diff options
| author | George Rimar <grimar@accesssoftek.com> | 2019-05-23 09:50:18 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | George Rimar <grimar@accesssoftek.com> | 2019-05-23 09:50:18 +0000 |
| commit | 77b4f0abb82c419fedca2ae3a20e1201f752b894 (patch) | |
| tree | 090ef3949ff2163f373ed5176ef9f9e97d334cd0 /lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/ScriptInterpreterPython.cpp | |
| parent | 691502f61e9e6e7de657b21f7c311d1cece3f99b (diff) | |
[LLD][ELF] - Improve diagnostic about unrecognized relocations.
This is a minor improvement inspired by https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38303.
A person reported that he observed message complaining about unsupported R_ARM_V4BX:
error: can't create dynamic relocation R_ARM_V4BX against local symbol in readonly segment; recompile object files with -fPIC
But with -z notext he only saw a relocation number, what is not convenient:
error: ../../gfx/cairo/libpixman/src/pixman-arm-neon-asm-bilinear.o:(.text+0x4F0): unrecognized reloc 40
Also, in the error messages we use relocation but not reloc.
With this patch we start to print one of the following messages:
error: file.o: unrecognized relocation Unknown(999)
error: file.o: unrecognized relocation R_X_KNOWN_BY_LLVM_BUT_UNSUPPORTED_BY_LLD_NAME
There is no way to write a test for that I believe.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62237
llvm-svn: 361472
Diffstat (limited to 'lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/ScriptInterpreterPython.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions