| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI everywhere (#131156)" (#141756)
This reverts commit c861fe8a71e64f3d2108c58147e7375cd9314521.
Unfortunately, this use of hidden visibility attributes causes
user-defined specializations of standard-library types to also be marked
hidden by default, which is incorrect. See discussion thread on #131156.
...and also reverts the follow-up commits:
Revert "[libc++] Add explicit ABI annotations to functions from the block runtime declared in <__functional/function.h> (#140592)"
This reverts commit 3e4c9dc299c35155934688184319d391b298fff7.
Revert "[libc++] Make ABI annotations explicit for windows-specific code (#140507)"
This reverts commit f73287e623a6c2e4a3485832bc3e10860cd26eb5.
Revert "[libc++][NFC] Replace a few "namespace std" with the correct macro (#140510)"
This reverts commit 1d411f27c769a32cb22ce50b9dc4421e34fd40dd.
|
|
We've added a new macro for the unversioned `namespace std` cases in
#133009, but it seems we've missed a few places. This fixes the places I
just found.
|
|
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI everywhere (#131156)
This patch introduces `_LIBCPP_{BEGIN,END}_EXPLICIT_ABI_ANNOTATIONS`,
which allow us to have implicit annotations for most functions, and just
where it's not "hide_from_abi everything" we add explicit annotations.
This allows us to drop the `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` macro from most
functions in libc++.
|
|
This patch implements the forwarding to frozen C++03 headers as
discussed in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-freezing-c-03-headers-in-libc. In the
RFC, we initially proposed selecting the right headers from the Clang
driver, however consensus seemed to steer towards handling this in the
library itself. This patch implements that direction.
At a high level, the changes basically amount to making each public
header look like this:
```
// inside <vector>
#ifdef _LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG
# include <__cxx03/vector>
#else
// normal <vector> content
#endif
```
In most cases, public headers are simple umbrella headers so there isn't
much code in the #else branch. In other cases, the #else branch contains
the actual implementation of the header.
|
|
|
|
Including The frozen C++03 headers results in a lot of formatting
changes in the main headers, so this splits these changes into a
separate commit instead.
This is part of
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-freezing-c-03-headers-in-libc.
|
|
|
|
Currently, the library-internal feature test macros are only defined if
the feature is not available, and always have the prefix
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_`. This patch changes that, so that they are always
defined and have the prefix `_LIBCPP_HAS_` instead. This changes the
canonical use of these macros to `#if _LIBCPP_HAS_FEATURE`, which means
that using an undefined macro (e.g. due to a missing include) is
diagnosed now. While this is rather unlikely currently, a similar change
in `<__configuration/availability.h>` caught a few bugs. This also
improves readability, since it removes the double-negation of `#ifndef
_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_FEATURE`.
The current patch only touches the macros defined in `<__config>`. If
people are happy with this approach, I'll make a follow-up PR to also
change the macros defined in `<__config_site>`.
|
|
(#80455)
`[[__noreturn__]]` is now always available, so we can simply use the
attribute directly instead of through a macro.
|
|
The output on eel.is has similar oddities, so I expect this was copy
pasted.
|
|
Originally, we used __libcpp_verbose_abort to handle assertion failures.
That function was declared from all public headers. Since we don't use
that mechanism anymore, we don't need to declare __libcpp_verbose_abort
from all public headers, and we can clean up a lot of unnecessary
includes.
This patch also moves the definition of the various assertion categories
to the <__assert> header, since we now rely on regular IWYU for these
assertion macros.
rdar://105510916
|
|
This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
|
|
As part of the upcoming clang-formatting of libc++, this patch performs
the long desired removal of the _VSTD macro.
See https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
for the clang-format proposal.
|
|
In preparation for running clang-format on the whole code base, we are
also removing mentions of the legacy _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY macro in
favor of the newer _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI.
We're still leaving the definition of _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to avoid
creating needless breakage in case some older patches are checked-in
with mentions of the old macro. After we branch for LLVM 18, we can do
another pass to clean up remaining uses of the macro that might have
gotten introduced by mistake (if any) and remove the macro itself at the
same time. This is just a minor convenience to smooth out the transition
as much as possible.
See
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
for the clang-format proposal.
|
|
|
|
the test suite
This is a follow up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D144694.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/60977.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144775
|
|
into _LIBCPP_EXPORTED_FROM_ABI
These macros are always defined identically, so we can simplify the code a bit by merging them.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, krytarowski, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152652
|
|
We already have a clang-tidy check for making sure that `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` is on free functions. This patch extends this to class members. The places where we don't check for `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` are classes for which we have an instantiation in the library.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: jplehr, mikhail.ramalho, sstefan1, libcxx-commits, krytarowski, miyuki, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142332
|
|
We changed the `abort` calls when trying to throw exceptions in `-fno-exceptions` mode to `__verbose_abort` calls, which removes the dependency in most files.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: dim, emaste, mikhail.ramalho, smeenai, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146076
|
|
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: mikhail.ramalho, smeenai, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146097
|
|
directly
These calls were added in D141222.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Spies: ldionne, libcxx-commits, smeenai, mikhail.ramalho
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146227
|
|
This results in proper error messages instead of just an abort.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: #libc_vendors, smeenai, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141222
|
|
Other macros that disable parts of the library are named `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_WHATEVER`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143163
|
|
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc
Spies: aheejin, libcxx-commits, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124714
|
|
This patch changes the requirement for getting the declaration of the
assertion handler from including <__assert> to including any public
C++ header of the library. Note that C compatibility headers are
excluded because we don't implement all the C headers ourselves --
some of them are taken straight from the C library, like assert.h.
