Identified with llvm-use-ranges.

Erasing the operation to which the current insertion point is set,
leaves the insertion point in an invalid state. This commit resets the
insertion point to the following operation.

Also adjust the insertion point when inlining a block.

These are identified by misc-include-cleaner.  I've filtered out those
that break builds.  Also, I'm staying away from llvm-config.h,
config.h, and Compiler.h, which likely cause platform- or
compiler-specific build failures.

I observed that we have the boundary comments in the codebase like:

```
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// ...
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
```

I also observed that there are incomplete boundary comments. The
revision is generated by a script that completes the boundary comments.

```
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// ...

...
```

Signed-off-by: hanhanW <hanhan0912@gmail.com>

The vast majority of rewrite / conversion patterns uses a combined
`matchAndRewrite` instead of separate `match` and `rewrite` functions.

This PR optimizes the code base for the most common case where users
implement a combined `matchAndRewrite`. There are no longer any `match`
and `rewrite` functions in `RewritePattern`, `ConversionPattern` and
their derived classes. Instead, there is a `SplitMatchAndRewriteImpl`
class that implements `matchAndRewrite` in terms of `match` and
`rewrite`.

Details:
* The `RewritePattern` and `ConversionPattern` classes are simpler
(fewer functions). Especially the `ConversionPattern` class, which now
has 5 fewer functions. (There were various `rewrite` overloads to
account for 1:1 / 1:N patterns.)
* There is a new class `SplitMatchAndRewriteImpl` that derives from
`RewritePattern` / `OpRewritePatern` / ..., along with a type alias
`RewritePattern::SplitMatchAndRewrite` for convenience.
* Fewer `llvm_unreachable` are needed throughout the code base. Instead,
we can use pure virtual functions. (In cases where users previously had
to implement `rewrite` or `matchAndRewrite`, etc.)
* This PR may also improve the number of [`-Woverload-virtual`
warnings](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/matchandrewrite-hiding-virtual-functions/84933)
that are produced by GCC. (To be confirmed...)

Note for LLVM integration: Patterns with separate `match` / `rewrite`
implementations, must derive from `X::SplitMatchAndRewrite` instead of
`X`.

---------

Co-authored-by: River Riddle <riddleriver@gmail.com>

As part of this extension this change also does some general cleanup

1) Make all the methods take `RewriterBase` as arguments instead of
   creating their own builders that tend to crash when used within
   pattern rewrites
2) Split `coalesePerfectlyNestedLoops` into two separate methods, one
   for `scf.for` and other for `affine.for`. The templatization didnt
   seem to be buying much there.

Also general clean up of tests.

Before this change: `notifyOperationReplaced` was triggered when calling
`RewriteBase::replaceOp`.
After this change: `notifyOperationReplaced` is triggered when
`RewriterBase::replaceAllOpUsesWith` or `RewriterBase::replaceOp` is
called.

Until now, every `notifyOperationReplaced` was always sent together with
a `notifyOperationErased`, which made that `notifyOperationErased`
callback irrelevant. More importantly, when a user called
`RewriterBase::replaceAllOpUsesWith`+`RewriterBase::eraseOp` instead of
`RewriterBase::replaceOp`, no `notifyOperationReplaced` callback was
sent, even though the two notations are semantically equivalent. As an
example, this can be a problem when applying patterns with the transform
dialect because the `TrackingListener` will only see the
`notifyOperationErased` callback and the payload op is dropped from the
mappings.

Note: It is still possible to write semantically equivalent code that
does not trigger a `notifyOperationReplaced` (e.g., when op results are
replaced one-by-one), but this commit already improves the situation a
lot.

#82629 added additional overloads to `replaceAllUsesWith` and
`replaceUsesWithIf`. This caused a build breakage with MSVC when called
with ops that can implicitly convert to `Value`.

```
external/llvm-project/mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/Transforms/TileUsingInterface.cpp(881): error C2666: 'mlir::RewriterBase::replaceAllUsesWith': 2 overloads have similar conversions
external/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/IR/PatternMatch.h(631): note: could be 'void mlir::RewriterBase::replaceAllUsesWith(mlir::Operation *,mlir::ValueRange)'
external/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/IR/PatternMatch.h(626): note: or       'void mlir::RewriterBase::replaceAllUsesWith(mlir::ValueRange,mlir::ValueRange)'
external/llvm-project/mlir/include\mlir/IR/PatternMatch.h(616): note: or       'void mlir::RewriterBase::replaceAllUsesWith(mlir::Value,mlir::Value)'
external/llvm-project/mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/Transforms/TileUsingInterface.cpp(882): note: while trying to match the argument list '(mlir::tensor::ExtractSliceOp, T)'
        with
        [
            T=mlir::Value
        ]
```

Note: The LLVM build bots (Linux and Windows) did not break, this seems
to be an issue with `Tools\MSVC\14.29.30133\bin\HostX64\x64\cl.exe`.

This change renames the newly added overloads to `replaceAllOpUsesWith`
and `replaceOpUsesWithIf`.

* `replaceOp` replaces all uses of the original op and erases the old
op.
* `replaceAllUsesWith` replaces all uses of the original op/value/block.
It does not erase any IR.

This commit renames `replaceOpWithIf` to `replaceUsesWithIf`.
`replaceOpWithIf` was a misnomer because the function never erases the
original op. Similarly, `replaceOpWithinBlock` is renamed to
`replaceUsesWithinBlock`. (No "operation replaced" is sent because the
op is not erased.)

Also improve comments.

#66771 introduce `llvm::post_order(&r.front())` which is equal to
`r.front().getSuccessor(...)`.
It will visit the succ block of current block. But actually here need to
visit all block of region in reverse order.
Fixes: #77420.