summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Writer/BitcodeWriter.cpp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-01-28Make llvm::StringRef to std::string conversions explicit.Benjamin Kramer
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with std::string_view. There should be no functional change here. This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies. This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
2020-01-23[ThinLTO] Summarize vcall_visibility metadataTeresa Johnson
Summary: Second patch in series to support Safe Whole Program Devirtualization Enablement, see RFC here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137543.html Summarize vcall_visibility metadata in ThinLTO global variable summary. Depends on D71907. Reviewers: pcc, evgeny777, steven_wu Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, hiraditya, dexonsmith, arphaman, ostannard, llvm-commits, cfe-commits, davidxl Tags: #clang, #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71911
2020-01-17Move the sysroot attribute from DIModule to DICompileUnitAdrian Prantl
[this re-applies c0176916a4824812d25a5a22c4ff7c95857b0cd6 with the correct commit message and phabricator link] This addresses point 1 of PR44213. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213 The DW_AT_LLVM_sysroot attribute is used for Clang module debug info, to allow LLDB to import a Clang module from source. Currently it is part of each DW_TAG_module, however, it is the same for all modules in a compile unit. It is more efficient and less ambiguous to store it once in the DW_TAG_compile_unit. This should have no effect on DWARF consumers other than LLDB. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71732
2020-01-17Revert "Rename DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot to DW_AT_LLVM_sysroot"Adrian Prantl
This reverts commit 12e479475a896f664fb721f98c2d6805185ac352. I accidentally landed this patch with the wrong commit message ...
2020-01-17Rename DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot to DW_AT_LLVM_sysrootAdrian Prantl
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax (-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any useful information otherwise. This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
2020-01-15[ThinLTO] Always import constantsevgeny
This patch imports constant variables even when they can't be internalized (which results in promotion). This offers some extra constant folding opportunities. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70404
2019-12-30Revert "DebugInfo: Fix rangesBaseAddress DICompileUnit bitcode ↵David Blaikie
serialization/deserialization" Seeing some curious CFI failures internally - which makes little sense to me, as I don't think anyone is using this flag (even us, internally)... so sounds like a bug in my code somewhere (possibly a latent one that propagating this flag exposed, not sure). Reverting while I investigate. This reverts commit c51b45e32ef7f35c11891f60871aa9c2c04cd991.
2019-12-27DebugInfo: Fix rangesBaseAddress DICompileUnit bitcode ↵David Blaikie
serialization/deserialization Follow-up to r346788 review feedback from Adrian Prantl.
2019-12-12[LTO] Support for embedding bitcode section during LTOTeresa Johnson
Summary: This adds support for embedding bitcode in a binary during LTO. The libLTO gains supports the `-lto-embed-bitcode` flag. The option allows users of the LTO library to embed a bitcode section. For example, LLD can pass the option via `ld.lld -mllvm=-lto-embed-bitcode`. This feature allows doing something comparable to `clang -c -fembed-bitcode`, but on the (LTO) linker level. Having bitcode alongside native code has many use-cases. To give an example, the MacOS linker can create a `-bitcode_bundle` section containing bitcode. Also, having this feature built into LLVM is an alternative to 3rd party tools such as [[ https://github.com/travitch/whole-program-llvm | wllvm ]] or [[ https://github.com/SRI-CSL/gllvm | gllvm ]]. As with these tools, this feature simplifies creating "whole-program" llvm bitcode files, but in contrast to wllvm/gllvm it does not rely on a specific llvm frontend/driver. Patch by Josef Eisl <josef.eisl@oracle.com> Reviewers: #llvm, #clang, rsmith, pcc, alexshap, tejohnson Reviewed By: tejohnson Subscribers: tejohnson, mehdi_amini, inglorion, hiraditya, aheejin, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, cfe-commits, llvm-commits, #llvm, #clang Tags: #clang, #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68213
2019-11-18Fix error message missed in commit dde589389fcb8b5098f7a47f1b781b27d29a0cac.Andrew Browne
Patch by Andrew Browne <browneee@google.com> Reviewers: tejohnson, evgeny777 Reviewed By: tejohnson Subscribers: arphaman, hiraditya, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70195
