summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprCXX.cpp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-06-09[clang][NFC] Remove dead PassTypeToPlacementDelete field (#143448)Oliver Hunt
The CallDeleteDuringNew::PassTypeToPlacementDelete field became unneeded during the many refactorings of P2719 but I didn't actually remove it.
2025-05-09clang: Remove dest LangAS argument from performAddrSpaceCast (#138866)Matt Arsenault
It isn't used and is redundant with the result pointer type argument. A more reasonable API would only have LangAS parameters, or IR parameters, not both. Not all values have a meaningful value for this. I'm also not sure why we have this at all, it's not overridden by any targets and further simplification is possible.
2025-04-14[MS][clang] Revert vector deleting destructors support (#135611)Mariya Podchishchaeva
Finding operator delete[] is still problematic, without it the extension is a security hazard, so reverting until the problem with operator delete[] is figured out. This reverts the following PRs: Reland [MS][clang] Add support for vector deleting destructors (llvm#133451) [MS][clang] Make sure vector deleting dtor calls correct operator delete (llvm#133950) [MS][clang] Fix crash on deletion of array of pointers (llvm#134088) [clang] Do not diagnose unused deleted operator delete[] (llvm#134357) [MS][clang] Error about ambiguous operator delete[] only when required (llvm#135041)
2025-04-10[RFC] Initial implementation of P2719 (#113510)Oliver Hunt
This is a basic implementation of P2719: "Type-aware allocation and deallocation functions" described at http://wg21.link/P2719 The proposal includes some more details but the basic change in functionality is the addition of support for an additional implicit parameter in operators `new` and `delete` to act as a type tag. Tag is of type `std::type_identity<T>` where T is the concrete type being allocated. So for example, a custom type specific allocator for `int` say can be provided by the declaration of void *operator new(std::type_identity<int>, size_t, std::align_val_t); void operator delete(std::type_identity<int>, void*, size_t, std::align_val_t); However this becomes more powerful by specifying templated declarations, for example template <typename T> void *operator new(std::type_identity<T>, size_t, std::align_val_t); template <typename T> void operator delete(std::type_identity<T>, void*, size_t, std::align_val_t);); Where the operators being resolved will be the concrete type being operated over (NB. A completely unconstrained global definition as above is not recommended as it triggers many problems similar to a general override of the global operators). These type aware operators can be declared as either free functions or in class, and can be specified with or without the other implicit parameters, with overload resolution performed according to the existing standard parameter prioritisation, only with type parameterised operators having higher precedence than non-type aware operators. The only exception is destroying_delete which for reasons discussed in the paper we do not support type-aware variants by default.
2025-03-31Reland [MS][clang] Add support for vector deleting destructors (#133451)Mariya Podchishchaeva
Whereas it is UB in terms of the standard to delete an array of objects via pointer whose static type doesn't match its dynamic type, MSVC supports an extension allowing to do it. Aside from array deletion not working correctly in the mentioned case, currently not having this extension implemented causes clang to generate code that is not compatible with the code generated by MSVC, because clang always puts scalar deleting destructor to the vftable. This PR aims to resolve these problems. It was reverted due to link time errors in chromium with sanitizer coverage enabled, which is fixed by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131929 . The second commit of this PR also contains a fix for a runtime failure in chromium reported in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126240#issuecomment-2730216384 . Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/19772
2025-03-21Reland: [clang] NFC: Clear some uses of MemberPointerType::getClass (#132317)Matheus Izvekov
Relands Original PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131965 Addresses https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131965#issuecomment-2741619498 * Fixes isIncompleteType for injected classes This clears up some uses of getClass on MemberPointerType when equivalent uses of getMostRecentCXXRecordDecl would be just as simple or simpler. This is split-off from a larger patch which removes getClass, in order to facilitate review.
2025-03-20Revert "[clang] NFC: Clear some uses of MemberPointerType::getClass" (#132281)Matheus Izvekov
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#131965 Reverted due to issue reported here: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131965#issuecomment-2741619498
2025-03-19[clang] NFC: Clear some uses of MemberPointerType::getClass (#131965)Matheus Izvekov
2025-03-12Revert "[MS][clang] Add support for vector deleting destructors (#126240)"Hans Wennborg
This caused link errors when building with sancov. See comment on the PR. > Whereas it is UB in terms of the standard to delete an array of objects > via pointer whose static type doesn't match its dynamic type, MSVC > supports an extension allowing to do it. > Aside from array deletion not working correctly in the mentioned case, > currently not having this extension implemented causes clang to generate > code that is not compatible with the code generated by MSVC, because > clang always puts scalar deleting destructor to the vftable. This PR > aims to resolve these problems. > > Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/19772 This reverts commit d6942d54f677000cf713d2b0eba57b641452beb4.
