| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
These are identified by misc-include-cleaner. I've filtered out those
that break builds. Also, I'm staying away from llvm-config.h,
config.h, and Compiler.h, which likely cause platform- or
compiler-specific build failures.
|
|
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-is-stmt-placement-for-better-interactive-debugging/82668
|
|
|
|
We can use *Set::insert_range to collapse:
for (auto Elem : Range)
Set.insert(E);
down to:
Set.insert_range(Range);
In some cases, we can further fold that into the set declaration.
|
|
Add an extra knob to RuntimeUnrollMultiExit to let backends control
whether to allow multi-exit unrolling on a per-loop basis.
This gives backends more fine-grained control on deciding if multi-exit
unrolling is profitable for a given loop and uarch. Similar to
4226e0a0c75.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124462
|
|
Add an extra know to UnrollingPreferences to let backends control the
maximum budget for SCEV expansions.
This gives backends more fine-grained control on the cost of the runtime
checks for runtime unrolling.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118316
|
|
This patch fixes a simple error where as part of loop unrolling we
optimize conditional loop-exiting branches into unconditional branches
when we know that they will or won't exit the loop, but does not
propagate the source location of the original branch to the new one.
Found using https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107279.
|
|
|
|
Identified with misc-include-cleaner.
|
|
Use the more aggressive invalidation method in a number of places
that add incoming values to lcssa phi nodes. It is likely that
it's possible to construct cases with incorrect SCEV preservation
similar to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/109333 for
these.
|
|
|
|
This is a helper to avoid writing `getModule()->getDataLayout()`. I
regularly try to use this method only to remember it doesn't exist...
`getModule()->getDataLayout()` is also a common (the most common?)
reason why code has to include the Module.h header.
|
|
- There is no restriction on a loop with controlled convergent
operations when
the relevant tokens are defined and used within the loop.
- When a token defined outside a loop is used inside (also called a loop
convergence heart), unrolling is allowed only in the absence of
remainder or
runtime checks.
- When a token defined inside a loop is used outside, such a loop is
said to be
"extended". This loop can only be unrolled by also duplicating the
extended part
lying outside the loop. Such unrolling is disabled for now.
- Clean up loop hearts: When unrolling a loop with a heart, duplicating
the
heart will introduce multiple static uses of a convergence control token
in a
cycle that does not contain its definition. This violates the static
rules for
tokens, and needs to be cleaned up into a single occurrence of the
intrinsic.
- Spell out the initializer for UnrollLoopOptions to improve
readability.
Original implementation [D85605] by Nicolai Haehnle
<nicolai.haehnle@amd.com>.
|
|
merged (#91246)
Remove redundant debug instructions after blocks have been merged into
the predecessor, It can reduce some compile time in some cases.
This change only fixes the situation of loop unrolling, and other
situations are not considered. "RemoveRedundantDbgInstrs" seems to be
very time-consuming. Thus, we just add here after the "Dest" has been
merged into the "Fold", this may be a more targeted solution!!!
fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/89073
|
|
(#91072)
I'm planning to remove StringRef::equals in favor of
StringRef::operator==.
- StringRef::operator==/!= outnumber StringRef::equals by a factor of
31 under llvm/ in terms of their usage.
- The elimination of StringRef::equals brings StringRef closer to
std::string_view, which has operator== but not equals.
- S == "foo" is more readable than S.equals("foo"), especially for
!Long.Expression.equals("str") vs Long.Expression != "str".
|
|
This patch adds loadCSE support to simplifyLoopAfterUnroll. It is based
on EarlyCSE's implementation using ScopeHashTable and is using SCEV for
accessed pointers to check to find redundant loads after unrolling.
This applies to the late unroll pass only, for full unrolling those
redundant loads will be cleaned up by the regular pipeline.
The current approach constructs MSSA on-demand per-loop, but there is
still small but notable compile-time impact:
stage1-O3 +0.04%
stage1-ReleaseThinLTO +0.06%
stage1-ReleaseLTO-g +0.05%
stage1-O0-g +0.02%
stage2-O3 +0.09%
stage2-O0-g +0.04%
stage2-clang +0.02%
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=c089fa5a729e217d0c0d4647656386dac1a1b135&to=ec7c0f27cb5c12b600d9adfc8543d131765ec7be&stat=instructions:u
This benefits some workloads with runtime-unrolling disabled,
where users use pragmas to force unrolling, as well as with
runtime unrolling enabled.
On SPEC/MultiSource, this removes a number of loads after unrolling
on AArch64 with runtime unrolling enabled.
```
External/S...te/526.blender_r/526.blender_r 96
MultiSourc...rks/mediabench/gsm/toast/toast 39
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ffbench 4
External/SPEC/CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc 18
MultiSourc.../Applications/JM/ldecod/ldecod 4
MultiSourc.../mediabench/jpeg/jpeg-6a/cjpeg 6
MultiSourc...OE-ProxyApps-C/miniGMG/miniGMG 9
MultiSourc...e/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan 4
MultiSourc.../MallocBench/espresso/espresso 3
MultiSourc...dence-flt/LinearDependence-flt 2
MultiSourc...ch/office-ispell/office-ispell 4
MultiSourc...ch/consumer-jpeg/consumer-jpeg 6
MultiSourc...ench/security-sha/security-sha 11
MultiSourc...chmarks/McCat/04-bisect/bisect 3
SingleSour...tTests/2020-01-06-coverage-009 12
MultiSourc...ench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm 39
MultiSourc...lds-flt/CrossingThresholds-flt 24
MultiSourc...dence-dbl/LinearDependence-dbl 2
External/S...C/CINT2006/445.gobmk/445.gobmk 6
MultiSourc...enchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign 53
External/S...31.deepsjeng_r/531.deepsjeng_r 3
External/S...rate/510.parest_r/510.parest_r 58
External/S...NT2006/464.h264ref/464.h264ref 29
External/S...NT2017rate/502.gcc_r/502.gcc_r 45
External/S...C/CINT2006/456.hmmer/456.hmmer 6
External/S...te/538.imagick_r/538.imagick_r 18
External/S.../CFP2006/447.dealII/447.dealII 4
MultiSourc...OE-ProxyApps-C++/miniFE/miniFE 12
External/S...2017rate/525.x264_r/525.x264_r 36
MultiSourc...Benchmarks/7zip/7zip-benchmark 33
MultiSourc...hmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk 2
MultiSourc...chmarks/VersaBench/8b10b/8b10b 1
MultiSourc.../Applications/JM/lencod/lencod 116
MultiSourc...lds-dbl/CrossingThresholds-dbl 24
MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/05-eks/eks 15
```
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83860
|
|
I'd reverted this in 6c7805d5d1 after a bad stage. Original commit
messsage follows:
[NFC][RemoveDIs] Bulk update utilities to insert with iterators
As part of the RemoveDIs project we need LLVM to insert instructions using
iterators wherever possible, so that the iterators can carry a bit of
debug-info. This commit implements some of that by updating the contents of
llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils to always use iterator-versions of instruction
constructors.
There are two general flavours of update:
* Almost all call-sites just call getIterator on an instruction
* Several make use of an existing iterator (scenarios where the code is
actually significant for debug-info)
The underlying logic is that any call to getFirstInsertionPt or similar
APIs that identify the start of a block need to have that iterator passed
directly to the insertion function, without being converted to a bare
Instruction pointer along the way.
I've also switched DemotePHIToStack to take an optional iterator: it needs
to take an iterator, and having a no-insert-location behaviour appears to
be important. The constructors for ICmpInst and FCmpInst have been updated
too. They're the only instructions that take block _references_ rather than
pointers for certain calls, and a future patch is going to make use of
default-null block insertion locations.
All of this should be NFC.
|
|
This reverts commit 3fda50d3915b2163a54a37b602be7783a89dd808.
Apparently I've missed a hunk while staging this; will back out for now.
Picked up here: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/139/builds/60429/steps/6/logs/stdio
|
|
As part of the RemoveDIs project we need LLVM to insert instructions using
iterators wherever possible, so that the iterators can carry a bit of
debug-info. This commit implements some of that by updating the contents of
llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils to always use iterator-versions of instruction
constructors.
There are two general flavours of update:
* Almost all call-sites just call getIterator on an instruction
* Several make use of an existing iterator (scenarios where the code is
actually significant for debug-info)
The underlying logic is that any call to getFirstInsertionPt or similar
APIs that identify the start of a block need to have that iterator passed
directly to the insertion function, without being converted to a bare
Instruction pointer along the way.
I've also switched DemotePHIToStack to take an optional iterator: it needs
to take an iterator, and having a no-insert-location behaviour appears to
be important. The constructors for ICmpInst and FCmpInst have been updated
too. They're the only instructions that take block _references_ rather than
pointers for certain calls, and a future patch is going to make use of
default-null block insertion locations.
All of this should be NFC.
|
|
C++20 comes with std::erase to erase a value from std::vector. This
patch renames llvm::erase_value to llvm::erase for consistency with
C++20.
We could make llvm::erase more similar to std::erase by having it
return the number of elements removed, but I'm not doing that for now
because nobody seems to care about that in our code base.
Since there are only 50 occurrences of erase_value in our code base,
this patch replaces all of them with llvm::erase and deprecates
llvm::erase_value.
|
|
Identified with misc-include-cleaner.
|
|
Loop unrolling tends to produce chains of
`%x1 = add %x0, 1; %x2 = add %x1, 1; ...` with one add per unrolled
iteration. This patch simplifies these adds to `%xN = add %x0, N`
directly during unrolling, rather than waiting for InstCombine to do so.
The motivation for this is that having a single add (rather than
an add chain) on the induction variable makes it a simple recurrence,
which we specially recognize in a number of places. This allows
InstCombine to directly perform folds with that knowledge, instead
of first folding the add chains, and then doing other folds in another
InstCombine iteration.
Due to the reduced number of InstCombine iterations, this also
results in a small compile-time improvement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153540
|
|
This reverts commit 5362a0d859d8e96b3f7c0437b7866e17a818a4f7.
In preparation for reverting a dependent revision.
|
|
A pseudo probe is created with dwarf line information shared with its nearest instruction. If the instruction comes with a dwarf discriminator, it will be shared with the probe as well. This can confuse the later FS-AFDO discriminator assignment pass. To fix this, I'm cleaning up the discriminator fields for probes when they are inserted.
I also notice another possibility to change the discriminator field of pseudo probes in the pipeline before the FS discriminator assignment pass. That is the loop unroller, which assigns duplication factor to instruction being vectorized. I'm disabling that for pseudo probe intrinsics specifically, also for callsites with probes.
Reviewed By: wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148569
|
|
After D149435, LCSSA formation no longer needs access to
ScalarEvolution, so remove the argument from the utilities.
|
|
The branch weights of the unrolled loop need to be reduced by the
unroll factor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143948
|
|
This reverts commit c5ea42bcf48c8f3d3e35a6bff620b06d2a499108.
Recommit the patch with a fix for loops where the exiting terminator is
not a branch instruction. In that case, ExitInfos may be empty. In
addition to checking if there's a single exiting block also check if
there's a single ExitInfo.
A test case has been added in f92b35392ed8e4631.
|
|
This reverts commit d0907ce7ed9f159562ca3f4cfd8d87e89e93febe.
Causes `opt -passes=loop-unroll-full` to crash on
```
define void @foo() {
bb:
br label %bb1
bb1: ; preds = %bb1, %bb1, %bb
switch i1 true, label %bb1 [
i1 true, label %bb2
i1 false, label %bb1
]
bb2: ; preds = %bb1
ret void
}
```
|
|
The scope of DT updates are very limited when unrolling loops: the DT
should only need updating for
* new blocks added
* exiting blocks we simplified branches
This can be done manually without too much extra work.
MergeBlockIntoPredecessor also needs to be updated to support direct
DT updates.
This fixes excessive time spent in DTU for same cases. In an internal
example, time spent in LoopUnroll with this patch goes from ~200s to 2s.
It also is slightly positive for CTMark:
* NewPM-O3: -0.13%
* NewPM-ReleaseThinLTO: -0.11%
* NewPM-ReleaseLTO-g: -0.13%
Notable improvements are mafft (~ -0.50%) and lencod (~ -0.30%), with no
workload regressed.
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=78a9ee7834331fb4360457cc565fa36f5452f7e0&to=687e08d011b0dc6d3edd223612761e44225c7537&stat=instructions:u
Reviewed By: kuhar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141487
|
|
There is no need to update the DT here, because there must be a unique
latch. Hence if the latch is not exiting it must directly branch back
to the original loop header and does not dominate any nodes.
Skipping a DT update here simplifies D141487.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141810
|
|
The function name was misleading - the expectation set both by the name
and by other members of Function (like isDeclaration or isIntrinsic)
would be that the function somehow would "be" "debug info for
profiling". But that's not the case - the property indicates (as the
comment over the declaration also explains) whether debug info should be
emitted (for profiling).
|
|
I think this is a better name because it is what STL uses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140068
|
|
These files no longer use llvm::Optional.
|
|
F->getBasicBlockList().insert()
This is part of a series of patches that aim at making Function::getBasicBlockList() private.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139906
|
|
|
|
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
|
|
eraseFromParent().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138617
|
|
When unrolling, the exit values in LCSSA phis will get updated.
Invalidate cached SCEV values for those phis in case SCEV looked through
a exit phi.
Fixes #58340.
|
|
After unrolling a loop, the block and loop dispositions need to be
cleared. As we don't know which SCEVs in the loop/blocks may be
impacted, completely clear the cache. This should also fix some cases
where deleted loops remained in the LoopDispositions cache.
This fixes a verification failure surfaced by D134531.
I am planning on reviewing/updating the existing uses of
forgetLoopDispositions to check if they should be replaced by
forgetBlockAndLoopDispositions.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134612
|
|
This patch replaces calls to GreatestCommonDivisor64 with std::gcd
where both arguments are known to be of unsigned types no larger than
64 bits in size.
|
|
|
|
Clang-format InstructionSimplify and convert all "FunctionName"s to
"functionName". This patch does touch a lot of files but gets done with
the cleanup of InstructionSimplify in one commit.
This is the alternative to the less invasive clang-format only patch: D126783
Reviewed By: spatel, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126889
|
|
I am suspecting a bug around updates of loop info for unreachable exits, but don't have a test case. Running this locally on make check didn't reveal anything, we'll see if the expensive checks bots find it.
|
|
This reverts commit 9bd22595bad36cd19f5e7ae18ccd9f41cba29dc5.
Seeing some bot failures which look plausibly connected. Revert while investigating/waiting for bots to stablize.
e.g. https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot#builders/36/builds/15933
|
|
If we have an exit which is controlled by a loop invariant condition and which dominates the latch, we know only the copy in the first unrolled iteration can be taken. All other copies are dead.
The change itself is pretty straight forward, but let me add two points of context:
* I'd have expected other transform passes to catch this after unrolling, but I'm seeing multiple examples where we get to the end of O2/O3 without simplifying.
* I'd like to do a stronger change which did CSE during unroll and accounted for invariant expressions (as defined by SCEV instead of trivial ones from LoopInfo), but that doesn't fit cleanly into the current code structure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116496
|
|
The unrolling code was previously inserting new cloned blocks at the end of the function. The result of this with typical loop structures is that the new iterations are placed far from the initial iteration.
With unrolling, the general assumption is that the a) the loop is reasonable hot, and b) the first Count-1 copies of the loop are rarely (if ever) loop exiting. As such, placing Count-1 copies out of line is a fairly poor code placement choice. We'd much rather fall through into the hot (non-exiting) path. For code with branch profiles, later layout would fix this, but this may have a positive impact on non-PGO compiled code.
However, the real motivation for this change isn't performance. Its readability and human understanding. Having to jump around long distances in an IR file to trace an unrolled loop structure is error prone and tedious.
|
|
|
|
This is the second attempt to remove the `llvm.trap` insertion after
https://reviews.llvm.org/rGe14e7bc4b889dfaffb7180d176a03311df2d4ae6
reverted the first one. It is not clear what the exact issue was back
then and it might already be gone by now, it has been >5 years after
all.
Replaces D106299.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106308
|
|
Currently, UnrollLoop() is passed an AllowRuntime flag and decides
itself whether runtime unrolling should be used or not. This patch
pushes the decision into the caller and allows us to eliminate the
ULO.TripCount and ULO.TripMultiple parameters.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104487
|
|
Remove dependence on ULO.TripCount/ULO.TripMultiple from ORE and
debug code. For debug code, print information about all exits.
For optimization remarks, only include the unroll count and the
type of unroll (complete, partial or runtime), but omit detailed
information about exit folding, now that more than one exit may
be folded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104482
|
