| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Renderscript is deprecated from Android, we no longer support LLDB for
Renderscript.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143983
|
|
Most notably, Pass.h is no longer included by TargetMachine.h
before: 1063570306
after: 1063332844
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121168
|
|
This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.
This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454
|
|
LLDB has a few different styles of header guards and they're not very
consistent because things get moved around or copy/pasted. This patch
unifies the header guards across LLDB and converts everything to match
LLVM's style.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74743
|
|
Summary:
According to [C128] "Virtual functions should specify exactly one
of `virtual`, `override`, or `final`", I've added override where a
virtual function is overriden but the explicit `override` keyword
was missing. Whenever both `virtual` and `override` were specified,
I removed `virtual`. As C.128 puts it:
> [...] writing more than one of these three is both redundant and
> a potential source of errors.
I anticipate a discussion about whether or not to add `override` to
destructors but I went for it because of an example in [ISOCPP1000].
Let me repeat the comment for you here:
Consider this code:
```
struct Base {
virtual ~Base(){}
};
struct SubClass : Base {
~SubClass() {
std::cout << "It works!\n";
}
};
int main() {
std::unique_ptr<Base> ptr = std::make_unique<SubClass>();
}
```
If for some odd reason somebody removes the `virtual` keyword from the
`Base` struct, the code will no longer print `It works!`. So adding
`override` to destructors actively protects us from accidentally
breaking our code at runtime.
[C128]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final
[ISOCPP1000]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/issues/1000#issuecomment-476951555
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, davide, shafik
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: kwk, arphaman, kadircet, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440
llvm-svn: 359868
|
|
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
|
|
This diff fixes typos in file headers (incorrect file names).
Test plan:
Under llvm/tools/lldb/source:
find ./* -type f | grep -e '\(cpp\|h\)$' | while read F; do B=$(basename $F); echo $F head -n 1 $F | grep -v $B | wc -l ; done
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27115
llvm-svn: 287966
|
|
Pay more attention to comment alignement (Since _The Great Reformat_ (a015ff50)
comments are no longer properly aligned) and variable naming conventions.
- Manually reflow and cleanup comments and array literals
- Be more economical with our naming conventions
- Be internally consistent with regard to local variable/member function
naming
llvm-svn: 283335
|
|
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
|
|
backend
Expression evaluation for function calls to certain public RenderScript
API functions in libRSCPURef can segfault.
`slang`,
the compiler frontend for RenderScript embeds an ARM specific triple in
IR that is shipped in the app, after generating IR that has some
assumptions that an ARM device is the target.
As the IR is then compiled on a device of unknown (at time the IR was
generated at least) architecture, when calling RenderScript API function
as part of debugger expressions, we have to perform a fixup pass that
removes those assumptions right before the module is sent to be
generated by the llvm backend.
This issue is caused by multiple problems with the ARMv7-specific
assumptions encoded in the LLVM IR. x86 large value returns use a hidden
first argument (mapping to llvm::Attribute::StructRet), which can't be
picked up by the JIT due to the mismatch between IR generated by the
slang frontend and llvm backend. This means that code generated by bcc
did not necessarily match the default SysV Linux/Android ABI used by the
LLDB JIT
- Original Authors: Luke Drummond (@ldrumm), Function declarations fixed by Aidan Dodds (@ADodds)
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18059
llvm-svn: 276976
|