2025-03-04[MS][clang] Add support for vector deleting destructors (#126240)Mariya Podchishchaeva
Whereas it is UB in terms of the standard to delete an array of objects via pointer whose static type doesn't match its dynamic type, MSVC supports an extension allowing to do it. Aside from array deletion not working correctly in the mentioned case, currently not having this extension implemented causes clang to generate code that is not compatible with the code generated by MSVC, because clang always puts scalar deleting destructor to the vftable. This PR aims to resolve these problems. Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/19772
2025-01-22[NFC] Minor fix to tryEmitAbstract type in EmitCXXNewAllocSize (#123433)Andy Kaylor
In EmitCXXNewAllocSize, when handling a constant array size, we were calling tryEmitAbstract with the type of the object being allocated rather than the expected type of the array size. This worked out because the allocated type was always a pointer and tryEmitAbstract only ends up using the size of the type to extend or truncate the constant, and in this case the destination type should be size_t, which is usually the same width as the pointer. This change fixes the type, but it makes no functional difference with the current constant emitter implementation.
2024-10-15clang: Remove some pointer bitcasts (#112324)Matt Arsenault
Obsolete since opaque pointers.
2024-09-08[Clang] C++20 Coroutines: Introduce Frontend Attribute ↵Yuxuan Chen
[[clang::coro_await_elidable]] (#99282) This patch is the frontend implementation of the coroutine elide improvement project detailed in this discourse post: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/language-extension-for-better-more-deterministic-halo-for-c-coroutines/80044 This patch proposes a C++ struct/class attribute `[[clang::coro_await_elidable]]`. This notion of await elidable task gives developers and library authors a certainty that coroutine heap elision happens in a predictable way. Originally, after we lower a coroutine to LLVM IR, CoroElide is responsible for analysis of whether an elision can happen. Take this as an example: ``` Task foo(); Task bar() { co_await foo(); } ``` For CoroElide to happen, the ramp function of `foo` must be inlined into `bar`. This inlining happens after `foo` has been split but `bar` is usually still a presplit coroutine. If `foo` is indeed a coroutine, the inlined `coro.id` intrinsics of `foo` is visible within `bar`. CoroElide then runs an analysis to figure out whether the SSA value of `coro.begin()` of `foo` gets destroyed before `bar` terminates. `Task` types are rarely simple enough for the destroy logic of the task to reference the SSA value from `coro.begin()` directly. Hence, the pass is very ineffective for even the most trivial C++ Task types. Improving CoroElide by implementing more powerful analyses is possible, however it doesn't give us the predictability when we expect elision to happen. The approach we want to take with this language extension generally originates from the philosophy that library implementations of `Task` types has the control over the structured concurrency guarantees we demand for elision to happen. That is, the lifetime for the callee's frame is shorter to that of the caller. The ``[[clang::coro_await_elidable]]`` is a class attribute which can be applied to a coroutine return type. When a coroutine function that returns such a type calls another coroutine function, the compiler performs heap allocation elision when the following conditions are all met: - callee coroutine function returns a type that is annotated with ``[[clang::coro_await_elidable]]``. - In caller coroutine, the return value of the callee is a prvalue that is immediately `co_await`ed. From the C++ perspective, it makes sense because we can ensure the lifetime of elided callee cannot exceed that of the caller if we can guarantee that the caller coroutine is never destroyed earlier than the callee coroutine. This is not generally true for any C++ programs. However, the library that implements `Task` types and executors may provide this guarantee to the compiler, providing the user with certainty that HALO will work on their programs. After this patch, when compiling coroutines that return a type with such attribute, the frontend checks that the type of the operand of `co_await` expressions (not `operator co_await`). If it's also attributed with `[[clang::coro_await_elidable]]`, the FE emits metadata on the call or invoke instruction as a hint for a later middle end pass to elide the elision. The original patch version is https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94693 and as suggested, the patch is split into frontend and middle end solutions into stacked PRs. The middle end CoroSplit patch can be found at https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99283 The middle end transformation that performs the elide can be found at https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99285
2024-06-17[Clang] Introduce `CXXTypeidExpr::hasNullCheck` (#95718)Mital Ashok
Used to implement CWG2191 where `typeid` for a polymorphic glvalue only becomes potentially-throwing if the `typeid` operand was already potentially throwing or a `nullptr` check was inserted: https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2191.html Also change `Expr::hasSideEffects` for `CXXTypeidExpr` to check the operand for side-effects instead of always reporting that there are side-effects Remove `IsDeref` parameter of `CGCXXABI::shouldTypeidBeNullChecked` because it should never return `true` if `!IsDeref` (we shouldn't add a null check that wasn't there in the first place)
2024-05-20[clang][CodeGen] Remove unused LValue::getAddress CGF arg. (#92465)Ahmed Bougacha
This is in effect a revert of f139ae3d93797, as we have since gained a more sophisticated way of doing extra IRGen with the addition of RawAddress in #86923.
