summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lldb/source/Plugins/Language/CPlusPlus/LibCxxAtomic.cpp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-10-13[LLDB] Check type before creating `std::atomic` synthetic children (#163176)nerix
From https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/163077#issuecomment-3396435083: Currently, `std::atomic<T>` will always use the MSVC STL synthetic children and summary. When inspecting types from other STLs, the output would not show any children. This PR adds a check that `std::atomic` contains `_Storage` to be classified as coming from MSVC's STL.
2025-04-30[lldb] Upgrade `GetIndexOfChildWithName` to use `llvm::Expected` (#136693)Charles Zablit
This patch replaces the use of `UINT32_MAX` as the error return value of `GetIndexOfChildWithName` with `llvm::Expected`. # Tasks to do in another PR 1. Replace `CalculateNumChildrenIgnoringErrors` with `CalculateNumChildren`. See [this comment](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136693#discussion_r2056319358). 2. Update `lldb_private::formatters::ExtractIndexFromString` to use `llvm::Expected`. See [this comment](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136693#discussion_r2054217536). 3. Create a new class which carries both user and internal errors. See [this comment](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136693#discussion_r2056439608).
2025-02-17[lldb] Provide default impl for MightHaveChildren (NFC) (#119977)Dave Lee
The vast majority of `SyntheticChildrenFrontEnd` subclasses provide children, and as such implement `MightHaveChildren` with a constant value of `true`. This change makes `true` the default value. With this change, `MightHaveChildren` only needs to be implemented by synthetic providers that can return `false`, which is only 3 subclasses.
2024-03-08Change GetNumChildren()/CalculateNumChildren() methods return llvm::Expected ↵Adrian Prantl
(#84219) Change GetNumChildren()/CalculateNumChildren() methods return llvm::Expected This is an NFC change that does not yet add any error handling or change any code to return any errors. This is the second big change in the patch series started with https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83501 A follow-up PR will wire up error handling.
2024-03-08Revert "Change GetNumChildren()/CalculateNumChildren() methods return ↵Florian Mayer
llvm::Expected (#84219)" This reverts commit 99118c809367d518ffe4de60c16da953744b68b9.
2024-03-08Change GetNumChildren()/CalculateNumChildren() methods return llvm::Expected ↵Adrian Prantl
(#84219) Change GetNumChildren()/CalculateNumChildren() methods return llvm::Expected This is an NFC change that does not yet add any error handling or change any code to return any errors. This is the second big change in the patch series started with https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83501 A follow-up PR will wire up error handling.
2024-03-07Change GetChildAtIndex to take a uint32_tAdrian Prantl
2024-03-07Change the return type of SyntheticFrontend::CalculateNumChildren to int32_tAdrian Prantl
This way it is consistent with ValueObject and TypeSystem.
2024-02-08[lldb][TypeSynthetic][NFC] Make SyntheticChildrenFrontend::Update() return ↵Michael Buch
an enum (#80167) This patch changes the return value of `SyntheticChildrenFrontend::Update` to a scoped enum that aims to describe what the return value means.
2023-06-13[lldb] Default can_create to true in GetChildMemberWithName (NFC)Dave Lee
It turns out all existing callers of `GetChildMemberWithName` pass true for `can_create`. This change makes `true` the default value, callers don't have to pass an opaque true. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151966
2023-05-31[lldb] Take StringRef name in GetChildMemberWithName (NFC)Dave Lee
`GetChildMemberWithName` does not need a `ConstString`. This change makes the function take a `StringRef` instead, which alleviates the need for callers to construct a `ConstString`. I don't expect this change to improve performance, only ergonomics. This is in support of Alex's effort to replace `ConstString` where appropriate. There are related `ValueObject` functions that can also be changed, if this is accepted. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151615
2023-01-25[LLDB] Fix for libc++ atomic allowing modification of contained valuePavel Kosov
Reviewed By: clayborg Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140623
2022-03-14[LLDB] Applying clang-tidy modernize-use-default-member-init over LLDBShafik Yaghmour
Applied modernize-use-default-member-init clang-tidy check over LLDB. It appears in many files we had already switched to in class member init but never updated the constructors to reflect that. This check is already present in the lldb/.clang-tidy config. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121481
2020-02-18[lldb] Don't model std::atomic as a transparent data structure in the data ↵Raphael Isemann
formatter Summary: Currently the data formatter is treating `std::atomic` variables as transparent wrappers around their underlying value type. This causes that when printing `std::atomic<A *>`, the data formatter will forward all requests for the children of the atomic variable to the `A *` pointer type which will then return the respective members of `A`. If `A` in turn has a member that contains the original atomic variable, this causes LLDB to infinitely recurse when printing an object with such a `std::atomic` pointer member. We could implement a workaround similar to whatever we do for pointer values but this patch just implements the `std::atomic` formatter in the same way as we already implement other formatters (e.g. smart pointers or `std::optional`) that just model the contents of the as a child "Value". This way LLDB knows when it actually prints a pointer and can just use its normal workaround if "Value" is a recursive pointer. Fixes rdar://59189235 Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jingham, shafik Reviewed By: shafik Subscribers: shafik, christof, jfb, abidh, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74310
2020-01-24[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headersRaphael Isemann
Summary: A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this: ``` //===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===// ``` However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this is done in the same way in other files). This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators, all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line). Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
2019-03-06Pass ConstString by value (NFC)Adrian Prantl
My apologies for the large patch. With the exception of ConstString.h itself it was entirely produced by sed. ConstString has exactly one const char * data member, so passing a ConstString by reference is not any more efficient than copying it by value. In both cases a single pointer is passed. But passing it by value makes it harder to accidentally return the address of a local object. (This fixes rdar://problem/48640859 for the Apple folks) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59030 llvm-svn: 355553
2019-03-05[DataFormatters] Fix regression in libc++ std::atomic formatter caused by ↵Shafik Yaghmour
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56913 rdar://problem/48568543 llvm-svn: 355422
2019-03-05Revert "[DataFormatters] Fix regression in libc++ std::atomic formatter ↵Shafik Yaghmour
caused by https://reviews.llvm.org/D56913" This reverts commit r355351. llvm-svn: 355352
2019-03-05[DataFormatters] Fix regression in libc++ std::atomic formatter caused by ↵Shafik Yaghmour
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56913 rdar://problem/48568543 llvm-svn: 355351
2019-01-19Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepoChandler Carruth
to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636
2016-09-06*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source codeKate Stone
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-02-12Remove an unnecessary includeEnrico Granata
llvm-svn: 260761
2016-02-12Data formatter support for libc++ std::atomic<T>Enrico Granata
On libc++ std::atomic is a fairly simple data type (layout wise, at least), wrapping actual contents in a member variable named "__a_" All the formatters are doing is "peel away" this intermediate layer and exposing user data as direct children or values of the std::atomic root variable Fixes rdar://24329405 llvm-svn: 260752