2019-11-12[IR] Redefine Freeze instructionaqjune
Summary: This patch redefines freeze instruction from being UnaryOperator to a subclass of UnaryInstruction. ConstantExpr freeze is removed, as discussed in the previous review. FreezeOperator is not added because there's no ConstantExpr freeze. `freeze i8* null` test is added to `test/Bindings/llvm-c/freeze.ll` as well, because the null pointer-related bug in `tools/llvm-c/echo.cpp` is now fixed. InstVisitor has visitFreeze now because freeze is not unaryop anymore. Reviewers: whitequark, deadalnix, craig.topper, jdoerfert, lebedev.ri Reviewed By: craig.topper, lebedev.ri Subscribers: regehr, nlopes, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, jfb, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69932
2019-11-08ThinLTO : Import always_inline functions irrespective of the thresholdTeresa Johnson
Summary: A user can force a function to be inlined by specifying the always_inline attribute. Currently, thinlto implementation is not aware of always_inline functions and does not guarantee import of such functions, which in turn can prevent inlining of such functions. Patch by Bharathi Seshadri <bseshadr@cisco.com> Reviewers: tejohnson Reviewed By: tejohnson Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70014
2019-11-07[ThinLTO] Import readonly vars with refsevgeny
Patch allows importing declarations of functions and variables, referenced by the initializer of some other readonly variable. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69561
2019-11-05[IR] Add Freeze instructionaqjune
Summary: - Define Instruction::Freeze, let it be UnaryOperator - Add support for freeze to LLLexer/LLParser/BitcodeReader/BitcodeWriter The format is `%x = freeze <ty> %v` - Add support for freeze instruction to llvm-c interface. - Add m_Freeze in PatternMatch. - Erase freeze when lowering IR to SelDag. Reviewers: deadalnix, hfinkel, efriedma, lebedev.ri, nlopes, jdoerfert, regehr, filcab, delcypher, whitequark Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, jdoerfert Subscribers: jfb, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, lebedev.ri, steven_wu, dexonsmith, xbolva00, delcypher, spatel, regehr, trentxintong, vsk, filcab, nlopes, mehdi_amini, deadalnix, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29011
2019-10-07[Bitcode] Update naming of UNOP_NEG to UNOP_FNEGCameron McInally
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68588 llvm-svn: 373958
2019-09-25[IR] allow fast-math-flags on phi of FP values (2nd try)Sanjay Patel
The changes here are based on the corresponding diffs for allowing FMF on 'select': D61917 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D61917> As discussed there, we want to have fast-math-flags be a property of an FP value because the alternative (having them on things like fcmp) leads to logical inconsistency such as: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086 The earlier patch for select made almost no practical difference because most unoptimized conditional code begins life as a phi (based on what I see in clang). Similarly, I don't expect this patch to do much on its own either because SimplifyCFG promptly drops the flags when converting to select on a minimal example like: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39535 But once we have this plumbing in place, we should be able to wire up the FMF propagation and start solving cases like that. The change to RecurrenceDescriptor::AddReductionVar() is required to prevent a regression in a LoopVectorize test. We are intersecting the FMF of any FPMathOperator there, so if a phi is not properly annotated, new math instructions may not be either. Once we fix the propagation in SimplifyCFG, it may be safe to remove that hack. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67564 llvm-svn: 372878
2019-09-25Revert [IR] allow fast-math-flags on phi of FP valuesSanjay Patel
This reverts r372866 (git commit dec03223a97af0e4dfcb23da55c0f7f8c9b62d00) llvm-svn: 372868
2019-09-25[IR] allow fast-math-flags on phi of FP valuesSanjay Patel
The changes here are based on the corresponding diffs for allowing FMF on 'select': D61917 As discussed there, we want to have fast-math-flags be a property of an FP value because the alternative (having them on things like fcmp) leads to logical inconsistency such as: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086 The earlier patch for select made almost no practical difference because most unoptimized conditional code begins life as a phi (based on what I see in clang). Similarly, I don't expect this patch to do much on its own either because SimplifyCFG promptly drops the flags when converting to select on a minimal example like: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39535 But once we have this plumbing in place, we should be able to wire up the FMF propagation and start solving cases like that. The change to RecurrenceDescriptor::AddReductionVar() is required to prevent a regression in a LoopVectorize test. We are intersecting the FMF of any FPMathOperator there, so if a phi is not properly annotated, new math instructions may not be either. Once we fix the propagation in SimplifyCFG, it may be safe to remove that hack. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67564 llvm-svn: 372866