2024-05-19[Clang][CodeGen] Start migrating away from assuming the Default AS is 0 (#88182)Alex Voicu
At the moment, Clang is rather liberal in assuming that 0 (and by extension unqualified) is always a safe default. This does not work for targets that actually use a different value for the default / generic AS (for example, the SPIRV that obtains from HIPSPV or SYCL). This patch is a first, fairly safe step towards trying to clear things up by querying a modules' default AS from the target, rather than assuming it's 0, alongside fixing a few places where things break / we encode the 0 == DefaultAS assumption. A bunch of existing tests are extended to check for non-zero default AS usage.
2024-04-29Re-apply "Emit missing cleanups for stmt-expr" and other commits (#89154)Utkarsh Saxena
Latest diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89154/files/f1ab4c2677394bbfc985d9680d5eecd7b2e6a882..adf9bc902baddb156c83ce0f8ec03c142e806d45 We address two additional bugs here: ### Problem 1: Deactivated normal cleanup still runs, leading to double-free Consider the following: ```cpp struct A { }; struct B { B(const A&); }; struct S { A a; B b; }; int AcceptS(S s); void Accept2(int x, int y); void Test() { Accept2(AcceptS({.a = A{}, .b = A{}}), ({ return; 0; })); } ``` We add cleanups as follows: 1. push dtor for field `S::a` 2. push dtor for temp `A{}` (used by ` B(const A&)` in `.b = A{}`) 3. push dtor for field `S::b` 4. Deactivate 3 `S::b`-> This pops the cleanup. 5. Deactivate 1 `S::a` -> Does not pop the cleanup as *2* is top. Should create _active flag_!! 6. push dtor for `~S()`. 7. ... It is important to deactivate **5** using active flags. Without the active flags, the `return` will fallthrough it and would run both `~S()` and dtor `S::a` leading to **double free** of `~A()`. In this patch, we unconditionally emit active flags while deactivating normal cleanups. These flags are deleted later by the `AllocaTracker` if the cleanup is not emitted. ### Problem 2: Missing cleanup for conditional lifetime extension We push 2 cleanups for lifetime-extended cleanup. The first cleanup is useful if we exit from the middle of the expression (stmt-expr/coro suspensions). This is deactivated after full-expr, and a new cleanup is pushed, extending the lifetime of the temporaries (to the scope of the reference being initialized). If this lifetime extension happens to be conditional, then we use active flags to remember whether the branch was taken and if the object was initialized. Previously, we used a **single** active flag, which was used by both cleanups. This is wrong because the first cleanup will be forced to deactivate after the full-expr and therefore this **active** flag will always be **inactive**. The dtor for the lifetime extended entity would not run as it always sees an **inactive** flag. In this patch, we solve this using two separate active flags for both cleanups. Both of them are activated if the conditional branch is taken, but only one of them is deactivated after the full-expr. --- Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63818 Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/88478 --- Previous PR logs: 1. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85398 2. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88670 3. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88751 4. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88884
2024-04-18[clang][NFC] Fix FieldDecl::isUnnamedBitfield() capitalization (#89048)Timm Baeder
We always capitalize bitfield as "BitField".
2024-04-16Revert "[codegen] Emit missing cleanups for stmt-expr and coro suspensions" ↵Utkarsh Saxena
and related commits (#88884) The original change caused widespread breakages in msan/ubsan tests and causes `use-after-free`. Most likely we are adding more cleanups than necessary.
