<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>llvm-project.git/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/control-flow.ll, branch users/nico/python-2</title>
<subtitle>Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>[LoopVectorize] Teach LoopVectorizationLegality about more early exits (#107004)</title>
<updated>2024-09-19T08:41:25+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>David Sherwood</name>
<email>david.sherwood@arm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-09-19T08:41:25+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=e762d4dac762a3fc27c6e251086b6645d7543bb2'/>
<id>e762d4dac762a3fc27c6e251086b6645d7543bb2</id>
<content type='text'>
This patch is split off from PR #88385 and concerns only the code
related to the legality of vectorising early exit loops. It is the first
step in adding support for vectorisation of a simple class of loops that
typically involves searching for something, i.e.

  for (int i = 0; i &lt; n; i++) {
    if (p[i] == val)
      return i;
  }
  return n;

or

  for (int i = 0; i &lt; n; i++) {
    if (p1[i] != p2[i])
      return i;
  }
  return n;

In this initial commit LoopVectorizationLegality will only consider
early exit loops legal for vectorising if they follow these criteria:

1. There are no stores in the loop.
2. The loop must have only one early exit like those shown in the above
example. I have referred to such exits as speculative early exits, to
distinguish from existing support for early exits where the
exit-not-taken count is known exactly at compile time.
3. The early exit block dominates the latch block.
4. The latch block must have an exact exit count.
5. There are no loads after the early exit block.
6. The loop must not contain reductions or recurrences. I don't see
anything fundamental blocking vectorisation of such loops, but I just
haven't done the work to support them yet.
7. We must be able to prove at compile-time that loops will not contain
faulting loads.

Tests have been added here:

  Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/simple_early_exit.ll</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This patch is split off from PR #88385 and concerns only the code
related to the legality of vectorising early exit loops. It is the first
step in adding support for vectorisation of a simple class of loops that
typically involves searching for something, i.e.

  for (int i = 0; i &lt; n; i++) {
    if (p[i] == val)
      return i;
  }
  return n;

or

  for (int i = 0; i &lt; n; i++) {
    if (p1[i] != p2[i])
      return i;
  }
  return n;

In this initial commit LoopVectorizationLegality will only consider
early exit loops legal for vectorising if they follow these criteria:

1. There are no stores in the loop.
2. The loop must have only one early exit like those shown in the above
example. I have referred to such exits as speculative early exits, to
distinguish from existing support for early exits where the
exit-not-taken count is known exactly at compile time.
3. The early exit block dominates the latch block.
4. The latch block must have an exact exit count.
5. There are no loads after the early exit block.
6. The loop must not contain reductions or recurrences. I don't see
anything fundamental blocking vectorisation of such loops, but I just
haven't done the work to support them yet.
7. We must be able to prove at compile-time that loops will not contain
faulting loads.

Tests have been added here:

  Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/simple_early_exit.ll</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[LoopVectorize] Convert some tests to opaque pointers (NFC)</title>
<updated>2022-12-14T14:16:59+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Nikita Popov</name>
<email>npopov@redhat.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-12-14T14:15:18+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=7d7577256b76e4293f455b8093504d5f7044ab4b'/>
<id>7d7577256b76e4293f455b8093504d5f7044ab4b</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[test][NewPM] Use -passes=loop-vectorize instead of -loop-vectorize</title>
<updated>2022-04-28T14:46:00+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Bjorn Pettersson</name>
<email>bjorn.a.pettersson@ericsson.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-04-28T14:46:00+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=2e14900db9a8c2e03f9933ed2222825454905214'/>
<id>2e14900db9a8c2e03f9933ed2222825454905214</id>
<content type='text'>
Update a bunch of loop-vectorize regression tests to use the new PM
syntax (opt -passes=loop-vectorize) instead of the deprecated legacy
PM syntax (opt -loop-vectorize).
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Update a bunch of loop-vectorize regression tests to use the new PM
syntax (opt -passes=loop-vectorize) instead of the deprecated legacy
PM syntax (opt -loop-vectorize).
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Reapply "[LV] Vectorize (some) early and multiple exit loops"" w/fix for builder</title>
<updated>2020-12-28T18:13:28+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Philip Reames</name>
<email>listmail@philipreames.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-12-28T18:11:06+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=4b33b2387787aef5020450cdcc8dde231eb0a5fc'/>
<id>4b33b2387787aef5020450cdcc8dde231eb0a5fc</id>
<content type='text'>
This reverts commit 4ffcd4fe9ac2ee948948f732baa16663eb63f1c7 thus restoring e4df6a40dad.

The only change from the original patch is to add "llvm::" before the call to empty(iterator_range).  This is a speculative fix for the ambiguity reported on some builders.
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This reverts commit 4ffcd4fe9ac2ee948948f732baa16663eb63f1c7 thus restoring e4df6a40dad.

The only change from the original patch is to add "llvm::" before the call to empty(iterator_range).  This is a speculative fix for the ambiguity reported on some builders.
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Revert "[LV] Vectorize (some) early and multiple exit loops"</title>
<updated>2020-12-28T18:05:41+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Arthur Eubanks</name>
<email>aeubanks@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-12-28T18:05:41+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=4ffcd4fe9ac2ee948948f732baa16663eb63f1c7'/>
<id>4ffcd4fe9ac2ee948948f732baa16663eb63f1c7</id>
<content type='text'>
This reverts commit e4df6a40dad66e989a4333c11d39cf3ed9635135.

Breaks Windows bots, e.g. http://45.33.8.238/win/30472/step_4.txt
and http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/83/builds/2078/steps/5/logs/stdio
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This reverts commit e4df6a40dad66e989a4333c11d39cf3ed9635135.

