| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This patch adds a large number of missing includes in the libc++ headers
and the test suite. Those were found as part of the effort to move
towards a mostly monolithic top-level std module.
|
|
std::bind is supposed to be constexpr-friendly since C++20 and it was
marked as such in our synopsis. However, the tests were not actually
testing any of it and as it happens, std::bind was not really constexpr
friendly. This fixes the issue and makes sure that at least some of the
tests are running in constexpr mode.
Some tests for std::bind check functions that return void, and those
use global variables. These tests haven't been made constexpr-friendly,
however the coverage added by this patch should be sufficient to get
decent confidence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149295
|
|
In D145589, we made the std::bind placeholders inline constexpr to
satisfy C++17. It turns out that this causes ODR violations since the
shared library provides strong definitions for those placeholders, and
the linker on Windows actually complains about this.
Fortunately, C++17 only encourages implementations to use `inline constexpr`,
it doesn't force them. So instead, we unconditionally define the placeholders
as `extern const`, which avoids the ODR violation and is indistinguishable
from `inline constexpr` for most purposes, since the placeholders are
empty types anyway.
Note that we could also go back to the pre-D145589 state of defining them
as non-inline constexpr variables in C++17, however that is definitely
non-conforming since that means the placeholders have different addresses
in different TUs. This is all a bit pedantic, but all in all I feel that
`extern const` provides the best bang for our buck, and I can't really
find any downsides to that solution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149292
|
|
`is_placeholder`, despite having an "is_" name, actually returns an int:
1 for `_1`, 2 for `_2`, 3 for `_3`, and so on. But it should still be int,
not size_t.
|
|
compressed_pair is widely used in the library, but most of the uses don't use the tuple parts. To avoid including <tuple> everywhere, use the forward declaration instead in compressed_pair.h
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133331
|
|
AIX's system header provides these C++ overloads for compatibility with
older XL C++ implementations, but they can be disabled by defining
__LIBC_NO_CPP_MATH_OVERLOADS__ since AIX 7.2 TL 5 SP 3.
Since D109078 landed clang will define this macro when using libc++ on
AIX and we already run the lit tests with it too. This change will
enable the overloads in libc++'s math.h and we'll continue to require
the compiler to define the macro going forward.
Reviewed By: ldionne, jsji, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102172
co-authored-by: Jason Liu <jasonliu.development@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
Before this patch, the user needed to specialize both of
`is_placeholder<MyType>` and `is_placeholder<const MyType>`.
After this patch, only the former is needed (although the
latter is harmless if provided).
The new tests don't actually fail unless return type deduction
is used, which is a C++14 feature. Specializing `is_placeholder`
is still allowed in C++11, though.
Fixes #51095.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116388
|
|
However, whether applications rely on the std::bad_function_call vtable
being in the dylib is still controlled by the ABI macro, since changing
that would be an ABI break.
Also separate preprocessor definitions for whether to use a key function
and whether to use a `bad_function_call`-specific `what` message
(`what` message is mandated by [LWG2233](http://wg21.link/LWG2233)).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92397
|
|
This changes adds the pipeline config for both 32-bit and 64-bit AIX targets. As well, we add a lit feature `LIBCXX-AIX-FIXME` which is used to mark the failing tests which remain to be investigated on AIX, so that the CI produces a clean build.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111359
|
|
|
|
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
|
|
The testing script used to test libc++ historically did not like directories
without any testing files, so these tests had been added. Since this is
not necessary anymore, we can now remove these files. This has the benefit
that the total number of tests reflects the real number of tests more
closely, and we also skip some unnecessary work (especially relevant when
running tests over SSH).
However, some nothing_to_do.pass.cpp tests actually serve the purpose of
documenting that an area of the Standard doesn't need to be tested, or is
tested elsewhere. These files are not removed by this commit.
Removal done with:
import os
import itertools
for (dirpath, dirnames, filenames) in itertools.chain(os.walk('./libcxx/test'),
os.walk('./libcxxabi/test')):
if len(filenames + dirnames) > 1 and \
any(p == 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp' for p in filenames):
os.remove(os.path.join(dirpath, 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp'))
|
|
Thanks to Zoe for the (big, but simple) patch. NFC intended.
llvm-svn: 362252
|
|
currently does not). Thanks to Jonathan Wakely for the fix.
llvm-svn: 359108
|
|
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
|
|
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
|
|
There were 3 tests with 'int main(void)', and 6 with the return type on a different line. I'm about to send a patch for main in tests, and this NFC change is unrelated.
llvm-svn: 350770
|
|
llvm-svn: 295434
|
|
llvm-svn: 290472
|
|
llvm-svn: 290459
|
|
loss of data", part 7/7.
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/input.streams/istream.unformatted/get.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char> because basic_istream::get() returns int_type (N4606 27.7.2.3 [istream.unformatted]/4).
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/output.streams/ostream.formatted/ostream.inserters.arithmetic/minus1.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char> because toupper() returns int (C11 7.4.2.2/1).
test/std/iterators/stream.iterators/ostream.iterator/ostream.iterator.ops/assign_t.pass.cpp
This test is intentionally writing doubles to ostream_iterator<int>.
It's silencing -Wliteral-conversion for Clang, so I'm adding C4244 silencing for MSVC.
test/std/language.support/support.limits/limits/numeric.limits.members/infinity.pass.cpp
Given `extern float zero;`, the expression `1./zero` has type double, which emits a truncation warning
when being passed to test<float>() taking float. The fix is to say `1.f/zero` which has type float.
test/std/numerics/complex.number/cmplx.over/arg.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/complex.number/cmplx.over/norm.pass.cpp
These tests were constructing std::complex<double>(x, 0), emitting truncation warnings when x is long long.
