| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Basically, disable everything except the eh_frame unwind plan, as that's
the only one which supports this right now. The other plans are working
with now trying the interpret everything in between the function parts
as a part of the function, which is more likely to produce wrong results
than correct ones.
I changed the interface for object file plans, to give the
implementations a chance to implement this correctly, but I haven't
actually converted PECallFrameInfo (its only implementation) to handle
that. (from the looks of things, it should be relatively easy to do, if
it becomes necessary)
I'm also deleting UnwindPlan::GetFirstNonPrologueInsn, as it's not used,
and it doesn't work for discontinuous functions.
|
|
To be able to describe discontinuous functions, this patch changes the
UnwindPlan to accept more than one address range.
I've also squeezed in a couple improvements/modernizations, for example
using the lower_bound function instead of a linear scan.
|
|
In most places, the rows are copied anyway (because they are generated
by cumulating modifications) immediately after adding them to the unwind
plans. In others, they can be moved into the unwind plan. This lets us
remove some backflip copies and make `const UnwindPlan` actually mean
something.
I've split this patch into two (and temporarily left both APIs) as this
patch was getting a bit big. This patch covers all the interesting
cases. Part two all about converting "architecture default" unwind plans
from ABI and InstructionEmulation plugins.
|
|
LLVM contains a helpful function for getting the size of a C-style
array: `llvm::array_lengthof`. This is useful prior to C++17, but not as
helpful for C++17 or later: `std::size` already has support for C-style
arrays.
Change call sites to use `std::size` instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133501
|
|
Applied modernize-use-default-member-init clang-tidy check over LLDB.
It appears in many files we had already switched to in class member init but
never updated the constructors to reflect that. This check is already present in
the lldb/.clang-tidy config.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121481
|
|
C++17"
This reverts commit ef8206320769ad31422a803a0d6de6077fd231d2.
- It conflicts with the existing llvm::size in STLExtras, which will now
never be called.
- Calling it without llvm:: breaks C++17 compat
|
|
As a conquence move llvm::array_lengthof from STLExtras.h to
STLForwardCompat.h (which is included by STLExtras.h so no build
breakage expected).
|
|
llvm-svn: 374545
|
|
unwind plans
This patch adds an implementation of unwinding using PE EH info. It allows to
get almost ideal call stacks on 64-bit Windows systems (except some epilogue
cases, but I believe that they can be fixed with unwind plan disassembly
augmentation in the future).
To achieve the goal the CallFrameInfo abstraction was made. It is based on the
DWARFCallFrameInfo class interface with a few changes to make it less
DWARF-specific.
To implement the new interface for PECOFF object files the class PECallFrameInfo
was written. It uses the next helper classes:
- UnwindCodesIterator helps to iterate through UnwindCode structures (and
processes chained infos transparently);
- EHProgramBuilder with the use of UnwindCodesIterator constructs EHProgram;
- EHProgram is, by fact, a vector of EHInstructions. It creates an abstraction
over the low-level unwind codes and simplifies work with them. It contains
only the information that is relevant to unwinding in the unified form. Also
the required unwind codes are read from the object file only once with it;
- EHProgramRange allows to take a range of EHProgram and to build an unwind row
for it.
So, PECallFrameInfo builds the EHProgram with EHProgramBuilder, takes the ranges
corresponding to every offset in prologue and builds the rows of the resulted
unwind plan. The resulted plan covers the whole range of the function except the
epilogue.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, asmith, amccarth, clayborg, JDevlieghere, stella.stamenova, labath, espindola
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Subscribers: leonid.mashinskiy, emaste, mgorny, aprantl, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67347
llvm-svn: 374528
|
