Port CodeGenPrepare to new pass manager and dependency
BasicBlockSectionsProfileReader
Fixes: #75380

Co-authored-by: Krishna-13-cyber <84722531+Krishna-13-cyber@users.noreply.github.com>

Revert e0c554ad87d18dcbfcb9b6485d0da800ae1338d1 "Port CodeGenPrepare to new pass manager (and BasicBlockSectionsProfil… (#75380)"

Revert #75380 and #77054 as they were breaking EXPENSIVE_CHECKS buildbots: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/104

Port CodeGenPrepare to new pass manager and dependency
BasicBlockSectionsProfileReader
Fixes: #64560

Co-authored-by: Krishna-13-cyber <84722531+Krishna-13-cyber@users.noreply.github.com>

This is a follow-up to b71edfaa4ec3c998aadb35255ce2f60bba2940b0
since I forgot the lit.local.cfg files in that one.

Reformatting is done with `black`.

If you end up having problems merging this commit because you
have made changes to a python file, the best way to handle that
is to run git checkout --ours <yourfile> and then reformat it
with black.

If you run into any problems, post to discourse about it and
we will try to help.

RFC Thread below:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style

Reviewed By: barannikov88, kwk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150762

NVPTX/dont-introduce-addrspacecast.ll required manually removing a check for
a bitcast.

AArch64/combine-address-mode.ll required rerunning update_test_checks

Mips required some manual updates due to a CHECK-NEXT coming after a
deleted bitcast.

ARM/sink-addrmode.ll needed one small manual fix.

Excludes one X86 function which needs more attention.

On some targets, like SPARC, forming overflow ops is only profitable if
the math result is used: https://godbolt.org/z/DxSmdB
This patch adds a new MathUsed parameter to allow the targets
to make the decision and defaults to only allowing it
if the math result is used. That is the conservative choice.

This patch also updates AArch64ISelLowering, X86ISelLowering,
ARMISelLowering.h, SystemZISelLowering.h to allow forming overflow
ops if the math result is not used. On those targets using the
overflow intrinsic for the overflow check only generates better code.

Reviewers: nikic, RKSimon, lebedev.ri, spatel

Reviewed By: lebedev.ri

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74722