| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
This is a part of #97655.
|
|
declaration" (#98593)
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#98075
bots are broken
|
|
This is a part of #97655.
|
|
This is step 4 of
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-customizable-namespace-to-allow-testing-the-libc-when-the-system-libc-is-also-llvms-libc/73079
|
|
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153231
|
|
This patch adds support for the `malloc` and `free` functions. These
currently aren't implemented in-tree so we first add the interface
filies.
This patch provides the most basic support for a true `malloc` and
`free` by using the RPC interface. This is functional, but in the future
we will want to implement a more intelligent system and primarily use
the RPC interface more as a `brk()` or `sbrk()` interface only called
when absolutely necessary. We will need to design an intelligent
allocator in the future.
The semantics of these memory allocations will need to be checked. I am
somewhat iffy on the details. I've heard that HSA can allocate
asynchronously which seems to work with my tests at least. CUDA uses an
implicit synchronization scheme so we need to use an explicitly separate
stream from the one launching the kernel or the default stream. I will
need to test the NVPTX case.
I would appreciate if anyone more experienced with the implementation details
here could chime in for the HSA and CUDA cases.
Reviewed By: sivachandra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151735
|
