| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
(#127799)
I *think* this should be equivalent to the original implementation for
all line tables occurring in practice. One difference I'm aware of is
that the original implementation tried to return the first line entry
out of multiple ones for the same address. However, this is not possible
(anymore?) because of the check in LineTable::AppendLineEntryToSequence.
|
|
LineSeqeunce is basically a vector, except that users aren't supposed to
know that. This implements the same concept in a slightly simpler
fashion.
|
|
After (too) much deliberation, I came to the conclusion that this isn't
the right abstraction, as it doesn't behave completely like the standard
upper_bound method. What I really wanted was to get the range of line
entries for a given address range -- so I implement just that.
lower_bound is still useful as a primitive for building other kinds of
lookups.
|
|
The motivation is #123622 and the fact that is hard to fine the last
line entry in a given range. `FindLineEntryByAddress(range_end-1)` is
the best we have, but it's not ideal because it has a magic -1 and that
it relies on there existing a line entry at that address (generally, it
should be there, but if for some case it isn't, we might end up ignoring
the entries that are there (or -- like my incorrect fix in #123622 did
-- iterating through the entire line table).
What we really want is to get the last entry that exists in the given
range. Or, equivalently (and more STL-like) the first entry after that
range. This is what these functions do. I've used the STL names since
they do pretty much exactly what the standard functions do (the main
head-scratcher comes from the fact that our entries represent ranges
rather than single values).
The functions can also be used to simplify the maze of `if` statements
in `FindLineEntryByAddress`, but I'm keeping that as a separate patch.
For now, I'm just adding some unit testing for that function to gain
more confidence that the patch does not change the function behavior.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jonas Devlieghere <jonas@devlieghere.com>
|
|
Now that more parts of LLDB know about SupportFiles, avoid going through
FileSpec (and losing the Checksum in the process). Instead, use the
SupportFile directly.
|
|
This is an improved attempt to improve the semantics of SupportFile
equivalence, taking into account the feedback from #95606.
Pavel's comment about the lack of a concise name because the concept
isn't trivial made me realize that I don't want to abstract this concept
away behind a helper function. Instead, I opted for a rather verbose
enum that forces the caller to consider exactly what kind of comparison
is appropriate for every call.
|
|
This is another step towards supporting DWARF5 checksums and inline
source code in LLDB. This is a reland of #85468 but without the
functional change of storing the support file from the line table (yet).
|
|
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#85468 because @slackito reports this broke
stepping in one of their tests [1] and this patch was meant to be NFC.
[1]
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d5a277d309e92b1d3e493da6036cffdf815105b1#commitcomment-139991120
|
|
This is another step towards supporting DWARF5 checksums and inline
source code in LLDB.
|
|
Store a SupportFile, rather than a FileSpec, in LineEntry. This commit
works towards having the SourceManageroperate on SupportFiles so that it
can (1) validate the Checksum and (2) materialize the content of inline
source information.
|
|
Those fixes were taken from https://reviews.llvm.org/D137338
|
|
|
|
Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;
$ run-clang-tidy.py -header-filter='lldb' -checks='-*,modernize-use-equals-default' -fix ,
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-equals-default.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104041
|
|
This patch fixes the column symbol resolution when creating a breakpoint
with the `move_to_nearest_code` flag set.
In order to achieve this, the patch adds column information handling in
the `LineTable`'s `LineEntry` finder. After experimenting a little, it
turns out the most natural approach in case of an inaccurate column match,
is to move backward and match the previous `LineEntry` rather than going
forward like we do with simple line breakpoints.
The patch also reflows the function to reduce code duplication.
Finally, it updates the `BreakpointResolver` heuristic to align it with
the `LineTable` method.
rdar://73218201
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101221
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch refactors a good part of the code base turning the usual
FileSpec, Line, Column, CheckInlines, ExactMatch arguments into a
SourceLocationSpec object.
