so that we can remove SampleProfileLoaderLegacyPass.
When sampleFDO is enabled, people may expect they can use -fno-profile-sample-use to opt-out using sample profile for a certain file. That could be either for debugging purpose or for performance tuning purpose. However, when thinlto is enabled, if a function in file A compiled with -fno-profile-sample-use is imported to another file B compiled with -fprofile-sample-use, the inlined copy of the function in file B may still get its profile annotated. The inconsistency may even introduce profile unused warning because if the target is not compiled with explicit debug information flag, the function in file A won't have its debug information enabled (debug information will be enabled implicitly only when -fprofile-sample-use is used). After it is imported into file B which is compiled with -fprofile-sample-use, profile annotation for the outline copy of the function will fail because the function has no debug information, and that will trigger profile unused warning. We add a new attribute use-sample-profile to control whether a function will use its sample profile no matter for its outline or inline copies. That will make the behavior of -fno-profile-sample-use consistent. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79959
Summary: AutoFDO compilation has two places that do inlining - the sample profile loader that does inlining with context sensitive profile, and the regular inliner as CGSCC pass. Ideally we want most inlining to come from sample profile loader as that is driven by context sensitive profile and also retains context sensitivity after inlining. However the reality is most of the inlining actually happens during regular inliner. To track the number of inline instances from sample profile loader and help move more inlining to sample profile loader, I'm adding statistics and optimization remarks for sample profile loader's inlining. Reviewers: wmi, davidxl Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70584
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory. Will be re-reverting again. llvm-svn: 358552
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton). This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda. llvm-svn: 358546
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly. We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format of DILabel is !DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3) We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block. The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out. The format of the intrinsic is llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1) It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter. We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend. Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024 Patch by Hsiangkai Wang. llvm-svn: 331841
Updating remark API to newer OptimizationDiagnosticInfo API. This allows remarks to show up in diagnostic yaml file, and enables use of opt-viewer tool. Hotness information for remarks (L505 and L751) do not display hotness information, most likely due to profile information not being propagated yet. Unsure if this is the desired outcome. Patch by Tarun Rajendran. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36127 llvm-svn: 310763
Summary: Now the SamplePGO support is more stable, we do not need so many verbose optimization remarks emitted. Reviewers: dnovillo, davidxl Reviewed By: davidxl Subscribers: fhahn, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31826 llvm-svn: 299883
Summary: The discriminator has been encoded, and only the base discriminator should be used during profile matching. Reviewers: dblaikie, davidxl Reviewed By: dblaikie, davidxl Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30218 llvm-svn: 295999