| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
DISubroutineType (#130674)" (#145697)
This reverts commit cd826d6e840ed33ad88458c862da5f9fcc6e908c and relands
27c1aa9b9cf9e0b14211758ff8f7d3aaba24ffcf
This fixes #104765
I tweaked the code to avoid an OOB.
|
|
Patch 1/4 adding bitcode support.
Store whether or not a function is using Key Instructions in its DISubprogram so
that we don't need to rely on the -mllvm flag -dwarf-use-key-instructions to
determine whether or not to interpret Key Instructions metadata to decide
is_stmt placement at DWARF emission time. This makes bitcode support simple and
enables well defined mixing of non-key-instructions and key-instructions
functions in an LTO context.
This patch adds the bit (using DISubprogram::SubclassData1).
PR 144104 and 144103 use it during DWARF emission.
PR 44102 adds bitcode
support.
See pull request for overview of alternative attempts.
|
|
In Ada, a record type can have a non-constant size, and a field can
appear at a non-constant bit offset in a record.
To support this, this patch changes DIType to record the size and offset
using metadata, rather than plain integers. In addition to a constant
offset, both DIVariable and DIExpression are now supported here.
One thing of note in this patch is the choice of how exactly to
represent a non-constant bit offset, with the difficulty being that
DWARF 5 does not support this. DWARF 3 did have a way to support a
non-constant byte offset, combined with a constant bit offset within the
byte, but this was deprecated in DWARF 4 and removed from DWARF 5.
This patch takes a simple approach: a DWARF extension allowing the use
of an expression with DW_AT_data_bit_offset. There is a corresponding
DWARF issue, see https://dwarfstd.org/issues/250501.1.html. The main
reason for this approach is that it keeps API simplicity: just a single
value is needed, rather than having separate data describing the byte
offset and the bit within the byte.
|
|
The dependency from the type sugar of the underlying type of a Typedef
were not being considered for the dependency of the TypedefType itself.
A TypedefType should be instantiation dependent if it involves
non-instantiated template parameters, even if they don't contribute to
the canonical type.
Besides, a TypedefType should be instantiation dependent if it is
declared in a dependent context, but fixing that would have performance
consequences, as otherwise non-dependent typedef declarations would need
to be transformed during instantiation as well.
This removes the workaround added in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90032
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/89774
|
|
This extends https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138577 to more UBSan checks, by changing SanitizerDebugLocation (formerly SanitizerScope) to add annotations if enabled for the specified ordinals.
Annotations will use the ordinal name if there is exactly one ordinal specified in the SanitizerDebugLocation; otherwise, it will use the handler name.
Updates the tests from https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141814.
---------
Co-authored-by: Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka@google.com>
|
|
We have multiple different attributes in clang representing device
kernels for specific targets/languages. Refactor them into one attribute
with different spellings to make it more easily scalable for new
languages/targets.
---------
Signed-off-by: Sarnie, Nick <nick.sarnie@intel.com>
|
|
DIBuilder::finalize() (#139914)
DIBuilder began tracking definition subprograms and finalizing them in
`DIBuilder::finalize()` in eb1bb4e419.
Currently, `finalizeSubprogram()` attaches local variables, imported
entities, and labels to the `retainedNodes:` field of a corresponding
subprogram.
After 75819aedf, the definition and some declaration subprograms are
finalized in `DIBuilder::finalize()`:
`AllSubprograms` holds references to definition subprograms.
`AllRetainTypes` holds references to declaration subprograms.
For DISubprogram elements of both variables, `finalizeSubprogram()` was
called there.
However, `retainTypes()` is not necessarily called for every declaration
subprogram (as in 40a3fcb0).
DIBuilder clients may also want to attach DILocalVariables to
declaration subprograms, for example, in 58bdf8f9a8.
Thus, the `finalizeSubprogram()` function is called for all definition
subprograms in `DIBuilder::finalize()` because they are stored in the
`AllSubprograms` by the `CreateFunction(isDefinition: true)` call. But
for the declaration subprograms, it should be called manually.
