summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMariya Podchishchaeva <mariya.podchishchaeva@intel.com>2025-11-13 10:32:03 +0100
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2025-11-13 10:32:03 +0100
commit4d10c1165442cbbbc0017b48fcdd7dae1ccf3678 (patch)
treed1e3d6dbd1f77fb3c06246d16297f0f9fb85ea9c /clang/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp
parent295a3f725153cb1e8e0b257c6409d2e12b904d0e (diff)
Reland [MS][clang] Add support for vector deleting destructors (#165598)
MSVC supports an extension allowing to delete an array of objects via pointer whose static type doesn't match its dynamic type. This is done via generation of special destructors - vector deleting destructors. MSVC's virtual tables always contain a pointer to the vector deleting destructor for classes with virtual destructors, so not having this extension implemented causes clang to generate code that is not compatible with the code generated by MSVC, because clang always puts a pointer to a scalar deleting destructor to the vtable. As a bonus the deletion of an array of polymorphic object will work just like it does with MSVC - no memory leaks and correct destructors are called. This patch will cause clang to emit code that is compatible with code produced by MSVC but not compatible with code produced with clang of older versions, so the new behavior can be disabled via passing -fclang-abi-compat=21 (or lower). This is yet another attempt to land vector deleting destructors support originally implemented by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133451. This PR contains fixes for issues reported in the original PR as well as fixes for issues related to operator delete[] search reported in several issues like https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133950#issuecomment-2787510484 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/134265 Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/19772
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp')
-rw-r--r--clang/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp95
1 files changed, 94 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp
index f782b0cd17da..ced175a9a8f0 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp
@@ -1442,6 +1442,95 @@ static bool CanSkipVTablePointerInitialization(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
return true;
}
+static void EmitConditionalArrayDtorCall(const CXXDestructorDecl *DD,
+ CodeGenFunction &CGF,
+ llvm::Value *ShouldDeleteCondition) {
+ Address ThisPtr = CGF.LoadCXXThisAddress();
+ llvm::BasicBlock *ScalarBB = CGF.createBasicBlock("dtor.scalar");
+ llvm::BasicBlock *callDeleteBB =
+ CGF.createBasicBlock("dtor.call_delete_after_array_destroy");
+ llvm::BasicBlock *VectorBB = CGF.createBasicBlock("dtor.vector");
+ auto *CondTy = cast<llvm::IntegerType>(ShouldDeleteCondition->getType());
+ llvm::Value *CheckTheBitForArrayDestroy = CGF.Builder.CreateAnd(
+ ShouldDeleteCondition, llvm::ConstantInt::get(CondTy, 2));
+ llvm::Value *ShouldDestroyArray =
+ CGF.Builder.CreateIsNull(CheckTheBitForArrayDestroy);
+ CGF.Builder.CreateCondBr(ShouldDestroyArray, ScalarBB, VectorBB);
+
+ CGF.EmitBlock(VectorBB);
+
+ llvm::Value *numElements = nullptr;
+ llvm::Value *allocatedPtr = nullptr;
+ CharUnits cookieSize;
+ QualType EltTy = DD->getThisType()->getPointeeType();
+ CGF.CGM.getCXXABI().ReadArrayCookie(CGF, ThisPtr, EltTy, numElements,
+ allocatedPtr, cookieSize);
+
+ // Destroy the elements.
+ QualType::DestructionKind dtorKind = EltTy.isDestructedType();
+
+ assert(dtorKind);
+ assert(numElements && "no element count for a type with a destructor!");
+
+ CharUnits elementSize = CGF.getContext().getTypeSizeInChars(EltTy);
+ CharUnits elementAlign =
+ ThisPtr.getAlignment().alignmentOfArrayElement(elementSize);
+
+ llvm::Value *arrayBegin = ThisPtr.emitRawPointer(CGF);
+ llvm::Value *arrayEnd = CGF.Builder.CreateInBoundsGEP(
+ ThisPtr.getElementType(), arrayBegin, numElements, "delete.end");
+
+ // We already checked that the array is not 0-length before entering vector
+ // deleting dtor.
