summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/clang/test/Analysis/malloc-annotations.cpp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-09-03[clang][analyzer] Remove checker 'alpha.core.CastSize' (#156350)Balázs Kéri
2025-07-28Rename 'free' in warning messages to 'release' (#150935)Baghirov Feyruz
Changed the warning message: - **From**: 'Attempt to free released memory' **To**: 'Attempt to release already released memory' - **From**: 'Attempt to free non-owned memory' **To**: 'Attempt to release non-owned memory' - **From**: 'Use of memory after it is freed' **To**: 'Use of memory after it is released' All connected tests and their expectations have been changed accordingly. Inspired by [this PR](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147542#discussion_r2195197922)
2022-06-14Reland "[analyzer] Deprecate `-analyzer-store region` flag"Balazs Benics
I'm trying to remove unused options from the `Analyses.def` file, then merge the rest of the useful options into the `AnalyzerOptions.def`. Then make sure one can set these by an `-analyzer-config XXX=YYY` style flag. Then surface the `-analyzer-config` to the `clang` frontend; After all of this, we can pursue the tablegen approach described https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-tablegen-clang-static-analyzer-engine-options-for-better-documentation/61488 In this patch, I'm proposing flag deprecations. We should support deprecated analyzer flags for exactly one release. In this case I'm planning to drop this flag in `clang-16`. In the clang frontend, now we won't pass this option to the cc1 frontend, rather emit a warning diagnostic reminding the users about this deprecated flag, which will be turned into error in clang-16. Unfortunately, I had to remove all the tests referring to this flag, causing a mass change. I've also added a test for checking this warning. I've seen that `scan-build` also uses this flag, but I think we should remove that part only after we turn this into a hard error. Reviewed By: martong Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126215
2022-06-10Revert "[analyzer] Deprecate `-analyzer-store region` flag"Nico Weber
This reverts commit d50d9946d1d7e5f20881f0bc71fbd025040b1c96. Broke check-clang, see comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D126067 Also revert dependent change "[analyzer] Deprecate the unused 'analyzer-opt-analyze-nested-blocks' cc1 flag" This reverts commit 07b4a6d0461fe64e10d30029ed3d598e49ca3810. Also revert "[analyzer] Fix buildbots after introducing a new frontend warning" This reverts commit 90374df15ddc58d823ca42326a76f58e748f20eb. (See https://reviews.llvm.org/rG90374df15ddc58d823ca42326a76f58e748f20eb)
2022-06-10[analyzer] Deprecate `-analyzer-store region` flagBalazs Benics
I'm trying to remove unused options from the `Analyses.def` file, then merge the rest of the useful options into the `AnalyzerOptions.def`. Then make sure one can set these by an `-analyzer-config XXX=YYY` style flag. Then surface the `-analyzer-config` to the `clang` frontend; After all of this, we can pursue the tablegen approach described https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-tablegen-clang-static-analyzer-engine-options-for-better-documentation/61488 In this patch, I'm proposing flag deprecations. We should support deprecated analyzer flags for exactly one release. In this case I'm planning to drop this flag in `clang-16`. In the clang frontend, now we won't pass this option to the cc1 frontend, rather emit a warning diagnostic reminding the users about this deprecated flag, which will be turned into error in clang-16. Unfortunately, I had to remove all the tests referring to this flag, causing a mass change. I've also added a test for checking this warning. I've seen that `scan-build` also uses this flag, but I think we should remove that part only after we turn this into a hard error. Reviewed By: martong Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126215
2020-02-25[analyzer][MallocChecker][NFC] Change the use of IdentifierInfo* to ↵Kristóf Umann
CallDescription Exactly what it says on the tin! I decided not to merge this with the patch that changes all these to a CallDescriptionMap object, so the patch is that much more trivial. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68163