With this commit, `AllSubprograms` is used for holding and finalizing all DISubprograms.
|
|
|
|
The IR now includes a global variable for the debugger that holds
the address of the vtable.
Now every class that contains virtual functions, has a static
member (marked as artificial) that identifies where that vtable
is loaded in memory. The unmangled name is '_vtable$'.
This new symbol will allow a debugger to easily associate
classes with the physical location of their VTables using
only the DWARF information. Previously, this had to be done
by searching for ELF symbols with matching names; something
that was time-consuming and error-prone in certain edge cases.
|
|
This implements the design proposed by [Representing SpirvType in
Clang's Type System](https://github.com/llvm/wg-hlsl/pull/181). It
creates `HLSLInlineSpirvType` as a new `Type` subclass, and
`__hlsl_spirv_type` as a new builtin type template to create such a
type.
This new type is lowered to the `spirv.Type` target extension type, as
described in [Target Extension Types for Inline SPIR-V and Decorated
Types](https://github.com/llvm/wg-hlsl/blob/main/proposals/0017-inline-spirv-and-decorated-types.md).
|
|
|
|
clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp:153:2: error: extra ';' outside of a function is incompatible with C++98 [-Werror,-Wc++98-compat-extra-semi]
153 | };
| ^
1 error generated.
|
|
This is a scoped helper similar to ApplyDebugLocation that creates a new source
location atom group which instructions can be added to.
A source atom is a source construct that is "interesting" for debug stepping
purposes. We use an atom group number to track the instruction(s) that implement
the functionality for the atom, plus backup instructions/source locations.
This patch is part of a stack that teaches Clang to generate Key Instructions
metadata for C and C++.
RFC:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-is-stmt-placement-for-better-interactive-debugging/82668
The feature is only functional in LLVM if LLVM is built with CMake flag
LLVM_EXPERIMENTAL_KEY_INSTRUCTIONs. Eventually that flag will be removed.
|
|
|
|
In DWARF info RISC-V Vector types are presented as DW_TAG_array_type
with tags DW_AT_type (what elements does this array consist of) and
DW_TAG_subrange_type. DW_TAG_subrange_type have DW_AT_upper_bound tag
which contain upper bound value for this array.
For now, it's generate same DWARF info about length of segmented types
and their corresponding non-tuple types.
For example, vint32m4x2_t and vint32m4_t have DW_TAG_array_type with
same DW_AT_type and DW_TAG_subrange_type, it means that this types have
same length, which is not correct
(vint32m4x2_t length is twice as big as vint32m4_t)
|
|
(#130674)"
This reverts commit 27c1aa9b9cf9e0b14211758ff8f7d3aaba24ffcf.
See comments on PR. After this change, Clang now asserts like this:
clang: ../llvm/include/llvm/IR/Metadata.h:1435: const MDOperand &llvm::MDNode::getOperand(unsigned int) const: Assertion `I < getNumOperands() && "Out of range"' failed.
...
#8 0x000055f345c4e4cb clang::CodeGen::CGDebugInfo::getOrCreateInstanceMethodType()
#9 0x000055f345c5ba4f clang::CodeGen::CGDebugInfo::EmitFunctionDecl()
#10 0x000055f345b52519 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenModule::EmitExternalFunctionDeclaration()
This is due to pre-existing jankiness in the way BPF emits extra
declarations for debug info, but we should rollback and then fix forward.
|
|
Fixes issue #104765: When creating a virtual destructor with an
artificial "vtt" argument, the type of "vtt" was previously missing in
the `DISubroutineType` `types` array.
This commit fixes this behavior and adds a regression test.
|
|
The qualifier allows programmer to directly control how pointers are
signed when they are stored in a particular variable.
The qualifier takes three arguments: the signing key, a flag specifying
whether address discrimination should be used, and a non-negative
integer that is used for additional discrimination.
```
typedef void (*my_callback)(const void*);
my_callback __ptrauth(ptrauth_key_process_dependent_code, 1, 0xe27a) callback;
```
Co-Authored-By: John McCall rjmccall@apple.com
|
|
This patch extends the canonicalization printing policy to cover
expressions
and template names, and wires that up to the template argument printer,
covering expressions, and to the expression within a dependent decltype.
