| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
constructors" (#96103)
Try it again. Use the approach suggested by Tim in the LWG thread :
using function default argument SFINAE
- Revert "[libc++] Revert LWG3233 Broken requirements for shared_ptr
converting constructors (#93071)"
- Revert "[libc++] Revert temporary attempt to implement LWG 4110
(#95263)"
- test for default_delete
- Revert "Revert "[libc++] Revert temporary attempt to implement LWG
4110 (#95263)""
- test for NULL
|
|
Fix several bugs:
1. https://llvm.org/PR60258
The conversion constructors' constraint `__compatible_with` incorrectly allow array types conversion to scalar types
2. https://llvm.org/PR53368
The constructor that takes `unique_ptr` are not suffiently constrained.
3. The constructors that take raw pointers incorretly use `__compatible_with`. They have different constraints
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143346
|
|
Those tests were extracted from D120996.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121340
|
|
This reverts commit 276ca873. That commit has quite a history at this
point. It was first landed in dbc647643577, which broke std::shared_ptr<T const>
and was reverted in 9138666f5. It was then re-applied in 276ca873, with
the std::shared_ptr issue fixed, but it caused widespread breakage at
Google (which suggests it would cause similar breakage in the wild too),
so now I'm reverting again.
Instead, I will add a escape hatch that vendors can turn on to enable
the extension and perform a phased transition over one or two releases
like we sometimes do when things become non-trivial.
|
|
This extension is a portability trap for users, since no other standard
library supports it. Furthermore, the Standard explicitly allows
implementations to reject std::allocator<cv T>, so allowing it is
really going against the current.
This was discovered in D120684: this extension required `const_cast`ing
in `__construct_range_forward`, a fishy bit of code that can be removed
if we don't support the extension anymore.
This is a re-application of dbc647643577, which was reverted in 9138666f5
because it broke std::shared_ptr<T const>. Tests have now been added and
we've made sure that std::shared_ptr<T const> wouldn't be broken in this
version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120996
|
|
The only possible kind of a conversion in initialization of a shared
pointer to an array is a qualification conversion (i.e., adding
cv-qualifiers). This patch adds tests for converting from `A[]` to
`const A[]` to the following functions:
```
template<class Y> explicit shared_ptr(Y* p);
template<class Y> shared_ptr(const shared_ptr<Y>& r);
template<class Y> shared_ptr(shared_ptr<Y>&& r);
template<class Y> shared_ptr& operator=(const shared_ptr<Y>& r);
template<class Y> shared_ptr& operator=(shared_ptr<Y>&& r);
template<class Y> void reset(Y* p);
template<class Y, class D> void reset(Y* p, D d);
template<class Y, class D, class A> void reset(Y* p, D d, A a);
```
Similar tests for converting functions that involve a `weak_ptr` should
be added once LWG issue [3001](https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3001)
is implemented.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112048
|
|
Implements P0414R2:
* Adds support for array types in std::shared_ptr.
* Adds reinterpret_pointer_cast for shared_ptr.
Re-committing now that the leaking tests are fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62259
|
|
This reverts commit e8c13c182a562f45287d6b8da612264d09027087.
|
|
Implements P0414R2:
* Adds support for array types in std::shared_ptr.
* Adds reinterpret_pointer_cast for shared_ptr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62259
|
|
Thanks to Zoe for the (big, but simple) patch. NFC intended.
llvm-svn: 362252
|
|
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
|
|
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
|
|
llvm-svn: 224658
|