2019-08-23Do a sweep of symbol internalization. NFC.Benjamin Kramer
llvm-svn: 369803
2019-07-15ARM MTE stack sanitizer.Evgeniy Stepanov
Add "memtag" sanitizer that detects and mitigates stack memory issues using armv8.5 Memory Tagging Extension. It is similar in principle to HWASan, which is a software implementation of the same idea, but there are enough differencies to warrant a new sanitizer type IMHO. It is also expected to have very different performance properties. The new sanitizer does not have a runtime library (it may grow one later, along with a "debugging" mode). Similar to SafeStack and StackProtector, the instrumentation pass (in a follow up change) will be inserted in all cases, but will only affect functions marked with the new sanitize_memtag attribute. Reviewers: pcc, hctim, vitalybuka, ostannard Subscribers: srhines, mehdi_amini, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cryptoad, steven_wu, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, llvm-commits Tags: #clang, #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64169 llvm-svn: 366123
2019-07-11[Attributor] Deduce "nosync" function attribute.Stefan Stipanovic
Introduce and deduce "nosync" function attribute to indicate that a function does not synchronize with another thread in a way that other thread might free memory. Reviewers: jdoerfert, jfb, nhaehnle, arsenm Subscribers: wdng, hfinkel, nhaenhle, mehdi_amini, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arsenm, uenoku, hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62766 llvm-svn: 365830
2019-07-09[ThinLTO] only emit used or referenced CFI records to indexBob Haarman
Summary: We emit CFI_FUNCTION_DEFS and CFI_FUNCTION_DECLS to distributed ThinLTO indices to implement indirect function call checking. This change causes us to only emit entries for functions that are either defined or used by the module we're writing the index for (instead of all functions in the combined index), which can make the indices substantially smaller. Fixes PR42378. Reviewers: pcc, vitalybuka, eugenis Subscribers: mehdi_amini, hiraditya, dexonsmith, arphaman, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63887 llvm-svn: 365537
2019-07-08Add, and infer, a nofree function attributeBrian Homerding
This patch adds a function attribute, nofree, to indicate that a function does not, directly or indirectly, call a memory-deallocation function (e.g., free, C++'s operator delete). Reviewers: jdoerfert Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49165 llvm-svn: 365336
2019-07-05[ThinLTO] Attempt to recommit r365188 after alignment fixEugene Leviant
llvm-svn: 365215
2019-07-05Reverted r365188 due to alignment problems on i686-androidEugene Leviant
llvm-svn: 365206
2019-07-05Scalable Vector IR Type with further LTO fixesGraham Hunter
Reintroduces the scalable vector IR type from D32530, after it was reverted a couple of times due to increasing chromium LTO build times. This latest incarnation removes the walk over aggregate types from the verifier entirely, in favor of rejecting scalable vectors in the isValidElementType methods in ArrayType and StructType. This removes the 70% degradation observed with the second repro tarball from PR42210. Reviewers: thakis, hans, rengolin, sdesmalen Reviewed By: sdesmalen Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64079 llvm-svn: 365203
2019-07-05[ThinLTO] Attempt to recommit r365040 after caching fixEugene Leviant
It's possible that some function can load and store the same variable using the same constant expression: store %Derived* @foo, %Derived** bitcast (%Base** @bar to %Derived**) %42 = load %Derived*, %Derived** bitcast (%Base** @bar to %Derived**) The bitcast expression was mistakenly cached while processing loads, and never examined later when processing store. This caused @bar to be mistakenly treated as read-only variable. See load-store-caching.ll. llvm-svn: 365188
2019-07-04Revert [ThinLTO] Optimize writeonly globals outReid Kleckner
This reverts r365040 (git commit 5cacb914758c7f436b47c8362100f10cef14bbc4) Speculatively reverting, since this appears to have broken check-lld on Linux. Partial analysis in https://crbug.com/981168. llvm-svn: 365097
2019-07-03[Bitcode] Move Bitstream to a separate libraryFrancis Visoiu Mistrih