This is helpful for debugging, or if these expressions somehow end up
in diagnostics, as without this patch they can print as completely
unrelated
expressions, which can be quite confusing.
This is because expressions are not uniqued, unlike types, and
when a template specialization containing an expression is the first to
be
canonicalized, the expression ends up appearing in the canonical type of
subsequent equivalent specializations.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/92292
|
|
Finding operator delete[] is still problematic, without it the extension
is a security hazard, so reverting until the problem with operator
delete[] is figured out.
This reverts the following PRs:
Reland [MS][clang] Add support for vector deleting destructors (llvm#133451)
[MS][clang] Make sure vector deleting dtor calls correct operator delete (llvm#133950)
[MS][clang] Fix crash on deletion of array of pointers (llvm#134088)
[clang] Do not diagnose unused deleted operator delete[] (llvm#134357)
[MS][clang] Error about ambiguous operator delete[] only when required (llvm#135041)
|
|
This is an expensive header, only include it where needed. Move some
functions out of line to achieve that.
This reduces time to build clang by ~0.5% in terms of instructions
retired.
|
|
Whereas it is UB in terms of the standard to delete an array of objects
via pointer whose static type doesn't match its dynamic type, MSVC
supports an extension allowing to do it.
Aside from array deletion not working correctly in the mentioned case,
currently not having this extension implemented causes clang to generate
code that is not compatible with the code generated by MSVC, because
clang always puts scalar deleting destructor to the vftable. This PR
aims to resolve these problems.
It was reverted due to link time errors in chromium with sanitizer
coverage enabled,
which is fixed by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131929 .
The second commit of this PR also contains a fix for a runtime failure
in chromium reported
in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126240#issuecomment-2730216384
.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/19772
|
|
With this, we can:
* use profilers to estimate how many cycles we spend on these checks
(subject to caveats),
* more easily see why we crashed.
|
|
|
|
Relands Original PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131965
Addresses
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131965#issuecomment-2741619498
* Fixes isIncompleteType for injected classes
This clears up some uses of getClass on MemberPointerType when
equivalent uses of getMostRecentCXXRecordDecl would be just as simple or
simpler.
This is split-off from a larger patch which removes getClass, in order
to facilitate review.
|
|
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#131965
Reverted due to issue reported here:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131965#issuecomment-2741619498
|
|
|
|
This caused link errors when building with sancov. See comment on the PR.
> Whereas it is UB in terms of the standard to delete an array of objects
> via pointer whose static type doesn't match its dynamic type, MSVC
> supports an extension allowing to do it.
> Aside from array deletion not working correctly in the mentioned case,
> currently not having this extension implemented causes clang to generate
> code that is not compatible with the code generated by MSVC, because
> clang always puts scalar deleting destructor to the vftable. This PR
> aims to resolve these problems.
>
> Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/19772
This reverts commit d6942d54f677000cf713d2b0eba57b641452beb4.
|
|
i32. Add support for boolean swizzling. (#123977)
Make the memory representation of boolean vectors in HLSL, vectors of
i32.
Allow boolean swizzling for boolean vectors in HLSL.
Add tests for boolean vectors and boolean vector swizzling.
Closes #91639
|
|
Whereas it is UB in terms of the standard to delete an array of objects
via pointer whose static type doesn't match its dynamic type, MSVC
supports an extension allowing to do it.
Aside from array deletion not working correctly in the mentioned case,
currently not having this extension implemented causes clang to generate
code that is not compatible with the code generated by MSVC, because
clang always puts scalar deleting destructor to the vftable. This PR
aims to resolve these problems.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/19772
|
|
This patch adds a function attribute `riscv_vls_cc` for RISCV VLS
calling
convention which takes 0 or 1 argument, the argument is the `ABI_VLEN`
which is the `VLEN` for passing the fixed-vector arguments, it wraps the
argument as a scalable vector(VLA) using the `ABI_VLEN` and uses the
corresponding mechanism to handle it. The range of `ABI_VLEN` is [32,
65536],
if not specified, the default value is 128.
