| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This patch separates the destroy algorithms from the primitive
construct_at and destroy_at operations, which are conceptually not
algorithms. This makes it easier to start using these destroy algorithms
from upcoming relocation facilities.
As part of this, it also implements `std::destroy_at` for arrays without
relying on the `std::destroy` algorithm, which is conceptually a
higher-level facility.
|
|
This disentangles the code which previously had a mix of many #ifdefs, a
non-versioned namespace and a versioned namespace. It also makes it
clearer which parts of <new> are implemented on Windows by including <new.h>.
|
|
This reverts commit f3d58f4161b86a479f68acb453e9622911c688a0.
Relands #110355.
|
|
This reverts commit 78f9a8b82d772ff04a12ef95f2c9d31ee8f3e409.
This caused the LLDB test `TestDataFormatterGenericOptional.py` to fail, and we need
a bit more time to look into it.
|
|
Instead of changing the cast sequence to implicit conversion in
_`voidify`_, I think it is better to totally remove `__voidify` and use
`static_cast` to `void*`, which has equivalent effects.
Test coverage for const iterators are removed.
Now most affected algorithms are underconstrained, for which I submitted
[LWG3888](https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3888). I'm not sure
whether we should speculatively implement it at this moment, and thus
haven't added any `*.verify.cpp`.
In some control block types and `optional`, the stored objects are
changed to have cv-unqualified type.
Fixes #105119.
|
|
The application of constexpr to __construct_at triggers weird linker
errors when building LLVM with modules enabled and C++ < 20.
> ld.lld: error: undefined hidden symbol: void*
std::__1::__voidify[abi:nn190000]<llvm::sys::ProcessStatistics>(llvm::sys::ProcessStatistics&)
>>>> referenced by construct_at.h:52
(/usr/local/bin/../include/c++/v1/__memory/construct_at.h:52)
>>>> Program.cpp.o:(llvm::sys::Wait(llvm::sys::ProcessInfo const&,
std::__1::optional<unsigned int>, std::__1::basic_string<char,
std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>*,
std::__1::optional<llvm::sys::ProcessStatistics>*, bool)) in archive
lib/libLLVMSupport.a
I suspect this is related to undefined behavior caused by the fact that
construct_at is never really constexpr (which is UB NDR).
I'm unsure how to meaningfully write a test for this, as I haven't been
able to trigger it in smaller unit tests
|
|
This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
|
|
(#71428)
|
|
This brings most of the enable_ifs in libc++ to the same style.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Spies: ldionne, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157753
|
|
POSIX allows certain macros to exist with generic names (i.e. refresh(), move(), and erase()) to exist in `curses.h` which conflict with functions found in std::filesystem, among others. This patch undefs the macros in question and adds them to LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS and LIBCPP_POP_MACROS.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147356
|
|
This patch reverts the following commits:
015cd317eaed28a923d14a33c9d6739012a688be (add missing HIDE_FROM_ABI)
420a204d52205f1277a8d5df3dbafac6082e02e2 (add _LIBCPP_NO_CFI)
31eeba3f7c0e2ef4a21c07da9326a4ae1a8de7e2 (add __uninitialized_buffer)
It also reverts a small part of b935ab8e747cf52ff12471879460206a9f433eea
which is required to make the stable_partition.pass.cpp test pass on GCC.
Some issues were pointed out in https://reviews.llvm.org/D152208 and
in https://reviews.llvm.org/D154017, so I am reverting this patch
until we have time to weigh the various solutions and get consensus
on the design of the API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154161
|
|
Replace most uses of `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` with
`_LIBCPP_ASSERT_UNCATEGORIZED`.
This is done as a prerequisite to introducing hardened mode to libc++.
The idea is to make enabling assertions an opt-in with (somewhat)
fine-grained controls over which categories of assertions are enabled.