Breaks Windows bots, e.g. http://45.33.8.238/win/30472/step_4.txt
and http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/83/builds/2078/steps/5/logs/stdio
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[LV] Vectorize (some) early and multiple exit loops</title>
<updated>2020-12-28T17:40:42+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Philip Reames</name>
<email>listmail@philipreames.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-12-28T17:39:09+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=e4df6a40dad66e989a4333c11d39cf3ed9635135'/>
<id>e4df6a40dad66e989a4333c11d39cf3ed9635135</id>
<content type='text'>
This patch is a major step towards supporting multiple exit loops in the vectorizer. This patch on it's own extends the loop forms allowed in two ways:

    single exit loops which are not bottom tested
    multiple exit loops w/ a single exit block reached from all exits and no phis in the exit block (because of LCSSA this implies no values defined in the loop used later)

The restrictions on multiple exit loop structures will be removed in follow up patches; disallowing cases for now makes the code changes smaller and more obvious. As before, we can only handle loops with entirely analyzable exits. Removing that restriction is much harder, and is not part of currently planned efforts.

The basic idea here is that we can force the last iteration to run in the scalar epilogue loop (if we have one). From the definition of SCEV's backedge taken count, we know that no earlier iteration can exit the vector body. As such, we can leave the decision on which exit to be taken to the scalar code and generate a bottom tested vector loop which runs all but the last iteration.

The existing code already had the notion of requiring one iteration in the scalar epilogue, this patch is mainly about generalizing that support slightly, making sure we don't try to use this mechanism when tail folding, and updating the code to reflect the difference between a single exit block and a unique exit block (very mechanical).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93317
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This patch is a major step towards supporting multiple exit loops in the vectorizer. This patch on it's own extends the loop forms allowed in two ways:

    single exit loops which are not bottom tested
    multiple exit loops w/ a single exit block reached from all exits and no phis in the exit block (because of LCSSA this implies no values defined in the loop used later)

The restrictions on multiple exit loop structures will be removed in follow up patches; disallowing cases for now makes the code changes smaller and more obvious. As before, we can only handle loops with entirely analyzable exits. Removing that restriction is much harder, and is not part of currently planned efforts.

The basic idea here is that we can force the last iteration to run in the scalar epilogue loop (if we have one). From the definition of SCEV's backedge taken count, we know that no earlier iteration can exit the vector body. As such, we can leave the decision on which exit to be taken to the scalar code and generate a bottom tested vector loop which runs all but the last iteration.

The existing code already had the notion of requiring one iteration in the scalar epilogue, this patch is mainly about generalizing that support slightly, making sure we don't try to use this mechanism when tail folding, and updating the code to reflect the difference between a single exit block and a unique exit block (very mechanical).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93317
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""</title>
<updated>2019-04-17T04:52:47+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Eric Christopher</name>
<email>echristo@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-04-17T04:52:47+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=cee313d288a4faf0355d76fb6e0e927e211d08a5'/>
<id>cee313d288a4faf0355d76fb6e0e927e211d08a5</id>
<content type='text'>
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."</title>
<updated>2019-04-17T02:12:23+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Eric Christopher</name>
<email>echristo@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-04-17T02:12:23+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=a86343512845c9c1fdbac865fea88aa5fce7142a'/>
<id>a86343512845c9c1fdbac865fea88aa5fce7142a</id>
<content type='text'>
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[DebugInfo] Add DILabel metadata and intrinsic llvm.dbg.label.</title>
<updated>2018-05-09T02:40:45+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Shiva Chen</name>
<email>shiva0217@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2018-05-09T02:40:45+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=2c864551df3945f50e1780b2f2c880ec358ae715'/>
<id>2c864551df3945f50e1780b2f2c880ec358ae715</id>
<content type='text'>
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the
address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM
IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly.
We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format
of DILabel is

!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)

We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the
code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label
metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block.
The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out.
The format of the intrinsic is

llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)

It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The
intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the
label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.

We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend.
Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use
insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024

Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.

llvm-svn: 331841
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the
address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM
IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly.
We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format
of DILabel is

!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)

We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the
code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label
metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block.
The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out.
The format of the intrinsic is

llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)

It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The
intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the
label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.

We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend.
Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use
insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024

Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.

llvm-svn: 331841
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[LV] Stop saying "use -Rpass-analysis=loop-vectorize"</title>
<updated>2016-11-11T22:51:46+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Adam Nemet</name>
<email>anemet@apple.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-11-11T22:51:46+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=9bfbf8bbdfda79210b4f37d0431151d359a0ee9b'/>
<id>9bfbf8bbdfda79210b4f37d0431151d359a0ee9b</id>
<content type='text'>
This is PR28376.

Unfortunately given the current structure of optimization diagnostics we
lack the capability to tell whether the user has
passed -Rpass-analysis=loop-vectorize since this is local to the
front-end (BackendConsumer::OptimizationRemarkHandler).

So rather than printing this even if the user has already
passed -Rpass-analysis, this patch just punts and stops recommending
this option.  I don't think that getting this right is worth the
complexity.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26563

llvm-svn: 286662
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This is PR28376.

Unfortunately given the current structure of optimization diagnostics we
lack the capability to tell whether the user has
passed -Rpass-analysis=loop-vectorize since this is local to the
front-end (BackendConsumer::OptimizationRemarkHandler).

So rather than printing this even if the user has already
passed -Rpass-analysis, this patch just punts and stops recommending
this option.  I don't think that getting this right is worth the
complexity.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26563

llvm-svn: 286662
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