+ CGF.emitArrayDestroy(arrayBegin, arrayEnd, EltTy, elementAlign,
+ CGF.getDestroyer(dtorKind),
+ /*checkZeroLength*/ false, CGF.needsEHCleanup(dtorKind));
+
+ llvm::BasicBlock *VectorBBCont = CGF.createBasicBlock("dtor.vector.cont");
+ CGF.EmitBlock(VectorBBCont);
+
+ llvm::Value *CheckTheBitForDeleteCall = CGF.Builder.CreateAnd(
+ ShouldDeleteCondition, llvm::ConstantInt::get(CondTy, 1));
+
+ llvm::Value *ShouldCallDelete =
+ CGF.Builder.CreateIsNull(CheckTheBitForDeleteCall);
+ CGF.Builder.CreateCondBr(ShouldCallDelete, CGF.ReturnBlock.getBlock(),
+ callDeleteBB);
+ CGF.EmitBlock(callDeleteBB);
+ const CXXDestructorDecl *Dtor = cast<CXXDestructorDecl>(CGF.CurCodeDecl);
+ const CXXRecordDecl *ClassDecl = Dtor->getParent();
+ assert(Dtor->getArrayOperatorDelete());
+ if (!Dtor->getGlobalArrayOperatorDelete()) {
+ CGF.EmitDeleteCall(Dtor->getArrayOperatorDelete(), allocatedPtr,
+ CGF.getContext().getCanonicalTagType(ClassDecl));
+ } else {
+ // If global operator[] is set, the class had its own operator delete[].
+ // In that case, check the 4th bit. If it is set, we need to call
+ // ::delete[].
+ llvm::Value *CheckTheBitForGlobDeleteCall = CGF.Builder.CreateAnd(
+ ShouldDeleteCondition, llvm::ConstantInt::get(CondTy, 4));
+
+ llvm::Value *ShouldCallGlobDelete =
+ CGF.Builder.CreateIsNull(CheckTheBitForGlobDeleteCall);
+ llvm::BasicBlock *GlobDelete =
+ CGF.createBasicBlock("dtor.call_glob_delete_after_array_destroy");
+ llvm::BasicBlock *ClassDelete =
+ CGF.createBasicBlock("dtor.call_class_delete_after_array_destroy");
+ CGF.Builder.CreateCondBr(ShouldCallGlobDelete, ClassDelete, GlobDelete);
+ CGF.EmitBlock(ClassDelete);
+ CGF.EmitDeleteCall(Dtor->getArrayOperatorDelete(), allocatedPtr,
+ CGF.getContext().getCanonicalTagType(ClassDecl));
+ CGF.EmitBranchThroughCleanup(CGF.ReturnBlock);
+
+ CGF.EmitBlock(GlobDelete);
+ CGF.EmitDeleteCall(Dtor->getGlobalArrayOperatorDelete(), allocatedPtr,
+ CGF.getContext().getCanonicalTagType(ClassDecl));
+ }
+
+ CGF.EmitBranchThroughCleanup(CGF.ReturnBlock);
+ CGF.EmitBlock(ScalarBB);
+}
+
/// EmitDestructorBody - Emits the body of the current destructor.
void CodeGenFunction::EmitDestructorBody(FunctionArgList &Args) {
const CXXDestructorDecl *Dtor = cast<CXXDestructorDecl>(CurGD.getDecl());
@@ -1471,7 +1560,9 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitDestructorBody(FunctionArgList &Args) {
// outside of the function-try-block, which means it's always
// possible to delegate the destructor body to the complete
// destructor. Do so.
- if (DtorType == Dtor_Deleting) {
+ if (DtorType == Dtor_Deleting || DtorType == Dtor_VectorDeleting) {
+ if (CXXStructorImplicitParamValue && DtorType == Dtor_VectorDeleting)
+ EmitConditionalArrayDtorCall(Dtor, *this, CXXStructorImplicitParamValue);
RunCleanupsScope DtorEpilogue(*this);
EnterDtorCleanups(Dtor, Dtor_Deleting);
if (HaveInsertPoint()) {
@@ -1502,6 +1593,8 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitDestructorBody(FunctionArgList &Args) {
llvm_unreachable("not expecting a unified dtor");
case Dtor_Comdat: llvm_unreachable("not expecting a COMDAT");
case Dtor_Deleting: llvm_unreachable("already handled deleting case");
+ case Dtor_VectorDeleting:
+ llvm_unreachable("already handled vector deleting case");
case Dtor_Complete:
assert((Body || getTarget().getCXXABI().isMicrosoft()) &&