Saying static_cast<double>(x) avoids this.
test/std/numerics/rand/rand.eng/rand.eng.lcong/seed_result_type.pass.cpp
This was using `int s` to construct and seed a linear_congruential_engine<T, stuff>, where T is
unsigned short/unsigned int/unsigned long/unsigned long long. That emits a truncation warning in the
unsigned short case. Because the range [0, 20) is tiny and we aren't doing anything else with the index,
we can just iterate with `T s`.
test/std/re/re.traits/value.pass.cpp
regex_traits<wchar_t>::value()'s first parameter is wchar_t (N4606 28.7 [re.traits]/13). This loop is
using int to iterate through ['g', 0xFFFF), emitting a truncation warning from int to wchar_t
(which is 16-bit for some of us). Because the bound is exclusive, we can just iterate with wchar_t.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/size_char_alloc.pass.cpp
This test is a little strange. It's trying to verify that basic_string's (InIt, InIt) range constructor
isn't confused by "N copies of C" when N and C have the same integral type. To do this, it was
testing (100, 65), but that eventually emits truncation warnings from int to char. There's a simple way
to avoid this - passing (static_cast<char>(100), static_cast<char>(65)) also exercises the disambiguation.
(And 100 is representable even when char has a signed range.)
test/std/strings/string.view/string.view.hash/string_view.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char_type> because `'0' + i` has type int.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/bind/func.bind/func.bind.bind/nested.pass.cpp
What's more horrible than nested bind()? pow() overloads! This operator()(T a, T b) was assuming that
std::pow(a, b) can be returned as T. (In this case, T is int.) However, N4606 26.9.1 [cmath.syn]/2
says that pow(int, int) returns double, so this was truncating double to int.
Adding static_cast<T> silences this.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/unord.hash/integral.pass.cpp
This was iterating `for (int i = 0; i <= 5; ++i)` and constructing `T t(i);` but that's truncating
when T is short. (And super truncating when T is bool.) Adding static_cast<T> silences this.
test/std/utilities/utility/exchange/exchange.pass.cpp
First, this was exchanging 67.2 into an int, but that's inherently truncating.
Changing this to static_cast<short>(67) avoids the truncation while preserving the
"what if T and U are different" test coverage.
Second, this was exchanging {} with the explicit type float into an int, and that's also
inherently truncating. Specifying short is just as good.
test/std/utilities/utility/pairs/pairs.spec/make_pair.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<short>. Note that this affects template argument deduction for make_pair(),
better fulfilling the test's intent. For example, this was saying
`typedef std::pair<int, short> P1; P1 p1 = std::make_pair(3, 4);` but that was asking
make_pair() to return pair<int, int>, which was then being converted to pair<int, short>.
(pair's converting constructors are tested elsewhere.)
Now, std::make_pair(3, static_cast<short>(4)) actually returns pair<int, short>.
(There's still a conversion from pair<nullptr_t, short> to pair<unique_ptr<int>, short>.)
Fixes D27544.
llvm-svn: 289111
|
|
uses_allocator_v
llvm-svn: 282126
|
|
STL@microsoft.com
llvm-svn: 276576
|
|
This patch makes the bind placeholders in std::placeholders both (1) const and
(2) constexpr (See below).
This is technically a breaking change for any code using the placeholders
outside of std::bind and depending on them being non-const. However I don't
think this will break any real world code.
(1) Previously the placeholders were non-const extern globals in all
dialects. This patch changes these extern globals to be const in all dialects.
Since the cv-qualifiers don't participate in name mangling for globals this
is an ABI compatible change.
(2) Make the placeholders constexpr in C++11 and beyond. Although LWG 2488 only
applies to C++17 I don't see any reason not to backport this change.
llvm-svn: 273824
|
|
llvm-svn: 271489
|
|
llvm-svn: 267852
|
|
The primary purpose of this patch is to add the 'is_callable' traits.
Since 'is_nothrow_callable' required making 'INVOKE' conditionally noexcept
I also took this oppertunity to implement a constexpr version of INVOKE.
This fixes 'std::experimental::apply' which required constexpr 'INVOKE support'.
This patch will be followed up with some cleanup. Primarly removing most
of "__member_function_traits" since it's no longer used by INVOKE (in C++11 at least).
llvm-svn: 266836
|
|
<__functional_03> provides the C++03 definitions for std::memfun and
std::function. However the interaction between <functional> and <__functional_03>
is ugly and duplicates code needlessly. This patch cleans up how the two
headers work together.
The major changes are:
- Provide placeholders, is_bind_expression and is_placeholder in <functional>
for both C++03 and C++11.
- Provide bad_function_call, function fwd decl,
__maybe_derive_from_unary_function and __maybe_derive_from_binary_function
in <functional> for both C++03 and C++11.
- Move the <__functional_03> include to the bottom of <functional>. This makes
it easier to see how <__functional_03> interacts with <functional>
- Remove a commented out implementation of bind in C++03. It's never going
to get implemented.
- Mark almost all std::bind tests as unsupported in C++03. std::is_placeholder
works in C++03 and C++11. std::is_bind_expression is provided in C++03 but
always returns false.
llvm-svn: 242870
|
|
Implemented LWG2420 bits for bind<void>
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10997
llvm-svn: 241967
|
|
llvm-svn: 228344
|
|
of a bind expression. Fixes PR22003.
The SFINAE on the function __mu(Fn, Args...) that evaluates nested bind
expressions always tries to deduce the return type for Fn(Args...) even when Fn
is not a nested bind expression. This can cause hard compile errors when the
instantation of Fn(Args...) is ill-formed. This patch prevents the instantation
of __invoke_of<Fn, Args...> unless Fn is actually a bind expression.
Bug reportand patch from Michel Morin.
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22003
llvm-svn: 224753
|
|
llvm-svn: 224658
|
