diff options
| author | David Green <david.green@arm.com> | 2023-04-24 22:02:30 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David Green <david.green@arm.com> | 2023-04-24 22:02:30 +0100 |
| commit | 1869a9c225c7ed411a15592d21b277716b65a374 (patch) | |
| tree | 0a9f941ccb2d812e80ca2fe9f854ce8e49e90072 /lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/PythonDataObjects.cpp | |
| parent | 2bca3f2a92a506997914f335396e124c0a5f87dd (diff) | |
[LV] Use the known trip count when costing non-tail folded VFs
Now that we store the ScalarCost in the VectorizationFactor it is possible to
use it to get a slightly more accurate cost in isMoreProfitable between two
vector factors. This extends the logic added in D101726 to non-tail-folded
cases, using the costs of `VecCost * (TripCount / VF) + ScalarCost * (TripCount % VF)`
to compare VFs where the TripCount is known and we are not folding the tail.
This shouldn't alter very much as small trip counts are usually not vectorized,
but does seem to help in the testcase where 4 * VF4 is chosen as profitable
compared to 2 * VF8 + 4 * scalar.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147720
Diffstat (limited to 'lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/PythonDataObjects.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions