summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectTrace.cpp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-09-05[lldb] Make conversions from llvm::Error explicit with Status::FromEr… ↵Adrian Prantl
(#107163) …ror() [NFC]
2024-02-27Start to clean up the process of defining command arguments. (#83097)jimingham
Partly, there's just a lot of unnecessary boiler plate. It's also possible to define combinations of arguments that make no sense (e.g. eArgRepeatPlus followed by eArgRepeatPlain...) but these are never checked since we just push_back directly into the argument definitions. This commit is step 1 of this cleanup - do the obvious stuff. In it, all the simple homogenous argument lists and the breakpoint/watchpoint ID/Range types, are set with common functions. This is an NFC change, it just centralizes boiler plate. There's no checking yet because you can't get a single argument wrong. The end goal is that all argument definition goes through functions and m_arguments is hidden so that you can't define inconsistent argument sets.
2023-10-30[lldb] Part 2 of 2 - Refactor `CommandObject::DoExecute(...)` return `void` ↵Pete Lawrence
(not `bool`) (#69991) [lldb] Part 2 of 2 - Refactor `CommandObject::DoExecute(...)` to return `void` instead of ~~`bool`~~ Justifications: - The code doesn't ultimately apply the `true`/`false` return values. - The methods already pass around a `CommandReturnObject`, typically with a `result` parameter. - Each command return object already contains: - A more precise status - The error code(s) that apply to that status Part 1 refactors the `CommandObject::Execute(...)` method. - See [https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69989](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69989) rdar://117378957
2023-06-06[lldb/Commands] Add support to auto-completion for user commandsMed Ismail Bennani
This patch should allow the user to set specific auto-completion type for their custom commands. To do so, we had to hoist the `CompletionType` enum so the user can access it and add a new completion type flag to the CommandScriptAdd Command Object. So now, the user can specify which completion type will be used with their custom command, when they register it. This also makes the `crashlog` custom commands use disk-file completion type, to browse through the user file system and load the report. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152011 Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <ismail@bennani.ma>
2023-01-10Move from llvm::makeArrayRef to ArrayRef deduction guides - last partserge-sans-paille
This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D140896, split into several parts as it touches a lot of files. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141298
2022-07-14[lldb] Refactor command option enum values (NFC)Jonas Devlieghere
Refactor the command option enum values and the command argument table to connect the two. This has two benefits: - We guarantee that two options that use the same argument type have the same accepted values. - We can print the enum values and their description in the help output. (D129707) Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129703
2022-07-13[trace] Add an option to save a compact trace bundleWalter Erquinigo
A trace bundle contains many trace files, and, in the case of intel pt, the largest files are often the context switch traces because they are not compressed by default. As a way to improve this, I'm adding a --compact option to the `trace save` command that filters out unwanted processes from the context switch traces. Eventually we can do the same for intel pt traces as well. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129239
2022-06-27Have CommandObjectParsed check for "commands that take no arguments".Jim Ingham
This is currently being done in an ad hoc way, and so for some commands it isn't being checked. We have the info to make this check, since commands are supposed to add their arguments to the m_arguments field of the CommandObject. This change uses that info to check whether the command received arguments in error. A handful of commands weren't defining their argument types, I also had to fix them. And a bunch of commands were checking for arguments by hand, so I removed those checks in favor of the CommandObject one. That also meant I had to change some tests that were checking for the ad hoc error outputs. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128453
2022-06-24[NFC][lldb][trace] Rename trace session to trace bundleWalter Erquinigo
As previously discussed with @jj10306, we didn't really have a name for the post-mortem (or offline) trace session representation, which is in fact a folder with a bunch of files. We decided to call this folder "trace bundle", and the main JSON file in it "trace bundle description file". This naming is pretty decent, so I'm refactoring all the existing code to account for that. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128484
2022-06-20Add LoadTraceFromFile to SBDebugger and SBTraceJakob Johnson
Add trace load functionality to SBDebugger via the `LoadTraceFromFile` method. Update intelpt test case class to have `testTraceLoad` method so we can take advantage of the testApiAndSB decorator to test both the CLI and SB without duplicating code. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128107
2022-01-23[Commands] Remove redundant member initialization (NFC)Kazu Hirata
Identified with readability-redundant-member-init.
