| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Metadata (via ValueAsMetadata) can reference constant expressions
that may no longer be supported. These references can both be in
function-local metadata and module metadata, if the same expression
is used in multiple functions. At least in theory, such references
could also be in metadata proper, rather than just inside
ValueAsMetadata references in calls.
Instead of trying to expand these expressions (which we can't
reliably do), pretend that the constant has been deleted, which
means that ValueAsMetadata references will get replaced with
undef metadata.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/68281.
|
|
This fixes the bitcode upgrade failure reported in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155924#4616789.
The expansion always happens in the entry block, so this may be
inaccurate if there are trapping constant expressions.
|
|
When opaque pointers are enabled and old IR with typed pointers is read,
the BitcodeReader automatically upgrades all typed pointers to opaque
pointers. This is a lossy conversion, i.e. when a function argument is a
pointer and unused, it’s impossible to reconstruct the original type
behind the pointer.
There are cases where the type information of pointers is needed. One is
reading DXIL, which is bitcode of old LLVM IR and makes a lot of use of
pointers in function signatures.
We’d like to keep using up-to-date llvm to read in and process DXIL, so
in the face of opaque pointers, we need some way to access the type
information of pointers from the read bitcode.
This patch allows extracting type information by supplying functions to
parseBitcodeFile that get called for each function signature or metadata
value. The function can access the type information via the reader’s
type IDs and the getTypeByID and getContainedTypeID functions.
The tests exemplarily shows how type info from pointers can be stored in
metadata for use after the BitcodeReader finished.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127728
|
|
This reverts commit b56df190b01335506ce30a4559d880da76d1a181.
The unit tests are implemented in a way that requires support for
writing typed pointer bitcode, which is going away soon. Please
rewrite it in a way that not have requirement, e.g. by shipping
pre-compiled bitcode, as we do for integration tests.
|
|
When opaque pointers are enabled and old IR with typed pointers is read,
the BitcodeReader automatically upgrades all typed pointers to opaque
pointers. This is a lossy conversion, i.e. when a function argument is a
pointer and unused, it’s impossible to reconstruct the original type
behind the pointer.
There are cases where the type information of pointers is needed. One is
reading DXIL, which is bitcode of old LLVM IR and makes a lot of use of
pointers in function signatures.
We’d like to keep using up-to-date llvm to read in and process DXIL, so
in the face of opaque pointers, we need some way to access the type
information of pointers from the read bitcode.
This patch allows extracting type information by supplying functions to
parseBitcodeFile that get called for each function signature or metadata
value. The function can access the type information via the reader’s
type IDs and the getTypeByID and getContainedTypeID functions.
The tests exemplarily shows how type info from pointers can be stored in
metadata for use after the BitcodeReader finished.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127728
|
|
Major user-facing changes:
llvm/Bitcode/BitcodeReader.h no longer includes llvm/IR/ModuleSummaryIndex.h
Some statistics:
clang++ -E -Iinclude -I../llvm/include ../llvm/lib/Bitcode/Reader/*.cpp -std=c++14 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions | wc -l
after: 493335
before: 539640
Discourse thread on the topic: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup/
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119091
|
|
We need to include Error.h already
|
|
|
|
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
Summary:
Followup from D53596/r346891. Remove the getMDNodeFwdRefOrNull interface
to the MDLoader since it is no longer used. Also improve error messages
when the internal implementation is used within the MDLoader.
Reviewers: steven_wu
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54542
llvm-svn: 346899
|
|
llvm-svn: 338987
|
|
The DWARF specification knows 3 kinds of non-empty simple location
descriptions:
1. Register location descriptions
- describe a variable in a register
- consist of only a DW_OP_reg
2. Memory location descriptions
- describe the address of a variable
3. Implicit location descriptions
- describe the value of a variable
- end with DW_OP_stack_value & friends
The existing DwarfExpression code is pretty much ignorant of these
restrictions. This used to not matter because we only emitted very
short expressions that we happened to get right by accident. This
patch makes DwarfExpression aware of the rules defined by the DWARF
standard and now chooses the right kind of location description for
each expression being emitted.
This would have been an NFC commit (for the existing testsuite) if not
for the way that clang describes captured block variables. Based on
how the previous code in LLVM emitted locations, DW_OP_deref
operations that should have come at the end of the expression are put
at its beginning. Fixing this means changing the semantics of
DIExpression, so this patch bumps the version number of DIExpression
and implements a bitcode upgrade.
There are two major changes in this patch:
I had to fix the semantics of dbg.declare for describing function
arguments. After this patch a dbg.declare always takes the *address*
of a variable as the first argument, even if the argument is not an
alloca.
When lowering a DBG_VALUE, the decision of whether to emit a register
location description or a memory location description depends on the
MachineLocation — register machine locations may get promoted to
memory locations based on their DIExpression. (Future) optimization
passes that want to salvage implicit debug location for variables may
do so by appending a DW_OP_stack_value. For example:
DBG_VALUE, [RBP-8] --> DW_OP_fbreg -8
DBG_VALUE, RAX --> DW_OP_reg0 +0
DBG_VALUE, RAX, DIExpression(DW_OP_deref) --> DW_OP_reg0 +0
All testcases that were modified were regenerated from clang. I also
added source-based testcases for each of these to the debuginfo-tests
repository over the last week to make sure that no synchronized bugs
slip in. The debuginfo-tests compile from source and run the debugger.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32382
<rdar://problem/31205000>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31439
llvm-svn: 300522
|
|
CFI is using intrinsics that takes MDString as arguments, and this
was broken during lazy-loading of metadata.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28916
llvm-svn: 292641
|
|
(NFC)
Keeping all the state together will make it easier to handle.
llvm-svn: 290406
|
|
Summary:
When reading the metadata bitcode, create a type declaration when
possible for composite types when we are importing. Doing this in
the bitcode reader saves memory. Also it works naturally in the case
when the type ODR map contains a definition for the same composite type
because it was used in the importing module (buildODRType will
automatically use the existing definition and not create a type
declaration).
For Chromium built with -g2, this reduces the aggregate size of the
generated native object files by 66% (from 31G to 10G). It reduced
the time through the ThinLTO link and backend phases by about 20% on
my machine.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, dblaikie, aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27775
llvm-svn: 289993
|
|
This ensures backward compatibility on bitcode loading.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27839
llvm-svn: 289977
|
|
class/file
Summary:
I'm planning on changing the way we load metadata to enable laziness.
I'm getting lost in this gigantic files, and gigantic class that is the bitcode
reader. This is a first toward splitting it in a few coarse components that
are more easily understandable.
Reviewers: pcc, tejohnson
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27646
llvm-svn: 289461
|