2024-04-10[codegen] Emit missing cleanups for stmt-expr and coro suspensions [take-2] ↵Utkarsh Saxena
(#85398) Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63818 for control flow out of an expressions. #### Background A control flow could happen in the middle of an expression due to stmt-expr and coroutine suspensions. Due to branch-in-expr, we missed running cleanups for the temporaries constructed in the expression before the branch. Previously, these cleanups were only added as `EHCleanup` during the expression and as normal expression after the full expression. Examples of such deferred cleanups include: `ParenList/InitList`: Cleanups for fields are performed by the destructor of the object being constructed. `Array init`: Cleanup for elements of an array is included in the array cleanup. `Lifetime-extended temporaries`: reference-binding temporaries in braced-init are lifetime extended to the parent scope. `Lambda capture init`: init in the lambda capture list is destroyed by the lambda object. --- #### In this PR In this PR, we change some of the `EHCleanups` cleanups to `NormalAndEHCleanups` to make sure these are emitted when we see a branch inside an expression (through statement expressions or coroutine suspensions). These are supposed to be deactivated after full expression and destroyed later as part of the destructor of the aggregate or array being constructed. To simplify deactivating cleanups, we add two utilities as well: * `DeferredDeactivationCleanupStack`: A stack to remember cleanups with deferred deactivation. * `CleanupDeactivationScope`: RAII for deactivating cleanups added to the above stack. --- #### Deactivating normal cleanups These were previously `EHCleanups` and not `Normal` and **deactivation** of **required** `Normal` cleanups had some bugs. These specifically include deactivating `Normal` cleanups which are not the top of `EHStack` [source1](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/92b56011e6b61e7dc1628c0431ece432f282b3cb/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCleanup.cpp#L1319), [2](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/92b56011e6b61e7dc1628c0431ece432f282b3cb/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCleanup.cpp#L722-L746). This has not been part of our test suite (maybe it was never required before statement expressions). In this PR, we also fix the emission of required-deactivated-normal cleanups.
2024-03-28[CodeGen][arm64e] Add methods and data members to Address, which are needed ↵Akira Hatanaka
to authenticate signed pointers (#86923) To authenticate pointers, CodeGen needs access to the key and discriminators that were used to sign the pointer. That information is sometimes known from the context, but not always, which is why `Address` needs to hold that information. This patch adds methods and data members to `Address`, which will be needed in subsequent patches to authenticate signed pointers, and uses the newly added methods throughout CodeGen. Although this patch isn't strictly NFC as it causes CodeGen to use different code paths in some cases (e.g., `mergeAddressesInConditionalExpr`), it doesn't cause any changes in functionality as it doesn't add any information needed for authentication. In addition to the changes mentioned above, this patch introduces class `RawAddress`, which contains a pointer that we know is unsigned, and adds several new functions for creating `Address` and `LValue` objects. This reapplies d9a685a9dd589486e882b722e513ee7b8c84870c, which was reverted because it broke ubsan bots. There seems to be a bug in coroutine code-gen, which is causing EmitTypeCheck to use the wrong alignment. For now, pass alignment zero to EmitTypeCheck so that it can compute the correct alignment based on the passed type (see function EmitCXXMemberOrOperatorMemberCallExpr).
2024-03-27Revert "[CodeGen][arm64e] Add methods and data members to Address, which are ↵Akira Hatanaka
needed to authenticate signed pointers (#86721)" (#86898) This reverts commit d9a685a9dd589486e882b722e513ee7b8c84870c. The commit broke ubsan bots.
2024-03-27[CodeGen][arm64e] Add methods and data members to Address, which are needed ↵Akira Hatanaka
to authenticate signed pointers (#86721) To authenticate pointers, CodeGen needs access to the key and discriminators that were used to sign the pointer. That information is sometimes known from the context, but not always, which is why `Address` needs to hold that information. This patch adds methods and data members to `Address`, which will be needed in subsequent patches to authenticate signed pointers, and uses the newly added methods throughout CodeGen. Although this patch isn't strictly NFC as it causes CodeGen to use different code paths in some cases (e.g., `mergeAddressesInConditionalExpr`), it doesn't cause any changes in functionality as it doesn't add any information needed for authentication. In addition to the changes mentioned above, this patch introduces class `RawAddress`, which contains a pointer that we know is unsigned, and adds several new functions for creating `Address` and `LValue` objects. This reapplies 8bd1f9116aab879183f34707e6d21c7051d083b6. The commit broke msan bots because LValue::IsKnownNonNull was uninitialized.
