| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI everywhere (#131156)" (#141756)
This reverts commit c861fe8a71e64f3d2108c58147e7375cd9314521.
Unfortunately, this use of hidden visibility attributes causes
user-defined specializations of standard-library types to also be marked
hidden by default, which is incorrect. See discussion thread on #131156.
...and also reverts the follow-up commits:
Revert "[libc++] Add explicit ABI annotations to functions from the block runtime declared in <__functional/function.h> (#140592)"
This reverts commit 3e4c9dc299c35155934688184319d391b298fff7.
Revert "[libc++] Make ABI annotations explicit for windows-specific code (#140507)"
This reverts commit f73287e623a6c2e4a3485832bc3e10860cd26eb5.
Revert "[libc++][NFC] Replace a few "namespace std" with the correct macro (#140510)"
This reverts commit 1d411f27c769a32cb22ce50b9dc4421e34fd40dd.
|
|
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI everywhere (#131156)
This patch introduces `_LIBCPP_{BEGIN,END}_EXPLICIT_ABI_ANNOTATIONS`,
which allow us to have implicit annotations for most functions, and just
where it's not "hide_from_abi everything" we add explicit annotations.
This allows us to drop the `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` macro from most
functions in libc++.
|
|
Also introduce `_LIBCPP_ASSERT_PEDANTIC` for assertions violating which
results in a no-op or other benign behavior, but which may nevertheless
indicate a bug in the invoking code.
|
|
As part of the upcoming clang-formatting of libc++, this patch performs
the long desired removal of the _VSTD macro.
See https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
for the clang-format proposal.
|
|
Should be the same logic, but hopefully easier to read this way. Gets
rid of some superfluous state variables, and uses early returns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112956
|
|
I'm about to land https://reviews.llvm.org/D112956 which touches many
lines in that file anyway, so we might as well clang-format it first.
|
|
Replace most uses of `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` with
`_LIBCPP_ASSERT_UNCATEGORIZED`.
This is done as a prerequisite to introducing hardened mode to libc++.
The idea is to make enabling assertions an opt-in with (somewhat)
fine-grained controls over which categories of assertions are enabled.
The vast majority of assertions are currently uncategorized; the new
macro will allow turning on `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` (the underlying mechanism
for all kinds of assertions) without enabling all the uncategorized
assertions (in the future; this patch preserves the current behavior).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153816
|
|
This is the first step towards disentangling the debug mode and assertions
in libc++. This patch doesn't make any functional change: it simply moves
_LIBCPP_ASSERT-related stuff to its own file so as to make it clear that
libc++ assertions and the debug mode are different things. Future patches
will make it possible to enable assertions without enabling the debug
mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119769
|
|
Our best guess is that the two syntaxes should have exactly equivalent
effects, so, let's be consistent with what we do in libcxx/include/.
I've left `#include "include/x.h"` and `#include "../y.h"` alone
because I'm less sure that they're interchangeable, and they aren't
inconsistent with libcxx/include/ because libcxx/include/ never
does that kind of thing.
Also, use the `_LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS/POP_MACROS` dance for `<__undef_macros>`,
even though it's technically unnecessary in a standalone .cpp file,
just so we have consistently one way to do it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119561
|
|
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, #libc
Spies: arichardson, mstorsjo, libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119152
|
|
We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste stuff.
This cleans up all the existing files so as to stop the spreading
as people copy-paste headers around.
|
|
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
|
|
thanks to Jonathan Wakely for the report
llvm-svn: 313031
|
|
Summary:
This patch improves how libc++ handles min/max macros within the headers. Previously libc++ would undef them and emit a warning.
This patch changes libc++ to use `#pragma push_macro` to save the macro before undefining it, and `#pragma pop_macro` to restore the macros and the end of the header.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, bcraig, compnerd, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits, krytarowski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33080
llvm-svn: 304357
|
|
Summary:
Currently a number of GCC warnings are emitted when building libc++. This patch fixes or ignores all of them. The primary changes are:
* Work around strict aliasing issues in `typeinfo::hash_code()` by using __attribute__((may_alias)). However I think a non-aliasing `hash_code()` implementation is possible. Further investigation needed.
* Add `_LIBCPP_UNREACHABLE()` to switch in `strstream.cpp` to avoid -Wpotentially-uninitialized.
* Fix -Wunused-value warning in `__all` by adding a void cast.
* Ignore -Wattributes for now. There are a number of real attribute issues when using GCC but enabling the warning is too noisy.
* Ignore -Wliteral-suffix since it warns about the use of reserved identifiers. Note Only GCC 7.0 supports disabling this warning.
* Ignore -Wc++14-compat since it warns about the sized new/delete overloads.
Reviewers: EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24003
llvm-svn: 280007
|
|
The end pointer should point to one past the end of the newly allocated
buffer.
rdar://problem/24265174
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20334
llvm-svn: 274132
|
|
* Fix non-null violation in strstream.cpp
Overflow was calling memcpy with a null parameter and a size of 0.
* Fix std/atomics/atomics.flag/ tests:
a.test_and_set() was reading from an uninitialized atomic, but wasn't
using the value. The tests now clear the flag before performing the
first test_and_set. This allows UBSAN to test that clear doesn't read
an invalid value.
* Fix std/experimental/algorithms/alg.random.sample/sample.pass.cpp
The tests were dereferencing a past-the-end pointer to an array so that
they could do pointer arithmetic with it. Instead of dereference the iterator
I changed the tests to use the special 'base()' test iterator method.
* Add -fno-sanitize=float-divide-by-zero to suppress division by zero UBSAN diagnostics.
The tests that cause float division by zero are explicitly aware that they
are doing that. Since this is well defined for IEEE floats suppress the warnings
for now.
llvm-svn: 273107
|
|
llvm-svn: 198505
|
|
warning about this in headers and to warn is the MSVC default. No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 192548
|
|
llvm-svn: 188395
|
|
-fsanitize=address on the test suite.
llvm-svn: 177452
|
|
llvm-svn: 145624
|
|
llvm-svn: 134639
|
|
llvm-svn: 134190
|
|
qualified (thanks Chris).
llvm-svn: 125510
|
|
llvm-svn: 124431
|
|
llvm-svn: 119395
|
|
flags, and renamed _LIBCPP_MOVE to _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES to be more consistent with the rest of the libc++'s flags, and with clang's nomenclature.
llvm-svn: 113086
|
|
llvm-svn: 111751
|
|
llvm-svn: 103516
|
|
llvm-svn: 103490
|
