| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Follow up to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/123569
|
|
I'd reverted this in 6c7805d5d1 after a bad stage. Original commit
messsage follows:
[NFC][RemoveDIs] Bulk update utilities to insert with iterators
As part of the RemoveDIs project we need LLVM to insert instructions using
iterators wherever possible, so that the iterators can carry a bit of
debug-info. This commit implements some of that by updating the contents of
llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils to always use iterator-versions of instruction
constructors.
There are two general flavours of update:
* Almost all call-sites just call getIterator on an instruction
* Several make use of an existing iterator (scenarios where the code is
actually significant for debug-info)
The underlying logic is that any call to getFirstInsertionPt or similar
APIs that identify the start of a block need to have that iterator passed
directly to the insertion function, without being converted to a bare
Instruction pointer along the way.
I've also switched DemotePHIToStack to take an optional iterator: it needs
to take an iterator, and having a no-insert-location behaviour appears to
be important. The constructors for ICmpInst and FCmpInst have been updated
too. They're the only instructions that take block _references_ rather than
pointers for certain calls, and a future patch is going to make use of
default-null block insertion locations.
All of this should be NFC.
|
|
This reverts commit 3fda50d3915b2163a54a37b602be7783a89dd808.
Apparently I've missed a hunk while staging this; will back out for now.
Picked up here: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/139/builds/60429/steps/6/logs/stdio
|
|
As part of the RemoveDIs project we need LLVM to insert instructions using
iterators wherever possible, so that the iterators can carry a bit of
debug-info. This commit implements some of that by updating the contents of
llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils to always use iterator-versions of instruction
constructors.
There are two general flavours of update:
* Almost all call-sites just call getIterator on an instruction
* Several make use of an existing iterator (scenarios where the code is
actually significant for debug-info)
The underlying logic is that any call to getFirstInsertionPt or similar
APIs that identify the start of a block need to have that iterator passed
directly to the insertion function, without being converted to a bare
Instruction pointer along the way.
I've also switched DemotePHIToStack to take an optional iterator: it needs
to take an iterator, and having a no-insert-location behaviour appears to
be important. The constructors for ICmpInst and FCmpInst have been updated
too. They're the only instructions that take block _references_ rather than
pointers for certain calls, and a future patch is going to make use of
default-null block insertion locations.
All of this should be NFC.
|
|
|
|
Replace this with PointerType::getUnqual().
Followup to the opaque pointer transition. Fixes an in-code TODO item.
|
|
Identified with modernize-use-bool-literals.
|
|
The build failed with
error: call to deleted constructor of 'llvm::Error'
errors.
This reverts commit 1c2241a7936bf85aa68aef94bd40c3ba77d8ddf2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
|
|
Summary:
This was flagged in https://www.viva64.com/en/b/0629/ under "Snippet No.
7".
These statements are order independent, short of the use-after-move.
Reviewers: echristo, srhines, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: dblaikie, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62114
llvm-svn: 362267
|
|
Summary:
This was flagged in https://www.viva64.com/en/b/0629/ under "Snippet No.
6".
Note that author also states:
"Note that the loop doesn't actually execute at all."
This is not true, but the author can be forgiven; there's two distinct
variables with very similar identifiers:
MiscompiledFunctions
MisCompFunctions
Reviewers: echristo, srhines, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62113
llvm-svn: 361279
|
|
This cleans up all LoadInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass the
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57172
llvm-svn: 352911
|
|
This cleans up all CallInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
function type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57170
llvm-svn: 352909
|
|
Recommit r352791 after tweaking DerivedTypes.h slightly, so that gcc
doesn't choke on it, hopefully.
Original Message:
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
llvm-svn: 352827
|
|
This reverts commit f47d6b38c7a61d50db4566b02719de05492dcef1 (r352791).
Seems to run into compilation failures with GCC (but not clang, where
I tested it). Reverting while I investigate.
llvm-svn: 352800
|
|
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
llvm-svn: 352791
|
|
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
Method BugDriver::performFinalCleanups(...) would delete Module object
it worked on, which was also deleted by its caller
(e.g. TestCodeGenerator(...)). Changed the code to avoid double delete
and make Module ownership slightly clearer.
Patch by Andrzej Janik.
llvm-svn: 330763
|
|
While there, change a bunch of helper functions to take references to
avoid adding calls to get().
This should conclude the bugpoint yak shaving.
llvm-svn: 325177
|
|
llvm-svn: 325176
|
|
llvm-svn: 325174
|
|
llvm-svn: 325173
|
|
llvm-svn: 325164
|
|
It can never be null and most callers were already using references or
std::unique_ptr.
llvm-svn: 325160
|
|
templates.
From a user prospective, it forces the use of an annoying nullptr to mark the end of the vararg, and there's not type checking on the arguments.