This moves Bitcode/Bitstream*, Bitcode/BitCodes.h to Bitstream/. This is needed to avoid a circular dependency when using the bitstream code for parsing optimization remarks. Since Bitcode uses Core for the IR part: libLLVMRemarks -> Bitcode -> Core and Core uses libLLVMRemarks to generate remarks (see IR/RemarkStreamer.cpp): Core -> libLLVMRemarks we need to separate the Bitstream and Bitcode part. For clang-doc, it seems that it doesn't need the whole bitcode layer, so I updated the CMake to only use the bitstream part. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63899 llvm-svn: 365091
2019-07-03[ThinLTO] Optimize writeonly globals outEugene Leviant
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63444 llvm-svn: 365040
2019-07-02[ThinLTO] Address post-review suggestions for index-based WPD summaryTeresa Johnson
Removes a couple of unnecessary and/or redundant checks introduced by r364960. llvm-svn: 364968
2019-07-02[ThinLTO] Add summary entries for index-based WPDTeresa Johnson
Summary: If LTOUnit splitting is disabled, the module summary analysis computes the summary information necessary to perform single implementation devirtualization during the thin link with the index and no IR. The information collected from the regular LTO IR in the current hybrid WPD algorithm is summarized, including: 1) For vtable definitions, record the function pointers and their offset within the vtable initializer (subsumes the information collected from IR by tryFindVirtualCallTargets). 2) A record for each type metadata summarizing the vtable definitions decorated with that metadata (subsumes the TypeIdentiferMap collected from IR). Also added are the necessary bitcode records, and the corresponding assembly support. The follow-on index-based WPD patch is D55153. Depends on D53890. Reviewers: pcc Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54815 llvm-svn: 364960
2019-06-27[Attr] Add "willreturn" function attributeJohannes Doerfert
This patch introduces a new function attribute, willreturn, to indicate that a call of this function will either exhibit undefined behavior or comes back and continues execution at a point in the existing call stack that includes the current invocation. This attribute guarantees that the function does not have any endless loops, endless recursion, or terminating functions like abort or exit. Patch by Hideto Ueno (@uenoku) Reviewers: jdoerfert Subscribers: mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62801 llvm-svn: 364555
2019-06-27Revert r363658 "[SVE][IR] Scalable Vector IR Type with pr42210 fix"Hans Wennborg
We saw a 70% ThinLTO link time increase in Chromium for Android, see crbug.com/978817. Sounds like more of PR42210. > Recommit of D32530 with a few small changes: > - Stopped recursively walking through aggregates in > the verifier, so that we don't impose too much > overhead on large modules under LTO (see PR42210). > - Changed tests to match; the errors are slightly > different since they only report the array or > struct that actually contains a scalable vector, > rather than all aggregates which contain one in > a nested member. > - Corrected an older comment > > Reviewers: thakis, rengolin, sdesmalen > > Reviewed By: sdesmalen > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63321 llvm-svn: 364543
2019-06-18[SVE][IR] Scalable Vector IR Type with pr42210 fixGraham Hunter
Recommit of D32530 with a few small changes: - Stopped recursively walking through aggregates in the verifier, so that we don't impose too much overhead on large modules under LTO (see PR42210). - Changed tests to match; the errors are slightly different since they only report the array or struct that actually contains a scalable vector, rather than all aggregates which contain one in a nested member. - Corrected an older comment Reviewers: thakis, rengolin, sdesmalen Reviewed By: sdesmalen Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63321 llvm-svn: 363658
2019-06-13[ThinLTO][Bitcode] Add 'entrycount' to FS_COMBINED_PROFILE. NFCEugene Leviant
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63078 llvm-svn: 363254
2019-06-09Revert r361953 "[SVE][IR] Scalable Vector IR Type"Nico Weber
This reverts commit f4fc01f8dd3a5dfd2060d1ad0df6b90e8351ddf7. It caused a 3-4x slowdown when doing thinlto links, PR42210. llvm-svn: 362913
2019-05-30Reapply: IR: add optional type to 'byval' function parametersTim Northover
When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack. This adds a (for now) optional extra type parameter. If present, the type must match the pointee type of the argument. The original commit did not remap byval types when linking modules, which broke LTO. This version fixes that. Note to front-end maintainers: if this causes test failures, it's probably because the "byval" attribute is printed after attributes without any parameter after this change. llvm-svn: 362128