This change is required for a following patch that will add handling of the
column line information when doing symbol resolution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100965
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
|
|
We were creating a bunch of LineSequence objects but never deleting
them.
This fixes the leak and changes the code to use std::unique_ptr, to make
it harder to make the same mistake again.
|
|
This addresses some post-commit feedback on D72909.
|
|
Summary:
Motivation: When setting breakpoints in certain projects line sequences are frequently being inserted out of order.
Rather than inserting sequences one at a time into a sorted line table, store all the line sequences as we're building them up and sort and flatten afterwards.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: teemperor, labath, mgrang, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72909
|
|
to avoid needing to declare iterators everywhere.
|
|
Summary:
lld r367537 changed the way the linker organizes sections and segments.
This exposed an lldb bug and caused some tests to fail.
In all of the failing tests the root cause was the same -- when we were
trying to resolve the last address in the line_table section, we failed
because it pointed past the end of the section.
This patch changes the line table address resolution code to back up the
address by one for end-of-sequence entries. This ensures the address
still points inside a section/module even if the line table sequence
ends at the very end of a section.
It also reverts the linker flags which were added to the failing tests
to restore previous behavior.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: mgorny, MaskRay, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65647
llvm-svn: 367983
|
|
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
|
|
llvm-svn: 355569
|
|
The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique pointers, some variables still carried the suffix.
In r353795 I removed another auto_ptr remnant, namely redundant calls to
::get for unique_pointers. Jim justly noted that this is a good
opportunity to clean up the variable names as well.
I went over all the changes to ensure my find-and-replace didn't have
any undesired side-effects. I hope I didn't miss any, but if you end up
at this commit doing a git blame on a weirdly named variable, please
know that the change was unintentional.
llvm-svn: 353912
|
|
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
|
|
table entries.
If you have code before the first line table entry when debugging with .o files on macOS, the
LineTable entry search code was assigning all that code to the first line table entry. Don't do that.
<rdar://problem/31095765>
llvm-svn: 298289
|
|
This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.
ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString
The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has
no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the
starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies.
These are all low level and very widely used classes, and
previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order
to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes
sense from both the short term and long term perspective in
solving this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427
llvm-svn: 293941
|
|
llvm-svn: 292598
|
|
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
|
|
Submitted by giffunip@yahoo.com; I fixed a couple of nearby errors and
incorrect changes in the patch.
llvm.org/pr27634
llvm-svn: 275983
|
|
Summary:
The "file" variable in a LineEntry was mapped using target.source-map, except when stepping through inlined code. This patch adds a new variable to LineEntry, "original_file", that contains the original file from the debug info. "file" will continue to (possibly) be mapped.
Some code has been changed to use "original_file". This is code dealing with symbols. Code dealing with source files will still use "file". Reviewers, please confirm that these particular changes are correct.
Tests run on Ubuntu 12.04 show no regression.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20135
llvm-svn: 269250
|
|
Summary:
If two dwarf sequences begin with entries that have identical addresses,
it is possible for the comparator to order the first entry of the new
sequence between the first and second entries of the existing sequence.
This will result in an attempted insertion of the second sequence inside
of the first sequence, which is invalid.
Ensure that insertions only occur in between existing sequences.
Reviewers: andrew.w.kaylor, clayborg
Subscribers: sas, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15979
Change by Francis Ricci <fjricci@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 257132
|
|
GCC don't use the is_prologue_end flag to mark the first instruction
after the prologue. Instead of it it is issuing a line table entry for
the first instruction of the prologue and one for the first instruction
after the prologue. If the size of the prologue is 0 instruction then
the 2 line entry will have the same file address.
We remove these duplicates entries as they are violating the dwarf spec
and can cause confusion in the debugger. To prevent the lost of
information about the end of prologue we should set the prologue end
flag for the line entries what are representing more then 1 entry.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12757
llvm-svn: 247788
|
|
Summary: Fix a bunch of typos.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11386
llvm-svn: 242856
|
|
files.
