summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lldb/source/Utility/AddressableBits.cpp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-03-20[lldb] Invert relationship between Process and AddressableBits (#85858)Alex Langford
AddressableBits is in the Utility module of LLDB. It currently directly refers to Process, which is from the Target LLDB module. This is a layering violation which concretely means that it is impossible to link anything that uses Utility without it also using Target as well. This is generally not an issue for LLDB (since everything is built together) but it may make it difficult to write unit tests for AddressableBits later on.
2024-03-06[lldb] Address mask sbprocess apis and new mask invalid const (#83663)Jason Molenda
[lldb] Add SBProcess methods for get/set/use address masks (#83095) I'm reviving a patch from phabracator, https://reviews.llvm.org/D155905 which was approved but I wasn't thrilled with all the API I was adding to SBProcess for all of the address mask types / memory regions. In this update, I added enums to control type address mask type (code, data, any) and address space specifiers (low, high, all) with defaulted arguments for the most common case. I originally landed this via https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83095 but it failed on CIs outside of arm64 Darwin so I had to debug it on more environments and update the patch. This patch is also fixing a bug in the "addressable bits to address mask" calculation I added in AddressableBits::SetProcessMasks. If lldb were told that 64 bits are valid for addressing, this method would overflow the calculation and set an invalid mask. Added tests to check this specific bug while I was adding these APIs. This patch changes the value of "no mask set" from 0 to LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS_MASK, which is UINT64_MAX. A mask of all 1's means "no bits are used for addressing" which is an impossible mask, whereas a mask of 0 means "all bits are used for addressing" which is possible. I added a base class implementation of ABI::FixCodeAddress and ABI::FixDataAddress that will apply the Process mask values if they are set to a value other than LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS_MASK. I updated all the callers/users of the Mask methods which were handling a value of 0 to mean invalid mask to use LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS_MASK. I added code to the all AArch64 ABI Fix* methods to apply the Highmem masks if they have been set. These will not be set on a Linux environment, but in TestAddressMasks.py I test the highmem masks feature for any AArch64 target, so all AArch64 ABI plugins must handle it. rdar://123530562
2024-02-29Revert "[lldb] Add SBProcess methods for get/set/use address masks (#83095)"Jason Molenda
This reverts commit 9a12b0a60084b2b92f728e1bddec884a47458459. TestAddressMasks fails its first test on lldb-x86_64-debian, lldb-arm-ubuntu, lldb-aarch64-ubuntu bots. Reverting while investigating.
2024-02-29[lldb] Add SBProcess methods for get/set/use address masks (#83095)Jason Molenda
I'm reviving a patch from phabracator, https://reviews.llvm.org/D155905 which was approved but I wasn't thrilled with all the API I was adding to SBProcess for all of the address mask types / memory regions. In this update, I added enums to control type address mask type (code, data, any) and address space specifiers (low, high, all) with defaulted arguments for the most common case. This patch is also fixing a bug in the "addressable bits to address mask" calculation I added in AddressableBits::SetProcessMasks. If lldb were told that 64 bits are valid for addressing, this method would overflow the calculation and set an invalid mask. Added tests to check this specific bug while I was adding these APIs. rdar://123530562
2023-08-17Simplify address mask setting logic in AddressableBitsJason Molenda
I wrote some complicated conditionals for how to handle a partially specified AddressableBits object in https://reviews.llvm.org/D158041 , and how to reuse existing masks if they were set and we had an unspecified value. I don't think this logic is the right thing to start with. Simplify back to the most straightforward setting, where only the bits that have been specified are set in the Process.
2023-08-16hi/low addr space bits can be sent in stop-rely packetJason Molenda
Add support for the `low_mem_addressing_bits` and `high_mem_addressing_bits` keys in the stop reply packet, in addition to the existing `addressing_bits`. Same behavior as in the qHostInfo packet. Clean up AddressableBits so we don't need to check if any values have been set in the object before using it to potentially update the Process address masks. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158041
2023-08-15Update qHostInfo/LC_NOTE so multiple address bits can be specifiedJason Molenda
On AArch64 systems, we may have different page table setups for low memory and high memory, and therefore a different number of bits used for addressing depending on which half of memory the address is in. This patch extends the qHostInfo and LC_NOTE "addrable bits" so that it can specify the number of addressing bits in high memory and in low memory separately. It builds on the patch I added in https://reviews.llvm.org/D151292 where Process tracks the separate address masks, and there is a user setting to set them manually. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157667 rdar://113225907