The vast majority of assertions are currently uncategorized; the new
macro will allow turning on `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` (the underlying mechanism
for all kinds of assertions) without enabling all the uncategorized
assertions (in the future; this patch preserves the current behavior).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153816
|
|
get_temporary_buffer
This will also be used in some PSTL backends.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Mordante
Spies: arichardson, mstorsjo, Mordante, sstefan1, jplehr, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152208
|
|
This change is almost fully mechanical. The only interesting change is in `generate_feature_test_macro_components.py` to generate `_LIBCPP_STD_VER >=` instead. To avoid churn in the git-blame this commit should be added to the `.git-blame-ignore-revs` once committed.
Reviewed By: ldionne, var-const, #libc
Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits, arichardson, arphaman, wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143962
|
|
Instead of destroying the object with allocator::destroy, we must
call its destructor directly. As a fly-by also mark LWG3008 as
fixed since it is handled by our implementation.
This was pointed out by Tim Song in https://reviews.llvm.org/D140913.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143791
|
|
|
|
While it's not necessary to qualify calls to `declval` it makes error messages very crypric if the declaration isn't reachable anymore
For example:
```
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:53:66: error: no type named 'type' in 'std::common_type<long, long>'
typedef chrono::duration<typename common_type<_Rep1, _Rep2>::type,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__type_traits/common_type.h:107:14: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>, std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>>' requested here
: public common_type<_Tp, _Tp> {};
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:279:58: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>>' requested here
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR typename common_type<duration>::type operator+() const {return typename common_type<duration>::type(*this);}
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:308:54: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>' requested here
typedef duration< int, ratio_multiply<ratio<24>, hours::period>> days;
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:280:81: error: no type named 'type' in 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>>'
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR typename common_type<duration>::type operator-() const {return typename common_type<duration>::type(-__rep_);}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:308:54: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<3600, 1>>' requested here
typedef duration< int, ratio_multiply<ratio<24>, hours::period>> days;
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:53:66: error: no type named 'type' in 'std::common_type<int, int>'
typedef chrono::duration<typename common_type<_Rep1, _Rep2>::type,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__type_traits/common_type.h:107:14: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<int, std::ratio<86400, 1>>, std::chrono::duration<int, std::ratio<86400, 1>>>' requested here
: public common_type<_Tp, _Tp> {};
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:279:58: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::common_type<std::chrono::duration<int, std::ratio<86400, 1>>>' requested here
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR typename common_type<duration>::type operator+() const {return typename common_type<duration>::type(*this);}
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__chrono/duration.h:309:55: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::chrono::duration<int, std::ratio<86400, 1>>' requested here
typedef duration< int, ratio_multiply<ratio<7>, days::period>> weeks;
^
19 similar errors omitted
```
changes with qualification added to:
```
While building module 'std' imported from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.trans/meta.trans.other/common_type.pass.cpp:13:
In file included from <module-includes>:17:
In file included from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/math.h:309:
In file included from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/limits:107:
In file included from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/type_traits:432:
In file included from /home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__type_traits/common_reference.h:13:
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__type_traits/common_type.h:28:43: error: declaration of 'declval' must be imported from module 'std.utility.__utility.declval' before it is required
using __cond_type = decltype(false ? std::declval<_Tp>() : std::declval<_Up>());
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/build/include/c++/v1/__utility/declval.h:30:34: note: declaration here is not visible
decltype(std::__declval<_Tp>(0)) declval() _NOEXCEPT;
^
/home/nikolask/llvm-projects/libcxx/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.trans/meta.trans.other/common_type.pass.cpp:13:10: fatal error: could not build module 'std'
#include <functional>
~~~~~~~~^
2 errors generated.
```
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130854
|
|
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140480
|
|
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: vitalybuka, paulkirth, libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132790
|
|
Breaks buildbots.
