Don't use the order of incoming values of IR phis when creating 
VPBlendRecipes. Instead, simply use the incoming operands and
blocks from the VPWidenPHIRecipe.

Note that this changes the order of the incoming operands/masks for some
blends.

PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139475

Considering that "or disjoint" is the canonical for certain add
operations, then I think we want to support such "add like" operations
when doing ADD+GEP->GEP+GEP rewrites to make things more consistent.

Problem was found when improving ValueTracking, which turned an ADD into
OR, and then suddenly optimizations got worse due to these rewrites no
longer triggering.

If the gep is nusw (usually via inbounds) and the offset is
non-negative, we can infer nuw.

Proof: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/ihztLy

This is a follow up to 924907bc6, and is mostly motivated by consistency
but does include one additional optimization. In general, we prefer 0.0
over -0.0 as the identity value for an fadd. We use that value in
several places, but don't in others. So, let's be consistent and use the
same identity (when nsz allows) everywhere.

This creates a bunch of test churn, but due to 924907bc6, most of that
churn doesn't actually indicate a change in codegen. The exception is
that this change enables the use of 0.0 for nsz, but *not* reasoc, fadd
reductions. Or said differently, it allows the neutral value of an
ordered fadd reduction to be 0.0.

The idea behind this canonicalization is that it allows us to handle less
patterns, because we know that some will be canonicalized away. This is
indeed very useful to e.g. know that constants are always on the right.

However, this is only useful if the canonicalization is actually
reliable. This is the case for constants, but not for arguments: Moving
these to the right makes it look like the "more complex" expression is
guaranteed to be on the left, but this is not actually the case in
practice. It fails as soon as you replace the argument with another
instruction.

The end result is that it looks like things correctly work in tests,
while they actually don't. We use the "thwart complexity-based
canonicalization" trick to handle this in tests, but it's often a
challenge for new contributors to get this right, and based on the
regressions this PR originally exposed, we clearly don't get this right
in many cases.

For this reason, I think that it's better to remove this complexity
canonicalization. It will make it much easier to write tests for
commuted cases and make sure that they are handled.

This patch moves branch condition creation to enter the scalar epilogue
loop to VPlan. Modeling the branch in the middle block also requires
modeling the successor blocks. This is done using the recently
introduced VPIRBasicBlock.

Note that the middle.block is still created as part of the skeleton and
then patched in during VPlan execution. Unfortunately the skeleton needs
to create the middle.block early on, as it is also used for induction
resume value creation and is also needed to properly update the
dominator tree during skeleton creation.

After this patch lands, I plan to move induction resume value and phi
node creation in the scalar preheader to VPlan. Once that is done, we
should be able to create the middle.block in VPlan directly.

This is a re-worked version based on the earlier
https://reviews.llvm.org/D150398 and the main change is the use of
VPIRBasicBlock.

Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92525

PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92651

Use VPIRBasicBlock to wrap the middle block and implement patching up
branches in predecessors in VPIRBasicBlock::execute. The IR middle block
is only created after skeleton creation. Initially a regular
VPBasicBlock is created, which will later be replaced by a
VPIRBasicBlock once the middle IR basic block has been created.

Note that this slightly changes the order of instructions created in the
middle block; code generated by recipe execution in the middle block
will now be inserted before the terminator (and in between the compare
to used by the terminator). The original order will be restored in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92651.


PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95816

This patch adds support for inferring trunc's nsw/nuw flags.

Folding a `select` into a floating point binary operators can only be
done if the result is preserved for both case. In particular, if the
other operand of the `select` can be a NaN, then the transformation
won't preserve the result value.