| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Generate nuw GEPs for struct member accesses, as inbounds + non-negative
implies nuw.
Regression tests are updated using update scripts where possible, and by
find + replace where not.
|
|
IR for 'target teams loop' is now dependent on suitability of associated
loop-nest.
If a loop-nest:
- does not contain a function call, or
- the -fopenmp-assume-no-nested-parallelism has been specified,
- or the call is to an OpenMP API AND
- does not contain nested loop bind(parallel) directives
then it can be emitted as 'target teams distribute parallel for', which
is the current default. Otherwise, it is emitted as 'target teams
distribute'.
Added debug output indicating how 'target teams loop' was emitted. Flag
is -mllvm -debug-only=target-teams-loop-codegen
Added LIT tests explicitly verifying 'target teams loop' emitted as a
parallel loop and a distribute loop.
Updated other 'loop' related tests as needed to reflect change in IR.
- These updates account for most of the changed files and
additions/deletions.
|
|
dyn_ptr. (#85363)
A kernel implicit parameter (dyn_ptr) was introduced some time back.
This patch increments the kernel args version for a compiler supporting
dyn_ptr. The version will be used by the runtime to determine whether
the implicit parameter is generated by the compiler. The versioning is
required to support use cases where code generated by an older compiler
is linked with a newer runtime.
If approved, this patch should be backported to release 18.
|
|
Authored-by: Raúl Peñacoba Veigas <rpenacob@bsc.es>
|
|
Summary:
Currently, OpenMP handles the `omp requires` clause by emitting a global
constructor into the runtime for every translation unit that requires
it. However, this is not a great solution because it prevents us from
having a defined order in which the runtime is accessed and used.
This patch changes the approach to no longer use global constructors,
but to instead group the flag with the other offloading entires that we
already handle. This has the effect of still registering each flag per
requires TU, but now we have a single constructor that handles
everything.
This function removes support for the old `__tgt_register_requires` and
replaces it with a warning message. We just had a recent release, and
the OpenMP policy for the past four releases since we switched to LLVM
is that we do not provide strict backwards compatibility between major
LLVM releases now that the library is versioned. This means that a user
will need to recompile if they have an old binary that relied on
`register_requires` having the old behavior. It is important that we
actively deprecate this, as otherwise it would not solve the problem of
having no defined init and shutdown order for `libomptarget`. The
problem of `libomptarget` not having a define init and shutdown order
cascades into a lot of other issues so I have a strong incentive to be
rid of it.
It is worth noting that the current `__tgt_offload_entry` only has space
for a 32-bit integer here. I am planning to overhaul these at some point
as well.
|
|
Reapplication of 7339c0f782d5c70e0928f8991b0c05338a90c84c with a fix
for a crash involving arrays without a size expression.
Clang supports VLAs in C++ as an extension, but we currently only warn
on their use when you pass -Wvla, -Wvla-extension, or -pedantic.
However, VLAs as they're expressed in C have been considered by WG21
and rejected, are easy to use accidentally to the surprise of users
(e.g., https://ddanilov.me/default-non-standard-features/), and they
have potential security implications beyond constant-size arrays
(https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/c/ARR32-C.+Ensure+size+arguments+for+variable+length+arrays+are+in+a+valid+range).
C++ users should strongly consider using other functionality such as
std::vector instead.
This seems like sufficiently compelling evidence to warn users about
VLA use by default in C++ modes. This patch enables the -Wvla-extension
diagnostic group in C++ language modes by default, and adds the warning
group to -Wall in GNU++ language modes. The warning is still opt-in in
C language modes, where support for VLAs is somewhat less surprising to
users.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-diagnosing-use-of-vlas-in-c/73109
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62836
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156565
|
|
This reverts commit 7339c0f782d5c70e0928f8991b0c05338a90c84c.
Breaks bots:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/139/builds/51875
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/164/builds/45262
|
|
Clang supports VLAs in C++ as an extension, but we currently only warn
on their use when you pass -Wvla, -Wvla-extension, or -pedantic.
However, VLAs as they're expressed in C have been considered by WG21
and rejected, are easy to use accidentally to the surprise of users
(e.g., https://ddanilov.me/default-non-standard-features/), and they
have potential security implications beyond constant-size arrays
(https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/c/ARR32-C.+Ensure+size+arguments+for+variable+length+arrays+are+in+a+valid+range).
C++ users should strongly consider using other functionality such as
std::vector instead.
This seems like sufficiently compelling evidence to warn users about
VLA use by default in C++ modes. This patch enables the -Wvla-extension
diagnostic group in C++ language modes by default, and adds the warning
group to -Wall in GNU++ language modes. The warning is still opt-in in
C language modes, where support for VLAs is somewhat less surprising to
users.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-diagnosing-use-of-vlas-in-c/73109
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62836
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156565
|
|
We used to have two separate implementations to derive the number of
threads used in a target region. This lead us to sometimes miss out on
user provided thread bounds (num_threads, or thread_limit) when we
looked for "constant default values". If we might miss out on the
presence of those bounds, we cannot set the thread_limit statically
since the runtime will try to honor user input rather than cap it at the
"preferred default". This patch replaces the secondary implementation
with the primary in a mode that will not emit code but just look for the
presence, and potentially upper bounds, of thread limiting clauses.
The runtime test would not pass without this rewrite as we missed some
clauses, set the static limit on the device to the preferred value, but
then violated that value at runtime.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64845
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158381
|
|
This allows use with non-0 address space stacks. llvm_ptr_ty should
never be used. This could use some more percolation up through mlir,
but this is enough to fix existing tests.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D156666
|
|
alignment requirements
The itanium ABI for certain platforms requires a minimum alignments for
member function pointers to reserve certain bits for distinguishing
virtual and non-virtual functions.
Our implementation of this however depends on the alignment of the
function involved, which may however not reflect the true alignment of
function pointers on certain targets for which the alignment is
independent of the function (e.g. AIX). Worse, the 2-byte alignment
we use may be less than the ABI minimum for the target, and in the case
we are using explicit sections will result in invalid codegen.
This patch attempts to correct this situation by considering the target
alignment of function pointers as part of making the decision about
whether we need to adjust the function alignment to conform to the ABI.
Targets which do not provide the function ptr alignment information
will return a value of 1 when queried and will conservatively retain
the old alignment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147184
|
|
The loop directive is a descriptive construct which allows the compiler
flexibility in how it generates code for the directive's associated
loop(s). See OpenMP specification 5.2 [257:8-9].
Codegen added in this patch for the combined 'loop' directives are:
'target teams loop' -> 'target teams distribute parallel for'
'teams loop' -> 'teams distribute parallel for'
'target parallel loop' -> 'target parallel for'
'parallel loop' -> 'parallel for'
NOTE: The implementation of the 'loop' directive itself is unchanged.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145823
|
