summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/libcxx/test/std/strings/basic.string/string.capacity/capacity.pass.cpp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-12-13[ASan][libc++] std::basic_string annotations (#72677)Tacet
This commit introduces basic annotations for `std::basic_string`, mirroring the approach used in `std::vector` and `std::deque`. Initially, only long strings with the default allocator will be annotated. Short strings (_SSO - short string optimization_) and strings with non-default allocators will be annotated in the near future, with separate commits dedicated to enabling them. The process will be similar to the workflow employed for enabling annotations in `std::deque`. **Please note**: these annotations function effectively only when libc++ and libc++abi dylibs are instrumented (with ASan). This aligns with the prevailing behavior of Memory Sanitizer. To avoid breaking everything, this commit also appends `_LIBCPP_INSTRUMENTED_WITH_ASAN` to `__config_site` whenever libc++ is compiled with ASan. If this macro is not defined, string annotations are not enabled. However, linking a binary that does **not** annotate strings with a dynamic library that annotates strings, is not permitted. Originally proposed here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132769 Related patches on Phabricator: - Turning on annotations for short strings: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147680 - Turning on annotations for all allocators: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146214 This PR is a part of a series of patches extending AddressSanitizer C++ container overflow detection capabilities by adding annotations, similar to those existing in `std::vector` and `std::deque` collections. These enhancements empower ASan to effectively detect instances where the instrumented program attempts to access memory within a collection's internal allocation that remains unused. This includes cases where access occurs before or after the stored elements in `std::deque`, or between the `std::basic_string`'s size (including the null terminator) and capacity bounds. The introduction of these annotations was spurred by a real-world software bug discovered by Trail of Bits, involving an out-of-bounds memory access during the comparison of two strings using the `std::equals` function. This function was taking iterators (`iter1_begin`, `iter1_end`, `iter2_begin`) to perform the comparison, using a custom comparison function. When the `iter1` object exceeded the length of `iter2`, an out-of-bounds read could occur on the `iter2` object. Container sanitization, upon enabling these annotations, would effectively identify and flag this potential vulnerability. This Pull Request introduces basic annotations for `std::basic_string`. Long strings exhibit structural similarities to `std::vector` and will be annotated accordingly. Short strings are already implemented, but will be turned on separately in a forthcoming commit. Look at [a comment](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72677#issuecomment-1850554465) below to read about SSO issues at current moment. Due to the functionality introduced in [D132522](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dd1b7b797a116eed588fd752fbe61d34deeb24e4), the `__sanitizer_annotate_contiguous_container` function now offers compatibility with all allocators. However, enabling this support will be done in a subsequent commit. For the time being, only strings with the default allocator will be annotated. If you have any questions, please email: - advenam.tacet@trailofbits.com - disconnect3d@trailofbits.com
2023-09-27[libc++] Refactor string unit tests to ease addition of new allocatorsLouis Dionne
While doing this, I also found a few tests that were either clearly incorrect (e.g. testing the wrong function) or that lacked basic test coverage like testing std::string itself (e.g. the test was only checking std::basic_string with a custom allocator). In these cases, I did a few conservative drive-by changes. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140550 Co-authored-by: Brendan Emery <brendan.emery@esrlabs.com>
2023-09-01[libc++] Apply clang formatting to all string unit testsBrendan Emery
This applies clang-format to the std::string unit tests in preparation for landing https://reviews.llvm.org/D140550. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140612
2022-04-27[libc++] Implement P0980R1 (constexpr std::string)Nikolas Klauser
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne Spies: daltenty, sdasgup3, ldionne, arichardson, MTC, ChuanqiXu, mehdi_amini, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, aartbik, liufengdb, stephenneuendorffer, Joonsoo, grosul1, Kayjukh, jurahul, msifontes, tatianashp, rdzhabarov, teijeong, cota, dcaballe, Chia-hungDuan, wrengr, wenzhicui, arphaman, Mordante, miscco, Quuxplusone, smeenai, libcxx-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110598
2022-02-08[libc++] Prepare string.{access, capacity, cons} tests for constexprNikolas Klauser
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc Spies: libcxx-commits, arphaman Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119123
2021-11-07[libc++] Make test_allocator constexpr-friendly for constexpr string/vectorNikolas Klauser
Make test_allocator etc. constexpr-friendly so they can be used to test constexpr string and possibly constexpr vector Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, #libc, ldionne Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110994
2019-02-04Support tests in freestandingJF Bastien
Summary: Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and "freestanding the library subset". Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this: In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add: self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding'] Run the tests and they all fail. Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its `return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings (ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2 leading to non-zero return code). Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124 files, and I apologize. The former was done with The Magic Of Sed. The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool: https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g. the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem tests), etc. Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++ freestanding fairly well in libc++. <rdar://problem/47754795> Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624 llvm-svn: 353086
2019-01-19Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepoChandler Carruth
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that defeated my regular expressions. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351648
2016-11-29Protect std::string tests under libcpp-no-exceptionsRoger Ferrer Ibanez
Skip tests that expect an exception be thrown and/or disable unreachable catch handlers. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26612 llvm-svn: 288158
2016-11-24Reverting wrong diffRoger Ferrer Ibanez
I managed to confuse me with two reviews of the same thing and ended commiting the wrong one. llvm-svn: 287868
2016-11-24Protect std::string tests under libcpp-no-exceptionsRoger Ferrer Ibanez
Skip tests that expect an exception be thrown and/or disable unreachable catch handlers. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26608 llvm-svn: 287865
2016-06-14Replace __cplusplus comparisons and dialect __has_feature checks with ↵Eric Fiselier
TEST_STD_VER. This is a huge cleanup that helps make the libc++ test suite more portable. Patch from STL@microsoft.com. Thanks STL! llvm-svn: 272716
2015-11-10Make it possible to build a no-exceptions variant of libcxx.Asiri Rathnayake
Fixes a small omission in libcxx that prevents libcxx being built when -DLIBCXX_ENABLE_EXCEPTIONS=0 is specified. This patch adds XFAILS to all those tests that are currently failing on the new -fno-exceptions library variant. Follow-up patches will update the tests (progressively) to cope with the new library variant. Change-Id: I4b801bd8d8e4fe7193df9e55f39f1f393a8ba81a llvm-svn: 252598
2014-12-20Move test into test/std subdirectory.Eric Fiselier
llvm-svn: 224658