2021-10-18[lldb] Return StringRef from PluginInterface::GetPluginNamePavel Labath
There is no reason why this function should be returning a ConstString. While modifying these files, I also fixed several instances where GetPluginName and GetPluginNameStatic were returning different strings. I am not changing the return type of GetPluginNameStatic in this patch, as that would necessitate additional changes, and this patch is big enough as it is. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111877
2021-06-23[lldb] Remove CommandReturnObject's SetError(StringRef)David Spickett
Replacing existing uses with AppendError. SetError is also part of the SBI API. This remains but instead of calling the underlying SetError it will call AppendError. Reviewed By: teemperor Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104768
2021-06-17[trace][intel-pt] Create basic SB APIWalter Erquinigo
This adds a basic SB API for creating and stopping traces. Note: This doesn't add any APIs for inspecting individual instructions. That'd be a more complicated change and it might be better to enhande the dump functionality to output the data in binary format. I'll leave that for a later diff. This also enhances the existing tests so that they test the same flow using both the command interface and the SB API. I also did some cleanup of legacy code. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103500
2021-06-17[lldb] Remove redundant calls to set eReturnStatusFailedDavid Spickett
This is part 2, covering the commands source. Some uses remain where it's tricky to see what the logic is or they are not used with AppendError. Reviewed By: teemperor Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104448
2021-03-30[trace][intel-pt] Implement trace start and trace stopWalter Erquinigo
This implements the interactive trace start and stop methods. This diff ended up being much larger than I anticipated because, by doing it, I found that I had implemented in the beginning many things in a non optimal way. In any case, the code is much better now. There's a lot of boilerplate code due to the gdb-remote protocol, but the main changes are: - New tracing packets: jLLDBTraceStop, jLLDBTraceStart, jLLDBTraceGetBinaryData. The gdb-remote packet definitions are quite comprehensive. - Implementation of the "process trace start|stop" and "thread trace start|stop" commands. - Implementaiton of an API in Trace.h to interact with live traces. - Created an IntelPTDecoder for live threads, that use the debugger's stop id as checkpoint for its internal cache. - Added a functionality to stop the process in case "process tracing" is enabled and a new thread can't traced. - Added tests I have some ideas to unify the code paths for post mortem and live threads, but I'll do that in another diff. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91679
2021-03-01[mlir][lldb] Fix several gcc warnings in mlir and lldbStella Stamenova
These warnings are raised when compiling with gcc due to either having too few or too many commas, or in the case of lldb, the possibility of a nullptr. Reviewed By: mehdi_amini Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97586
2020-10-09[intel pt] Refactor parsingWalter Erquinigo
With the feedback I was getting in different diffs, I realized that splitting the parsing logic into two classes was not easy to deal with. I do see value in doing that, but I'd rather leave that as a refactor after most of the intel-pt logic is in place. Thus, I'm merging the common parser into the intel pt one, having thus only one that is fully aware of Intel PT during parsing and object creation. Besides, based on the feedback in https://reviews.llvm.org/D88769, I'm creating a ThreadIntelPT class that will be able to orchestrate decoding of its own trace and can handle the stop events correctly. This leaves the TraceIntelPT class as an initialization class that glues together different components. Right now it can initialize a trace session from a json file, and in the future will be able to initialize a trace session from a live process. Besides, I'm renaming SettingsParser to SessionParser, which I think is a better name, as the json object represents a trace session of possibly many processes. With the current set of targets, we have the following - Trace: main interface for dealing with trace sessions - TraceIntelPT: plugin Trace for dealing with intel pt sessions - TraceIntelPTSessionParser: a parser of a json trace session file that can create a corresponding TraceIntelPT instance along with Targets, ProcessTraces (to be created in https://reviews.llvm.org/D88769), and ThreadIntelPT threads. - ProcessTrace: (to be created in https://reviews.llvm.org/D88769) can handle the correct state of the traces as the user traverses the trace. I don't think there'll be a need an intel-pt specific implementation of this class. - ThreadIntelPT: a thread implementation that can handle the decoding of its own trace file, along with keeping track of the current position the user is looking at when doing reverse debugging. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88841
2020-09-21Add a "Trace" plug-in to LLDB to add process trace support in stages.Walter Erquinigo
This is the first in a series of patches that will adds a new processor trace plug-in to LLDB. The idea for this first patch to to add the plug-in interface with simple commands for the trace files that can "load" and "dump" the trace information. We can test the functionality and ensure people are happy with the way things are done and how things are organized before moving on to adding more functionality. Processor trace information can be view in a few different ways: - post mortem where a trace is saved off that can be viewed later in the debugger - gathered while a process is running and allow the user to step back in time (with no variables, memory or registers) to see how each thread arrived at where it is currently stopped. This patch attempts to start with the first solution of loading a trace file after the fact. The idea is that we will use a JSON file to load the trace information. JSON allows us to specify information about the trace like: - plug-in name in LLDB - path to trace file - shared library load information so we can re-create a target and symbolicate the information in the trace - any other info that the trace plug-in will need to be able to successfully parse the trace information - cpu type - version info - ??? A new "trace" command was added at the top level of the LLDB commmands: - "trace load" - "trace dump" I did this because if we load trace information we don't need to have a process and we might end up creating a new target for the trace information that will become active. If anyone has any input on where this would be better suited, please let me know. Walter Erquinigo will end up filling in the Intel PT specific plug-in so that it works and is tested once we can agree that the direction of this patch is the correct one, so please feel free to chime in with ideas on comments! Reviewed By: clayborg Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85705