The problem occurred when we had incorrect address ranges in the debug map that included the padding between functions causing the end address of a line table entry to fall into an inlinked (next function) address range.
<rdar://problem/19721144>
llvm-svn: 228707
|
|
clang static analyzer fixit.
llvm-svn: 219905
|
|
The compiler, when JIT'ing code, can emit illegal DWARF line tables (address is line table sequences must increase). This changes fixes that issue by replacing previous line entries whose start address is the same with the new line entry to avoid having multiple line entries with the same address. Since the address range of lines entries is determined by the delta between the current and next line entry, this shouldn't cause any issues.
llvm-svn: 211212
|
|
Patch by Robert Matusewicz
llvm-svn: 206713
|
|
the macros and just use C++11.
llvm-svn: 179805
|
|
C++11 is being used. To do this, we follow what we have done for shared pointers and we define a STD_UNIQUE_PTR macro that can be used and it will "do the right thing". Due to some API differences in std::unique_ptr and due to the fact that we need to be able to compile without C++11, we can't use move semantics so some code needed to change so that it can compile with either C++.
Anyone wanting to use a unique_ptr or auto_ptr should now use the "STD_UNIQUE_PTR(TYPE)" macro.
llvm-svn: 179779
|
|
Fixed a crasher in the new DWARF in .o files line table linking function where "back()" could end up being called on an empty std::vector.
llvm-svn: 177082
|
|
LLDB was not parsing line tables correctly for DWARF in .o files after recent debug map changes. This has now been fixed.
llvm-svn: 176592
|
|
DWARF with .o files now uses 40-60% less memory!
Big fixes include:
- Change line table internal representation to contain "file addresses". Since each line table is owned by a compile unit that is owned by a module, it makes address translation into lldb_private::Address easy to do when needed.
- Removed linked address members/methods from lldb_private::Section and lldb_private::Address
- lldb_private::LineTable can now relink itself using a FileRangeMap to make it easier to re-link line tables in the future
- Added ObjectFile::ClearSymtab() so that we can get rid of the object file symbol tables after we parse them once since they are not needed and kept memory allocated for no reason
- Moved the m_sections_ap (std::auto_ptr to section list) and m_symtab_ap (std::auto_ptr to the lldb_private::Symtab) out of each of the ObjectFile subclasses and put it into lldb_private::ObjectFile.
- Changed how the debug map is parsed and stored to be able to:
- Lazily parse the debug map for each object file
- not require the address map for a .o file until debug information is linked for a .o file
llvm-svn: 176454
|
|
llvm-svn: 171548
|
|
nothing else to support clang's new -gline-tables-only mode of compiling.
llvm-svn: 169994
|
|
Line tables when using DWARF in .o files can be wrong when two entries get moved around by the compiler. This was due to incorrect logic in the line entry comparison operator.
llvm-svn: 153685
|
|
LLDB can match incorrect line table entries when an address is between two valid line entries (in the gap between the valid debug info), now it doesn't!
llvm-svn: 153077
|
|
I started work on being able to add symbol files after a debug session
had started with a new "target symfile add" command and quickly ran into
problems with stale Address objects in breakpoint locations that had
lldb_private::Section pointers into modules that had been removed or
replaced. This also let to grabbing stale modules from those sections.
So I needed to thread harded the Address, Section and related objects.
To do this I modified the ModuleChild class to now require a ModuleSP
on initialization so that a weak reference can created. I also changed
all places that were handing out "Section *" to have them hand out SectionSP.
All ObjectFile, SymbolFile and SymbolVendors were inheriting from ModuleChild
so all of the find plug-in, static creation function and constructors now
require ModuleSP references instead of Module *.
Address objects now have weak references to their sections which can
safely go stale when a module gets destructed.
This checkin doesn't complete the "target symfile add" command, but it
does get us a lot clioser to being able to do such things without a high
risk of crashing or memory corruption.
llvm-svn: 151336
|
