diff options
| author | Chuanqi Xu <yedeng.yd@linux.alibaba.com> | 2024-02-01 13:44:32 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tom Stellard <tstellar@redhat.com> | 2024-02-06 21:30:14 -0800 |
| commit | c6c86965d967886ca5a2ed8968c949cd42cdd49a (patch) | |
| tree | 20502630f3678fb1074e854cf1446f5e9c15cead /clang/test/Modules/polluted-operator.cppm | |
| parent | 70195e0d67080c2d0d1f321db69ebb40042a1c7a (diff) | |
[C++20] [Modules] Introduce -fskip-odr-check-in-gmf (#79959)llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/79240
Cite the comment from @mizvekov in
//github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/79240:
> There are two kinds of bugs / issues relevant here:
>
> Clang bugs that this change hides
> Here we can add a Frontend flag that disables the GMF ODR check, just
> so
> we can keep tracking, testing and fixing these issues.
> The Driver would just always pass that flag.
> We could add that flag in this current issue.
> Bugs in user code:
> I don't think it's worth adding a corresponding Driver flag for
> controlling the above Frontend flag, since we intend it's behavior to
> become default as we fix the problems, and users interested in testing
> the more strict behavior can just use the Frontend flag directly.
This patch follows the suggestion:
- Introduce the CC1 flag `-fskip-odr-check-in-gmf` which is by default
off, so that the every existing test will still be tested with checking
ODR violations.
- Passing `-fskip-odr-check-in-gmf` in the driver to keep the behavior
we intended.
- Edit the document to tell the users who are still interested in more
strict checks can use `-Xclang -fno-skip-odr-check-in-gmf` to get the
existing behavior.
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/test/Modules/polluted-operator.cppm')
| -rw-r--r-- | clang/test/Modules/polluted-operator.cppm | 18 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/clang/test/Modules/polluted-operator.cppm b/clang/test/Modules/polluted-operator.cppm index d4b0041b5d34..721ca061c939 100644 --- a/clang/test/Modules/polluted-operator.cppm +++ b/clang/test/Modules/polluted-operator.cppm @@ -4,6 +4,12 @@ // // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -emit-module-interface %t/a.cppm -o %t/a.pcm // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/b.cppm -fprebuilt-module-path=%t -emit-module-interface -o %t/b.pcm -verify +// +// Testing the behavior of `-fskip-odr-check-in-gmf` +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fskip-odr-check-in-gmf -emit-module-interface %t/a.cppm -o \ +// RUN: %t/a.pcm +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fskip-odr-check-in-gmf %t/b.cppm -fprebuilt-module-path=%t \ +// RUN: -emit-module-interface -DSKIP_ODR_CHECK_IN_GMF -o %t/b.pcm -verify //--- foo.h @@ -46,10 +52,16 @@ module; export module a; //--- b.cppm -// This is actually an ODR violation. But given https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/79240, -// we don't count it as an ODR violation any more. -// expected-no-diagnostics module; #include "bar.h" export module b; import a; + +#ifdef SKIP_ODR_CHECK_IN_GMF +// expected-no-diagnostics +#else +// expected-error@* {{has different definitions in different modules; first difference is defined here found data member '_S_copy_ctor' with an initializer}} +// expected-note@* {{but in 'a.<global>' found data member '_S_copy_ctor' with a different initializer}} +// expected-error@* {{from module 'a.<global>' is not present in definition of 'variant<_Types...>' provided earlier}} +// expected-note@* {{declaration of 'swap' does not match}} +#endif |
