| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
ValueObject is part of lldbCore for historical reasons, but conceptually
it deserves to be its own library. This does introduce a (link-time) circular
dependency between lldbCore and lldbValueObject, which is unfortunate
but probably unavoidable because so many things in LLDB rely on
ValueObject. We already have cycles and these libraries are never built
as dylibs so while this doesn't improve the situation, it also doesn't
make things worse.
The header includes were updated with the following command:
```
find . -type f -exec sed -i.bak "s%include \"lldb/Core/ValueObject%include \"lldb/ValueObject/ValueObject%" '{}' \;
```
|
|
- Remove unused parameter `valobj` (I checked downstream, not
even swift is using it).
- Return a std::pair<StringRef, StringRef> insted of having 2 out
parameter strings.
- Remove the use of ConstStrings.
This change was primarily mechanical except in
`ObjCLanguage::GetFormatterPrefixSuffix`. To keep this fast, we
construct an llvm::StringMap<std::pair<StringRef, StringRef>> so that we
can look things up quickly. There is some amount of cost to setting up
the map the first time it is called, but subsequent lookups should be
as fast as a hash + string comparison (the cost of looking up something
in an llvm::StringMap).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151603
|
|
Currently, all data buffers are assumed to be writable. This is a
problem on macOS where it's not allowed to load unsigned binaries in
memory as writable. To be more precise, MAP_RESILIENT_CODESIGN and
MAP_RESILIENT_MEDIA need to be set for mapped (unsigned) binaries on our
platform.
Binaries are mapped through FileSystem::CreateDataBuffer which returns a
DataBufferLLVM. The latter is backed by a llvm::WritableMemoryBuffer
because every DataBuffer in LLDB is considered to be writable. In order
to use a read-only llvm::MemoryBuffer I had to split our abstraction
around it.
This patch distinguishes between a DataBuffer (read-only) and
WritableDataBuffer (read-write) and updates LLDB to use the appropriate
one.
rdar://74890607
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122856
|
|
Identifiers with __ anywhere are reserved. I picked this up via the
bugprone-reserved-identifier clang-tidy check but -Wreserved-identifier will
also flag these uses as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119915
|
|
The formatter was requesting an unsigned integer from the ValueObject,
but CFAbsoluteTime is a signed double, so in the NSDate test the formatter
actually just printed the 'error value' date which is the Cocoa epoch. This
started failing after the recent Scalar changes.
This patch just changes the logic to use a signed value which fits to the data
we try to read and avoids this issue.
|
|
Summary:
This change represents the move of ClangASTImporter, ClangASTMetadata,
ClangExternalASTSourceCallbacks, ClangUtil, CxxModuleHandler, and
TypeSystemClang from lldbSource to lldbPluginExpressionParserClang.h
This explicitly removes knowledge of clang internals from lldbSymbol,
moving towards a more generic core implementation of lldb.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, aprantl, teemperor, clayborg, labath, jingham, shafik
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73661
|
|
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
|
|
Summary:
This commit renames ClangASTContext to TypeSystemClang to better reflect what this class is actually supposed to do
(implement the TypeSystem interface for Clang). It also gets rid of the very confusing situation that we have both a
`clang::ASTContext` and a `ClangASTContext` in clang (which sometimes causes Clang people to think I'm fiddling
with Clang's ASTContext when I'm actually just doing LLDB work).
I also have plans to potentially have multiple clang::ASTContext instances associated with one ClangASTContext so
the ASTContext naming will then become even more confusing to people.
Reviewers: #lldb, aprantl, shafik, clayborg, labath, JDevlieghere, davide, espindola, jdoerfert, xiaobai
Reviewed By: clayborg, labath, xiaobai
Subscribers: wuzish, emaste, nemanjai, mgorny, kbarton, MaskRay, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, jingham, xiaobai, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72684
|
|
Summary:
Following up to my CPPLanguageRuntime change, I'm moving
ObjCLanguageRuntime into a plugin as well.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, compnerd, jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, arphaman, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64763
llvm-svn: 366148
|
|
Summary:
In an effort to make Process more language agnostic, I removed
GetCPPLanguageRuntime from Process. I'm following up now with an equivalent
change for ObjC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63052
llvm-svn: 362981
|
|
Summary:
Using llvm-style rtti gives us stronger guarantees around casting
LanguageRuntimes.
As discussed in D62755
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62934
llvm-svn: 362884
|
|
Summary:
When we want to compare a ConstString against a string literal (or any other non-ConstString),
we currently have to explicitly turn the other string into a ConstString. This makes sense as
comparing ConstStrings against each other is only a fast pointer comparison.
However, currently we (rather incorrectly) use in several places in LLDB temporary ConstStrings when
we just want to compare a given ConstString against a hardcoded value, for example like this:
```
if (extension != ConstString(".oat") && extension != ConstString(".odex"))
```
Obviously this kind of defeats the point of ConstStrings. In the comparison above we would
construct two temporary ConstStrings every time we hit the given code. Constructing a
ConstString is relatively expensive: we need to go to the StringPool, take a read and possibly
an exclusive write-lock and then look up our temporary string in the string map of the pool.
So we do a lot of heavy work for essentially just comparing a <6 characters in two strings.
I initially wanted to just fix these issues by turning the temporary ConstString in static variables/
members, but that made the code much less readable. Instead I propose to add a new overload
for the ConstString comparison operator that takes a StringRef. This comparison operator directly
compares the ConstString content against the given StringRef without turning the StringRef into
a ConstString.
This means that the example above can look like this now:
```
if (extension != ".oat" && extension != ".odex")
```
It also no longer has to unlock/lock two locks and call multiple functions in other TUs for constructing
the temporary ConstString instances. Instead this should end up just being a direct string comparison
of the two given strings on most compilers.
This patch also directly updates all uses of temporary and short ConstStrings in LLDB to use this new
comparison operator. It also adds a some unit tests for the new and old comparison operator.
Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere, espindola, amccarth
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, amccarth
Subscribers: amccarth, clayborg, JDevlieghere, emaste, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60667
llvm-svn: 359281
|
|
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
This patch simplifies boolean expressions acorss LLDB. It was generated
using clang-tidy with the following command:
run-clang-tidy.py -checks='-*,readability-simplify-boolean-expr' -format -fix $PWD
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55584
llvm-svn: 349215
|
|
This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.
A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted
occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort
was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error"
appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still
some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too
serious.
llvm-svn: 302872
|
|
llvm-svn: 296943
|
|
With this patch, the only dependency left is from Utility
to Host. After this is broken, Utility will finally be
standalone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29909
llvm-svn: 295088
|
|
This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.
ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString
The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has
no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the
starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies.
These are all low level and very widely used classes, and
previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order
to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes
sense from both the short term and long term perspective in
solving this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427
llvm-svn: 293941
|
|
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
|
|
llvm-svn: 265865
|
|
than a
StackFrame * (StackFrame is an ExecutionContextScope.) That allows you to call an
expression on a particular Thread, but not using the context of any particular frame.
That in turn is useful for injecting utility functions that don't actually depend on
locals/self/etc of the current frame.
I also had to include StackFrame.h in a couple of places so the compiler knew
how to downcast StackFrame to ExecutionContextScope.
<rdar://problem/22852953>
llvm-svn: 251564
|
|
Introduce the notion of Language-based formatter prefix/suffix
This is meant for languages that share certain data types but present them in syntatically different ways, such that LLDB can now have language-based awareness of which of the syntax variations it has to present to the user when formatting those values
This is goodness for new languages and interoperability, but is NFC for existing languages. As such, existing tests cover this
llvm-svn: 249587
|
|
they belong
llvm-svn: 247627
|