Here is an example of VLS argument passing:
Non-VLS call:
```
void original_call(__attribute__((vector_size(16))) int arg) {}
=>
define void @original_call(i128 noundef %arg) {
entry:
...
ret void
}
```
VLS call:
```
void __attribute__((riscv_vls_cc(256))) vls_call(__attribute__((vector_size(16))) int arg) {}
=>
define riscv_vls_cc void @vls_call(<vscale x 1 x i32> %arg) {
entry:
...
ret void
}
}
```
The first Non-VLS call passes generic vector argument of 16 bytes by
flattened integer.
On the contrary, the VLS call uses `ABI_VLEN=256` which wraps the
vector to <vscale x 1 x i32> where the number of scalable vector
elements
is calaulated by: `ORIG_ELTS * RVV_BITS_PER_BLOCK / ABI_VLEN`.
Note: ORIG_ELTS = Vector Size / Type Size = 128 / 32 = 4.
PsABI PR: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/pull/418
C-API PR: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-c-api-doc/pull/68
|
|
After #124287 updated several functions to return iterators rather than
Instruction *, it was no longer straightforward to pass their result to
DIBuilder. This commit updates DIBuilder methods to accept an
InsertPosition instead, so that they can be called with an iterator
(preferred), or with a deprecation warning an Instruction *, or a
BasicBlock *. This commit also updates the existing calls to the
DIBuilder methods to pass in iterators.
As a special exception, DIBuilder::insertDeclare() keeps a separate
overload accepting a BasicBlock *InsertAtEnd. This is because despite
the name, this method does not insert at the end of the block, therefore
this cannot be handled implicitly by using InsertPosition.
|
|
This reverts commit 3ec9f7494b31f2fe51d5ed0e07adcf4b7199def6.
|
|
After #124287 updated several functions to return iterators rather than
Instruction *, it was no longer straightforward to pass their result to
DIBuilder. This commit updates DIBuilder methods to accept an
InsertPosition instead, so that they can be called with an iterator
(preferred), or with a deprecation warning an Instruction *, or a
BasicBlock *. This commit also updates the existing calls to the
DIBuilder methods to pass in iterators.
|
|
This is the 2nd part to
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124752. Here we make sure to
set the `DICompositeType` `EnumKind` if the enum was declared with
`__attribute__((enum_extensibility(...)))`. In DWARF this will be
rendered as `DW_AT_APPLE_enum_kind` and will be used by LLDB when
creating `clang::EnumDecl`s from debug-info.
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126044
|
|
This is an implementation of P1061 Structure Bindings Introduce a Pack
without the ability to use packs outside of templates. There is a couple
of ways the AST could have been sliced so let me know what you think.
The only part of this change that I am unsure of is the
serialization/deserialization stuff. I followed the implementation of
other Exprs, but I do not really know how it is tested. Thank you for
your time considering this.
---------
Co-authored-by: Yanzuo Liu <zwuis@outlook.com>
|
|
When no vtable is emitted in the debug info because a record was marked
`__declspec(novtable)`, only a forward declaration of that type will be
emitted. This PR fixes that by not omitting the definition for the
`RecordDecl` in this case.
Fixes #124638.
|
|
declarations with explicit `this`" (#123455)
This reverts commit c3a935e3f967f8f22f5db240d145459ee621c1e0.
The only change to the reverted commit is that this also updates
the OCaml bindings according to the C debug-info API changes.
