summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/SWIGPythonBridge.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChuanqi Xu <yedeng.yd@linux.alibaba.com>2021-09-03 10:22:53 +0800
committerChuanqi Xu <yedeng.yd@linux.alibaba.com>2021-09-03 10:22:55 +0800
commit2fbd254aa46b4934c88cf4bac5ad756471463862 (patch)
tree9ba828803f98bb15d94699a4cbcb4e2f94da9050 /lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/SWIGPythonBridge.cpp
parent6cd4b508a8a51ecd16d2b0297dfeb445ab41b42e (diff)
[Coroutines] [Clang] Look up coroutine component in std namespace first
Summary: Now in libcxx and clang, all the coroutine components are defined in std::experimental namespace. And now the coroutine TS is merged into C++20. So in the working draft like N4892, we could find the coroutine components is defined in std namespace instead of std::experimental namespace. And the coroutine support in clang seems to be relatively stable. So I think it may be suitable to move the coroutine component into the experiment namespace now. But move the coroutine component into the std namespace may be an break change. So I planned to split this change into two patch. One in clang and other in libcxx. This patch would make clang lookup coroutine_traits in std namespace first. For the compatibility consideration, clang would lookup in std::experimental namespace if it can't find definitions in std namespace and emit a warning in this case. So the existing codes wouldn't be break after update compiler. Test Plan: check-clang, check-libcxx Reviewed By: lxfind Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108696
Diffstat (limited to 'lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/SWIGPythonBridge.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions