| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
WebAssembly doesn't support horizontal operations nor does it have a way
of expressing fast-math or reassoc flags, so runtimes are currently
unable to use pairwise operations when generating code from the existing
shuffle patterns.
This patch allows the backend to select which, arbitary, shuffle pattern
to be used per reduction intrinsic. The default behaviour is the same as
the existing, which is by splitting the vector into a top and bottom
half. The other pattern introduced is for a pairwise shuffle.
WebAssembly enables pairwise reductions for int/fp add/sub.
|
|
Arithmetic Instruction Opcode and MinMax IntrinsicID / RecurKind
Noticed on #81852
|
|
The intrinsics have been out of experimental since 322d0afd875d
("[llvm][mlir] Promote the experimental reduction intrinsics to be
first class intrinsics.", 2020-10-07); update some places that still
referred to them as experimental.
|
|
bitcast(<X x i1> V)) canonicalization
This already exists in InstCombine but was missing from the late stage ExpandReductions pass
Fixes #53419
Fixes #61923
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147452
|
|
This is a (fixed) recommit of https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
after: 1061034926
before: 1063332844
Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121681
|
|
This reverts commit 7f230feeeac8a67b335f52bd2e900a05c6098f20.
Breaks CodeGenCUDA/link-device-bitcode.cu in check-clang,
and many LLVM tests, see comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
|
|
after: 1061034926
before: 1063332844
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
|
|
The upstream callers (the vectorizers) were fixed with:
bbed5f2f8a04 ( D95690 )
77adbe6a8c71
We should remove this pass entirely now that reduction
legalization/lowering is expected to work just as well,
but we need to confirm that the shuffle ops do not
regress (for x86 in particular).
This should be the last step needed to close:
https://llvm.org/PR23116
|
|
This is almost all mechanical search-and-replace and
no-functional-change-intended (NFC). Having a single
enum makes it easier to match/reason about the
reduction cases.
The goal is to remove `Opcode` from reduction matching
code in the vectorizers because that makes it harder to
adapt the code to handle intrinsics.
The code in RecurrenceDescriptor::AddReductionVar() is
the only place that required closer inspection. It uses
a RecurrenceDescriptor and a second InstDesc to sometimes
overwrite part of the struct. It seem like we should be
able to simplify that logic, but it's not clear exactly
which cmp+sel patterns that we are trying to handle/avoid.
|
|
intrinsics.
This change renames the intrinsics to not have "experimental" in the name.
The autoupgrader will handle legacy intrinsics.
Relevant ML thread: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/140729.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88787
|
|
As discussed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/140729.html
This is hopefully the final remaining showstopper before we can remove
the 'experimental' from the reduction intrinsics.
No behavior was specified for the FP min/max reductions, so we have a
mess of different interpretations.
There are a few potential options for the semantics of these max/min ops.
I think this is the simplest based on current behavior/implementation:
make the reductions inherit from the existing llvm.maxnum/minnum intrinsics.
These correspond to libm fmax/fmin, and those are similar to the (now
deprecated?) IEEE-754 maxNum/minNum functions (NaNs are treated as missing
data). So the default expansion creates calls to libm functions.
Another option would be to inherit from llvm.maximum/minimum (NaNs propagate),
but most targets just crash in codegen when given those nodes because no
default expansion was ever implemented AFAICT.
We could also just assume 'nnan' semantics by default (we are already
assuming 'nsz' semantics in the maxnum/minnum intrinsics), but some targets
(AArch64, PowerPC) support the more defined behavior, so it doesn't make much
sense to not allow a tighter spec. Fast-math-flags (nnan) can be used to
loosen the semantics.
(Note that D67507 was proposed to update the LangRef to acknowledge the more
recent IEEE-754 2019 standard, but that patch seems to have stalled. If we do
update based on the new standard, the reduction instructions can seamlessly
inherit from whatever updates are made to the max/min intrinsics.)
x86 sees a regression here on 'nnan' tests because we have underlying,
longstanding bugs in FMF creation/propagation. Those need to be fixed apart
from this change (for example: https://llvm.org/PR35538). The expansion
sequence before this patch may not have been correct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87391
|
|
Reviewers: efriedma, fpetrogalli, sdesmalen, RKSimon, arsenm
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: wdng, tschuett, hiraditya, rkruppe, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82210
|
|
Summary:
Remove usages of asserting vector getters in Type in preparation for the
VectorType refactor. The existence of these functions complicates the
refactor while adding little value.
Reviewers: stoklund, sdesmalen, efriedma
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77272
|
|
reductions.
We were previously pushing all intrinsics used in a function to the
worklist. This is wasteful for memory in a function with a lot of
intrinsics.
We also ask TTI if we should expand every intrinsic, but we only
have expansion support for the reduction intrinsics. This just
wastes time for the non-reduction intrinsics.
This patch only pushes reduction intrinsics into the worklist and
skips other intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69470
|
|
This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is
very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it
caused lots of recompilation.
I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the
number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits
multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the
current checkout:
recompiles touches affected_files header
342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h
314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h
170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h
162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h
158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h
137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h
131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h
Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files
to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in
an incremental rebuild.
Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211
|
|
size isn't power of 2
Summary:
For below test case, we will get assert error except for AArch64 and ARM:
declare i8 @llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.and.i8.v3i8(<3 x i8> %a)
define i8 @test_v3i8(<3 x i8> %a) nounwind {
%b = call i8 @llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.and.i8.v3i8(<3 x i8> %a)
ret i8 %b
}
In the function getShuffleReduction (), we can see it needs the vector size must be power of 2.
This patch is fix below error when the number of element is not power of 2 for those llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.* function.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68625
|
|
This patch changes how LLVM handles the accumulator/start value
in the reduction, by never ignoring it regardless of the presence of
fast-math flags on callsites. This change introduces the following
new intrinsics to replace the existing ones:
llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.fadd -> llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.v2.fadd
llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.fmul -> llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.v2.fmul
and adds functionality to auto-upgrade existing LLVM IR and bitcode.
Reviewers: RKSimon, greened, dmgreen, nikic, simoll, aemerson
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60261
llvm-svn: 363035
|
|
Instead of passing around fast-math-flags as a parameter, we can set those
using an IRBuilder guard object. This is no-functional-change-intended.
The motivation is to eventually fix the vectorizers to use and set the
correct fast-math-flags for reductions. Examples of that not behaving as
expected are:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23116 (should be able to reduce with less than 'fast')
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35538 (possible miscompile for -0.0)
D61802 (should be able to reduce with IR-level FMF)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62272
llvm-svn: 362612
|
|
Change from original commit: move test (that uses an X86 triple) into the X86
subdirectory.
Original description:
Gating vectorizing reductions on *all* fastmath flags seems unnecessary;
`reassoc` should be sufficient.
Reviewers: tvvikram, mkuper, kristof.beyls, sdesmalen, Ayal
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Subscribers: dcaballe, huntergr, jmolloy, mcrosier, jlebar, bixia, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57728
llvm-svn: 355889
|
|
This reverts commit r355868. Breaks hexagon.
llvm-svn: 355873
|
|
Summary:
Gating vectorizing reductions on *all* fastmath flags seems unnecessary;
`reassoc` should be sufficient.
Reviewers: tvvikram, mkuper, kristof.beyls, sdesmalen, Ayal
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Subscribers: dcaballe, huntergr, jmolloy, mcrosier, jlebar, bixia, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57728
llvm-svn: 355868
|
|
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
Without the fast math flags, the llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.fadd/fmul intrinsic expansions must be expanded in order.
This patch scalarizes the reduction, applying the accumulator at the start of the sequence: ((((Acc + Scl[0]) + Scl[1]) + Scl[2]) + ) ... + Scl[NumElts-1]
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45366
llvm-svn: 329585
|
|
fast-math-flag
As discussed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-November/107104.html
and again more recently:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118118.html
...this is a step in cleaning up our fast-math-flags implementation in IR to better match
the capabilities of both clang's user-visible flags and the backend's flags for SDNode.
As proposed in the above threads, we're replacing the 'UnsafeAlgebra' bit (which had the
'umbrella' meaning that all flags are set) with a new bit that only applies to algebraic
reassociation - 'AllowReassoc'.
We're also adding a bit to allow approximations for library functions called 'ApproxFunc'
(this was initially proposed as 'libm' or similar).
...and we're out of bits. 7 bits ought to be enough for anyone, right? :) FWIW, I did
look at getting this out of SubclassOptionalData via SubclassData (spacious 16-bits),
but that's apparently already used for other purposes. Also, I don't think we can just
add a field to FPMathOperator because Operator is not intended to be instantiated.
We'll defer movement of FMF to another day.
We keep the 'fast' keyword. I thought about removing that, but seeing IR like this:
%f.fast = fadd reassoc nnan ninf nsz arcp contract afn float %op1, %op2
...made me think we want to keep the shortcut synonym.
Finally, this change is binary incompatible with existing IR as seen in the
compatibility tests. This statement:
"Newer releases can ignore features from older releases, but they cannot miscompile
them. For example, if nsw is ever replaced with something else, dropping it would be
a valid way to upgrade the IR."
( http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#ir-backwards-compatibility )
...provides the flexibility we want to make this change without requiring a new IR
version. Ie, we're not loosening the FP strictness of existing IR. At worst, we will
fail to optimize some previously 'fast' code because it's no longer recognized as
'fast'. This should get fixed as we audit/squash all of the uses of 'isFast()'.
Note: an inter-dependent clang commit to use the new API name should closely follow
commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39304
llvm-svn: 317488
|
|
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
|
|
This pass uses a new target hook to decide whether or not to expand a particular
intrinsic to the shuffevector sequence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32245
llvm-svn: 302631
|
