test case is added that runs on AArch64 Linux using the top byte ignore feature. Reviewed By: omjavaid Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102757
2021-10-28[lldb] Remove ConstString from Process, ScriptInterpreter and StructuredData ↵Pavel Labath
plugin names
2021-10-18[lldb] Return StringRef from PluginInterface::GetPluginNamePavel Labath
There is no reason why this function should be returning a ConstString. While modifying these files, I also fixed several instances where GetPluginName and GetPluginNameStatic were returning different strings. I am not changing the return type of GetPluginNameStatic in this patch, as that would necessitate additional changes, and this patch is big enough as it is. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111877
2021-09-13[lldb] Remove PluginInterface::GetPluginVersionPavel Labath
In all these years, we haven't found a use for this function (it has zero callers). Lets just remove the boilerplate. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109600
2021-01-25[ThreadPlan] fix exec on LinuxWalter Erquinigo
2020-11-23[lldb] Prevent 'process connect' from using local-only pluginsMichał Górny
Add a 'can_connect' parameter to Process plugin initialization, and use it to filter plugins to these capable of remote connections. This is used to prevent 'process connect' from picking up a plugin that can only be used locally, e.g. the legacy FreeBSD plugin. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91810
2019-09-06[Windows] Add support of watchpoints to `ProcessWindows`Aleksandr Urakov
Summary: This patch adds support of watchpoints to the old `ProcessWindows` plugin. The `ProcessWindows` plugin uses the `RegisterContext` to set and reset watchpoints. The `RegisterContext` has some interface to access watchpoints, but it is very limited (e.g. it is impossible to retrieve the last triggered watchpoint with it), that's why I have implemented a slightly different interface in the `RegisterContextWindows`. Moreover, I have made the `ProcessWindows` plugin responsible for search of a vacant watchpoint slot, because watchpoints exist per-process (not per-thread), then we can place the same watchpoint in the same slot in different threads. With this scheme threads don't need to have their own watchpoint lists, and it simplifies identifying of the last triggered watchpoint. Reviewers: asmith, stella.stamenova, amccarth Reviewed By: amccarth Subscribers: labath, zturner, leonid.mashinskiy, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67168 llvm-svn: 371166
2019-07-10Try again to move common functionality from ProcessWindows into ProcessDebuggerAaron Smith
This reverts commit ed499a36b67cf46cbf66052cfe374c80a595f1c1 and addresses a problem causing a Windows build bot to hang. llvm-svn: 365592
2019-07-08Revert "Move common functionality from processwindows into processdebugger"Stella Stamenova
This reverts commit 9c01eaff6aa3f59d91530f47b85bb470377a7780. The changes in this commit are causing several of the LLDB tests to hang and/or timeout. llvm-svn: 365371
2019-06-24Move common functionality from processwindows into processdebuggerAaron Smith
Summary: This change extracts functionalities from processwindows into a introduced processdebugger that can be reused in native process debugging. The main reason is that the native process debugging can't directly be based on processwindows or be implemented as a pass-through to this plugin since the plugin has ties to Target and Process classes that are needed in host debugging but not necessary in native debugging. Reviewers: labath, Hui, jfb, clayborg, amccarth Reviewed By: labath Subscribers: amccarth, dexonsmith, mgorny, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63166 llvm-svn: 364210
2019-04-10[NFC] Remove ASCII lines from commentsJonas Devlieghere
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the begging and end of the comment. Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit, where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much. Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment. I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508 llvm-svn: 358135
2019-02-15Implement GetLoadAddress for the Windows process pluginAaron Smith
Summary: When a process is loaded, update its sections with the load address to resolve any created breakpoints. For the remote debugging case, the debugged process is launched remotely so GetLoadAddress is intended to pass the load address from remote to LLDB (client). Reviewers: zturner, llvm-commits, clayborg, labath Reviewed By: labath Subscribers: mgorny, sas, Hui, clayborg, labath, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56237 llvm-svn: 354099
2019-01-19Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepoChandler Carruth
to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636
2018-11-11Remove header grouping comments.Jonas Devlieghere
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain. llvm-svn: 346626
2018-11-01[Windows] A basic implementation of memory allocations in a debuggee processAleksandr Urakov
Summary: This patch adds a basic implementation of `DoAllocateMemory` and `DoDeallocateMemory` for Windows processes. For now it considers only the executable permission (and always allows reads and writes). Reviewers: zturner, asmith, stella.stamenova, labath, clayborg Reviewed By: zturner Subscribers: Hui, vsk, jingham, aleksandr.urakov, clayborg, abidh, teemperor, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52618 llvm-svn: 345815
2017-05-12Rename Error -> Status.Zachary Turner
This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed on the lldb-dev mailing list. A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error" appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too serious. llvm-svn: 302872
2017-02-02Move classes from Core -> Utility.Zachary Turner
This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility. ConstString Error RegularExpression Stream StreamString The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies. These are all low level and very widely used classes, and previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes sense from both the short term and long term perspective in solving this problem. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427 llvm-svn: 293941
2016-11-23Refactor LLDB's Windows process plugin (NFC)Adrian McCarthy
The Windows process plugin was broken up into multiple pieces a while back in order to share code between debugging live processes and minidumps (postmortem) debugging. The minidump portion was replaced by a cross-platform solution. This left the plugin split into a formerly "common" base classes and the derived classes for live debugging. This extra layer made the code harder to understand and work with. This patch simplifies these class hierarchies by rolling the live debugging concrete classes up to the base classes. Last week I posted my intent to make this change to lldb-dev, and I didn't hear any objections. This involved moving code and changing references to classes like ProcessWindowsLive to ProcessWindows. It still builds for both 32- and 64-bit, and the tests still pass on 32-bit. (Tests on 64-bit weren't passing before this refactor for unrelated reasons.) llvm-svn: 287770
2016-09-06*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source codeKate Stone
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-03-07Change over the broadcaster/listener process to hold shared or weak pointersJim Ingham
to each other. This should remove some infrequent teardown crashes when the listener is not the debugger's listener. Processes now need to take a ListenerSP, not a Listener&. This required changing over the Process plugin class constructors to take a ListenerSP, instead of a Listener&. Other than that there should be no functional change. <rdar://problem/24580184> CrashTracer: [USER] Xcode at …ework: lldb_private::Listener::BroadcasterWillDestruct + 39 llvm-svn: 262863
2015-12-04Implement GetMemoryRegionInfo for mini dumps.Adrian McCarthy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15218 llvm-svn: 254780
2015-10-28Refactor Windows process plugin to allow code sharing between live and mini ↵Adrian McCarthy
dump debugging. llvm-svn: 251540