2019-05-29Revert "IR: add optional type to 'byval' function parameters"Tim Northover
The IRLinker doesn't delve into the new byval attribute when mapping types, and this breaks LTO. llvm-svn: 362029
2019-05-29IR: add optional type to 'byval' function parametersTim Northover
When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack. This adds a (for now) optional extra type parameter. If present, the type must match the pointee type of the argument. Note to front-end maintainers: if this causes test failures, it's probably because the "byval" attribute is printed after attributes without any parameter after this change. llvm-svn: 362012
2019-05-29[SVE][IR] Scalable Vector IR TypeGraham Hunter
* Adds a 'scalable' flag to VectorType * Adds an 'ElementCount' class to VectorType to pass (possibly scalable) vector lengths, with overloaded operators. * Modifies existing helper functions to use ElementCount * Adds support for serializing/deserializing to/from both textual and bitcode IR formats * Extends the verifier to reject global variables of scalable types * Updates documentation See the latest version of the RFC here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-July/124396.html Reviewers: rengolin, lattner, echristo, chandlerc, hfinkel, rkruppe, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, greened, sebpop Reviewed By: hfinkel, sebpop Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32530 llvm-svn: 361953
2019-05-29Add IR support, ELF section and user documentation for partitioning feature.Peter Collingbourne
The partitioning feature was proposed here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130583.html This is mostly just documentation. The feature itself will be contributed in subsequent patches. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60242 llvm-svn: 361923
2019-05-22[IR] allow fast-math-flags on select of FP valuesSanjay Patel
This is a minimal start to correcting a problem most directly discussed in PR38086: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086 We have been hacking around a limitation for FP select patterns by using the fast-math-flags on the condition of the select rather than the select itself. This patch just allows FMF to appear with the 'select' opcode. No changes are needed to "FPMathOperator" because it already includes select-of-FP because that definition is based on the (return) value type. Once we have this ability, we can start correcting and adding IR transforms to use the FMF on a 'select' instruction. The instcombine and vectorizer test diffs only show that the IRBuilder change is behaving as expected by applying an FMF guard value to 'select'. For reference: rL241901 - allowed FMF with fcmp rL255555 - allowed FMF with FP calls Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61917 llvm-svn: 361401
2019-05-10[ThinLTO] Auto-hide prevailing linkonce_odr only when all copies eligibleTeresa Johnson
Summary: We hit undefined references building with ThinLTO when one source file contained explicit instantiations of a template method (weak_odr) but there were also implicit instantiations in another file (linkonce_odr), and the latter was the prevailing copy. In this case the symbol was marked hidden when the prevailing linkonce_odr copy was promoted to weak_odr. It led to unsats when the resulting shared library was linked with other code that contained a reference (expecting to be resolved due to the explicit instantiation). Add a CanAutoHide flag to the GV summary to allow the thin link to identify when all copies are eligible for auto-hiding (because they were all originally linkonce_odr global unnamed addr), and only do the auto-hide in that case. Most of the changes here are due to plumbing the new flag through the bitcode and llvm assembly, and resulting test changes. I augmented the existing auto-hide test to check for this situation. Reviewers: pcc Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits, steven_wu, wmi Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59709 llvm-svn: 360466
2019-04-08Add LLVM IR debug info support for Fortran COMMON blocksAdrian Prantl
