| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This patch allows users to evaluate expressions using
`expr -l c++20`. Currently DWARF keeps the CU's at
`DW_AT_language` at `DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14` even
when compiling with `-std=c++20`. So even in "C++20
programs" expression evaluation will by default be
performed in `C++11` mode for now.
Enabling `C++14` has been previously attempted at
https://reviews.llvm.org/D80308
There are some remaining issues around evaluating C++20
expressions. Mainly, lack of support for C++20 AST nodes in
`clang::ASTImporter`. But these can be addressed in follow-up
patches.
|
|
credits to @jmagee
|
|
This patch removes the unused "using" declarations, updates comments,
and removes #include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h".
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
|
|
This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<. I'll post
a separate patch to clean up the "using" declarations, #include
"llvm/ADT/Optional.h", etc.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
|
|
This patch adds #include <optional> to those files containing
llvm::Optional<...> or Optional<...>.
I'll post a separate patch to actually replace llvm::Optional with
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
|
|
std::optional::value() has undesired exception checking semantics and is
unavailable in older Xcode (see _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS). The
call sites block std::optional migration.
|
|
These .cpp files do not use llvm::None anymore.
Since these are not header files, we can remove them pretty safely
without deprecating them first.
|
|
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
|
|
This patch adds a way to extract the return type out
of the `CPlusPlusNameParser`. This will be useful
for cases where we want a function's basename *and* the
return type but not the function arguments; this is
currently not possible (the parser either gives us the
full name or just the basename). Since the parser knows
how to handle return types already we should just expose
this to users that need it.
**Testing**
* Added unit-tests
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136935
|
|
This patch teaches the `CPlusPlusNameParser` to parse the
demangled/prettified [[gnu::abi_tag(...)]] attribute. The demangled format
isn't standardized and the additions to the parser were mainly driven
using Clang (and the limited information on this from the official
Clang docs).
This change is motivated by multiple failures around step-in
behaviour for libcxx APIs (many of which have ABI tags as of recently).
LLDB determines whether the `step-avoid-regexp` matches the current
frame by parsing the scope-qualified name out of the demangled
function symbol. On failure, the `CPlusPlusNameParser` will simply
return the fully demangled name (which can include the return type)
to the caller, which in `FrameMatchesAvoidCriteria` means we will
not correctly decide whether we should stop at a frame or not if
the function has an abi_tag.
Ideally we wouldn't want to rely on the non-standard format
of demangled attributes. Alternatives would be:
1. Use the mangle tree API to do the parsing for us
2. Reconstruct the scope-qualified name from DWARF instead of parsing
the demangled name
(1) isn't feasible without a significant refactor of `lldb_private::Mangled`,
if we want to do this efficiently.
(2) could be feasible in cases where debug-info for a frame is
available. But it does mean we certain operations (such as step-in regexp,
and frame function names) won't work with/won't show ABI tags.
**Testing**
* Un-XFAILed step-in API test
* Added parser unit-tests
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136306
|
|
auto return types
**Summary**
The primary motivation for this patch is to make sure we handle
the step-in behaviour for functions in the `std` namespace which
have an `auto` return type. Currently the default `step-avoid-regex`
setting is `^std::` but LLDB will still step into template functions
with `auto` return types in the `std` namespace.
**Details**
When we hit a breakpoint and check whether we should stop, we call
into `ThreadPlanStepInRange::FrameMatchesAvoidCriteria`. We then ask
for the frame function name via `SymbolContext::GetFunctionName(Mangled::ePreferDemangledWithoutArguments)`.
This ends up trying to parse the function name using `CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName::GetBasename` which
parses the raw demangled name string.
`CPlusPlusNameParser::ParseFunctionImpl` calls `ConsumeTypename` to skip
the (in our case auto) return type of the demangled name (according to the
Itanium ABI this is a valid thing to encode into the mangled name). However,
`ConsumeTypename` doesn't strip out a plain `auto` identifier
(it will strip a `decltype(auto) return type though). So we are now left with
a basename that still has the return type in it, thus failing to match the `^std::`
regex.
Example frame where the return type is still part of the function name:
```
Process 1234 stopped
* thread #1, stop reason = step in
frame #0: 0x12345678 repro`auto std::test_return_auto<int>() at main.cpp:12:5
9
10 template <class>
11 auto test_return_auto() {
-> 12 return 42;
13 }
```
This is another case where the `CPlusPlusNameParser` breaks us in subtle ways
due to evolving C++ syntax. There are longer-term plans of replacing the hand-rolled
C++ parser with an alternative that uses the mangle tree API to do the parsing for us.
**Testing**
* Added API and unit-tests
* Adding support for ABI tags into the parser is a larger undertaking
which we would rather solve properly by using libcxxabi's mangle tree
parser
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135413
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit aa8feeefd3ac6c78ee8f67bf033976fc7d68bc6d.
|
|
|
|
Found by msan.
|
|
CPlusPlusNameParser is used in several places on of them is during IR execution and setting breakpoints to pull information C++ like the basename, the context and arguments.
Currently it does not handle templated operator< properly, because of idiosyncrasy is how clang generates debug info for these cases.
It uses clang::Lexer which will tokenize operator<<A::B> into:
tok::kw_operator
tok::lessless
tok::raw_identifier
Later on the parser in ConsumeOperator() does not handle this case properly and we end up failing to parse.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76168
|
|
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
|
|
There is likely also an underlying bug in all code that calls
CPlusPlusNameParser with nullptrs, but this patch can also stand for
itself.
rdar://problem/49072829
llvm-svn: 362177
|
|
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
|
|
Now incorrect type argument that looks like T<A><B> doesn't
cause an assert, but just a parsing error.
Bug: 36224
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42939
llvm-svn: 324380
|
|
llvm-svn: 319694
|
|
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34911 from Weng Xuetian.
llvm-svn: 307944
|
|
Current implementation of CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName::Parse() doesn't
get anywhere close to covering full extent of possible function declarations.
It causes incorrect behavior in avoid-stepping and sometimes messes
printing of thread backtrace.
This change implements more methodical parsing logic based on clang
lexer and simple recursive parser.
Examples:
void std::vector<Class, std::allocator<Class>>::_M_emplace_back_aux<Class const&>(Class const&)
void (*&std::_Any_data::_M_access<void (*)()>())()
Previous version of this change (D31451) was rolled back due to an issue
with Objective-C selectors being incorrectly recognized as a C++ identifier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31451
llvm-svn: 299721
|
|
This caused a failure in the test case:
functionalities/breakpoint/objc/TestObjCBreakpoints.py
When we are parsing up names we stick interesting parts of the names
in various buckets, one of which is the ObjC selector bucket. The new
C++ name parser must be interfering with this process somehow.
<rdar://problem/31439305>
llvm-svn: 299489
|
|
Current implementation of CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName::Parse() doesn't
get anywhere close to covering full extent of possible function declarations.
It causes incorrect behavior in avoid-stepping and sometimes messes
printing of thread backtrace.
This change implements more methodical parsing logic based on clang
lexer and simple recursive parser.
Examples:
void std::vector<Class, std::allocator<Class>>::_M_emplace_back_aux<Class const&>(Class const&)
void (*&std::_Any_data::_M_access<void (*)()>())()
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31451
llvm-svn: 299374
|