It also adds a generated test to check it. Furthermore, this new
generated test is designed in a way that will make it possible to
replace almost all the existing test-generation scripts with this
system in upcoming patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122506
|
|
Now we'll notice if a header forgets to include this magic phrase.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118800
|
|
The NFC part of D116809. We still want to enforce this in CI,
but the mechanism for that is still to-be-determined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116809
|
|
update the namspace comments in include/
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: smeenai, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114947
|
|
We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste stuff.
This cleans up all the existing files so as to stop the spreading
as people copy-paste headers around.
|
|
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102781
|
|
|
|
We include <exception>, which includes <cstdlib> unconditionally anyway.
|
|
Summary:
The former are like:
libcxx/include/typeinfo:322:11: warning: definition of implicit copy constructor for 'bad_cast' is deprecated because it has a user-declared destructor [-Wdeprecated-copy-dtor]
virtual ~bad_cast() _NOEXCEPT;
^
libcxx/include/typeinfo:344:11: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'std::bad_cast' first required here
throw bad_cast();
^
Fix these by adding an explicitly defaulted copy constructor.
The latter are like:
libcxx/include/codecvt:105:37: warning: dynamic exception specifications are deprecated [-Wdeprecated-dynamic-exception-spec]
virtual int do_encoding() const throw();
^~~~~~~
Fix these by using the _NOEXCEPT macro instead.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, ldionne, #libc
Reviewed By: EricWF, #libc
Subscribers: dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76150
|
|
Summary:
Currently, libc++'s `<stdexcept>` doesn't play nice with `vcruntime`. Specifically:
* `logic_error` and `runtime_error` have a different layout.
* libc++'s `logic_error` and `runtime_error` override `what()` but `vcruntime` does not.
* `vcruntime` uses weak vtables for `<stdexcept>` types.
* libc++'s `<stdexcept>` constructors and assignment operators may have different manglings than `vcruntimes`.
This patch makes libc++'s declarations in `<stdexcept>` match those provided by MSVC's STL as closely as possible.
If MSVC doesn't declare a special member, then neither do we. This ensures that the implicit definitions have the same linkage, visibility, triviality, and noexcept-ness.
Reviewers: thomasanderson, ldionne, smeenai
Reviewed By: thomasanderson
Subscribers: jdoerfert, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58945
llvm-svn: 355546
|
|
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
|
|
rdar://problem/19988944
llvm-svn: 338933
|
|
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Note that this commit had originally been applied in r336369 and then
reverted in r336382 because of unforeseen problems. Both of these problems
have now been fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336866
|
|
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY"
This reverts commit r336369. The commit had two problems:
1. __pbump was marked as _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY instead of
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which lead to two symbols being added in the
dylib and the check-cxx-abilist failing.
2. The LLDB tests started failing because they undefine
`_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY`. I need to figure out why they do that and
fix the tests before we can go forward with this change.
llvm-svn: 336382
|
|
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336369
|
|
llvm-svn: 304383
|
|
llvm-svn: 290459
|
|
Summary:
`__libcpp_refstring` currently has two different definitions. First there is the complete definition in `<__refstring>` but there is also a second in `<stdexcept>`. The historical reason for this split is because both libc++ and libc++abi need to see the inline definitions of __libcpp_refstrings methods, but the `<stdexcept>` header doesn't. However this is an ODR violation and breaks the modules build.
This patch fixes the issue by creating a single class definition in `<stdexcept>` and changing `<__refstring>` to contain only the inline method definitions. This way both `libcxx/src/stdexcept.cpp` and `libcxxabi/src/stdexcept.cpp` see the same declaration in `<stdexcept>` and definitions in `<__refstring>`
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25603
llvm-svn: 285100
|
|
This patch removes the `<cstdlib>` include from exception where it is no longer
needed. Unlike my previous attempt this patch also adds <cstdlib> where needed
in other headers like <new> and <typeinfo>.
This won't fix the Firefox build issues discussed on IRC but it is more correct
for libc++.
llvm-svn: 280754
|
|
type we define. They either construct and throw the exception, or abort() (if exceptions are disabled). Use these functions everywhere instead of assert()ing when exceptions are disabled. WARNING: This is a behavior change - but only with exceptions disabled. Reviewed as: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23855.
llvm-svn: 279744
|
|
llvm-svn: 267074
|
|
Add a new _LIBCPP_UNUSED define in __config, which can be used to
indicate explicitly unused items, and apply it to the __imp__ field of
__libcpp_refstring.
Somebody who knows about Microsoft C++ and IBM C++ should fill in the
unused attribute syntax appropriate for those compilers, if there is
any.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6836
llvm-svn: 228281
|
|
compatibility to libstdc++. Move the implementation into a header for
easier sharing with libc++abi. Merge a number of improvements from that
version. Provide a POD definition for <stdexcept>'s public use to avoid
cast dances. Discussed with Marshall Clow.
llvm-svn: 207695
|
|
llvm-svn: 142235
|
|
llvm-svn: 132137
|
|
llvm-svn: 119395
|
