diff options
| author | Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> | 2025-11-18 15:23:20 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> | 2025-11-19 12:42:44 -0500 |
| commit | e2faea35a1edf6fca4d98800a1d9566db04a133b (patch) | |
| tree | c968e3872386ec18a6553fa9d34a4454fcab1cbc /libjava/java | |
| parent | 74bcef9f528c7d5bd89e5bee96bca7bddd89e9c8 (diff) | |
c++: fix ICE when comparing targs [PR119580]
In r10-7816, cp_tree_equal/TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR was changed to use
comp_template_args to compare the targs. This makes sense, but
comp_template_args won't deal with an error_mark_node. We created
a BASELINK for S::foo<T::value_type>, but since value_type couldn't
be looked up, we ended up with an error_mark_node instead of a TREE_VEC
of arguments for the TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR in the BASELINK.
It seems reasonable not to create such a TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR by checking
the result of tsubst_template_args like we do in so many other places.
This changes the diagnostic in three tests, but it's only the followup
error message after complaining about the type/value mismatch.
PR c++/119580
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* pt.cc (tsubst_baselink): Return error_mark_node if
tsubst_template_args returned error_mark_node.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/template/crash106.C: Adjust expected diagnostics.
* g++.dg/template/crash112.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/template/dependent-args1.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr119580.C: New test.
Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'libjava/java')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