The build failure originally introduced was:
```
FAILED: bindings/ocaml/debuginfo/debuginfo_ocaml.o /b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/build/bindings/ocaml/debuginfo/debuginfo_ocaml.o
cd /b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/build/bindings/ocaml/debuginfo && /usr/bin/ocamlfind ocamlc -c /b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/build/bindings/ocaml/debuginfo/debuginfo_ocaml.c -ccopt "-I/b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/llvm-project/llvm/bindings/ocaml/debuginfo/../llvm -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_DEBUG -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -DEXPENSIVE_CHECKS -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/build/include -I/b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/llvm-project/llvm/include -DNDEBUG "
/b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/build/bindings/ocaml/debuginfo/debuginfo_ocaml.c: In function ‘llvm_dibuild_create_object_pointer_type’:
/b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/build/bindings/ocaml/debuginfo/debuginfo_ocaml.c:620:30: error: too few arguments to function ‘LLVMDIBuilderCreateObjectPointerType’
620 | LLVMMetadataRef Metadata = LLVMDIBuilderCreateObjectPointerType(
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/build/bindings/ocaml/debuginfo/debuginfo_ocaml.c:23:
/b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm-c/DebugInfo.h:880:17: note: declared here
880 | LLVMMetadataRef LLVMDIBuilderCreateObjectPointerType(LLVMDIBuilderRef Builder,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
|
|
declarations with explicit `this`" (#123455)
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#122928
|
|
explicit `this` (#122928)
In https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122897 we started attaching
`DW_AT_object_pointer` to function definitions. This patch does the same
but for function declarations (which we do for implicit object pointers
already).
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/120974
|
|
Only comes up for CodeView, since it forcibly emits even unused nested
typedefs.
Part of issue #122350
|
|
explicit `this` (#122897)
We currently don't emit `DW_AT_object_pointer` on function declarations
or definitions. GCC suffers from the same issue:
https://godbolt.org/z/h4jeT54G5
Fixing this will help LLDB in identifying static vs. non-static member
functions (see https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/120856).
If I interpreted the DWARFv5 spec correctly, it doesn't mandate this
attribute be present *only* for implicit object parameters:
```
If the member function entry describes a non-static member function,
then that entry has a DW_AT_object_pointer attribute whose value is a reference to
the formal parameter entry that corresponds to the object for which the
function is called.
That parameter also has a DW_AT_artificial attribute whose value is true.
```
This patch attaches the `DW_AT_object_pointer` for function
*defintions*. The declarations will be handled in a separate patch.
The part about `DW_AT_artificial` seems overly restrictive, and not true
for explicit object parameters. We probably should relax this part of
the DWARF spec.
Partially fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/120974
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 81fc3add1e627c23b7270fe2739cdacc09063e54.
This breaks some LLDB tests, e.g.
SymbolFile/DWARF/x86/no_unique_address-with-bitfields.cpp:
lldb: ../llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp:4604: unsigned int clang::FieldDecl::getBitWidthValue() const: Assertion `isa<ConstantExpr>(getBitWidth())' failed.
|
|
Save the bitwidth value as a `ConstantExpr` with the value set. Remove
the `ASTContext` parameter from `getBitWidthValue()`, so the latter
simply returns the value from the `ConstantExpr` instead of
constant-evaluating the bitwidth expression every time it is called.
|
|
This PR fix the debug infor generation for RWBuffer types.
- This implements the [same fix as
DXC](https://github.com/microsoft/DirectXShaderCompiler/pull/6296).
- Adds the HLSLAttributedResource debug info generation
Closes #118523
---------
Co-authored-by: Joao Saffran <jderezende@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: joaosaffran <joao.saffran@microsoft.com>
|
|
This is PR is updating the debug info generation for `this`. This is
required to fix the generation of debug information for HLSL RWBuffer
type. This was required from another PR:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119041/files
Co-authored-by: Joao Saffran <jderezende@microsoft.com>
|
|
(#120154)
In Objective-C, forward declarations are currently represented as:
```
DW_TAG_structure_type
DW_AT_name ("Foo")
DW_AT_declaration (true)
DW_AT_APPLE_runtime_class (DW_LANG_ObjC)
```
However, when compiling with `-gmodules`, when a class definition is
turned into a forward declaration within a `DW_TAG_module`, the DIE for
the forward declaration looks as follows:
```
DW_TAG_structure_type
DW_AT_name ("Foo")
DW_AT_declaration (true)
```
Note the absence of `DW_AT_APPLE_runtime_class`. With recent changes in
LLDB, not being able to differentiate between C++ and Objective-C
forward declarations has become problematic (see attached test-case and
explanation in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119860).
|
|
Identified with misc-include-cleaner.
|
|
See
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-deprecate-and-eventually-remove-renderscript-support/81284
for the RFC
|