The variadic template is an obvious solution to both issues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31070
llvm-svn: 299949
|
|
Moving Modules into `testMergedProgram` is incorrect (and causes segmentation
faults) since all callers expect to retain ownership. This is evidenced by the
later calls to `unique_ptr<Module>::get` in the same function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31727
llvm-svn: 299596
|
|
It got disconnected during the cmake conversion. For Miscompilation.cpp,
it was purely advisory for the user and the ToolRunner.cpp version was
trying to compensate for libs and bins in the same directory, which
hasn't been the case for a very long time.
llvm-svn: 283022
|
|
This replaces the threading of `std::string &Error` through all of
these APIs with checked Error returns instead. There are very few
places here that actually emit any errors right now, but threading the
APIs through will allow us to replace a bunch of exit(1)'s that are
scattered through this code with proper error handling.
This is more or less NFC, but does move around where a couple of error
messages are printed out.
llvm-svn: 280720
|
|
This isn't the right thing to do - it turns out a number of the APIs
that "never fail" just exit(1) if something bad happens. We can and
should thread Error through this instead.
That diff will make more sense with this reverted. Sorry for the
noise.
This reverts r280690
llvm-svn: 280691
|
|
This simplifies ListReducer and most of its subclasses by removing the
std::string &Error that was threaded through all of them but almost
never used. If we end up needing error handling in more places here we
can reinstate it using llvm::Error instead of these unwieldy strings.
The 2 cases (out of 12) that actually can hit the error cases are a
little bit awkward now, but those will clean up as I refactor this API
further.
llvm-svn: 280690
|
|
I'm going to clean up the APIs here a bit and touch many many lines
anyway.
llvm-svn: 280450
|
|
llvm-svn: 274083
|
|
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16793
llvm-svn: 259539
|
|
Passing in a std::unique_ptr should help find errors when the module
is used after being linked into another module.
llvm-svn: 255842
|
|
This patch converts code that has access to a LLVMContext to not take a
diagnostic handler.
This has a few advantages
* It is easier to use a consistent diagnostic handler in a single program.
* Less clutter since we are not passing a handler around.
It does make it a bit awkward to implement some C APIs that return a
diagnostic string. I will propose new versions of these APIs and
deprecate the current ones.
llvm-svn: 255571
|
|
It now receives and returns std::unique_ptr.
llvm-svn: 255087
|
|
This passes std::unique_ptr to predicates that are expected to delete
their argument.
llvm-svn: 255086
|
|
llvm-svn: 255084
|
|
llvm-svn: 255082
|
|
llvm-svn: 255079
|
|
llvm-svn: 255078
|
|
Before this patch the diagnostic handler was optional. If it was not
passed, the one in the LLVMContext was used.
That is probably not a pattern we want to follow. If each area has an
optional callback, there is a sea of callbacks and it is hard to follow
which one is called.
Doing this also found cases where the callback is a nice addition, like
testing that no errors or warnings are reported.
The other option is to always use the diagnostic handler in the
LLVMContext. That has a few problems
* To implement the C API we would have to set the diag handler and then
set it back to the original value.
* Code that creates the context might be far away from code that wants
the diagnostics.
I do have a patch that implements the second option and will send that as
an RFC.
llvm-svn: 254777
|
|
The linker never takes ownership of a module or changes which module it
is refering to, making it natural to use references.
llvm-svn: 254449
|
|
This is the last of the implicit ilist iterator conversions in LLVM.
Still up for debate whether we let these bitrot back:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091617.html
llvm-svn: 250852
|
|
We now use clang by default and fallback to gcc when requested.
With this commit, names reflect reality. No functional change
intended.
Discussed with: Rafael Espindola.
llvm-svn: 250321
|
|
If the type isn't trivially moveable emplace can skip a potentially
expensive move. It also saves a couple of characters.
Call sites were found with the ASTMatcher + some semi-automated cleanup.
memberCallExpr(
argumentCountIs(1), callee(methodDecl(hasName("push_back"))),
on(hasType(recordDecl(has(namedDecl(hasName("emplace_back")))))),
hasArgument(0, bindTemporaryExpr(
hasType(recordDecl(hasNonTrivialDestructor())),
has(constructExpr()))),
unless(isInTemplateInstantiation()))
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 238602
|
|
Require the pointee type to be passed explicitly and assert that it is
correct. For now it's possible to pass nullptr here (and I've done so in
a few places in this patch) but eventually that will be disallowed once
all clients have been updated or removed. It'll be a long road to get
all the way there... but if you have the cahnce to update your callers
to pass the type explicitly without depending on a pointer's element
type, that would be a good thing to do soon and a necessary thing to do
eventually.
llvm-svn: 233938
|