This reverts commit 30adaa730c4768b5eb06719c808b2884fcf53cf3.
|
|
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132790
|
|
This was discussed on Discord with the consensus that we should rename the macros.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, var-const, avogelsgesang, jloser, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131498
|
|
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Spies: mgorny, var-const, ormris, philnik, miscco, hiraditya, steven_wu, jkorous, ldionne, christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68365
|
|
This mostly copys the `<experimental/functional>` stuff and updates the code to current libc++ style.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: nlopes, adamdebreceni, arichardson, libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121074
|
|
I audited all uses of _LIBCPP_ASSERT to make sure that we only used it
for "basic assertions", i.e. assertions with constant-time conditions.
I also audited all uses of _LIBCPP_DEBUG_ASSERT to make sure we used it
only for debug-mode assertions, and in one case had to change for
_LIBCPP_ASSERT instead.
As a fly-by, I also changed a couple of tests against nullptr or 0 to
be more explicit.
After this patch, all uses of _LIBCPP_ASSERT should be with constant-time
conditions, and all uses of _LIBCPP_DEBUG_ASSERT should be with conditions
that we only want to check when the debug mode is enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122395
|
|
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
|
|
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124
|
|
This is the first step towards disentangling the debug mode and assertions
in libc++. This patch doesn't make any functional change: it simply moves
_LIBCPP_ASSERT-related stuff to its own file so as to make it clear that
libc++ assertions and the debug mode are different things. Future patches
will make it possible to enable assertions without enabling the debug
mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119769
|
|
Basically a rebase of D104980; most of that patch had already happened
via gradual drive-by changes, but this finishes it up.
Don't touch the inclusions from `<__functional_base>`, `<__hash_table>`,
or `<__locale>`; those could be removed if we propagated the
inclusions up to the includers of those files, but there are lots
of those includers.
`<algorithm>`, `<functional>`, and `<memory>` already include `<utility>`
at the top level. `<iterator>` did not, so I've added it there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119020
|
|
Now we'll notice if a header forgets to include this magic phrase.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118800
|
|
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116078
|
|
`uninitialized_fill{,_n}`.
Also:
- refactor out `__voidify`;
- use the `destroy` algorithm internally;
- refactor out helper classes used in tests for `uninitialized_*`
algorithms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115626
|
|
I just ran into a compiler error involving __bind_back and some overloads
that were being disabled with _EnableIf. I noticed that the error message
was quite bad and did not mention the reason for the overload being
excluded. Specifically, the error looked like this:
candidate template ignored: substitution failure [with _Args =
<ContiguousView>]: no member named '_EnableIfImpl' in 'std::_MetaBase<false>'
Instead, when using enable_if or enable_if_t, the compiler is clever and
can produce better diagnostics, like so:
candidate template ignored: requirement 'is_invocable_v<
std::__bind_back_op<1, std::integer_sequence<unsigned long, 0>>,
std::ranges::views::__transform::__fn &, std::tuple<PlusOne> &,
ContiguousView>' was not satisfied [with _Args = <ContiguousView>]
Basically, it tries to do a poor man's implementation of concepts, which
is already a lot better than simply complaining about substitution failure.
Hence, this commit uses enable_if_t instead of _EnableIf whenever
possible. That is both more straightforward than using the internal
helper, and also leads to better error messages in those cases.
I understand the motivation for _EnableIf's implementation was to improve
compile-time performance, however I believe striving to improve error
messages is even more important for our QOI, hence this patch. Furthermore,
it is unclear that _EnableIf actually improved compile-time performance
in any noticeable way (see discussion in the review for details).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108216
|
|
Only files that actually use min/max are required to do this dance.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108778
|
|
Also, improve tests for std::destroy and std::destroy_n so that they
check for array support.
These changes are part of http://wg21.link/p0896 (the One Ranges proposal).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106916
|
|
Moves:
* `std::move`, `std::forward`, `std::declval`, and `std::swap` into
`__utility/${FUNCTION_NAME}`.
* `std::swap_ranges` and `std::iter_swap` into
`__algorithm/${FUNCTION_NAME}`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