COMMON blocks are a feature of Fortran that has no direct analog in C languages, but they are similar to data sections in assembly language programming. A COMMON block is a named area of memory that holds a collection of variables. Fortran subprograms may map the COMMON block memory area to their own, possibly distinct, non-empty list of variables. A Fortran COMMON block might look like the following example. COMMON /ALPHA/ I, J For this construct, the compiler generates a new scope-like DI construct (!DICommonBlock) into which variables (see I, J above) can be placed. As the common block implies a range of storage with global lifetime, the !DICommonBlock refers to a !DIGlobalVariable. The Fortran variable that comprise the COMMON block are also linked via metadata to offsets within the global variable that stands for the entire common block. @alpha_ = common global %alphabytes_ zeroinitializer, align 64, !dbg !27, !dbg !30, !dbg !33 !14 = distinct !DISubprogram(…) !20 = distinct !DICommonBlock(scope: !14, declaration: !25, name: "alpha") !25 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "common alpha", type: !24) !27 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !25, expr: !DIExpression()) !29 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "i", file: !3, type: !28) !30 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !29, expr: !DIExpression()) !31 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "j", file: !3, type: !28) !32 = !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 4) !33 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !31, expr: !32) The DWARF generated for this is as follows. DW_TAG_common_block: DW_AT_name: alpha DW_AT_location: @alpha_+0 DW_TAG_variable: DW_AT_name: common alpha DW_AT_type: array of 8 bytes DW_AT_location: @alpha_+0 DW_TAG_variable: DW_AT_name: i DW_AT_type: integer*4 DW_AT_location: @Alpha+0 DW_TAG_variable: DW_AT_name: j DW_AT_type: integer*4 DW_AT_location: @Alpha+4 Patch by Eric Schweitz! Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54327 llvm-svn: 357934
2019-03-12IR: Add immarg attributeMatt Arsenault
This indicates an intrinsic parameter is required to be a constant, and should not be replaced with a non-constant value. Add the attribute to all AMDGPU and generic intrinsics that comments indicate it should apply to. I scanned other target intrinsics, but I don't see any obvious comments indicating which arguments are intended to be only immediates. This breaks one questionable testcase for the autoupgrade. I'm unclear on whether the autoupgrade is supposed to really handle declarations which were never valid. The verifier fails because the attributes now refer to a parameter past the end of the argument list. llvm-svn: 355981
2019-02-08Implementation of asm-goto support in LLVMCraig Topper
This patch accompanies the RFC posted here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction to support asm-goto inline assembly like gcc as used by the linux kernel. This instruction is both a call instruction and a terminator instruction with multiple successors. Only inline assembly usage is supported today. This also adds a new INLINEASM_BR opcode to SelectionDAG and MachineIR to represent an INLINEASM block that is also considered a terminator instruction. There will likely be more bug fixes and optimizations to follow this, but we felt it had reached a point where we would like to switch to an incremental development model. Patch by Craig Topper, Alexander Ivchenko, Mikhail Dvoretckii Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53765 llvm-svn: 353563
2019-01-24Revert "[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the ↵Julian Lettner
presence of `noreturn` calls" This reverts commit cea84ab93aeb079a358ab1c8aeba6d9140ef8b47. llvm-svn: 352069
2019-01-24[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of ↵Julian Lettner
`noreturn` calls Summary: UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it adds instrumentation before every `unreachable` instruction. However, the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with `noreturn`. To avoid this UBSan removes `noreturn` from both the call instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to `_asan_handle_no_return` before `noreturn` functions. This is important for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g., unwinder functions *like* `longjmp` (`longjmp` itself is actually "double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and UBSan are combined, the `noreturn` attributes are missing and ASan cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack unwinding is used. Changes: # UBSan now adds the `expect_noreturn` attribute whenever it removes the `noreturn` attribute from a function # ASan additionally checks for the presence of this attribute Generated code: ``` call void @__asan_handle_no_return // Additionally inserted to avoid false positives call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable unreachable ``` The second call to `__asan_handle_no_return` is redundant. This will be cleaned up in a follow-up patch. rdar://problem/40723397 Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis Tags: #sanitizers Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56624 llvm-svn: 352003
2019-01-22Reapply "IR: Add fp operations to atomicrmw"Matt Arsenault
This reapplies commits r351778 and r351782 with RISCV test fixes. llvm-svn: 351850