2024-03-26[NFC] Refactor ConstantArrayType size storage (#85716)Chris B
In PR #79382, I need to add a new type that derives from ConstantArrayType. This means that ConstantArrayType can no longer use `llvm::TrailingObjects` to store the trailing optional Expr*. This change refactors ConstantArrayType to store a 60-bit integer and 4-bits for the integer size in bytes. This replaces the APInt field previously in the type but preserves enough information to recreate it where needed. To reduce the number of places where the APInt is re-constructed I've also added some helper methods to the ConstantArrayType to allow some common use cases that operate on either the stored small integer or the APInt as appropriate. Resolves #85124.
2024-03-26Revert "[CodeGen][arm64e] Add methods and data members to Address, which are ↵Akira Hatanaka
needed to authenticate signed pointers (#67454)" (#86674) This reverts commit 8bd1f9116aab879183f34707e6d21c7051d083b6. It appears that the commit broke msan bots.
2024-03-25[CodeGen][arm64e] Add methods and data members to Address, which are needed ↵Akira Hatanaka
to authenticate signed pointers (#67454) To authenticate pointers, CodeGen needs access to the key and discriminators that were used to sign the pointer. That information is sometimes known from the context, but not always, which is why `Address` needs to hold that information. This patch adds methods and data members to `Address`, which will be needed in subsequent patches to authenticate signed pointers, and uses the newly added methods throughout CodeGen. Although this patch isn't strictly NFC as it causes CodeGen to use different code paths in some cases (e.g., `mergeAddressesInConditionalExpr`), it doesn't cause any changes in functionality as it doesn't add any information needed for authentication. In addition to the changes mentioned above, this patch introduces class `RawAddress`, which contains a pointer that we know is unsigned, and adds several new functions for creating `Address` and `LValue` objects.
2024-02-11[clang][NFC] Annotate `CGExprCXX.cpp` with `preferred_type`Vlad Serebrennikov
This helps debuggers to display values in bit-fields in a more helpful way.
2024-01-18[clang] Fix parenthesized list initialization of arrays not working with ↵Alan Zhao
`new` (#76976) This bug is caused by parenthesized list initialization not being implemented in `CodeGenFunction::EmitNewArrayInitializer(...)`. Parenthesized list initialization of `struct`s with `operator new` already works in Clang and is not affected by this bug. Additionally, fix the test new-delete.cpp as it incorrectly assumes that using parentheses with operator new to initialize arrays is illegal for C++ versions >= C++17. Fixes #68198
2023-11-05[clang][NFC] Refactor `CXXConstructExpr::ConstructionKind`Vlad Serebrennikov
This patch converts `CXXConstructExpr::ConstructionKind` into a scoped enum in namespace scope, making it eligible for forward declaring. This is useful in cases like annotating bit-fields with `preferred_type`.
2023-10-27[clang] Remove no-op ptr-to-ptr bitcasts (NFC)Youngsuk Kim
Opaque pointer cleanup effort. NFC.
2023-10-02[C++] Implement "Deducing this" (P0847R7)Corentin Jabot
This patch implements P0847R7 (partially), CWG2561 and CWG2653. Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140828
2023-08-28[Clang][CodeGen] `typeid` needs special care when `type_info` is not in the ↵Alex Voicu
default AS After https://reviews.llvm.org/D153092, for targets that use a non-default AS for globals, an "interesting" situation arises around typeid and its paired type, type_info: - on the AST level, the type_info interface is defined with default / generic addresses, be it for function arguments, or for this; - in IR, type_info values are globals, and thus pointers to type_info values are pointers to global This leads to a mismatch between the function signature / formal type of the argument, and its actual type. Currently we try to handle such mismatches via `bitcast`, but that is wrong in this case, since an `ascast` is required. This patch ensures that iff the pointer to `type_info` points to a non-default AS, an ascast is inserted so as to match the `typeid` interface / return value type. Reviewed by: yaxunl Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157452
2023-07-24Don't perform dynamic_cast optimization at -O0.Richard Smith
It seems preferable to avoid this optimization under -O0, and we're not set up to emit speculative references to vtables at -O0 in general anyway. For #64088.
2023-07-21Optimize emission of `dynamic_cast` to final classes.Richard Smith
- When the destination is a final class type that does not derive from the source type, the cast always fails and is now emitted as a null pointer or call to __cxa_bad_cast. - When the destination is a final class type that does derive from the source type, emit a direct comparison against the corresponding base class vptr value(s). There may be more than one such value in the case of multiple inheritance; check them all. For now, this is supported only for the Itanium ABI. I expect the same thing is possible for the MS ABI too, but I don't know what guarantees are made about vfptr uniqueness. Reviewed By: rjmccall Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154658
2023-07-02[clang] Remove CGBuilderTy::CreateElementBitCastYoungsuk Kim
`CGBuilderTy::CreateElementBitCast()` no longer does what its name suggests. Remove remaining in-tree uses by one of the following methods. * drop the call entirely * fold it to an `Address` construction * replace it with `Address::withElementType()` This is a NFC cleanup effort. Reviewed By: barannikov88, nikic, jrtc27 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154285
2023-06-29[clang][CodeGen] Remove no-op EmitCastToVoidPtr (NFC)Sergei Barannikov
Reviewed By: JOE1994 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153694
2023-06-16[clang] Replace use of Type::getPointerTo() (NFC)Youngsuk Kim
Partial progress towards replacing in-tree uses of `Type::getPointerTo()`. This needs to be done before deprecating the API. Reviewed By: nikic, barannikov88 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152321
2023-04-10Use APInt::getOneBitSet (NFC)Kazu Hirata
2023-02-28[Clang][CodeGen] Fix this argument type for certain destructorsJacob Young
With the Microsoft ABI, some destructors need to offset a parameter to get the derived this pointer, in which case the type of that parameter should not be a pointer to the derived type. Fixes #60465
2023-02-19Use APInt::count{l,r}_{zero,one} (NFC)Kazu Hirata
2023-02-15[CodeGen] Add a flag to `Address` and `Lvalue` that is used to keepAkira Hatanaka
track of whether the pointer is known not to be null The flag will be used for the arm64e work we plan to upstream in the future (see https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-October/136091.html). Currently the flag has no effect on code generation. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142584
2023-01-28[llvm] Use llvm::bit_floor instead of llvm::PowerOf2Floor (NFC)Kazu Hirata
2022-08-08[clang] LLVM_FALLTHROUGH => [[fallthrough]]. NFCFangrui Song
With C++17 there is no Clang pedantic warning or MSVC C5051. Reviewed By: aaron.ballman Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131346
2022-05-10[CodeGen] Use ABI alignment for C++ new expressionsDaniel Bertalan
In case of placement new, if we do not know the alignment of the operand, we can't assume it has the preferred alignment. It might be e.g. a pointer to a struct member which follows ABI alignment rules. This makes UBSAN no longer report "constructor call on misaligned address" when constructing a double into a struct field of type double on i686. The psABI specifies an alignment of 4 bytes, but the preferred alignment used by Clang is 8 bytes. We now use ABI alignment for allocating new as well, as the preferred alignment should be used for over-aligning e.g. local variables, which isn't relevant for ABI code dealing with operator new. AFAICT there wouldn't be problems either way though. Fixes #54845. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124736
2022-02-17[clang] Remove Address::deprecated() call in CGExprCXX.cppArthur Eubanks
2022-02-17[CodeGen] Rename deprecated Address constructorNikita Popov
To make uses of the deprecated constructor easier to spot, and to ensure that no new uses are introduced, rename it to Address::deprecated(). While doing the rename, I've filled in element types in cases where it was relatively obvious, but we're still left with 135 calls to the deprecated constructor.
2022-02-14[CGBuilder] Remove CreateBitCast() methodNikita Popov
Use CreateElementBitCast() instead, or don't work on Address where not necessary.
2022-01-27[NFC][Clang][OpaquePtr] Move away from deprecated Address constructor in ↵Arthur Eubanks
EmitNewArrayInitializer() Specify the Address element type, which is the same for all pointers in the array.
2021-12-23[CodeGen] Use CreateConstInBoundsGEP() in one more placeNikita Popov
This does exactly what this code manually implemented.
2021-12-21[CodeGen] Accept Address in CreateLaunderInvariantGroupNikita Popov
Add an overload that accepts and returns an Address, as we generally just want to replace the pointer with a laundered one, while retaining remaining information.